Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination

The annual survey of the literature relating to the synthesis and reactions of tertiary phosphines, containing only P–C bonds, and published during 2020, is presented. The data concerning various synthetic approaches to new phosphines are summarized and reviewed.

This chapter covers the literature published during 2020 relating to the synthesis of tertiary phosphines. Although it has been necessary to continue to be selective in the choice of publications cited, it is hoped that the most significant developments have been noted. A significant number of review articles has been published in 2020 and some of these reviews are cited in the various sections of this report. The use of a wide range of tervalent phosphorus ligands in transition metal catalysis and in organocatalysis continues to be a major driver in the chemistry of traditional P–C-bonded phosphines which inspires the design of new phosphines of various structures and the tuning of their properties. Recent general reviews represent the current state of knowledge in the fields of the chemistry of phosphaangulenes (hexacyclic triarylphosphines with a distinctive conical shape) and their derivatives,1  triazole-based phosphines,2  photoswitchable phosphines containing azo, dithienylalkene and biindane moieties and their applications in catalysis,3  chiral ferrocene-based phosphine ligands and their catalytic properties4  and phosphorus-containing amino acids including the corresponding phosphines and their derivatives.5 

A short and important review overviews the advanced synthetic approaches to P-stereogenic compounds including P-stereogenic phosphines,6  and a comprehensive review summarizes the historical background and recent breakthroughs in the field of phosphine-mediated radical organic reactions.7 

This synthetic approach continues to be the most widely-used and universal. The interaction of Grignard organomagnesium reagents with corresponding chlorophosphines was found to be a more convenient synthetic route to known dimethyl(1-pyrenyl)phosphine,8  diallylphenylphosphine9  and to several 1,2-bis(dialkylphosphino)benzenes (1, R1 = R2 = R3 = Me, Et, Pri) (see Scheme 1).10  New racemic unsymmetrical BenzP-ligands (1, R1 = But, R2 = Me, R3 = Cy, Pri) were prepared by the addition of methyl triflate to the corresponding 7,8-diphosphabicyclo[4.2.0]octa-1,3,5-triene followed by the treatment with alkylmagnesium halogenide.11  Grignard reagents have been applied in the synthesis of tris(2-methoxy-5-vinylphenyl)phosphine (2) as a monomer for the preparation of new porous organic ligands,12  2-(2′-di-tert-butylphosphinophenyl)-1-methylindole (3),13  a new 5-boryl-2-phosphinoimidazole PN type ligand (4) for the synthesis of luminescent copper(i) complexes14  and tris-phosphine (5) with 1,3,5-triazine core as a base component of a new Frustrated Lewis Pare (FLP) for a gas-constructed vesicular system.15  A broad family of new phospholes (6) was obtained through the interaction of the corresponding Grignard reagents with 1-bromophospholes generated in situ from zirconacyclopentadienes and phosphorus tribromide.16  The diastereoselective introduction of a P-chirogenic phosphino group at the 2-position of 2-bromo-2′-(diorganylphosphoryl)-1,1′-binaphthyls was achieved by a successive lithium-bromide exchange and a treatment with a dichloroorganylphosphine, followed by a final interaction with an organomagnesium halogenide. It afforded unsymmetrical 2-phosphino-2′-phosphoryl-1,1′-binaphthyls (7) with binaphthyl axial chirality and one or two phosphorus stereocenters with a variety of P substituents.17,18  An analogous approach allowed synthesis of all four possible diastereoisomers of phosphinoferrocenyloxazoline (Phosferrox) ligands (8) containing three elements of chirality.19  A cleavage of the P–P bond of a tetracyclic ethoxy(phosphino)phosphonium salt formed by the AlCl3-promoted coupling of 7-ethoxy-7-phosphanorbornadiene with phenylmagnesium chloride, led to the anthracene-based macrocyclic bisphosphine (9).20 

Organolithium compounds are the most common reagents for the synthesis of phosphines. The organolithium-halogenophosphine synthetic routes include mainly the in situ lithiation of a pre-designed organic precursor by the halogen–lithium exchange. New tertiary monophosphines reported include several representatives of 2-phosphino-2′-phosphoryl-1,1′-binaphthyls (7, R1 = R2 = Ph; R3 = Ph, Me,Cy; R4 = But, Np, Tolp, C6H4F-4, FcBr-1′),17  (2-ethylphenyl)diphenylphosphine,21  bis(2-methoxy-3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)(2-diphenylphosphinophenyl)methane which was hydrolysed to the corresponding bis-phenol,22 N-Boc-protected 2-diisopropylphosphinopyrrole which was unprotected to the phosphinopyrrole precursor for a new alane/tris(phosphine)ligand (see Section 2.6.5),23  and (2-bromophenyl)di(ortho-tolyl)phosphine as a key starting reagent for the synthesis of a rigid tridentate NPP-ligand (see Section 2.6.2).24  New chiral 2-naphthyl-3-phosphinoindoles (10, X = nothing)25  and WK-phos type 2-aryl-3-phosphinoindole (10, X = OMe-6) (see Scheme 2),26  (2-indolylphenyl)diorganylphosphines (11),27  mono- and di(2-trifluoromethyl-pyridin-5-yl)phosphines (12) as the precursors of bis- and tris-(pyridyl)arylphosphonium reagents for the selective halogenation of pyridines28  and chiral cis-1-diphenylphosphino-2-phenylcyclopropane (13)29  were also synthesized via the standard organolithium-halogenophosphine approach. This route was used for the preparation of 4-phosphinophenols (14) as the precursors of PEGylated phosphine ligands for palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions,30  new P-(2-carbazolylphenyl)- and P-(2-pyrrolylphenyl) substituted phosphine-sulfonate ligands (15) for ethylene (co)polymerization,31  new biarylphosphine ligands (16),32  (17)33  and (18),34  bis(2-dimethylaminophenyl)phenylphosphine as a tridentate NPN ligand for the design of hexanuclear copper(i) iodide nanoclusters demonstrating a tunable blue to white to yellow emission,35  new atropoisomeric tetraryl monophosphine ligands (19),36  bis(1-pyrenyl)phenylphosphine and new [2-(1-pyrenyl)phenyl]diorganylphosphines (20),8  9-[5′-bromo-2′-(di-tert-butylphosphino)phenyl]-9H-carbazole (21) as a precursor for the synthesis of 9-(5-boryl-2-phosphinophenyl)-9H-carbazole components of fluorescent FLPs,37  a new representative of phosphines with π-conjugated spacers between diphenylamino and phosphino groups (22) as a chromophoric co-ligand for luminescent Eu–Au dyads,38  (ortho-bromoaryl(heteroaryl))dicyclohexylphosphines (23) and (24) as the precursors for (ortho-borylaryl(heteroaryl))phosphine FLPs (see Section 2.6.2),39  new representatives of PNN-pincer ligands (25) based on a pyridyl-quinoline scaffold,40  new camphor-based phosphine-carbonyl ligands (26),41  chiral bis(oxazolinyl)phenylphosphine ligands (27),42  isomeric dithienophosphepines (28) and (29) which were isolated as borane complexes and deprotected with DABCO,43  and new representatives of (2-phosphinoaryl)- or (2-phosphinopyridin-3-yl)alkynes (30).44  A lithium/halogen exchange in 1,1′-dibromoruthenocene followed by the interaction with Ph2PCl smoothly afforded 1-bromo-1′-diphenylphosphinoruthenocene (31), but the analogous reaction sequence in the case of 1-bromo-1′-(4″-tert-butyloxazolin-2-yl)ruthenocene unexpectedly led to the transfer of the carbanion centre with the formation of 1-oxazolinyl-2-phosphinoruthenocene (32).45 

Various new diphosphines have also been synthesized by organolithium-halogenophosphine routes, in particular 1,2-bis[di(2,6-dimethylphenyl)phosphino]ethane (33) (see Scheme 3) as a “missing” member of the 1,2-bis(phosphino)ethane family,46  new representatives of diphosphine ligands with 1,8-anthracene- (34),47  1,1′-binaphthalene- (35),48  acenaphthene- (36),49  9-chloro-1,8-acridine- (37)50  and terthiophene-cores (38).51  Bis(PNP) pincer ligands (39) where two PNP units are linked with aromatic spacers of a various length have also been prepared by this method.52  A lithiation of tetrakis(4-bromophenyl)methane followed by the treatment with 1,2-bis(dichlorophosphino)ethane afforded a new porous organic polymer (40) as the support for effective and recyclable ruthenium-based hydrogenation catalysts.53,54 

The direct lithiation of selected precursors through lithium/H exchange, (usually with n-, sec- or tert-butyllithium (sometimes in the presence of TMEDA or ButOK), more rarely with LDA or lithium 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidide (TMPLi)), followed by treatment with chlorophosphines, gave new desirable tertiary phosphines, and has been widely used for the synthesis of phosphines with heterocyclic substituents. N-Boc-2-diisopropylphosphinopyrrole,23  a bulky N-arylated-2-di-tert-butylphosphinopyrrole (41) (see Scheme 4),55  new representatives of monosubstituted 1-R-2-diphenylphosphinoimidazoles (42) with bulky substituents,56  a previously unknown bis(imidazole-2-yl)(imidazol-5-yl)phosphine (43),57  [2-(2′-diphenylphosphino)-1H-imidazol-1-yl]pyridine (44)58  and a polydentate 2,6-bis[(2′-diphenylphosphino)-1H-imidazol-1-yl]pyridine ligand (45)59  able to achieve versatile coordination modes were synthesized by this method. The interaction of dilithiated 2,10-di-tert-butyldipyrido[1,2-c;2′,1′-e]imidazol-6-thione with Pri2PCl followed by the methylation and the reductive elimination of the thione group led to the bis(phosphino)-substituted imidazolium salt (46) which was deprotonated with ButOK to afford a new carbene P–CNHC–P pincer ligand (47).60  The direct C–H lithiation was also successfully used for the synthesis of tris(N-Boc-3-methylindol-2-yl)phosphine (48) as a starting reagent for the preparation of C3-symmetric ligand combining three anionic N-donors tethered to a phosphonium center,61  indole-bridged phosphine-amidophosphinate, -amidophosphate and sulfonylamido P,O-ligands (49),62  new 3-dialkoxyphosphoryl-2-diarylphosphino- and 3-diarylphosphino-2-(tetramethyldiamidophosphoryl)benzothiophene ligands (50) and (51).63  The direct lithiation of aryl moieties was applied for the preparation of new representatives of N,N-dimethyl-4-R-2-dialkylphosphinoanilines (52),64  new sulfoxide-phosphine and pincer-type bis(sulfoxide)-phosphine ligands (53)65  and (54),66  a new very bulky ortho-phosphinophenol ligand (55) obtained from the corresponding tetrahydropyrane-protected phenol and hydrolytically deprotected before the purification67  and a novel biarylphosphine ligand N2Phos (56) providing the ppm-level palladium catalysis of Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling in water media.68  P,O-chelating ligands (49)–(51) and (55) were successfully tested in nickel and palladium-catalyzed ethylene (co)polymerization.62,63,67 

The easy lithium/H exchange on a carbon atom at the α-position relative to the aryl (heteroaryl) fragment or electron-withdrawing group was used in the preparation of 2,6-lutidine-based P,N,N-ligands (57) (see Scheme 4) bearing pyrrolidine (including chiral systems) and phosphino groups69  and the borane protected bis(phosphine) (58) with octen-7-yl substituents at phosphorus atoms as a key reagent for the synthesis of a macrocyclic PNP pincer ligand (see Section 2.6.7),70  new PNN-ligands (59) and (60) containing aminoquinoline and aminomethylisoquinoline moieties,71  alkyne-bis(phosphine) ligand (61) with elongated linker,72  new representatives of imine-phosphine ligands (62)73  and ylide-phosphine ligands (63).74,75 

The relatively acidic protons of carborane and ferrocene derivatives also easily undergo the lithium/H exchange, so it has been used for the synthesis of new mono(diarylphosphino)carboranes (64) as the substrates for the further boron functionalization (see Section 2.6.1),76  new electron-deficient 1,1′-bis(diarylphosphino)ferrocenes (65),77  chiral 1,1′-bis(diarylphosphino)-2-(α-dimethylaminoethyl)ferrocenes (66, R = Me) which were treated with acetic acid and ammonia to give the corresponding primary amines (66, R = H) as the precursors of diphosphine-thiourea ZhaoPhos ligands (see Section 2.6.5).78 

1-Bromo-1-diisopropylphosphinoethene (67) (see Scheme 4) as the precursor for the synthesis of geminal P,B-containing FLPs,79  a borane-protected diphenylphosphinocyclopentadiene (68) as a key starting reagent for the preparation of 1-oxazolyl-1′-phosphinoruthenocene derivatives45  and a chromophoric phosphine (69) with the enlarged π-conjugated linker between phosphino and amino groups were also obtained through the direct lithiation of organic reagents.38 

