Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination

Mimics of oligosaccharides are under current investigation by a number of groups striving to produce tools for glycobiology and to design antagonists of medically relevant lectins. This chapter reviews trends that have developed over the past 5 years (2010–2014) in the field, focusing on three topics that we believe are providing the most interesting progress: (a) multivalent sugar-processing enzyme inhibitors; (b) synthesis of oligosaccharide and glycoconjugate mimics with unnatural glycosidic bonds/linkers and (c) use of second site interactions in monosaccharide-anchored lectin antagonists.

The past decades have witnessed a fast growth of chemical glycobiology, driven by an increased understanding of glycans ability to encode a large variety of biochemical information in physiological and pathological conditions.1–3  One of the main objectives of the field consists in manipulating chemical information encoded in sugar structures (the sugar code4 ) to control or alter the flow of information read-out by sugar binding proteins, called lectins. Glycomimetic molecules that can disrupt the formation of sugar–protein complexes have been used in this context as probes of biological processes and are providing ideas for medicinal applications.5–7  A large part of this work has been directed towards inhibitors of enzymes involved in glycan metabolism, i.e. glycosidases and glycosyltransferases. Inhibition of glycosidases by azasugar mimics of monosaccharides8–11  and structure-based discovery of influenza sialidase inhibitors5,12  have been milestones in the field and have both led to marketed drugs. Inhibition of glycosyltransferases has proven harder, but important steps forwards have been made with the discovery of potent inhibitors of O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT).13,14  Seminal advances in the development of small molecule probes of glycan-processing enzymes have been recently reviewed.3 

Antagonists of lectin-mediated sugar recognition events have also been discovered. As opposed to sugar-processing enzymes, lectins are proteins that recognize glycans with high specificity, but lack enzymatic activity. They are main mediators of sugar encoded information and are implicated in all processes involving cell–cell communication and pathogen recognition events. In the past, carbohydrates have been mostly disregarded as a class of molecules for drug development and lectins have rarely been exploited for the discovery of novel therapeutic opportunities.6,11,15,16  The high density of functional groups, the large variety of glycans and their structural and synthetic complexity represent a formidable challenge for the development of antagonists. Additionally, lectins binding sites are shallow and exposed to the solvent, which makes recognition of oligosaccharides an intrinsically low-affinity process, to the point that questions have been raised concerning their druggability.17  Nonetheless, recent breakthroughs on pan-selectin antagonists18  and the involvement of major big-pharma players in the field19,20  have highlighted the potential of glycomimetics as drugs and are attracting increasing attention to lectin antagonists as tools for basic research in glycobiology and for the development of drugs.

Progresses in the development of glycomimetics targeted against sugar binding proteins (lectins) have been comprehensively reviewed very recently.21  In this account, rather than once more providing a complete coverage of glycomimetic structures that have successfully been designed as lectin antagonists, we will try to highlight trends and novel research lines that have been developing over the past 5 years in the field.

Specifically, we have identified three topics that have attracted attention and provided new angles to glycomimetic research in recent years:

  1. Multivalent enzyme inhibitors

  2. Synthesis of oligosaccharide and glycoconjugate mimics with unnatural glycosidic bonds/linkers

  3. Use of second site interactions in monosaccharide-anchored antagonists

The multivalent interactions of proteins with cell-surface glycoconjugates have stimulated intense interest in the carbohydrate community towards understanding and exploiting multivalency to antagonize the formation of lectin:sugar complexes.22,23  In contrast to lectins, that are often polymeric, glycosidases are generally monomeric proteins and, as a consequence, multivalency was largely ignored as a tool to improve the activity of glycosidase inhibitors. However, early successful examples of multivalent enhancement obtained with different sialidases24–26  stimulated additional research, suggesting that glycosidases and even glycosyltransferases can profit of multivalent effects, with a rapid growth of cases reported in the last 5 years (reviewed in ref. 27).

Clusters of iminosugars were synthesized using deoxynojirimycin (DNJ, 1, Fig. 1) on a variety of scaffolds,11  from trivalent polyethers (6)28  to fullerenes (7),29  calixarenes (10 and 11) and porphyrins (12).30  Inhibition studies performed on panels of glycosidases showed quantifiable inhibitory multivalent effects on various enzymes. Most importantly, these studies showed that multivalency can significantly modify the selectivity of DNJ. This is considered an exciting discovery, since the lack of glycosidase selectivity of iminosugars is a major cause of severe side-effects in clinical applications and a major drawback to the development of therapies based on glycosidase inhibitors.

Figure 1

Structures of multivalent compounds and monovalent references obtained from iminosugars deoxynojirimycin (DNJ, 1), 1N-Oxomethylnojirimycin (1N-ONJ, 4) and 1N-oxomethylmannojirimycin (1N-OMJ, 5). Affinity enhancements observed with DNJ clusters on different enzymes (JBα-Man=jack bean α-mannosidase; BKisomal=baker's yeast isomaltase).

Figure 1

Structures of multivalent compounds and monovalent references obtained from iminosugars deoxynojirimycin (DNJ, 1), 1N-Oxomethylnojirimycin (1N-ONJ, 4) and 1N-oxomethylmannojirimycin (1N-OMJ, 5). Affinity enhancements observed with DNJ clusters on different enzymes (JBα-Man=jack bean α-mannosidase; BKisomal=baker's yeast isomaltase).