One-pot C-Hal and C–H lithiations were used for the synthesis of a variety of bisphosphines based on a 1,4-diphenyl-1,2,3-triazole scaffold and corresponding trisphosphine (70); the direction of derivatization depended on the reaction conditions and in some cases the transfer of the reaction centers took place.80  The analogous transfer was observed in the course of the lithiation of 2-iodo-2′-(4″-phenyl-1″,2″,3″-triazol-1″-yl)-6,6-dimethyl-1,1′-biphenyl followed by the addition of copper(i) iodide and then Cy2PCl. It led to the phosphinilation of the position 5 of the triazolyl ring; the corresponding phosphine (71) was isolated by the demetallation of the copper(i) complex with aqueous ammonia.81 

In some cases, other phosphorus-containing starting reagents were applied. Several new arylbis(2-oxazolinylaryl)phosphines (27, R1 = C6H2But2-3,5-OMe-4, C6H4CF3-4, Me; R2 = Ph, Me, But; R3 = H; R4 = H, Me) (see Scheme 2) with various aryl and methyl substituents at phosphorus atoms were obtained from the corresponding O-phenyl-bis(2-oxazolinylaryl)phosphinites,42,82,83  whereas an electron-poor tris(4-pentafluorosulfanylphenyl)phosphine (72) (see Scheme 5) was prepared by the interaction of triethylphosphite with the corresponding aryllithium reagent.84  A wide series of P-stereogenic Xantphos bisphosphine ligands (73) was synthesized by the interaction of dilithiated xanthene with enantiopure O-methyl(aryl)phenylphosphinite-boranes which were deprotected in situ with DABCO.85  A similar approach was used for the synthesis of enantiopure O-silyl protected and P-borane protected phenol-functionalized ruthenocylphosphines (74, R = SiButMe2, X = BH3); their deprotection by successive treatment with tetrabutylammonium fluoride trihydrate and diethylamine afforded the enantiopure phosphines (74, R = H, X – nothing) which were used for the grafting to P(S)Cl2-terminated dendrimers.86 

A new representative of sterically constrained tricyclic phosphines (75) was obtained by the interaction of phosphorus trichloride with trilithium compound prepared by the combined transmetallation and C–H lithiation of a tetrachlorodigallium derivative of 1,3-bis(2-trimethylsilylvinyl)benzene.87  The transmetallation of 1-tributylstannyl-2-(2′-phenylvinyl)ferrocene with butyllithium followed by the interaction with chlorobis(4-cyanophenyl)phosphine led to (2-vinylferrocenyl)diarylphosphinoferrocene (76).88  The cyclization of dimethylbis(phenylethynyl)silane with lithium naphthalenide (LiNaphth) gave a dilithio-substituted silole ring; the quenching of the excess of LiNaphth with Ph3SiCl and the final treatment with Pri2PCl afforded bis(diisopropylphosphino)silole (77).89 

The interaction 1-chloro-2,3,4,5-tetraethylphosphole with corresponding stable carbenes followed by anion exchange with NaSbF6 led to α-cationic phospholes (78)–(80) (see Scheme 5) containing imidazolium, cyclopropenium and cyclic iminium substituents respectively.90 

Nucleophilic substitution reactions between organophosphide anions, commercially available, preprepared or generated in situ, and halogenated alkanes or their analogues is an alternative to the above way to the various, usually functionalized and/or chiral phosphines. The availability and stability of corresponding metal phosphide determine the suitability of this approach. Lithium-, sodium- and potassium-organophosphides provided the most commonly used reagents for the synthesis of new phosphines. Substitution of halogen group by secondary phosphines in the presence of various bases is also one of the used procedures. The borane group provides the stability of phosphorus atom configuration and a protection against oxidation of the new phosphine during purification steps.

Traditional lithium phosphide reagents are available via simple deprotonation of primary or secondary phosphines by BunLi. The phosphine (81) containing the P-bonded bioisosteric CH2F moiety,91  a series of bidentate bis(diphenylphosphino)propane ligands (82) (with different geminal dialkyl groups at the central carbon of the ligand backbone),92  Si-containing bis- and tris-phosphines (83)–(86),93  and allylic phosphines (87)9  have been obtained from lithium diphenylphosphide generated in situ from diphenylphosphine and BunLi (see Scheme 6).

Lithium diphenylphosphide is tolerant for a wide variety of N- and N,O-heterocyclic fragments. Thus, a number of phosphines and diphosphines containing heterocyclic substituents was synthesised from halogenated heterocyclic substrates, including 3-(2-(diphenylphosphino)ethyl)oxazolidin-2-one (88) (see Scheme 7),94  2-methyl- and 2-phenyl-8-(diphenylphosphino)quinolones (89),95  2,3-bis(diphenylphosphino)dibenzo[f,h]-quinoxaline (90),51  4,6-bis(diphenylphosphino)pyrimidine (91)96  and 2-phosphino-pyridine-N-oxides (92).97 

Hemilabile ligands (93) (see Scheme 8) were obtained through the phosphorylation of 2-chloroethyl methyl ether with various secondary diarylphosphines.98  Bis(3-chloropropyl)phenylphosphine reacted with lithium phospholanide in the presence of BunLi to form bis(3-phospholanopropyl)phenylphosphine (94) – a new oligodentate phosphine ligand with phospholane end groups.99  Studies of the protonation and alkylation of imidazolio-phosphides (formed by the deprotonation of imidazoliophosphines with ButLi) revealed a complex behaviour that can be traced back to an interplay of Brønsted-type proton transfers and Lewis-type P–P bond formation reactions. As a consequence, alkylation processes leading to secondary imidazolio-alkylphosphine (95) and tertiary imidazolio-dialkylphosphine (96) salts compete with reactions producing cyclic or linear oligophosphines.100  Novel alkane-diyl based heterobidentate PN ligands (97)–(100) have been prepared starting from cyclic sulfate esters or naturally occurring compounds with C1 symmetry and lithium diphenylphosphide.101 

In the preparation of chiral phosphine ligands borane-protected lithium phosphides were used in order to avoid oxidation of desired compounds and racemisation on chirogenic phosphorus atoms. The first examples of highly enantioselective palladium catalysts for the fluoroarylation of gem-difluoroalkenes based on new chiral sulfinamide phosphine ligands (101)–(106) (see Scheme 9) have been developed. Ligands were synthesized on a gram scale from di-tert-butylphosphine borane; borane protecting groups were eliminated by diethylamine and crude products were then purified by flash column chromatography.102  Bis(1-adamantyl)phosphine borane activated by BunLi reacted with (RS)-sulfinyl imines to give chiral phosphines (107) after the deprotection.103  Amino-phosphine ligands (108), which bear a P-chirogenic group and an amino group on the pyridylene backbone, as a novel class of chiral ligands possessing chirogenic donors, have been designed.104  A number of chiral tertiary phosphine boranes containing o-substituted phenylene fragments was synthesized including novel (Rp)-tert-butyl(2-iodophenyl)(2-methoxyphenyl)phosphine–borane (109) and (Sp)-2-(tert-butyl(2-methoxyphenyl)phosphino)benzoic acid–borane (110).105  An asymmetric, unsaturated secondary diphosphine borane was converted directly into the corresponding phosphide by deprotonation with BunLi and reacted with 1,3-bis(bromomethyl)benzene to afford bisphosphine (111) as the precursor of a new macrocyclic pincer (pro)ligand (see Section 2.6.7)106 

Deprotonation of primary 2-naphthyl- and 1-pyrenylphosphines and further reaction with ditosyl- and 1,2-dichloroethanes gave 2-naphthyl- (112) and 1-pyrenylphosphiranes (113) respectively (see Scheme 10).8,107 

Ph2PLi generated from Ph2PH and lithium shots was alkylated with 2,6-F2C6H3SiMe3 providing bisphosphine (114) (see Scheme 10), which could be regarded as a precursor for the novel anionic tridentate ligand [2,6-(Ph2P)2C6H3].108,109 

Potassium diphenylphosphide is commercially available. The preparation, application, and reaction mechanisms of sodium phosphide and other alkali metal phosphides R2PM (M = Li and K) have been studied. It has been shown that R2PNa could be prepared, accurately and selectively, via the reactions of sodium finely dispersed in mineral oil with phosphinites R2POR′ and chlorophosphines R2PCl. R2PNa could also be prepared from triarylphosphines and diarylphosphines via the selective cleavage of C–P bonds. Na was superior to Li and K for these reactions. R2PNa reacted with a variety of ArCl to produce various phosphines R2PAr. ArCl was superior to ArBr and ArI since they only gave low yields of the products. In addition, Ph2PNa was superior to Ph2PLi and Ph2PK since Ph2PLi did not produce the coupling product with PhCl, while Ph2PK only gave a low yield of the product. An electron-withdrawing group on the benzene ring of ArCl greatly accelerated the reactions with R2PNa, while an alkyl group reduced the reactivity. Vinyl chloride and alkyl chlorides RCl also reacted efficiently. While ButCl did not produce the corresponding product, adamantyl halides could give the corresponding phosphine in high yields. Unsymmetric phosphines could also be conveniently generated in a one pot process starting from Ph3P. Chiral phosphines were also obtained in good yields from the reactions of menthyl chlorides with R2PNa.110 

A chiral (R)-(diphenylphosphino)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydroquinoline (115) (see Scheme 11) was obtained starting from the chiral 5,6,7,8-tetrahydroquinolin-8-ol core and commercial Ph2PK.111  2-(2′-Diphenylphosphinophenyl)-1-phenyl-5-methoxybenzimidazole derivatives (116) were also synthesized from commercial Ph2PK.112 

Reaction of the potassium salt generated in situ from diphenylphosphine and ButOK with 3-(2-bromoethyl)-1-R-imidazolium bromides, followed by anionic exchange with sodium tetrakis(3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)borate (NaBArF), gave chelating NHC-P ligands (117).113 

It has been shown that sodium phosphides could be stabilized and isolated via formation of the sodium salt of corresponding phosphinoborate. 9,10-Dihydroanthracene-9,10-diylphosphine, triphenylborane and solution of sodium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide gave a sodium salt of corresponding phosphinoborate (118), which in turn reacted with tri-tert-butyl cyclopropenyl tetrafluoroborate to form phosphine (119). It has been shown that compound (119) is a precursor of a highly strained tri-tert-butyl phosphatetrahedrane. (see Section 2.7).114  The phosphine functionalized β-diketimine ligand (120) was obtained in a multigram scale from Ph2PK (formed from the corresponding secondary phosphine and potassium chunks) and fluorine functionalized β-diketimine. The newly designed ligand features symmetrically placed phosphine moieties around a β-diketimine unit, forming a PNNP-type pocket.115 

Chlorophosphines could be reduced by free metallic sodium or KC8 (potassium graphite intercalation) forming corresponding metal phosphides. Ph2PNa obtained from Ph2PCl and sodium chunks gave metal-containing phosphine (121).116  Cyclic chloroalkylphosphine reduced on KC8 reacted with alkyl iodides or bromides to give phosphines (122) with a bulky phosphacyclopentane backbone.117 

Et3N and NaHCO3 are usually used for a cleavage of phosphonium salts formed after alkylation of secondary phosphines to give desired tertiary phosphines. The sterically demanding new pincer (123)–(124) (see Scheme 11) and chelate naphthyridinone-substituted (125) phosphine ligands were prepared that way.118–120 

A one-pot organometallics-free synthesis of diphenyl(pyrazin-2-yl)phosphine (126) (see Scheme 12) from air-stable and readily available precursors, Ph3P, Li and 2-chloropyrazine, has been developed.121  Reduction of Ph3P oxide with sodium led to its selective transformation to sodium benzo[b]phosphindol-5-ide and its derivatives (127, 128) via quenching with alkyl bromides.122 

Compounds containing P-B covalent bonds could be regarded as analogues of metal-containing phosphines. The reactivity of phosphinoboronate esters Ph2PBpin (pin = 1,2-O2C2Me4) and Ph2PBcat (cat = 1,2-O2C6H4), as well as other phosphinoboron species, with various aryl and aliphatic acyl chlorides, has been examined. These reactions proceeded smoothly to give acyl phosphines (129) along with a loss of a boron-chloride compound.123 

Hydrophosphination of unsaturated compounds is a prospective P–C bond formation route because it proceeds with 100% atom economy and the potential for high selectivity, producing regio-, chemo-, and enantio-specific products. Addition of primary and secondary phosphines to unsaturated compounds proceeds under a variety of conditions involving thermal-, radical (UV or AIBN)-, base- or metal complex-catalyzed initiation and is applied for the synthesis of a range of new phosphines. Hydrophosphination can proceed without a catalyst, but the purpose of a catalyst is to enhance reactivity and selectivity. The search for efficient catalysts providing the control of regio-, chemo- and stereo-selectivity is a continuous activity.