Close modal

A rationalization of the multivalent effect in enzyme inhibition is not complete, yet. Increase of local concentration of the inhibitor should clearly be beneficial in most situations.31  However, selectivity studies suggest that specific effects must be operative. In the case of Jack-bean α-mannosidase (JBα-Man), multivalent iminosugars were shown to promote the formation of aggregates, allowed by the dimeric nature of the enzyme.30  This mechanism is unavailable to other glycosidases, such as baker's yeast α-glucosidase. This monomeric enzyme has a similar affinity as JBα-Man for DNJ, but it does not respond to multivalency of the inhibitors, possibly because it misses a cross-linking mechanism.

Another puzzling observation concerning selectivity came from the group of Ortiz Mellet and co-workers working with JBα-Man and sp2-iminosugars 4 (1N-oxomethylnojirimycin, 1N-ONJ) and 5 (1N-oxomethylmannojirimycin, 1N-OMJ), the latter being ca. 200 times more potent than the former, at the monovalent level.32  These authors reported that some specific combinations of multivalent support and linker length (Fig. 1) were able to abrogate the intrinsic difference in inhibition potency of the ligand, yielding multivalent inhibitors of identical activity (compare Ki values for 8 and 9, Fig. 1).

Multivalent iminosugars have also been investigated for pharmacological chaperone therapy of lysosomal storage disorders, a set of diseases that depend on defects of lysosomal glycosidases leading to accumulation of glycosphingolipids.33  The strategy is based on the conformational stabilization of the defective glycosidase by sub-inhibitory concentrations of reversible competitive inhibitors. The inhibitor stabilizes the protein enough to prevent its premature degradation and thus rescues its catalytic activity. Multivalent DNJ derivatives were found to improve the affinity of DNJ for β-glucocerebrosidase (GCase) in vitro, with relative potency enhancements up to 21 (valency-corrected) with the heptavalent cyclodextrin-based cluster 14 (Fig. 2). However, in cellular studies the monovalent ligand (13) and the heptavalent cluster had very similar chaperoning activity,33  possibly because of poor membrane permeation by 14. Recently, a more systematic exploration of multivalent DNJ derivatives led to similar conclusions and highlighted a lack of correlation between β-glucocerebrosidase inhibition and chaperoning activity.34 

Figure 2

Monovalent DNJ analogue 13 and its polyvalent presentations 14 (heptavalent cyclodextrin derivative) and 15 (trivalent dendron).

Figure 2

Monovalent DNJ analogue 13 and its polyvalent presentations 14 (heptavalent cyclodextrin derivative) and 15 (trivalent dendron).

Close modal

Another important field of application of glycosidase inhibitors consists in their use as “correctors” of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) glycosidases. Reducing the activity of ER glycosidases allows misfolded proteins to escape quality control and degradation and helps to protect defective proteins that are nonetheless functional, once they are trafficked to their correct cellular location. This approach is actively studied to restore the function of misfolded cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR), the main cause of cystic fibrosis.35  Multivalent DNJ derivatives were evaluated as correctors, measuring the ability to restore mature CFTR to its correct location. The best effects were obtained for a trivalent cluster 1536  that gave relative potency enhancements of ca. 300 fold (Fig. 2). However, the effect did not correlate with inhibition of the ER glycosidase.

Summarizing, multivalent presentation of glycosidase inhibiting iminosugars has raised big hopes for the development of novel approaches to the cure of severe diseases. The effect has been observed for a limited number of enzymes, so far, which provides a good opportunity for the development of selective inhibitors. However, more research is required to identify potential targets and to understand the basis of the operating effects.

Many modifications have been introduced in the structure of carbohydrates to generate glycomimetics with improved drug-like characteristics and stability to enzymatic degradation.

The endocyclic oxygen was replaced by a carbon atom (cyclitols or carbasugars),37  a nitrogen atom (imino sugars),6  or a sulfur atom (thio sugars).38,39  A PO group was used to replace the anomeric carbon (phospha sugars).40,41  Alternatively, the exocyclic oxygen was replaced by the same set of atoms, giving, respectively, C-glycosyl compounds, N-glycosyl compounds, S-glycosides and phostines (Fig. 3). A recent review by Werz et al. covers advances in the field from 2000 to 2010.42 

Figure 3

Some examples of carbohydrates endocyclic and exocyclic oxygen atom replacement generating different glycomimetic units.

Figure 3

Some examples of carbohydrates endocyclic and exocyclic oxygen atom replacement generating different glycomimetic units.

Close modal

Fluorosugars have also attracted a great deal of attention as inhibitors of carbohydrate processing enzymes.43–47  Replacement of the anomeric oxygen by a CHF43,45  or CF244,46  provides molecular entities with different mimicking abilities than C-glycosyl compounds. Indeed, fluoro-C-pyranosyl rings appear to adopt consistently the classic 4C1 conformation of natural O-glycosides. Non-exo conformations of the anomeric bond are favored by CHF glycosides, while the exo-anomeric effect is restored when the ring oxygen is replaced by a CF2 group (gem-difluorocarbadisaccharide) (Fig. 3). Development of appropriate synthetic methodology is still needed for full exploration of this class of compounds.

Sulfonamide-bridged oligosaccharides have been recently introduced as glycomimetics by Poulsen and co-workers.48  These molecules incorporate a sulfonamide linker in place of the glycosidic bond and are prepared from S-glycosyl thioacetates and amino sugars, as exemplified in Fig. 4. The synthesis is straightforward and structures up to the octasaccharide have been prepared.