During the 2020 year, investigations on the development of new metal-complex catalysts for hydrophosphination were mainly focused on transition-, main group- and rare earth- metals.

It has been shown that cobalt complexes containing carbazolido NNN pincer ligands catalyzed a hydrophosphination process which solely and selectively yielded the β-addition (anti-Markovnikov) product. The scope of this transformation has been investigated using a variety of activated alkenes.124 

Hydrophosphination with a commercially available ruthenium compound, bis(cyclopentadienylruthenium dicarbonyl) dimer ([CpRu(CO)2]2), was explored. Styrene derivatives or Michael acceptors reacted readily with either primary or secondary phosphines in the presence of catalyst under photolysis.125 

A commercial availability, ease of use, and broad substrate scope of bench-stable copper photocatalyst has been developed for the rapid hydrophosphination of activated and unactivated alkenes.126 

Ln(ii) (Ln = Yb, Sm) and Ca(ii) pincer type complexes coordinated by a tridentate diarylmethanido ligand were found to be efficient and selective precatalysts for intermolecular hydrophosphination of olefins and acetylenes. Complexes have demonstrated their versatility for intermolecular C–P bond formation and allowed the realization of hydrophosphination of styrene and phenylacetylene. Moreover, they were found to be active in the catalysis of challenging transformations such as hydrophosphination of internal double and triple C–C bonds.127 

New Ln(ii) ring-expanded NHC complexes (Ln = Sm, Yb) were synthesized and proved to be highly efficient pre-catalysts for the intermolecular hydrophosphination of such indolent substrates as 1-alkenes, cyclohexene and norbornene.128 

The first example of hydrophosphination using a germanium pre-catalyst, yielding anti-Markovnikov products when diphenylphosphine is reacted with styrenes or internal alkynes at room temperature, was described.129 

In spite of high theoretical interest for the development of catalysts for hydrophosphination, the procedure has been used quite rarely for the preparative synthesis of novel types of phosphines.

Methacrylated lignin reacted with gaseous PH3 in the presence of AIBN ((azo)bis(isobutyronitrile))to prepare a phosphorus rich bio-based polymer (130) (see Scheme 13) containing PH/PH2 functional groups, which were converted to tertiary phosphine units (131) via the phosphine–ene reaction. This represents a straightforward method for the upconversion of low-value biomass waste to useful inorganic polymer with potential utility in metal scavenging applications.130 

During 2020 the main achievements in the field of synthesis of new phosphines via addition of P–H bonds to unsaturated compounds were concentrated on the reactions with conjugated C═C–C═C, C═C–C═N and C═C–C═O systems. Biaryl phosphorinanes (132) (see Scheme 13) were synthesized by a general and higher-yielding procedure - the phospha-Michael addition of primary biarylphosphines to various 1,1,5,5-tetraalkylpenta-1,4-dien-3-ones, followed by ketalization of the resulting phosphinanones (132) with ethylene glycol. Fluorinated alcohols, such as 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol (TFE) and 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol (HFIP), have been shown to accelerate hetero-Michael additions.131 N-Methylnaphthalen-1-amine activated with Lewis acids reacted with Ph2PH forming phosphine (133) due to the amine-imine tautomerization and further hydrolysis of the addition product.132 

A general procedure for the synthesis of 1,1-bis(2-cyanoethyl)-N-(4-methoxyphenyl)phosphinecarboxamide (134) and a single Michael addition product N-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1-(3-oxo-3-(p-tolylamino)propyl)phosphinecarboxamide (135) from N-(4-methoxyphenyl)phosphanecarboxamide and N-arylacrylonitrile or acrylamide in the presence of K2CO3, has been represented.133  A series of enantioenriched ferrocenyl monophosphines (136), imbued with both central and planar chirality, was obtained catalytically (80–99% ee) via the kinetic resolution of 1,2-disubstituted planar chiral ferrocenyl enone racemates. The synthetic approach utilized a chiral palladacycle to facilitate the asymmetric hydrophosphination (AHP) as a means to achieve the high stereoselectivity. The enantioenriched ferrocenylphosphine products were protected with BH3 and recrystallized to obtain ees up to 99%.134 

Reactions of isocyanates with primary and secondary phosphines without solvent at room temperature afforded the corresponding phosphinecarboxamides (137) in excellent yields. This reaction system is applicable for isothiocyanates. Reaction of 1,3- and 1,4-diisocyanatobenzene with diphenylphosphine HPPh2 yielded the double hydrophosphination products (138)–(139). In addition, 1,3,5-triisocyanatobenzene could be converted into the triple hydrophosphination product (140).135 

At present, a reduction of phosphoryl compounds using a wide range of reducing agents still remains to be the effective pathway to tertiary phosphines. Silanes and related compounds remain the most common reagents for the reduction of tertiary phosphine oxides.

Trichlorosilane in the presence of tertiary amines (as a rule triethylamine, pyridine, tributylamine or diisopropylethylamine) was successfully used for the synthesis of bis(4-ethynyl)phenylphosphine (141) (see Scheme 14.) as a precursor of phosphonium building blocks for the design of phosphorus-containing oligomers,136  tris(4′-methylcarboxy-1,1′-biphenyl-4-yl)phosphine (142, R = Me) which was hydrolyzed to the corresponding carboxylic acid (142, R = H) as a linker for new MOFs,137  and a wide variety of axially chiral biarylphosphine ligands (143),138  (144),138  (145),138  (146),139  (147),140  (148)141  and (149)142  for various catalytic applications. A chiral binol (150) with a diphenylphosphinophenyl substituent was also prepared by the reduction of the corresponding phosphine oxide with HSiCl3/NEt3 and used for the synthesis of gold(i) catalysts bearing a chiral phosphoric acid moiety.143  New representatives of bis(phosphino)biaryl SYNPHOS-type (151)144,145  and SEGPHOS-type ligands (152)144,146  containing ferrocenyl,146  bis(trimethylsilyl)- or bis(trimethylgermyl)aryl groups at phosphorus atoms,144,145  two new spiro PNP-ligands (153, Ar1 = C6H3But2-3,5; Ar2 = C6H3Me2-3,5, C6H3But2-3,5),147  a new chiral (1-indolyl-naphthalen-2-yl)diphenylphosphine organocatalyst (154)25  and an exemplary representative of phosphines (155) bearing a 3,3-disubstituted oxindole moiety148  have also been obtained by this method. The reduction of cycloadducts of enantiopure Sp-1-phenylphosphol-2-ene-1-oxide with anthracene and in situ generated α-oxy-ortho-xylylene with the HSiCl3/pyridine system, provided complete stereoretention (unlike the reduction with phenylsilane) with the formation of enantiopure polycyclic phosphines (156) and (157).149  The HSiCl3/amine reducing systems were also successfully used for the synthesis of enantiopure l-menthyl-ortho-anisyl(phenyl)phosphinoacetate (158) as a substrate for the P-alkylation,150  1,4-bis[phenyl(ortho-tolyl)phosphino]butane151  and tris(4-trans-(tert-butyl)cyclohexyl)phosphine as a ligand with a “conformational lock”.152 

The reduction of tertiary phosphine oxides with trichlorosilane in the absence of tertiary amines allowed isolation of several para-phosphinophenol derivatives, R1P(Ph)-C6H4-OR2-4 (R1 = Me, Ph; R2 = Me, H),153  axially chiral [1-(quinolin-4-yl)-naphthalen-2-yl]diphenylphosphine (159),154  [2,2-bis(4′-chlorophenyl)vinyl]diphenylphosphine (160)155  and an exemplary representative of 3-phosphinobenzofurans (161).156  P-Chiral monophosphines (162) were synthesized by the stereoretentive reduction of enantiopure (2-arylethynyl)(aryl)phenylphosphine oxides with HSiCl3/PPh3 mixture and used as chiral organocatalysts in the [3 + 2]-annulation of allenes.151 

Phenylsilane was successfully used for the reduction of rac-1-phenylphosphol-2-ene-1-oxide in the course of its resolution into enantiomers, including the quaternization of the obtained phospholene, the resolution of P-epimeric phosphonium salts and their stereoselective hydrolysis to afford the pure enantiomers of the starting phosphine oxide. The reduction of Sp-1-phenylphosphol-2-ene-1-oxide cycloadducts with butadiene, cyclopentadiene and cyclohexadiene (and their hydrogenated saturated derivatives) by phenylsilane proceeded stereoretentively to give a range of optically active bicyclic and tricyclic P-stereogenic phospholane derivatives (163) and (164) (see Scheme 15).149  Several spiro-PNP-ligands (153, Ar1 = C6H3But2-3,5, C6H3Me2-3,5; Ar2 = C6H3Me2-3,5, C6H3But2-3,5, C6H2Ad2-3,5-OMe-4) (see Scheme 14),147  two representatives of [2-(pyridine-2′-yl)alkyl]diarylphosphines (165)157  and an exemplary representative of 2-(2′-diphenylphosphinoalkyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazoles (166, X-nothing, R = Boc) hydrolytically converted to the N-unprotected derivative (166, X = BH3, R = H)158  were obtained by the reduction of the corresponding phosphine oxides with phenylsilane (sometimes in the presence of triflic acid147  or diphenylphosphate158 ). A spiro-fluorene-bridged triarylphosphine (167) was synthesized by the reduction of the sterically constrained phosphine oxide only with Lemaire's optimized reducing system, namely PhSiH3/HSiCl3 mixture, at 150 °C.159 

The silane–titanate system HSi(OEt)3/Ti(OPri)4 was applied for the reduction of the chiral phosphine oxides to prepare a range of chiral 1,2-bis(diarylphosphino)ethane ligands (168)160,161  isolated in borane-unprotected160  and borane-protected forms,161  and a family of enantiopure aziridine–phosphines (169).162 

An exemplary representative of meta-(diarylphosphinyl)anilines obtained by a three-component reaction of p-quinone monoacetals, amines and diarylphosphine oxides was reduced with tetramethyldisiloxane to the corresponding tertiary phosphine (170).163  Trimethoxysilane was applied in the reduction of macrocyclic phosphine oxides with chiral crown-ether fragments to obtain a range of macrocyclic phosphines and bis(phosphines) (171)–(173) and bis(2-hydroxyphenyl)phenylphosphine as a possible starting reagent for the macrocyclization.164 

The use of 1,3-diphenyldisiloxane (DPDS) as the reducing agent for PV/PIII redox recycling in Wittig, Staudinger and alcohol substitution reactions has been described.165  The DFT study of silane-mediated reduction of phosphine oxides explains the higher reactivity of relatively electron-rich alkylphosphine oxides in comparison with arylphosphine oxides; these results may guide the design of new “regenerating” phosphine catalysts for various organic reactions.166 

Various aluminium hydride reagents are also used for the reduction of tertiary phosphine oxides. An example of borane-protected P-chirogenic alkenylphosphines (174) (see Scheme 15) was prepared by the stereoselective reduction of the corresponding enantiopure phosphine oxide, including its successive treatment with methyl triflate and lithium aluminium hydride followed by the borane protection of the resulting phosphine.167  The reduction of 3-benzyl-5-[(diphenylphosphoryl)methyl]oxazolidin-2-one with LiAlH4 was accompanied by a ring-opening and led to the corresponding 1-amino-3-(diphenylphosphino)propan-2-ol (175).168  Diisobutylaluminium hydride (DIBAL-H) was used for the synthesis of partially fluorinated phosphine (176) for useable applications in Wittig reactions169  and one of diarylphosphinophenols (177, Y – nothing, R = H, X = Cl4),170  whereas a series of unsymmetrically substituted 1,3-bis(phosphino)propanes (178) was obtained by the reduction of the corresponding bis(phosphine) oxides with alane (AlH3) in glyme at 60–70 °C.171 

Several recorded examples of the application of boron-containing reducing agents for the synthesis of tertiary phosphines include the preparation of borane-protected diarylphosphinophenols (177, Y = BH3) through the reduction of the phosphine oxides with borane-dimethylsulfide complex170  and the regiospecific and stereoselective reduction of biaryls (7) bearing phosphoryl and chiral phosphino groups (see Section 1, Scheme 1) with a complex reducing system of CeCl3/NaBH4/LiAlH4 at low temperatures (from −90 °C to ambient temperature) after the preliminary borane protection of the phosphino group.17  The resulting bis(phosphines) were converted to the boronate complexes by the treatment with BH3-THF complex before the purification; the final deprotection with diethylamine afforded optically pure unsymmetrical 2,2′-bis(phosphino)-1,1′-binaphthyls (179) (see Scheme 15) with one or two P-chirogenic phosphine moieties.17  It should be mentioned that two representatives of these bis(phosphines) (179, R1 = R2 = Ph, C6H4OMe-4; R3 = Me; R4 = Ph) were stereoselectively synthesized by the reduction of corresponding compounds (7) with standard HSiCl3/NEt3 reducing systems.18 

The direct electrochemical reduction of trialkyl- and triaryl-phosphine oxides in high yields under mild conditions was achieved by the use of an aluminium anode in the presence of catalytic amounts of Lewis acid activators (in particular the combination of TMEDA/AlCl3 with Bu4NCl and Bu4NPF6).172  A review has summarized the emergence of electrochemical strategies developed for the reduction of phosphine oxides (mainly triphenylphosphine oxide) in the past few decades.173 

The treatment of phosphine sulfides with hexamethyltriamidophosphite P(NMe2)3 or tertiary phosphines is often used for their desulfurization to give trivalent phosphine compounds. The electron-rich chiral PNP-ligand (180) with phospholane fragments was prepared by the desulfurization of the corresponding bis(phosphine) disulfide with P(NMe2)3.174  The reduction of 1-phenyl-2,4-bis(diphenylphosphino)but-1-ene and 1,5-bis(diphenylphosphino)-pent-2-ene disulfides, obtained by the diphosphination of benzylidene- and vinylcyclopropanes with Ph2P–PPh2 quenched by sulfur addition, was performed by the treatment with P(NMe2)3 or Schwartz reagent Cp2Zr(H)Cl, respectively, and afforded bis(phosphines) (181) and (182).175  A new representative of 10-alkylidene-acridophosphines (183) was obtained by the desulfurization of the phosphine sulfide precursor containing a thiirane bridging fragment instead of the alkylidene one with P(NMe2)3. Two diasteroisomers of (183) were separated chromatographically and their photochemical interconversions were studied.176  Two phosphine-containing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (184) and (185) containing acridophosphine fragments were obtained by the treatment of the corresponding phosphine sulfides with tributylphosphine in toluene or with LiAlH4 in dioxane under microwave irradiation respectively; these phosphines could be considered as a prospective basis for the development of P-containing π-conjugated materials.177  A new P-chirogenic (2-triazolylphenyl)diarylphosphine ligand (186) was prepared by the reduction of the phosphine sulfide precursor with Si2Cl6 in toluene at 80 °C (Scheme 16).178 

Transition metal-catalyzed C–P(iii) bond formation has become an effective and widely-used synthetic approach to various aryl-, heteroaryl- and even alkylphosphines. Most of the catalysts are based on Pd(ii) and Pd(0) salts and complexes, which may be used both in the presence and sometimes in the absence of additional ligands (as a rule DIPPF, DPPF or DPPB) and organic or inorganic basic reagents (as a rule NaOBut, KOBut, NEt3, Cs2CO3), whereas the most applied phosphorus sources are secondary phosphines. A facile method of Pd(OAc)2/DPPF-catalyzed C–P(iii) cross-coupling between various aryl- or heteroaryl-halides and enantiopure borane complexes of (S)- and (R)-(tert-butyl)methylphosphines has been developed for the effective and enantioselective synthesis of (R)- or (S)-P-chiral (aryl-) and (heteroaryl)-(tert-butyl)methylphosphines in moderate to high yields. These reactions were applicable to a wide series of arylhalides bearing both electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups and nitrogen-containing heteroarylhalides; additionally the reaction time could be significantly reduced without the loss of stereoselectivity under microwave conditions.179  PdCl2(PhCN)2-catalyzed C(sp3)–P(iii) coupling reactions between alkyl- and arylalkyl-halides and (benzoyl)diphenylphosphine as the phosphorus source allowed access to a wide range of (alkyl)- and (arylalkyl)-diphenylphosphines including compounds with ether, ester or amide functional groups.180  The C–P(iii) coupling between various arylhalide precursors and secondary phosphines in the presence of the most common catalytic system, namely Pd(OAc)2/phosphine ligand/base, led to new representatives of functionalized (aryl)diphenylphosphines (187) (see Scheme 17)21,181,182  which were used as starting or intermediate reagents in the synthesis of silylated arylphosphines,21  polyfunctionalized phosphines with alkyne moieties181  and a new bioluminescent probe (see Section 2.6.1, 2.6.4, 2.6.7).182  The same approach was used for the synthesis of 8-(diisopropylphosphino)-2-methylquinoline (188) as an intermediate compound for the synthesis of new NNP-pincer ligands (see Section 2.6.1),183  and diorganylphosphino-substituted tris(amine) (189) as a precursor of a novel bidentate PP-ligand containing phosphine and triamidophosphite donor centers (see Section 2.6.5)184  and a chiral bisphosphine (190) containing a spiro-oxindole scaffold.185  Pd(OAc)2-Catalyzed interaction of monoiodinated diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP) with triphenylphosphine as the phosphorus source and the ligand gave a new phosphine (191) with a DPP moiety as the basis for the preparation of neutral fluorescent probes for bioimaging.186  The P–C coupling reaction of 9-bromo-[7]helicene with diphenylphosphine catalyzed by Herrmann's catalyst (trans-bis(acetato)-bis[o-(di-o-tolylphosphino)benzyl]palladium(ii)) provided 9-diphenylphosphino-[7]helicene which was isolated as the corresponding borane complex (192).187 

The catalytic systems Pd(PPh3)4/base (NEt3 or K2CO3) were also used for the coupling reactions of arylhalides with secondary phosphines to afford 2-diphenylphosphino-4,5-dimethoxybenzaldehyde (193)188  and the sterically demanding (2,6-dibenzhydryl-4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine ligand (194).189  Phosphaalkenes (195) bearing a phosphino group were obtained as low-yield (up to 10%) by-products in the course of the derivatization of (2,7-dibromofluorenyl)phosphaalkene with tributyl(heteroaryl)stannane under Stille coupling conditions (Pd(PPh3)4, THF, microwave irradiation) where a triphenylphosphine ligand of the catalyst acted as the phosphorus source.190  A series of (para-aminoaryl)- and (para-aminoheteroaryl)-diadamantylphosphines (196) and diadamantyl(pyridine-4-yl)phosphine were synthesized by Pd(dba)2/NaOBut-catalyzed coupling of the corresponding aryl- or heteroaryl-bromides with diadamantylphosphines.191 

Di-(tert-alkyl)phosphonium triflates were successfully used as air-stable and odorless di(tert-alkyl)phosphine surrogates in the Pd-catalyzed coupling reactions with biphenylyltriflate or -bromide to provide a broad family of bulky di(tert-alkyl)biphenylylphosphine ligands (197).192  The coupling of Z- and E-stiff-stilbene dibromides with diphenylphosphine, catalyzed by Pd(PPh3)4/NEt3 and Pd(OAc)2/KOAc systems, respectively, led to the corresponding Z- and E-isomers of photoswithable bisphosphine ligand (198) and (199) based on a stiff-stilbene scaffold.193 

Several small bite-angle bisphosphine ligands with alkylidene bridges (200) (see Scheme 17) were obtained by NiCl2(PPh3)2-catalyzed P–C coupling of 1,1-dicloroalkenes with diphenylphosphine.194  A model 2,7-bis(diphenylphosphinoethynyl)fluorene (201) and a copolymer with similar components (202) were prepared by Ni(AcAc)2-catalyzed coupling of chlorodiphenylphosphine or dichlorophenylphosphine with corresponding bis(alkynes); the copolymer (202) selectively exhibited a bright blue fluorescence in the presence of gold(i/iii) ions.195 

New phosphine-oxazoline ligands (203) and (204) were synthesized by Ullman type coupling of the corresponding bromide or iodide precursors with diphenylphosphine in the presence of CuI/DMEDA/Cs2CO3 catalytic system.196,197 

Manganese-mediated decarboxylative or deaminative coupling reactions of cyclohexyl N-hydroxyphthalimide ester or N-cyclohexyl-2,4,6-triphenylpyridium tetrafluoroborate with chlorodiphenylphosphine gave (cyclohexyl)diphenylphosphine in moderate (36%) and low (7%) yields.198 

A mild and versatile approach for the selective formation of a broad scope of unsymmetrical aryl- and aryl-alkyl-substituted tertiary phosphines and quaternary phosphonium salts has been developed, which was based on blue visible light-mediated C–P coupling between aryl and alkyl iodides and secondary or primary phosphines, Ph2P–PPh2 and even P4 in the presence of an inexpensive organic photocatalyst, 4,6-dicyano-1,3,5-tris(diphenylamino)-2-fluorobenzene.199 

The development of transition-metal-catalyzed methods for the synthesis of phosphine derivatives poses a considerable challenge. Rhodium-, ruthenium or iridium-catalysed hydroarylation, hydrosylilation or hydroborylation reactions open the way to a wide row of new phosphine ligands. The rhodium-catalyzed phosphorus(iii)-directed hydroarylation of internal alkynes generated various alkenylated (205) and 2′,6′-dialkenylated (206) biarylphosphines with high selectivity.200  Ru(ii)-catalyzed direct alkylation of tertiary phosphines via hydroarylation of activated olefins, promoted by mono-N-protected amino acid (MPAA), provided a straightforward access to a large library of Buchwald-type bulky alkylated monophosphines (207) from commercially available biaryl phosphine.201  The first ruthenium-catalyzed aromatic C–H silylation reactions between triaryl(heteroyl)- or diarylalkyl phosphines and hydrosilanes opened the way to the wide row of ortho-silylated arylphosphines (208).21 

The mono- and geminal bis-borylation products (209) were prepared via iridium-catalyzed C–H-borylation of 1-di(R)phosphino-2-methylbenzene (R = Ph, Cy). For the dicyclohexyl-substituted phosphine, conditions have been identified to control for mono- and bis-borylation products. In contrast, the use of the diphenyl-substituted phosphine led to a rapid formation of the bisborylation product.202 

The deprotonation of the acidic methyl group at a borane protected phosphine with BuLi and subsequent electrophilic quenching with various chloroderivatives led to the formation of methylene-substituted diphosphines of the type PPhAr–CH2–PR2 (210) (Ar = 1-naphthyl (Np), 9-phenanthryl (Phen), 2-biphenylyl (Biph), R = Ph, Pri)203  and 2,2′-bis(phosphino)-1,1′-binaphthyl (211).18 

Reaction of a phosphine-substituted quinolone with lithium diisopropylamide, followed by the treatment with imidoyl chloride, furnished a ligand (212) in excellent yield.183  Treatment of the alkynyl–substituted phosphole with EtMgBr generated the alkynyl Grignard reagent which was converted to internal alkyne (213) through the reactions with paraformaldehyde.16  Silyl substituted ferrocenylphosphines (214) were obtained by the subsequent treatment of the corresponding o-diphenylphosphinoformylferrocene with lithium N-methylpiperazide, ButLi and chlorosilanes.88  The mixed phosphine-phosphinoxide ligand (215) was obtained by the deprotonation of a benzothiophene moiety of the phosphine with BuLi and a following reaction with ClP(O)Ph2.204  Simple and efficient approaches to the rhodium- and palladium-catalyzed modification of monophosphino-o-carboranes (64) (see Section 2.1, Scheme 4) into B3-arylated, B3,B6-diarylated, and B3,B6-dialkylated) as well as C-arylated and B6-halogenated derivatives (216), was developed.76  The deprotonation of a tungsten alkene complex bearing a phosphine as Lewis base and a carbenium group as Lewis acid with BunLi and the subsequent reaction with ketones resulted in η2-C,C′-phosphino-propargyl complexes (217).205  A Lewis pair-containing diphenylacetylene combining phosphine and borane moieties (218) was prepared in high yields by Sonogashira coupling of dimesityl(4-iodophenyl)borane with (4-ethynylphenyl)diphenylphosphine in the presence of CuI and Pd(PPh3)4.206 

Triphenylphosphine- and diphenylpyridylphosphine-based porous aromatic frameworks (219) were synthesized via the straightforward Friedel–Crafts alkylation reaction using anhydrous FeCl3 as a catalyst and biphenyl as the comonomer and dimethoxymethane as an external linkage (Scheme 18).207 

Various phosphines bearing peripheral halogen groups serve as convenient precursors for the insertion of different functional groups and fragments into ligand molecules. Usually, initial halogen-metal exchange (as a rule, lithiation) in the corresponding halogen-containing phosphine occurs and subsequent interaction with the appropriate electrophilic reagents gives the desired products.