Figure 4

Exploitation of a sulfonamide bridge as pseudo-glycosidic linkage for the construction of pseudo-oligosaccharides.

Figure 4

Exploitation of a sulfonamide bridge as pseudo-glycosidic linkage for the construction of pseudo-oligosaccharides.

Close modal

Carbohydrate-based sulfonamides have been developed as a new class of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors with good isoform specificity dictated by a cellular permeability profile controlled by the sugar moiety.49 

Among unnatural glycoconjugates, we have explored α-linked glycosyl amides. Natural glycopeptides are invariably β-linked, thus the unnatural, α-linked isomers should be stable to enzymatic hydrolysis. In particular, we have used an α-fucosylamide anchor to design antagonists of P. aeruginosa PA-IIL50  and of DC-SIGN (1619, Fig. 5).51,52  The synthesis of these mimics relies on a one-pot Staudinger reduction/aza-Wittig sequence described by De Shong.53  The structure of the DC-SIGN antagonist 19 (Fig. 5) was initially designed as a mimic of LewisX, a natural ligand of DC-SIGN, and further simplified, following suggestions by NMR and computational studies,54  to get ligand 16.51  Both 19 and 16 were found to have very similar affinity to the natural ligand and to inhibit DC-SIGN binding to highly mannosylated surfaces (IC50 values of 0.35 mM for 19, 0.5 mM for 16, and 0.8 mM for LewisX). A radical reduction of the structure complexity, as in the fucosyl-β-alanylamide 17, still yielded a molecule with a measurable affinity for the protein (IC50 0.9 mM). Remarkably, gold nanoparticles 20 functionalized with 17 bound to cellular DC-SIGN and induced internalization as effectively as similar particles coated with comparable amounts of the LewisX oligosaccharide.55  They were found to be neutral towards dendritic cell maturation and IL-10 production, thus they may have interesting applications as tools for targeted imaging and delivery.

Figure 5

PA IIL antagonists 1618, DC-SIGN natural ligand LewisX and LewisX inspired DC-SIGN antagonists 19. α-fucosylamide functionalized gold nanoparticles (20) are effective DC-SIGN-targeting agents.

Figure 5

PA IIL antagonists 1618, DC-SIGN natural ligand LewisX and LewisX inspired DC-SIGN antagonists 19. α-fucosylamide functionalized gold nanoparticles (20) are effective DC-SIGN-targeting agents.

Close modal

A limited number of approaches are available for the selective synthesis of α-glycosyl amides. We have recently described a new method based on the traceless Staudinger ligation of glycosyl azides with functionalized phosphines bearing an acylating agent (2156  and 22,57 Fig. 6). The method is particularly effective for furanoses, as it offers a stereodivergent way of synthesizing glycofuranosyl amides of either anomeric configuration starting from the same azide. The stereochemical outcome of the process is controlled through the absence/presence of acetyl protecting groups on the sugar (Fig. 6a).58  This approach was applied to an easy synthesis of α-N-ribosyl-asparagine (24) and α-N-ribosyl-glutamine (25) building blocks starting from 5-tert-butyldiphenylsilyl-β-d-ribofuranosyl azide 23 (Fig. 6b) and phosphine 22.59  The N-glycosyl aminoacids (24 and 25) were produced in good yields as pure α-anomers, suitably protected on the sugar ring for peptide synthesis.

Figure 6

(a) Traceless Staudinger ligation of galactofuranosyl azide with functionalized phosphines. The O-acetyl glycosyl azide affords the amide with retention of configuration at the anomeric center. Inversion of configuration is obtained if the azide is unprotected. (b) Stereoselective synthesis of α-N-ribosyl-asparagine and α-N-ribosyl-glutamine derivatives 24 and 25via traceless Staudinger ligation of ribosyl azide 23.

Figure 6

(a) Traceless Staudinger ligation of galactofuranosyl azide with functionalized phosphines. The O-acetyl glycosyl azide affords the amide with retention of configuration at the anomeric center. Inversion of configuration is obtained if the azide is unprotected. (b) Stereoselective synthesis of α-N-ribosyl-asparagine and α-N-ribosyl-glutamine derivatives 24 and 25via traceless Staudinger ligation of ribosyl azide 23.

Close modal

In the same year, van de Marel, Filippov and co-workers described the synthesis of the same building blocks by direct glycosylation of the carboxamide side chains of asparagine and glutamine with ribofuranosyl N-phenyltrifluoroacetimidates 26 (Fig. 7).60 

Figure 7

Stereoselective ribosylation of glutamine and asparagine side chain with ribofuranosyl N-phenyltrifluoroacetimidate 26.

Figure 7

Stereoselective ribosylation of glutamine and asparagine side chain with ribofuranosyl N-phenyltrifluoroacetimidate 26.

Close modal

N-glycosyl triazoles were introduced in 2006 by Dondoni and coworkers as isosteric replacements of glycosidic bonds.61  More recently, they have been shown to possess in vitro metabolic stability and plasma stability.62,63  Direct synthesis of triazole-linked glycoconjugates from unprotected sugars was investigated by the groups of A. Fairbanks and M. Brimble.64  These authors developed a one-pot sequence that generates glycosyl azides from unprotected monosaccharides in D2O/CH3CN mixtures and used it in situ for the synthesis of glycoconjugates by copper catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) reaction (Fig. 8). 2-azido-1,3-dimethylimidazolinium hexafluorophosphate 27 was used as both the activating agent of the anomeric group and the azide source. The configuration of the resulting glycosyl azide is β, except for mannose, which gives exclusively the α anomer. Click reaction occurs smoothly with a variety of alkynes, including oligosaccharides and peptides. Thus the method allows the easy synthesis of mimics of oligosaccharides and glycopeptides by direct conjugation of reducing sugars to alkynes under aqueous conditions in a two-step one-pot transformation, and it is totally steroselective.