This approach was used for the synthesis of a series of new phosphine-borane FLPs (220) and (221) (see Scheme 19) able to photo-promote skeletal rearrangements,39  new [2-(1′,4′-azaborin-4′-yl)phenyl]dicycloxexylphosphine ligands (222),34  tris[4-(diisopropoxyboryl)phenyl]phosphine (223) as the precursor for the construction of covalent and hybrid organic frameworks,208  a new germinal P/B FLP (224) obtained from the brominated precursor (67) (see Section 2.1, Scheme 4)79  and a new representative of phosphines containing a carbazolyl donor – triarylboryl acceptor unit (225) which was prepared from the bromo-substituted phosphine (21) (see Section 2.1, Scheme 2) and was used as the Lewis base component of new FLPs.37  The lithiation/electrophilic trapping synthetic route with the use of phosphorus-containing electrophiles allowed routes to new representatives of trisphosphine ligands (226),209  asymmetrically substituted PNP-ligands (227)210  and a new 1,5-diaza-3,7-diphosphacyclooctane ligand (228) with phosphonate peripheral groups for the synthesis of immobilized nickel complexes as electrocatalysts. It should be mentioned that in this case the dilithiation of the starting 1,5-diphenyl-3,7-di(p-bromophenyl)-1.5-diaza-3,7-diphosphacyclooctane (see Section 2.7) and the subsequent treatment with (EtO)2P(O)Cl were performed at very low temperature (−108 °C)in order to prevent side reactions.211  The lithiation of (2-bromophenyl)di(o-tolyl)phosphine and the subsequent treatment of the lithiated derivative with Tol(Et2N)PCl and then with HCl led to the derivative (229, X = Cl) which reacted with the corresponding o-lithio(pyrazolyl)benzene to give a new rigid tridentate NPP-ligand (229, X = –C6H4-PyrrMe2-3,4) for the design of copper(i) and gold(i) TADF-fluorescent complexes.24  The lithation of 6-bromo-5-diisopropylphosphinoacenaphthene, followed by the interaction with Ph2BiCl, led to acenaphthene-based phosphine-bismuthine (230).212  (Fluoro)diorganyl(2-diphenylphosphinophenyl)silanes (231) as substrates for the sila-Negishi coupling were prepared from (2-bromophenyl)diphenylphosphine through lithiation/R2SiCl2-trapping, followed by halogen exchange by the treatment with Na2SiF6.213  A similar approach was used for the synthesis of a new bidentate ligand (232) containing two 5-diphenylphosphinoacenaphthen-6-yl moieties linked by the disilane fragment from 6-bromo-5-diphenylphosphinoacenaphthene and (ClSiMe2)2.214  A lithation – I2-trapping process was applied for bromine-iodine exchange in the phosphine Tipp2P–C6H2–PrI2–2,6-Br-4 to afford the useful iodine-functionalized crowded reagent (233).215 

The metallation of 4-iodo-5-diphenylphosphino-1-methylimidazole with PriMgCl followed by a reaction with Mes2BF yielded a very stable dimeric phosphine-functionalized ammoniumborate product (234).14 

The lithiation of borane-protected phosphines with an iodoferrocenyl fragment (see Section 2.7), followed by an interaction with DMF, led to new representatives of borane-protected chiral (α-phosphinoethyl)ferrocenyl aldehydes (235) as intermediate reagents in the synthesis of ferrocene-based chiral PNP-ligands (see Section 2.6.3).216  A similar approach including CO2 as the carboxylating agent was used for the preparation of racemic and enantiopure borane complexes of P-chirogenic 2-diorganylphosphinobenzoic acids (236), as the precursors of P-chirogenic Trost ligands.105 

Various cross-coupling reactions also may be applied for the functionalization of halogen groups in tertiary phosphines. The PdCl2(PPh3)2/CuI-catalyzed Sonogashira cross-coupling of (187, R1 = Br-3, R2 = COOMe-5) (see Section 2.5, Scheme 17) with trimethylsilylacetylene led to (alkynylaryl)diphenylphosphine (237, R1 = SiMe3, R2 = Me) (see Scheme 19) which was hydrolyzed to the terminal ethynyl derivative (237, R1 = R2 = H).181  Iodine-substituted phosphine (233) was used in an analogous Sonogashira coupling with trimethylsilylacetylene to afford (alkynylaryl)phosphine (238, R = SiMe3); its subsequent hydrolysis and the repeated coupling with (233) led to sterically crowded bisphosphine (238, R = C6H2-PrI2-3,5-(PTipp2)-4) with an ethynylene linker.215  The Pd(PPh3)4/Na2CO3-catalyzed Suzuki coupling of the arylboronic acid prepared from Tipp2P–C6H2–PrI2–2,6-Br-4 by successive treatment with BuLi and B(OMe)3 and used without isolation with 1,2-dibromobenzene led to the similar bisphosphine (239) with a 1,2-phenylene bridge.215 

(4-dioxaborolanylphenyl)diphenylphosphine (240) (see Scheme 19) was prepared by PdCl2(DPPF)2-catalyzed coupling between (4-bromophenyl)diphenylphosphine and 2-chloro-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane.217 

The nucleophilic substitution of chlorine in bisphosphine (37) (see Section 2.1, Scheme 3) by treatment with NaOMe or MesOH in the presence of K2CO3 led to the corresponding 9-methoxy- and 9-aryloxy-derivatives (241).50  The bulk polycondensation reaction between bis(4-fluorophenyl)phenylphosphine and 2,2-bis(4-trimethylsilyloxyphenyl)propane in the presence of CsF led to the polymer (242) (of approximately 85% purity due to the partial oxidation of the phosphine fragments) which was used as a polymeric reagent in the Mitsunobu reactions.218 

The alkylation of imidazoles and imidazolines with (2-chloromethylphenyl)diphenylphosphine followed by anion-exchange led to new representatives of imidazolium- and imidazolinium-containing phosphine ligands (243)113,219  and (244), respectively, as precursors of phosphino-substituted N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) ligands.220  Pentadentate N3P2 ligand (245) was synthesized by deprotonation of 2,6-di(5′-butylpyrazol-3′-yl)pyridine with NaH, followed by alkylation with (2-chloromethylphenyl)diphenylphosphine.221 

The condensation of phosphines containing aldehyde groups with various amines and diamines provides a route to a wide range of iminophosphines which may be reduced smoothly with NaBH4 and similar reagents to aminophosphines. For example, new perfluorooctyl or bulky substituted bidentate phosphine-imine ligands (246),222,223  sulfoxide containing imino- and amino-phosphines (247),224  the dual N-heterocyclic carbene-imino-phosphine ligand (248)225  and ferrocene-based chiral PNP-ligands (249)216  were synthesized (Scheme 20).

The co-condensation of tris(4-formylphenyl)phosphine and p-phenylenediamine or benzidine under solvothermal conditions resulted in phosphine-based covalent organic frameworks (250).226,227  Another phosphine-containing porous organic cage (251) was prepared from a [2 + 3] self-assembly of tris(4-formylphenyl)phosphine and (S,S)-1,2-diaminocyclohexane.228 

Condensation of phosphinoaldehyde (193) (see Section 2.5, Scheme 17) with enantiopure tert-butanesulfinamide in the presence of Ti(OAlk)4 as a Lewis acid forms the novel chiral sulfinyl imine phosphine (252).188 

A reductive amination of various phosphine-acetaldehydes which were generated by the reaction of sodium tris(acetoxy)borohydride with parent phosphonium dimers, with different phosphine-amines or NH4OAc, gave novel unsymmetrical tripodal NPP’2 and symmetrical NP3 ligands (253), respectively.229 

Ligand (254) was synthesized by a modified Seyferth–Gilbert homologation of P-protected (formylferrocenyl)phosphine with the Ohira-Bestman reagent.230  1′-Silylated vinylferrocenyl phosphines (255) were prepared from formylferrocenes (214) (see Section 2.6.1, Scheme 18) via Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons reactions with diethyl benzylphosponate.88 

The phosphinanones (132) (see Section 2.3, Scheme 13) were converted directly to the corresponding phosphorinanes (256) by the reaction with ethylene glycol in the presence of p-toluenesulfonic acid or to the corresponding 4-methoxyphosphorinanes by the reduction with LiAlH4 and subsequent methylation with MeI.131 

The condensation reactions between phosphines bearing carboxylic groups and alcohols, thioalcohols or amines in the presence of reagents DIC, DCC, EDC, BOP etc and organic base (DMAP, DIPEA) or inorganic base (Cs2CO3) are commonly used for the synthesis of various ester-, thioester- or amide-derivatives. So, phosphine amide derivatives (257) (see Scheme 21),231  (258),232  triaryl phosphines bearing terminal alkyne fragments (259) and (260),181  the ruthenocene-based phosphine amide obtained from L-valinol and cyclized with MsCl/DIPEA to phosphine-oxazoline ligand (261),45  P-chirogenic Trost ligands (262) as a 1 : 2 : 1 mixture of the diastereomers (C*, C*, Rp, Rp), (C*, C*, Rp, Sp), and (C*, C*, Sp, Sp), which were separated by column chromatography on silica gel,105  tris-amides (263) as well as mono-amides (264),233  alkyne-containing SNO probe (265),234  NIR fluorescent probes (266),235  (267),236  (268),237  mono-ester (269),238  and the mixed phosphonium-phosphine (270)182  were obtained.

The mixed-monolayer Si(111) electrode (271) was prepared by the formation of covalent amide bonds between the amine unit of the Si–C6H4(CH2)2NH2 substrate and the carboxylate unit on the phosphine ligand in the presence of DIC and DMAP.239 

Treatment of racemic or enantiopure phosphine-carboxylic acids (110) (see Section 2.2, Scheme 9) with trimethylsilyldiazomethane resulted in the corresponding methyl ester (272).105 

A functionalization of phosphines containing peripheral amino groups by various electrophilic agents is often used for the synthesis of novel phosphines. The condensation reactions between phosphines bearing amine groups and various carbon acids or their derivatives in the presence of reagents for peptide synthesis (DCC, EDC, BOP, HBTU etc.) and organic bases (DMAP, DIEA, NEt3) are commonly used for the preparation of various amido-derivatives. This methodology was used for the synthesis of diastereo- and enantiopure-bifunctional phosphines (273) (see Scheme 22) containing amino-acid-based amide fragments,240,241  phosphines with dipeptide moieties (274) prepared on the basis of compounds (273, R1 = C6H4Ph-2),241  a novel amide-phosphine ligand KePhos (275) containing a phosphanorbornadiene core242  and a new phosphine (276) with an imido-group.243 

Similar types of bifunctional phosphines have been obtained by the addition of amino-substituted phosphines to heterocumulenes. The addition to isothiocyanates afforded new chiral phosphines containing thiourea moieties, namely polyfunctional compound (277) with an additional amide fragment,244  new representatives of ferrocene-based bisphosphine ZhaoPhos ligands (278),78  and the benzhydryl-thiourea substituted phosphine (279).245  The addition of 2-diorganylphosphinobenzyl- and 2-diphenylphosphinoethylamines to isothiocyanates prepared in situ from chiral styrenes bearing simultaneously indolyl, oxindolyl and 2-aminoaryl substituents and thiophosgene in the presence of pyridine led to axially chiral thiourea-phosphines (280).246  The addition of (1′-aminoferrocen-1-yl)diphenylphosphine to carbodiimides in the presence of ZnEt2 or after the treatment with BuLi led to new phosphinoferrocene-guanidine ligands (281).247  Most new polyfunctional phosphines with amide (peptide), imide and thiourea fragments are of interest as new organocatalysts.78,240–242,244,245 

The condensation reactions between phosphines with peripheral amine groups and various aldehydes are used for the synthesis of imino-phosphines, and their subsequent reduction with different borohydride reagent (NaBH4, NaBH3CN, Na[BH(OAc)3) (a reductive amination of aldehydes) is a common approach to novel phosphine-amines.

The use of appropriate amino-substituted phosphines and aldehydes provided routes to pyrrolyl- and ferrocenyl-substituted imino-phosphines (282) (see Scheme 22)248  and (283, R – nothing),249  whereas the reductive amination route led to the corresponding amino-phosphine ligand (283, R = H),249  a series of new PNN-ligands (284) containing ferrocene and (benzo)imidazole fragments,250 spiro-amino-phosphines (285) with the peripheral phosphoryl group as the precursors of spiro-PNP bisphosphine ligands (153) (see Section 2.4.1, Scheme 14),147  one of bisphosphines (153, Ar1 = C6H3But2-3,5, Ar2 = Ph)147  and chiral amino-functionalized phosphine ligand (286) with binaphthylene core.251 

A series of N-alkylated sulfinylamide-phosphine ligands (287),252  (288),253  (289)103  and the N-styrylmethyl functionalized Nixantphos-type monomer (290)254  were obtained by the treatment of the corresponding secondary amine-phosphine precursors with alkyl or benzyl halides after the initial deprotonation with NaH252,254  or BuLi103  or in the presence of KOH/TBAB base.253 

The interaction of phosphines containing amine group with organoelement electrophilic reagents allowed the synthesis of a variety of N-functionalized derivatives. The reactions of lithium 2-diphenylphosphinopyrrolide with chlorodiorganylphosphines led to a series of 1-amidophosphinito-2-phosphinopyrrole ligands (291) (see Scheme 23).255  The hydrolysis of indolylphosphine (49, X = SO2Ph, R1 = R2 = C6H4OMe-2) (see Section 2.1, Scheme 2) led to N-unprotected indolylphosphine (49, X = H, R1 = R2 = C6H4OMe-2). Its subsequent deprotonation with BuLi and treatment with Ph2P(O)Cl gave a new analogue of compounds (49, X = P(O)Ph2, R1 = R2 = C6H4OMe-2).62  The interaction of phosphino-substituted tris(amines) (189) (see Section 2.5, Scheme 17) with PCl3 in the presence of NEt3 afforded PP-ligands (292) containing a nontrigonal phosphorus triamide moiety tethered by a phenylene linker to a diphenylphosphino group.184 

1,2-Bis[(diphenylphosphinomethyl)amino]benzene reacted with SbCl3 in the presence of NMe3 to form diphosphine-chlorostibine ligand (293), which was used for the synthesis of metal complexes containing a pincer diphenylstibenium ligand, inaccessible in the free form.256 

The interaction of 2-diisopropylphosphinopyrrole with LiAlH4 or AlMe3 led to the PAlP proto-pincer ligand (294)257  or tripodal alane/trisphosphine ligand (295).23 

A deprotonation of a bis(diphenylphosphino)-functionalized β-diketiminato compound with K[N(SiMe3)2], followed by treatment with GeCl2(dioxane) complex or SnCl2, afforded the germylene and stannylene chloride complexes (296, X = Cl) which reacted with [Na(dioxane)x]P═C═O to give the novel phosphaketene derivatives (296, X = P═C═O), whereas chloride abstraction with NaBArF led to bis-phosphino-functionalized germylidene and stannylidene salts (297).258 

2-[(2′-Diphenylphosphinophenyl)amino]benzonitrile (298) as a precursor for the synthesis of phosphine-oxazoline ligands was obtained by the nucleophilic substitution of 2-fluorobenzonitrile with 2-diphenylphosphinoaniline in the presence of KOBut.197  New [N,N-bis(ferrocenylmethyl)aminoalkyl]diphenylphosphines (299) were synthesized by a nucleophilic substitution of (ferrocenylmethyl)trimethylammonium iodide with diphenylphosphinoalkylamines in the presence of K2CO3.249 

The deprotection of phosphino-substituted carbamates (257) (see Section 2.6.4, Scheme 21) with trifluoroacetic acid led to N-((1R,2R)-2-aminocyclohexyl)- and N-((1R,2R)-2-amino-1,2-diphenylethyl)-2-(diphenylphosphino)benzamides (300) having terminal amino groups.231  The interaction of 3-(2′-(diphenylphosphino)ethyl)oxazolidin-2-one with NaSMe led to the PNS-pincer ligand (301) for the preparation of air- and moisture-stable manganese catalysts.94 

Etherification of hydroxy-phosphines with different triflates, tosylates and mesitylates, in the presence of cesium or potassium carbonates in DMF results in corresponding phosphine-ethers. Thus, 2-(perfluorohexyl)ethyl substituted phosphine (302),259  macrocyclic phosphine (172, n = 2, R1 = Bui, R2 = H) (see Section 2.4, Scheme 2.4.2) as R,R-isomer,164  photo-switchable ligands (303),260  and PEG5000-containing phosphines (304)30  were obtained (see Scheme 24).

A series of Fréchet-type dendrons (305) with N,P-iminophosphine terminal moieties were afforded via Williamson-ether reactions from the corresponding Schiff-base phosphines containing a phenol group and the bromido-Fréchet dendrons.261  Phosphite-phospholane ligand (306) was synthesized from (Sax)-BIPHEN bromophosphite and (S,S)-hydroxymethylphospholane in the presence of DABCO.262  A condensation of 2-hydroxy-di(aryl)phosphine with various BOC- and Fmoc-protected amino acids under the peptide synthesis conditions (DCC, DMAP) afforded phosphines (307).170  MOP-alkene ligands (308) were prepared via Pd-catalyzed reactions of corresponding aryltriflates with β-styrylboronate.263  The interaction of unprotected chiral phenol-functionalized ferrocenylphosphines (74, R = H, X – nothing) (see Section 2.1, Scheme 5) with phosphazene-based dendrimers containing P(S)Cl2-terminal groups in the presence of Cs2CO3 afforded P-stereogenic dendritic ferrocenyl phosphines (309) as the supporting ligands for the ruthenium catalysts of redox-switchable transfer hydrogenation of ketones.86 

Addition of Grignard or RLi reagents to various phosphine sulfinyl imines gave the corresponding sulfinyl amine ligands (310)188,264  and (311) (see Scheme 25).138  Selective click reactions of the alkyne moieties of phosphines (259), (260) (see Section 2.6.4, Scheme 21) and (254) (see Section 2.6.3, Scheme 20) with various azides catalysed by Cu(CH3CN)4BF4 resulted in a wide row of triazolyl derivatives (312), (313)181  and (314).230  Phosphine–amide-oxazolyl ligands (315) were prepared by the reactions of phosphine-amine benzonitrile (298) (see Section 2.6.5, Scheme 23) with amino-alcohols in the presence of Zn(OTf)2.197  A reaction of phosphine (270) (see Section 2.6.4, Scheme 21) bearing nitrile group with d-cysteine led to the new ligand (316).182  Rh-Catalyzed hydroaminomethylation of vinyl-phosphine derivatives appeared to be a versatile tool to promote their covalent immobilization onto amine-carbon nanotubes or iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles to form phosphine-functionalized materials (317) and (318), respectively.265  The olefin metathesis of phosphines (58) (see Section 2.1, Scheme 4) and (111) (see Section 2.2, Scheme 9) with terminal alkene groups under dilute conditions using Grubbs’ catalyst generated the corresponding macrocycles (319) as a mixture of isomers which were separated using column chromatography and subsequently hydrogenated using Wilkinson's catalyst to produce the saturated derivatives.70,106 

Borane-protected diphosphine (320) was synthesized by nucleophilic substitution of a hydroxyl-group in the corresponding monophosphine (136) (see Section 2.3, Scheme 13) with Ph2PH in the presence of AcOH.134  New diferrocenylphosphines (321) were obtained by the substitution of two dimethylamino groups by acetoxy groups and their subsequent elimination upon heating in acetic anhydride.266  Reaction of di-o-tolyl-(trimethylsilyl)methylphosphine with dichlorophenylphenyl phosphine gave tris-phosphine (322) in 70% yield.267 

The monolithiation of 2,6-dibromotoluene with BunLi followed by the interaction with bis(o-diisopropylphosphinophenyl)chlorophosphine led to (3-bromo-2-methylphenyl)bis(o-diisopropylphosphinophenyl)phosphine which in turn was converted to the corresponding Grignard reagent and quenched with the second equivalent of bis(o-diisopropylphosphinophenyl)chlorophosphine to yield a new hexaphosphine ligand (323) (see Scheme 25).268 

A mono-quaternization of 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane with one equivalent of 2-bromo-4′-cyanoacetophenone led to an unsymmetrical phosphine-phosphonium ligand (324) which was converted to the corresponding phosphine-ylide ligand (325).269 

PCP-carbodiphosphorane ligand (326) has been obtained from [CH(dppm)2]Cl and an excess of sodium amide in liquid ammonia.270 

Bis-phosphine fluoroborate (327) was prepared by fluorination of bis-phosphine–borane with cesium fluoride.271  The phosphinoboration of acyl phosphines with Ph2PBR2 gave corresponding diphosphine derivatives (328) and (329).123 

Two covalent organic frameworks (330) and (331) (see Scheme 26) comprising Lewis basic P(iii) centres and Lewis acidic boron atoms were prepared by polycondensation reactions of tris(4-diisopropoxyborylphenyl)phosphine (223) (see Section 2.6.2, Scheme 19) with tetrahydroxy-dimethylanthracene and hexahydroxytriphenylene.208 

A fluorodearylation of phosphine-bismuthine (230) (see Section 2.6.2, Scheme 19) with BF3·OEt2 followed by treatment with an excess of sodium or potassium halides gave halobismuthine derivatives (332, X = Cl, Br, I); the subsequent interaction of (332, X = Cl) with PhSLi or (5-diisopropylphosphinoacenaphth-6-yl)lithium led to phenylthiobismuthine (332, X = SPh) or bis(5-diisopropylphosphinoacenaphth-6-yl)phenylbismuthine (332, X = AcenaphPPri2) respectively.212  The treatment of (5-diphenylphosphinoacenaphth-6-yl)chlorodimethylsilane with lithium in the presence of 4,4′-di-(tert-butyl)biphenyl led to bisphosphino-disilane (232) (see Section 2.6.2, Scheme 19).214  The phosphinylvinyl Grignard reagent reacted with MeGaCl2, EtGaCl2, or MeInCl2 by salt elimination and the formation of the frustrated Lewis pairs (333).272 

Pd- and Ni-catalysed Si–F bond activation of fluorosilane-phosphines (231) (see Section 2.6.2, Scheme 19) under mild conditions and the coupling with diarylzinc reagents were successfully performed to give arylsilylated phosphines (334).213  Silylated norbornene amino(phosphino) derivatives (335) were prepared from the corresponding iminophosphines with BuLi and chlorosilanes.273 

An addition of various phosphorus-containing reagents to unsaturated compounds is sometimes used for the synthesis of functionalized phosphines. The PBu3-catalyzed trans-phosphinoboration of alkynoate esters led to a wide variety of trans-α-phosphino-β-borylacrylates (336) (see Scheme 27) in moderate to good yields with high regio- and Z-stereoselectivity.274  The addition of the silylphosphine Ph3SiPBut2 to the phosphaketene Ph3Ge–P═C═O led to the E-isomer of phosphino-substituted phosphaalkene (337, R1 = Ph, R2 = But), whereas the Z-isomer of this phosphino-phosphaalkene was obtained by the interaction of K+[But2P–C(O)═PGePh3] with Ph3SiCl. These isomers interconverted thermally and photochemically due to the reversibility of the silylphosphination; this reversibility also provided silyl and phosphine exchange processes to give various phosphino-phosphaalkenes (337).275  An unusual 1,1-addition of the P–P bond of α-C2-bridged biphospholes to terminal alkynes in the presence of one equivalent of KOBut in THF provided a simple access to the previously unknown 1,3-diphosphepines (338); in some cases spiro-tricyclic bisphosphines (339) were isolated as by-products in yields up to 15%.276  The interaction of allenes containing a peripheral secondary amino group with diarylphosphine oxides in the presence of Tf2O and 2,6-lutidine proceeded as intramolecular aminophosphination through the formation of electrophilic intermediate [Ar2P]+[OTf] and led to a wide variety of 1-phosphinoalkenyl substituted nitrogen-containing heterocycles (340) and (341).277 

The ring-opening of quaternary phosphiranium triflates or tetrafluoroborates with primary and secondary arylamines afforded a wide range of tertiary phosphinoethylamines, (342) and (343), with two phosphinoethylamino fragments linked by the organic spacer.278  A nucleophilic substitution of the dimethylamino group of iodinated Ugi's amine with secondary phosphines in the presence of acetic acid, followed by the treatment with BH3·SMe2, led to borane-protected enantiopure 1-(α-diorganylphosphinoethyl)-2-iodoferrocene (344) as the precursor of the borane-protected phosphino-aldehyde (235) (see Section 2.6.2, Scheme 19).216  The interaction of (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane with KPPh2 led to (3-(diphenylphosphino)propyl)triethoxysilane ligand (345).279 