Figure 8

One-pot sequence for the transformation of unprotected sugars in glycosyl azides and in situ CuAAC reaction on complex alkynes.

Figure 8

One-pot sequence for the transformation of unprotected sugars in glycosyl azides and in situ CuAAC reaction on complex alkynes.

Close modal

Sugar azides have also been used by Volonterio et al. in a multicomponent domino process65  that allows the combinatorial synthesis of multivalent glycoconjugates (Fig. 9). Staudinger reduction of glycosyl azide 28 in the presence of isocyanates or isothiocyanates 29 yields sugar-carbodiimides 30 that react with fumarates 31 in a domino process affording glyco-idantoins 32 or glyco-peptides (33–35), in the presence of appropriate nucleophiles. Using a combination of glycosylated reagents (sugar azides, sugar isothiocyanates and sugar amines), the authors prepared a group of 34 divalent and trivalent glycomimetics, including aminoglycoside conjugates. The approach appears to be very general, to work efficiently with a number of different substrates and, coupled with appropriate screening procedures, should be promising for the discovery of lectin antagonists.

Figure 9

Multicomponent domino process developed for the combinatorial synthesis of multivalent glycoconjugates.

Figure 9

Multicomponent domino process developed for the combinatorial synthesis of multivalent glycoconjugates.

Close modal

A similar approach was adopted by Overkleeft and co-workers to obtain a library of monovalent C-glycosyl derivatives of imino sugars (IUPAC not recommended term: aza-C-glycosides) through a domino Staudinger/aza-Witting/Ugi three-component reaction (Fig. 10).66  Sugar-derived azido-pentanals and azido-hexanals 36 were treated with PMe3 to afford imine 37, as the aza-Wittig product. A 3-component Ugi reaction of 37 with isonitriles and 4-pentenoic acid yields 38, as a mixture of separable diastereoisomers. Upon removal of the pentenyl group, further manipulation and diversification of the aza sugar allowed the synthesis of 62 compounds from seven sub-libraries.

Figure 10

Domino Staudinger/aza-Witting/Ugi three-component reaction exploited to obtain a library of monovalent C-glycosyl imino sugars.

Figure 10

Domino Staudinger/aza-Witting/Ugi three-component reaction exploited to obtain a library of monovalent C-glycosyl imino sugars.

Close modal

Elimination or substitution of hydroxy groups by other functional groups, introduction of aliphatic or aromatic substituents in the structure of the glycomimetic or use of different ring sizes (e.g. polyhydroxylated azepanes,67 Fig. 11) are other possibilities that have been explored to mimic carbohydrates. Sialic acids with single or multiple and combined modifications of positions 2, 3, 4, 5 and 9 of the sialic acid core have been studied as ligands of human Siglec-2 (CD22) for immunoglycotherapy (Fig. 11).68,69 

Figure 11

Polyhydroxylated azepanes 39–42 and their inhibition activity on Salmonella typhimurium N-acetylglucosaminidase (NagZ) and O-GlcNAcase (OGA). Minimal Siglec ligand scaffold 43 (αMe Neu5Ac) and CD22 ligands 44 (BPCNeu5Ac) and 45 with the corresponding IC50 values and relative Inhibitory Potencies (rIP) compared to 43.

Figure 11

Polyhydroxylated azepanes 39–42 and their inhibition activity on Salmonella typhimurium N-acetylglucosaminidase (NagZ) and O-GlcNAcase (OGA). Minimal Siglec ligand scaffold 43 (αMe Neu5Ac) and CD22 ligands 44 (BPCNeu5Ac) and 45 with the corresponding IC50 values and relative Inhibitory Potencies (rIP) compared to 43.

Close modal

Glycomimetics have also been generated by modifications of glycoconjugates, for example by truncation of the native structure, or by replacement of oligosaccharide fragments with appropriate linkers. We used this approach in the search of non-hydrolyzable mimics of the GM1 oligosaccharide (GM1os 46, Fig. 12a).70  The mimics were selected from a library of C-galactosyl groups linked to a N-sialyltriazole residue (47, Fig. 12a) using weak affinity chromatography with immobilized cholera toxin B, a known high-affinity receptor of GM1. Affinity could be enhanced by up to one or two orders of magnitude over the individual sugar residues. A further simplification was reported recently by Robina, Moreno-Vargas and co-workers71  who used S-galactosides and replaced the sialic acid residue of GM1 with a polyhydroxyalkylfuran moiety (48, Fig. 12b). This project actually led to the discovery of a non glycosylated polyhydroxyalkylfuran ligand 49 which shows interesting activity as a small molecule cholera toxin antagonist.

Figure 12

Cholera toxin antagonists from non hydrolyzable GM1os mimics (a) from ref. 70; (b) from ref. 71.

Figure 12

Cholera toxin antagonists from non hydrolyzable GM1os mimics (a) from ref. 70; (b) from ref. 71.