The Mannich-like condensation between hydroxyalkylphosphines and amines is an effective approach to the synthesis of various α-aminoalkylphosphines. Hydroxyalkylphosphines are usually generated in situ from P–H phosphines and aldehydes (mainly formaldehyde) or from the corresponding hydroxymethylphosphonium salts with bases, so the condensations are usually performed as one-pot processes or even directly in three-component phosphine–aldehyde–amine mixtures. The phosphines synthesized on the basis of this approach include a new bulky bis(diphenylphosphinomethyl)(2,6-dibenzhydryl-4-methylphenyl)amine ligand (346),189  trisphosphine ligands (347)280  with the central aminomethylphosphine fragment and tris((2-diphenylphosphinomethylamino)phenyl)amine (348) as a pro-ligand for the synthesis of heterobimetallic scandium-group 10 metal complexes with unusual LM-Sc dative bonds.281  Mannich-type condensations were successfully used for the synthesis of cyclic aminomethylphosphines, namely new representatives of 1-aza-3,5-diphosphacyclohexanes (349) obtained as the mixtures of RpRp/SpSp isomers,282  new 1,5-diaza-3,7-diphosphacyclooctane ligands (350) with various substituents on heteroatoms (the compound (350, R1 = C6H4Br-4, R2 = Ph) was the precursor of the analogous cyclic diphosphine (228) with phosphonate peripheral groups (see Section 2.6.2, Scheme 19)),211,283,284  new representatives of 18-membered P4N2-corands (351, n = 4)285  and previously unknown 22-membered P4N2-corands (351, n = 6)286  which were obtained by the stereoselective condensations of the corresponding 1,n-bis(arylphosphino)alkanes, formaldehyde and primary amines and isolated as the individual stereoisomers (RpRpRpRp/SpSpSpSp or RpSpSpRp in the case of 18-membered corands and RpSpSpRp in the case of 22-membered corands).285,286 

The enzyme invertase containing amino groups was successfully immobilized on chitosan using tris(hydroxymethyl)phosphine as a cross-linking reagent which formed aminomethylphosphine linkers; the immobilized invertase was used as a catalyst for the production of bioethanol.287  The synthetic procedure for the large-scale preparation of the important aminomethylphosphine ligand phosphatriazaadamantane (PTA) by the interaction of tris((hydroxymethyl)phosphine with a hexamethylenetetramine/formaldehyde mixture has been improved by the final treatment of the reaction mixture with formaldehyde and by the use of an inert atmosphere;these changes allowed the isolation of PTA of high purity.288 

Cryptoaldehydes have also been used in the synthesis of aminomethylphosphines. The cyclocondensation of N-mesityl-2-(phenylphosphino)aniline with dimethylformamide dimethyl acetal led to cyclic aminomethylphosphine (352).289  The condensation of diphenylphosphine with glyoxylic acid hydrate and primary amines gave several new representatives of α-diphenylphosphinoglycines (353) as the basis of organonickel catalysts for ethylene oligomerization.290,291  A summary of data concerning the chemistry α-phosphino-α-amino acids has been noted in a review.5 

The base decomposition of bis(4-methoxyphenyl)bis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium chloride with NEt3 led to the diaryl(hydroxymethyl)phosphine (354) (see Scheme 27), which reacted with sarcosine-glycine peptide to give the corresponding phosphine-peptide conjugate (355); the ligands (354) and (355) were used for the synthesis of cytotoxic copper(i) complexes.292 

The light-induced decomposition of phosphaallene TippP═C═CHBut (Tipp = C6H2Pri3-2,4,6) or the interaction of TippP(C≡CBut)2 with Bui2AlH under mercury vapor lamp irradiation through the intermediate formation of the phosphaallene stereoselectively led to an unusual tricyclic phosphine (356) (see Scheme 28) which is a rare example of a compound with a strained phosphirane cycle included into the tricyclic structure.293  A very reactive phosphaallene PhP═C═CHBut began to decompose in the course of its preparation from PhP(C≡CBut)2 and ((SiMe3)2CH)2AlH to give a trimerization product (357) along with other compounds.294  The hydroboration of a stable phosphaallene Mes*P–CH═C═CHBut (Mes* = C6H2But3-2,4,6) with H2BC6F5·SMe2 unexpectedly led to the formation of the P2C2B-heterocycle (358).294 

The treatment of bicyclic phosphine (119) (see Section 2.2, Scheme 11) first with triflic acid and secondly with Me4NF resulted in anthracene elimination and the formation of fluoro(1,2,3-tri-tert-butylcyclopropen-3-yl)phosphonite, which interacted with LiTMP to give tri-tert-butyl-phosphatetrahedrane (359).114 

The known analogue of tricyclic phosphine (75) (see Section 2.1, Scheme 5) with SiMe2Ph substituents reacted with an excess of Mo(CO)6 to form the molybdenum complex of a ring-expanded ligand due to the insertion of a CO unit into P–C bond; the demetalation of this complex with DPPE gave the free unsymmetrical tricyclic ligand (360).295 

The template transformation of tetrafluorinated chalcone-phosphine ligands in their complexes with PdCl2via nucleophilic substitution of one fluoro group with carbonyl oxygen and the subsequent oxidation with peroxides in aged THF led to the formation of PO-chelate complexes of bicyclic ligands (361), which were released from the complexes by the treatment with DPPE.296 

The lithiation of borane-protected diphenylphosphinocyclopentadiene (68) (see Section 2.1, Scheme 4) followed by the interaction with the ruthenium complex [(CpCO2Me)Ru(CH3CN)3]+PF6 afforded the borane-protected 1-diphenylphosphino-1′-methylcarboxyruthenocene (362) as the key intermediate in the synthesis of ruthenocene-based phosphine-oxazoline ligand (261) (see Section 2.6.4, Scheme 21).45 

1-[2-(N-(3-diphenylphosphinopropyl))aminoethyl]pyrrolidine (363) was synthesized by a three-step process without the isolation and the purification of all intermediate products; this process included the acylation of the starting 1-(2-aminoethyl)pyrrolidine with acryloyl chloride in the presence of NEt3, the hydrophosphination of the unsaturated amide with Ph2PH in the presence of Et4N+OH and the final reduction of the amide fragment to an amine with LiAlH4.297 

A series of new porous organic ligands (POL) (364) was obtained by the AIBN-catalyzed polymerization of tris(styryl)phosphines with various substituents at the meta- or para-positions of the styryl groups; POLs (364) were used for the preparation of palladium(II) catalysts for the distannylation of terminal alkynes.12  The AIBN-catalyzed copolymerization of tris(4-vinylphenyl)phosphine and sodium 4-vinylbenzenesulfonate led to a new porous organic polymer (POP) as the support for a bifunctional heterogeneous ruthenium catalyst for the N-formylation of amines with CO2.298  The analogous three-component copolymerization of tris(4-vinylphenyl)phosphine, divinylbenzene and styrene or 4-tert-butylstyrene gave monolithic macroporous polymers (365) with a tuned content of phenylene cross-linking units resulting in variable porosity, which were used as the support for the palladium catalysts of Suzuki–Miyara cross-coupling.299,300  Phosphine-functionalized porous ionic polymer (366) as a support of Pd-nanoparticles for water-mediated reduction of nitrobenzene with H2 was synthesized by a solvothermal, free-radical and cross-linked copolymerization method from 4-vinylbenzyl-tris-(4-vinylphenyl)-phosphonium chloride and tris(4-vinylphenyl)phosphine.301  The linear copolymer of phosphine and pyrrolidone (367) was synthesized by AIBN polymerization of vinyl-pyrrolidone and diphenylphosphinostyrene and was further immobilized in the network formed from hydroxyethyl methacrylate, poly(ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate and diphenylphosphinostyrene to form a semi-interpenetrating polymer network hydrogel.302 

A CPAD/AIBN catalyzed RAFT-copolymerization of styrene, di(pentafluorophenyl)(4-vinylphenyl)borane and dimesityl(4-vinylphenyl)phosphine at a feed ratio 0.8 : 0.1 : 0.1 afforded a linear copolymer (368) in which the bulky borane and phosphine units served as Lewis acceptors and donors, so that the treatment of this polymer with CO2 led to intrachain folding due to the formation of zwitterionic –Mes2P+–C(O)–O–B(C6F5)2– linkers; these CO2-folded single-chain nanoparticles could function as recyclable carboxylase mimics.303  The nitroxide-mediated copolymerization of diphenyl(4-vinylphenyl)phosphine, diphenyl(4-vinylphenyl)phosphine oxide and styrene yielded a linear copolymer with phosphine and phosphine oxide donor sites, which underwent a similar intrachain folding with the formation of nanoparticles via a selective complexation of PtCl2 and Eu(β-diketonate)3 centers; these single-chain nanoparticles demonstrated both catalytic and luminescent properties.304 

Nixantphos-functionalized styrene (290) (see Section 2.6.5, Scheme 22) was incorporated as a co-monomer in core-cross-linked micelle synthesis to give a nixantphos@CCM polymer (369) as nanoreactor to the aqueous biphasic hydroformylation of 1-octene.254 

New and known tertiary phosphines all exhibit classical reactivity. They form phosphonium derivatives (salts and zwitter-ions) by the nucleophilic attack of phosphorus at a carbon atom of organic electrophiles (as a rule organyl halides, triflates, sulfonates or related compounds with labile leaving groups and unsaturated compounds activated by electron-withdrawing groups). Several examples of phosphonium salt formation by the reactions of phosphines with less usual electrophiles, namely tris(2,6-dimethoxyphenyl)carbenium salts, has been described.305  Two short reviews summarized the chemistry of phosphine-based FLPs, including the formation of zwitter-ionic phosphonium derivatives, as a novel strategy for the design and application of the main group chemistry and the development of new metal-free catalytic processes.306,307  Tertiary phosphines may be oxidized to form the corresponding chalcogenide derivatives (oxides, sulphides and selenides). The Staudinger reactions of tertiary phosphines with organic azides and related reagents with the formation of iminophosphoranes and similar derivatives with P═N bonds continue to attract attention because these reactions are widely used for biorthogonal ligation in biochemistry.308,309  The most interesting examples of unusual reactivity of tertiary phosphines published in 2020 are a TiCl4-mediated intramolecular cyclization of divinyl-substituted bis(ferrocenyl)phosphine (321) (see Section 2.6.7, Scheme 25) with the formation of eight-membered phosphacycle 4-methyl-1-phenyl-diferroceno-5-Z-ethylene-1-phosphinoxide266  and Pd-catalyzed three-component reactions between triarylphosphines, as the sources of arylene moieties, diarylacetylenes and primary amines with the formation of highly substituted indoles.310 

The use of tertiary phosphines as ligands for metal complex catalysis and as organocatalysts of various organic reactions remains their main field of application. Several reviews summarizing modern advances in the applications of phosphine catalysts (along with other types of basic organocatalysts) in different types of annulation reactions,311–317  addition reactions,313,317  and rearrangements318  have been published in 2020.

Tertiary phosphines were often used as mild reducing agents, in particular as disulfide reducing agents in biological and medical studies (mainly tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP), tris(hydroxymethyl)phosphine (THP) and tris(hydroxypropyl)phosphine (THPP)),319  and deoxygenative reagents in the organic synrhesis.320,321  Several reviews considered the application of phosphines in biorthogonal chemistry.322,323  The Ph3P/NaI system has been used as a decarboxylative reagent in photocatalytic cascade reactions,324  and tris(2,4,6-trimethoxyphenyl)phosphine has been applied as the methoxylating reagent for the conversion of acylfluorides to the corresponding methyl esters under metal-free conditions.325 