Close modal

So far, the most successful linkers for oligosaccharide replacement strategy have been conformationally restricted scaffolds, designed to reproduce the 3D features of the ligands in their bioactive conformation. This approach was pioneered by Ernst in his work on mimics of sialyl LewisX (sLeX) as selectin antagonists in the late ‘90s72  and culminated in 2010 in the discovery of GMI-1070 (Rivipansel, 50, Fig. 13),18  a pan-selectin antagonists that is currently undergoing clinical trials for treatment of vaso-occlusive crisis in people with sickle cell disease. In these structures, a trans diequatorial cyclohexanediol replaces sLeX native GlcNAc, while maintaining a stacked conformation of the Gal and Fuc rings, which is required for lectin interaction. Replacement of sLeX sialic acid residue with an alkyl (S)-lactic ester completes the structural simplification of the natural ligand.

Figure 13

Rivipansel (50, GMI-1070) a sLeX mimic in clinical trials for treatment of vaso-occlusive crisis in sickle cell disease patients; 51, a sLeX mimic that maximizes conformational preorganization of the binding determinants and 52, a sLeX mimic based on a conformationally restricted acyclic scaffold.

Figure 13

Rivipansel (50, GMI-1070) a sLeX mimic in clinical trials for treatment of vaso-occlusive crisis in sickle cell disease patients; 51, a sLeX mimic that maximizes conformational preorganization of the binding determinants and 52, a sLeX mimic based on a conformationally restricted acyclic scaffold.

Close modal

In a recent work, the Ernst group dissected the role of the cyclohexane core structure pre-organization in a series of E-selectin antagonists using Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) and Saturation Transfer Difference NMR experiments.73  They showed that addition of hydrophobic substituents on the cycle as in 51 (Fig. 13) improved the affinity not by adding interactions with the receptor, but by restricting the conformational freedom of the structures in ways that increased their similarity with the native ligand.

Recently, tartaric esters have been introduced as conformationally constrained acyclic scaffolds for the design of selectin antagonists.74,75  The conformational bias is dictated by minimization of dipole–dipole interactions between the carboxy groups and by the gauche effect of the tartrate diol. Intriguingly, the configuration of the lactic acid side-chain of the most active compounds (e.g.52, Fig. 13) is the opposite one, relative to GMI-1070. The antagonists generated with this approach were found to be highly potent both by in vitro and in vivo assays.

Following Ernst's lead, in 2000 we introduced two enantiomerically pure, conformationally stable cyclohexanediols 53 and 54 designed to replicate carbohydrate branching motifs that incorporate one or more axial substituents and used them to synthesize mimics of the GM1os and of linear oligomannosides7  (Fig. 14).

Figure 14

Conformationally restricted cyclohexanediols 53 and 54 incorporating axial substituents.

Figure 14

Conformationally restricted cyclohexanediols 53 and 54 incorporating axial substituents.

Close modal

The pseudo-dimannoside 55 and pseudo-trimannoside 56 (Fig. 15) generated from 54 as mimics of Manα(1,2)Man and Manα(1,2)Manα(1,6)Man, respectively, where used in multimeric format as antagonists of DC-SIGN mediated viral infections by HIV and Ebola virus. DC-SIGN (dendritic cell-specific ICAM-3 grabbing non-integrin) is a tetrameric calcium dependent (C-type) lectin, expressed by immature dendritic cells (DCs), which specifically recognizes highly-glycosylated structures displayed at the surface of several pathogens.76–79  Recognition by DC-SIGN is known to play a key role in HIV transmission and is involved in a number of other viral infections, so that it is currently regarded as an interesting target for the design of anti-viral agents.22  A tetravalent presentation of the pseudo-trisaccharide 56 in dendron 58, based on bis-hydroxymethylpropionic acid monomers (Fig. 15), was shown to inhibit trans infection of T lymphocytes by DC-SIGN expressing B-cells, which had been pre-incubated with HIV in the presence of 58. Infection was abrogated almost totally at 100 μM concentration of the dendron, and an IC50ca. 10 µM could be estimated.80  Dendron 58 was also found to block HIV-1 infection of human cervical tissue, under conditions mimicking compromised epithelial integrity.81 

Figure 15

Multivalent presentation of glicomimetics 55 and 56 using dendrons (57, 58) and dendrimers (59, 60) scaffolds.

Figure 15

Multivalent presentation of glicomimetics 55 and 56 using dendrons (57, 58) and dendrimers (59, 60) scaffolds.

Close modal

This dendron and higher valency constructs based on similar scaffolds (such as 60) were also tested in a DC-SIGN dependent Ebola infection model based on pseudotiped viral particles.82  In these experiments, the tetravalent systems 57 and 58 were active in the low micromolar range, and the multivalent systems G3(pseudosugar)3259 and 60 showed a very strong inhibition effect with IC50 in the nanomolar range. Surprisingly, relatively small differences were observed between equivalent constructs obtained from the pseudo-di 55 and the pseudo-trisaccharide 56, even if, at the monovalent level, 56 was found to be an order of magnitude more active than 55 by SPR competition experiments.80  Recently, we have been able to explain this puzzling observation by showing, with a number of biophysical techniques, that 56 as a monovalent ligand is able to cluster DC-SIGN tetramers, leading to an artificially overestimated inhibitory potency in the SPR assay.83  Additional optimization of the pseudo-disaccharide 55 as DC-SIGN ligand is described in the following section.