1.
Heskia
A.
,
Maris
T.
,
Wuest
J. D
,
Acc. Chem. Res.
,
2020
, vol.
53
pg.
2472
2.
Mondal
D.
,
Balakrishna
M. S.
,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
2020
pg.
2392
3.
Medici
F.
,
Goual
N.
,
Delattre
V.
,
Voituriez
A.
,
Marinetti
A.
,
ChemCatChem
,
2020
, vol.
12
pg.
5573
4.
Cunningham
L.
,
Benson
A.
,
Guiry
P. J.
,
Org. Biomol. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
18
pg.
9329
5.
Arribat
M.
,
Cavelier
F.
,
Rémond
E.
,
RSC Adv.
,
2020
, vol.
10
(pg.
6678
-
6724
)
6.
Lemouzy
S.
,
Giordano
L.
,
Hérault
D.
,
Buono
G.
,
Eur. J. Org. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
2020
pg.
3351
7.
Pan
D.
,
Nie
G.
,
Jiang
S.
,
Li
T.
,
Jin
Z.
,
Org. Chem. Front.
,
2020
, vol.
7
pg.
2349
8.
Rafols
L.
,
Torrente
S.
,
Aguilà
D.
,
Soto-Cerrato
V.
,
Pérez-Tomás
R.
,
Gamez
P.
,
Grabulosa
A.
,
Organometallics
,
2020
, vol.
39
pg.
2959
9.
Eren
N. M.
,
Orr
S. A.
,
Thompson
C. D.
,
Border
E. C.
,
Stevens
M. A.
,
Blair
V. L.
,
Organometallics
,
2020
, vol.
39
pg.
2080
10.
Boelter
S. D.
,
Davies
D. R.
,
Milbrandt
K. A.
,
Wilson
D. R.
,
Wiltzius
M.
,
Rosen
M. S.
,
Klosin
J.
,
Organometallics
,
2020
, vol.
39
pg.
967
11.
Uttley
K. B.
,
Shimmei
K.
,
Bernskoetter
W. H.
,
Organometallics
,
2020
, vol.
39
pg.
1573
12.
Huang
W. Y.
,
Wang
G. Q.
,
Li
W. H.
,
Li
T. T.
,
Ji
G. J.
,
Ren
S. C.
,
Jiang
M.
,
Yan
L.
,
Tang
H. T.
,
Pan
Y. M.
,
Ding
Y. J.
,
Chem
,
2020
, vol.
6
pg.
2300
13.
Yuen
O. Y.
,
So
C. M.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
23438
14.
Avinash
I.
,
Parveen
S.
,
Anantharaman
G.
,
Inorg. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
5646
15.
Xu
M.
,
Chen
L.
,
Yan
Q.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
15104
16.
Qin
C.
,
Xie
X.
,
Wang
G.
,
Jia
X.
,
Liu
Y.
,
Tetrahedron Lett.
,
2020
, vol.
61
pg.
151388
17.
Xue
Q.
,
Huo
S.
,
Wang
T.
,
Wang
Z.
,
Li
J.
,
Zhu
M.
,
Zuo
W.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
8153
18.
Huo
S.
,
Wang
Q.
,
Zuo
W.
,
Dalton Trans.
,
2020
, vol.
49
pg.
7959
19.
Arthurs
R. A.
,
Hughes
D. L.
,
Richards
C. J.
,
J. Org. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
85
pg.
4838
20.
Riu
M. L. Y.
,
Transue
W. J.
,
Knopf
I.
,
Cummins
C. C.
,
Organometallics
,
2020
, vol.
39
pg.
4187
21.
Wen
J.
,
Dong
B.
,
Zhu
J.
,
Zhao
Y.
,
Shi
Z.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
10909
22.
Nakanishi
Y.
,
Ishida
Y.
,
Kawaguchi
H.
,
Dalton Trans.
,
2019
, vol.
49
pg.
27
23.
Lai
Q.
,
Cosio
M. N.
,
Ozerov
O. V.
,
Chem. Commun.
,
2020
, vol.
56
pg.
14845
24.
Klein
M.
,
Rau
N.
,
Wende
M.
,
Sundermeyer
J.
,
Cheng
G.
,
Che
C. M.
,
Schinabeck
A.
,
Yersin
H.
,
Chem. Mater.
,
2020
, vol.
32
pg.
10365
25.
He
T.
,
Peng
L.
,
Li
S.
,
Hu
F.
,
Xie
C.
,
Huang
S.
,
Jia
S.
,
Qin
W.
,
Yan
H.
,
Org. Lett.
,
2020
, vol.
22
pg.
6966
26.
Choy
P. Y.
,
Yuen
O. Y.
,
Leung
M. P.
,
Chow
W. K.
,
Kwong
F. Y.
,
Eur. J. Org. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
2020
pg.
2846
27.
Huang
Y.
,
Choy
P. Y.
,
Wang
J.
,
Tse
M. K.
,
Sun
R. W.-Y.
,
Chan
A. S.-C.
,
Kwong
F. Y.
,
J. Org. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
85
pg.
14664
28.
Levy
J. N.
,
Alegre-Requena
J. V.
,
Liu
R.
,
Paton
R. S.
,
McNally
A.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2020
, vol.
142
pg.
11295
29.
An
L.
,
Tong
F. F.
,
Zhang
S.
,
Zhang
X.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2020
, vol.
142
pg.
11884
30.
Wang
E.
,
Zhang
J.
,
Zhong
Z.
,
Chen
K.
,
Chen
M.
,
Isr. J. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
60
pg.
419
31.
Tan
C.
,
Qasim
M.
,
Pang
W.
,
Chen
C.
,
Polym. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
11
pg.
411
32.
McCann
S. D.
,
Reichert
E. C.
,
Arrechea
P. L.
,
Buchwald
S. L.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2020
, vol.
142
pg.
15027
33.
Ponce-De-León
J.
,
Infante
R.
,
Pérez-Iglesias
M.
,
Espinet
P.
,
Inorg. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
16599
34.
Zhang
Y.
,
Li
B.
,
Liu
S. Y.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
15928
35.
Xu
K.
,
Chen
B. L.
,
Zhang
R.
,
Liu
L.
,
Zhong
X. X.
,
Wang
L.
,
Li
F. Y.
,
Li
G. H.
,
Alamry
K. A.
,
Li
F. B.
,
Wong
W. Y.
,
Qin
H. M.
,
Dalton Trans.
,
2020
, vol.
49
pg.
5859
36.
Castrogiovanni
A.
,
Lotter
D.
,
Bissegger
F. R.
,
Sparr
C.
,
Chem. – Eur. J.
,
2020
, vol.
26
pg.
9864
37.
Lee
Y. H.
,
Nam
E. B.
,
Lee
J.
,
Lee
S. U.
,
Lee
M. H.
,
Dalton Trans.
,
2020
, vol.
49
pg.
13198
38.
Belyaev
A.
,
Slavova
S. O.
,
Solovyev
I. V.
,
Sizov
V. V.
,
Jänis
J.
,
Grachova
E. V.
,
Koshevoy
I. O.
,
Inorg. Chem. Front.
,
2020
, vol.
7
pg.
140
39.
Ito
T.
,
Iwasawa
N.
,
Takaya
J.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
11913
40.
Kamitani
M.
,
Yujiri
K.
,
Yuge
H.
,
Organometallics
,
2020
, vol.
39
pg.
3535
41.
Behzadi
S.
,
Chi
M.
,
Pang
W.
,
Liang
T.
,
Tan
C.
,
New J. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
44
pg.
1076
42.
Chen
J. F.
,
Li
C.
,
Org. Lett.
,
2020
, vol.
22
pg.
4686
43.
Padberg
K.
,
Ascherl
J. D. R.
,
Hampel
F.
,
Kivala
M.
,
Chem. – Eur. J.
,
2020
, vol.
26
pg.
3474
44.
Song
Y.
,
Wang
L.
,
Duan
Z.
,
Mathey
F.
,
Chin. Chem. Lett.
,
2020
, vol.
31
pg.
329
45.
Ye
J.
,
Xu
Y.
,
Li
J.
,
Liu
D.
,
Zhang
W.
,
Res. Chem. Intermed.
,
2020
, vol.
46
pg.
5101
46.
Noor
A.
,
Qayyum
S.
,
Khan
S. A.
,
J. Chem. Crystallogr.
,
2020
, vol.
50
pg.
438
47.
Erken
C.
,
Hindemith
C.
,
Weyhermüller
T.
,
Hölscher
M.
,
Werlé
C.
,
Leitner
W.
,
ACS Omega
,
2020
, vol.
5
pg.
8912
48.
Liu
J.
,
Yang
J.
,
Schneider
C.
,
Franke
R.
,
Jackstell
R.
,
Beller
M.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
9032
49.
Tosolini
M.
,
Avó
J.
,
Parola
A. J.
,
Balducci
G.
,
Tecilla
P.
,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
2020
pg.
3859
50.
Omolo
K. O.
,
Bacsa
J.
,
Sadighi
J. P.
,
Isr. J. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
60
pg.
433
51.
Wise
D. E.
,
Gamble
A. J.
,
Arkawazi
S. W.
,
Walton
P. H.
,
Galan
M. C.
,
O'Hagan
M. P.
,
Hogg
K. G.
,
Marrison
J. L.
,
O'Toole
P. J.
,
Sparkes
H. A.
,
Lynam
J. M.
,
Pringle
P. G.
,
Dalton Trans.
,
2020
, vol.
49
pg.
15219
52.
Yu
C. H.
,
Zhu
C.
,
Ji
X.
,
Hu
W.
,
Xie
H.
,
Bhuvanesh
N.
,
Fang
L.
,
Ozerov
O. V.
,
Inorg. Chem. Front.
,
2020
, vol.
7
pg.
4357
53.
Gunasekar
G. H.
,
Padmanaban
S.
,
Park
K.
,
Jung
K. D.
,
Yoon
S.
,
ChemSusChem
,
2020
, vol.
13
pg.
1735
54.
Gunasekar
G. H.
,
Park
H.
,
Padmanaban
S.
,
Yoon
S.
,
Green Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
22
pg.
4995
55.
Ge
Y.
,
Ye
F.
,
Liu
J.
,
Yang
J.
,
Spannenberg
A.
,
Jiao
H.
,
Jackstell
R.
,
Beller
M.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
21585
56.
Martinez
E. E.
,
Jensen
C. A.
,
Larson
A. J. S.
,
Kenney
K. C.
,
Clark
K. J.
,
Nazari
S. H.
,
Valdivia-Berroeta
G. A.
,
Smith
S. J.
,
Ess
D. H.
,
Michaelis
D. J.
,
Adv. Synth. Catal.
,
2020
, vol.
362
pg.
2876
57.
Lerch
M.
,
Weitzer
M.
,
Stumpf
T. D. J.
,
Laurini
L.
,
Hoffmann
A.
,
Becker
J.
,
Miska
A.
,
Göttlich
R.
,
Herres-Pawlis
S.
,
Schindler
S.
,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
2020
pg.
3143
58.
Kumar
S.
,
Balakrishna
M. S.
,
Polyhedron
,
2020
, vol.
190
pg.
114779
59.
Kumar
S.
,
Mague
J. T.
,
Balakrishna
M. S.
,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
2020
pg.
2718
60.
De Ruiter
G.
,
Garhwal
S.
,
Kaushansky
A.
,
Fridman
N.
,
Shimon
L. J. W.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2020
, vol.
142
pg.
17131
61.
Tretiakov
S.
,
Damen
J. A. M.
,
Lutz
M.
,
Moret
M. E.
,
Dalton Trans.
,
2020
, vol.
49
pg.
13549
62.
Li
K.
,
Ye
J.
,
Wang
Z.
,
Mu
H.
,
Jian
Z.
,
Polym. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
11
pg.
2740
63.
Zhou
G.
,
Mu
H.
,
Jian
Z.
,
J. Catal.
,
2020
, vol.
383
pg.
215
64.
Jing Li
C.
,
Russ. J. Gen. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
90
pg.
725
65.
Yin
X.
,
Chen
B.
,
Qiu
F.
,
Wang
X.
,
Liao
Y.
,
Wang
M.
,
Lei
X.
,
Liao
J
,
ACS Catal.
,
2020
, vol.
10
pg.
1954
66.
Deak
N.
,
Thillaye du Boullay
O.
,
Mallet-Ladeira
S.
,
Moraru
I. T.
,
Madec
D.
,
Nemes
G.
,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
2020
pg.
3729
67.
Zhang
Y.
,
Zhang
Y.
,
Chi
Y.
,
Jian
Z.
,
Dalton Trans.
,
2020
, vol.
49
pg.
2636
68.
Akporji
N.
,
Thakore
R. R.
,
Cortes-Clerget
M.
,
Andersen
J.
,
Landstrom
E.
,
Aue
D. H.
,
Gallou
F.
,
Lipshutz
B. H.
,
Chem. Sci.
,
2020
, vol.
11
pg.
5205
69.
Bootsma
J.
,
Guo
B.
,
De Vries
J. G.
,
Otten
E.
,
Organometallics
,
2020
, vol.
39
pg.
544
70.
Hood
T. M.
,
Gyton
M. R.
,
Chaplin
A. B.
,
Dalton Trans.
,
2020
, vol.
49
pg.
2077
71.
Fanara
P. M.
,
MacMillan
S. N.
,
Lacy
D. C.
,
Organometallics
,
2020
, vol.
39
pg.
3628
72.
Sasakura
K.
,
Okamoto
K.
,
Ohe
K.
,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
2020
pg.
1894
73.
Santiago
T. G.
,
Urbaneja
C.
,
Álvarez
E.
,
Ávila
E.
,
Palma
P.
,
Cámpora
J.
,
Dalton Trans.
,
2020
, vol.
49
pg.
322
74.
Tappen
J.
,
Rodstein
I.
,
McGuire
K.
,
Großjohann
A.
,
Löffler
J.
,
Scherpf
T.
,
Gessner
V. H.
,
Chem. – Eur. J.
,
2020
, vol.
26
pg.
4281
75.
Rodstein
I.
,
Prendes
D. S.
,
Wickert
L.
,
Paaßen
M.
,
Gessner
V. H.
,
J. Org. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
85
pg.
14674
76.
Zhang
Z. Y.
,
Zhang
X.
,
Yuan
J.
,
Yue
C. D.
,
Meng
S.
,