The identification of unnatural inhibitors of lectin–sugar recognition events has been approached most often by reducing the complexity of oligosaccharide ligands to mono- or disaccharide binding determinants working as the lectin anchor. These units are linked to aglycones that can be designed to reproduce the 3D structure of the native oligosaccharide as discussed above, and/or provide additional functional units for interaction with the lectin in the proximity of the primary binding site. In both cases, the aglycone is also used to impart to the molecule some pharmacologically favorable properties, such as improved lipophilicity or resistance to hydrolytic enzymes.

The pioneering study of Sharon on the use of mannosides as antagonists of bacterial adhesion mediated by FimH,84  together with structural information obtained from X-ray studies85  led to the rational design and optimization of high affinity antagonists directed against uropathogenic E. coli.86–90  All these compounds are targeted to FimH binding site by their mannose component and carry extended aromatic aglycones that establish high affinity interaction with lipophilic residues lining the rim of the sugar-binding pocket of the protein (6163, Fig. 16). These lipophilic aglycones have also been shown to tune the selectivity of the antagonists against a panel of human mannose-binding lectins, a key element for in vivo application development.91 

Figure 16

FimH antagonists 61,86 6288  and 6390  for antiadhesion therapy of urinary tract infections.

Figure 16

FimH antagonists 61,86 6288  and 6390  for antiadhesion therapy of urinary tract infections.

Close modal

We recently used a similar approach to optimize the activity and selectivity of the pseudo-dimannoside antagonist of DC-SIGN 55. A library of amide derivatives was prepared following the approach shown in Fig. 17.92  SPR inhibition tests showed that tertiary amides are no longer recognized by the lectin, but a group of bis-benzylamido derivatives 64 was found to be more active by a factor of 3–4 than the parent pseudo-mannobioside 55 and displayed good selectivity against Langerin, a C-type lectin similar to DC-SIGN, but protective against HIV infection. NMR studies showed relatively high saturation transfer for the aromatic amide moieties in the STD spectrum, suggesting a close proximity between the aromatic groups of the ligand and the binding site of DC-SIGN.

Figure 17

Synthesis of a library of secondary amide derivatives of general structure 64 of pseudo-dimannoside 55. Compound 64a was selected for further development.

Figure 17

Synthesis of a library of secondary amide derivatives of general structure 64 of pseudo-dimannoside 55. Compound 64a was selected for further development.

Close modal

The small affinity improvement observed can be amplified by multivalent presentation,93  as clearly shown by the IC50 values of similar dendrimers of equal valency carrying different monovalent ligands (Fig. 18). IC50 in the low micromolar range are rapidly achieved using the most powerful ligand 64a; other mannosylated and pseudo-mannosylated materials are less effective, even when the sugar is presented in higher valency on the dendrimers. This is one of the few cases reported in the literature where the relationship between the intrinsic affinity of monovalent ligands for a lectin target and the level of affinity enhancements observed in their polyvalent presentation has been studied. The results contrast sharply with the observations of Ortiz Mellet described above for clustered glycosidase inhibitors.32  Her work clearly shows that clustering a more potent inhibitor is not automatically rewarded, but the results will depend on the operating binding mode. Whether these contrasting data point to a fundamental difference between lectins and glycosidases will deserve further attention in the future.

Figure 18

DC-SIGN binding inhibition. IC50 (µM) values obtained for similar dendrimers with different monovalent ligands (from ref. 93).

Figure 18

DC-SIGN binding inhibition. IC50 (µM) values obtained for similar dendrimers with different monovalent ligands (from ref. 93).

Close modal

The hexavalent presentation of 64a (65, Fig. 19) was shown to block both DC-SIGN mediated uptake of Dengue Virus by Raji cells and HIV trans-infection of T cells at low μM concentration.93  Inclusion of a rigid spacer at the dendrimer core yielded elongated structures that displayed significantly higher activity in infection studies, reaching IC50 in the nM range with 66 (Fig. 19), which was found to be 40 times more active than 65 in HIV trans-infection studies.94  The activity of 66 appears to stem from a combination of three elements: an effective monovalent ligand, a rigid core of appropriate length, allowing to bridge two adjacent binding sites of the lectin, and two trivalent dendrons, providing increased local density at each site.

Figure 19

Multivalent derivatives 65 and 66 of 64a provide high activity anti-HIV agents.

Figure 19

Multivalent derivatives 65 and 66 of 64a provide high activity anti-HIV agents.

Close modal

Other research programs making use of second site interactions have been developed for the discovery of ligands of the human asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR),95 P. aeruginosa LecB96  and Galectin 3.97,98 

ASGPR is a galactose binding receptor expressed by hepatocytes and is actively studied for hepatic delivery of drugs and diagnostic probes. Early work for the discovery of active ligands focused on GalNAc and reported various replacements of the amide group showing little effect on the activity. Recently, combinatorial modification of all the positions of galactosamine except the ASGPR anchoring C3/C4-diol was performed, yielding one-order of magnitude improvements over the starting scaffold (Fig. 20).95 

Figure 20

Representative structures of ASGPR antagonists from ref. 95.

Figure 20

Representative structures of ASGPR antagonists from ref. 95.

Close modal

Titz and co-workers, instead, applied a structure-based approach to the optimization of ligands for LecB, a crucial factor for maintenance of P. aeruginosa biofilm.96,99  The authors addressed a cleft on the lectin surface that is adjacent to the C6 hydroxy group of O-methyl-mannoside in the crystal structure of its LecB complex. They synthesized a library of 6-modified mannosides, identifying two low micromolar ligands, 67 and 68, with different binding modes (Fig. 21). Despite the affinity improvement over methyl-mannoside (as measured by ITC), neither of these molecules displayed improved ability to disrupt biofilm and reduce bacterial adhesion.

Figure 21

LecB ligands 67 and 68 developed by Titz and co-workers.

Figure 21

LecB ligands 67 and 68 developed by Titz and co-workers.

Close modal

Nilsson and co-workers have used second site interactions for the structure-based rational design of potent Galectin 3 (Gal3) antagonists.97,98  The X-ray structure of N-acetyllactosamine-Gal3100  shows an extended binding groove that could be probed with different aromatic fragments connected to galactosides or thiodigalactosides. This project led to the discovery of TD139 (69, Fig. 22) a modulator of the VEGF/VEGFR-2 signaling pathway in angiogenesis, currently in clinical trial.101 

Figure 22

The thiodigalactoside TD139 (69) currently in clinical trial as antagonists of Gal1 and Gal3.

Figure 22

The thiodigalactoside TD139 (69) currently in clinical trial as antagonists of Gal1 and Gal3.

Close modal

Optimization of E-selectin antagonists was recently carried out by Ernst using fragment-based discovery techniques to select ligands able to bind in a second site near the sLeX mimic binding site.102  Fragments were screened for E-selectin binding by spin-lock filtered NMR experiments. The hits were re-tested in the presence of the first site ligand, modified with a spin-label probe. The fragments binding in the vicinity of the spin-label were identified by paramagnetic relaxation enhancement spectroscopy and then connected to the sLeX mimic through flexible linkers of variable length. The extended antagonists so obtained (e.g.70, Fig. 23) were tested by SPR for interaction with E-selectin and exhibited strong interaction (in the nanomolar range) and improved binding kinetics, as expected from a two-point ligand.

Figure 23

E-selectin antagonist 70 designed using fragment-based discovery techniques.

Figure 23

E-selectin antagonist 70 designed using fragment-based discovery techniques.

Close modal

The quest for glycomimetic molecules capable of antagonizing the native ligands of lectins and sugar-processing enzymes is actively pursued by a number of groups and some exciting advances have occurred during the past five years. Some new molecules have reached the market, others are currently in clinical trial. Fundamental improvements have also been achieved in our ability to understand and use the design principles leading to efficient mimicry of complex carbohydrates. Much work remains to be done in this area to improve both synthetic procedures and design tools to finally reach the goal of obtaining mimetics optimal in size, shape and valency and finely tuned to the supramolecular architecture of individual lectins.

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Structures of multivalent compounds and monovalent references obtained from iminosugars deoxynojirimycin (DNJ, 1), 1N-Oxomethylnojirimycin (1N-ONJ, 4) and 1N-oxomethylmannojirimycin (1N-OMJ, 5). Affinity enhancements observed with DNJ clusters on different enzymes (JBα-Man=jack bean α-mannosidase; BKisomal=baker's yeast isomaltase).

Figure 1

Structures of multivalent compounds and monovalent references obtained from iminosugars deoxynojirimycin (DNJ, 1), 1N-Oxomethylnojirimycin (1N-ONJ, 4) and 1N-oxomethylmannojirimycin (1N-OMJ, 5). Affinity enhancements observed with DNJ clusters on different enzymes (JBα-Man=jack bean α-mannosidase; BKisomal=baker's yeast isomaltase).

Close modal
Figure 2

Monovalent DNJ analogue 13 and its polyvalent presentations 14 (heptavalent cyclodextrin derivative) and 15 (trivalent dendron).

Figure 2

Monovalent DNJ analogue 13 and its polyvalent presentations 14 (heptavalent cyclodextrin derivative) and 15 (trivalent dendron).

Close modal
Figure 3

Some examples of carbohydrates endocyclic and exocyclic oxygen atom replacement generating different glycomimetic units.

Figure 3

Some examples of carbohydrates endocyclic and exocyclic oxygen atom replacement generating different glycomimetic units.

Close modal
Figure 4

Exploitation of a sulfonamide bridge as pseudo-glycosidic linkage for the construction of pseudo-oligosaccharides.

Figure 4

Exploitation of a sulfonamide bridge as pseudo-glycosidic linkage for the construction of pseudo-oligosaccharides.

Close modal
Figure 5

PA IIL antagonists 1618, DC-SIGN natural ligand LewisX and LewisX inspired DC-SIGN antagonists 19. α-fucosylamide functionalized gold nanoparticles (20) are effective DC-SIGN-targeting agents.

Figure 5

PA IIL antagonists 1618, DC-SIGN natural ligand LewisX and LewisX inspired DC-SIGN antagonists 19. α-fucosylamide functionalized gold nanoparticles (20) are effective DC-SIGN-targeting agents.

Close modal
Figure 6

(a) Traceless Staudinger ligation of galactofuranosyl azide with functionalized phosphines. The O-acetyl glycosyl azide affords the amide with retention of configuration at the anomeric center. Inversion of configuration is obtained if the azide is unprotected. (b) Stereoselective synthesis of α-N-ribosyl-asparagine and α-N-ribosyl-glutamine derivatives 24 and 25via traceless Staudinger ligation of ribosyl azide 23.

Figure 6

(a) Traceless Staudinger ligation of galactofuranosyl azide with functionalized phosphines. The O-acetyl glycosyl azide affords the amide with retention of configuration at the anomeric center. Inversion of configuration is obtained if the azide is unprotected. (b) Stereoselective synthesis of α-N-ribosyl-asparagine and α-N-ribosyl-glutamine derivatives 24 and 25via traceless Staudinger ligation of ribosyl azide 23.

Close modal
Figure 7

Stereoselective ribosylation of glutamine and asparagine side chain with ribofuranosyl N-phenyltrifluoroacetimidate 26.

Figure 7

Stereoselective ribosylation of glutamine and asparagine side chain with ribofuranosyl N-phenyltrifluoroacetimidate 26.

Close modal
Figure 8

One-pot sequence for the transformation of unprotected sugars in glycosyl azides and in situ CuAAC reaction on complex alkynes.

Figure 8

One-pot sequence for the transformation of unprotected sugars in glycosyl azides and in situ CuAAC reaction on complex alkynes.

Close modal
Figure 9

Multicomponent domino process developed for the combinatorial synthesis of multivalent glycoconjugates.

Figure 9

Multicomponent domino process developed for the combinatorial synthesis of multivalent glycoconjugates.

Close modal
Figure 10

Domino Staudinger/aza-Witting/Ugi three-component reaction exploited to obtain a library of monovalent C-glycosyl imino sugars.

Figure 10

Domino Staudinger/aza-Witting/Ugi three-component reaction exploited to obtain a library of monovalent C-glycosyl imino sugars.

Close modal
Figure 11

Polyhydroxylated azepanes 39–42 and their inhibition activity on Salmonella typhimurium N-acetylglucosaminidase (NagZ) and O-GlcNAcase (OGA). Minimal Siglec ligand scaffold 43 (αMe Neu5Ac) and CD22 ligands 44 (BPCNeu5Ac) and 45 with the corresponding IC50 values and relative Inhibitory Potencies (rIP) compared to 43.

Figure 11

Polyhydroxylated azepanes 39–42 and their inhibition activity on Salmonella typhimurium N-acetylglucosaminidase (NagZ) and O-GlcNAcase (OGA). Minimal Siglec ligand scaffold 43 (αMe Neu5Ac) and CD22 ligands 44 (BPCNeu5Ac) and 45 with the corresponding IC50 values and relative Inhibitory Potencies (rIP) compared to 43.

Close modal
Figure 12

Cholera toxin antagonists from non hydrolyzable GM1os mimics (a) from ref. 70; (b) from ref. 71.

Figure 12

Cholera toxin antagonists from non hydrolyzable GM1os mimics (a) from ref. 70; (b) from ref. 71.

Close modal
Figure 13

Rivipansel (50, GMI-1070) a sLeX mimic in clinical trials for treatment of vaso-occlusive crisis in sickle cell disease patients; 51, a sLeX mimic that maximizes conformational preorganization of the binding determinants and 52, a sLeX mimic based on a conformationally restricted acyclic scaffold.

Figure 13

Rivipansel (50, GMI-1070) a sLeX mimic in clinical trials for treatment of vaso-occlusive crisis in sickle cell disease patients; 51, a sLeX mimic that maximizes conformational preorganization of the binding determinants and 52, a sLeX mimic based on a conformationally restricted acyclic scaffold.

Close modal
Figure 14

Conformationally restricted cyclohexanediols 53 and 54 incorporating axial substituents.

Figure 14

Conformationally restricted cyclohexanediols 53 and 54 incorporating axial substituents.

Close modal
Figure 15

Multivalent presentation of glicomimetics 55 and 56 using dendrons (57, 58) and dendrimers (59, 60) scaffolds.

Figure 15

Multivalent presentation of glicomimetics 55 and 56 using dendrons (57, 58) and dendrimers (59, 60) scaffolds.

Close modal
Figure 16

FimH antagonists 61,86 6288  and 6390  for antiadhesion therapy of urinary tract infections.

Figure 16

FimH antagonists 61,86 6288  and 6390  for antiadhesion therapy of urinary tract infections.

Close modal
Figure 17

Synthesis of a library of secondary amide derivatives of general structure 64 of pseudo-dimannoside 55. Compound 64a was selected for further development.

Figure 17

Synthesis of a library of secondary amide derivatives of general structure 64 of pseudo-dimannoside 55. Compound 64a was selected for further development.

Close modal
Figure 18

DC-SIGN binding inhibition. IC50 (µM) values obtained for similar dendrimers with different monovalent ligands (from ref. 93).

Figure 18

DC-SIGN binding inhibition. IC50 (µM) values obtained for similar dendrimers with different monovalent ligands (from ref. 93).

Close modal
Figure 19

Multivalent derivatives 65 and 66 of 64a provide high activity anti-HIV agents.

Figure 19

Multivalent derivatives 65 and 66 of 64a provide high activity anti-HIV agents.

Close modal
Figure 20

Representative structures of ASGPR antagonists from ref. 95.

Figure 20

Representative structures of ASGPR antagonists from ref. 95.

Close modal
Figure 21

LecB ligands 67 and 68 developed by Titz and co-workers.

Figure 21

LecB ligands 67 and 68 developed by Titz and co-workers.

Close modal
Figure 22

The thiodigalactoside TD139 (69) currently in clinical trial as antagonists of Gal1 and Gal3.

Figure 22

The thiodigalactoside TD139 (69) currently in clinical trial as antagonists of Gal1 and Gal3.

Close modal
Figure 23

E-selectin antagonist 70 designed using fragment-based discovery techniques.

Figure 23

E-selectin antagonist 70 designed using fragment-based discovery techniques.

Close modal

Contents

References

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal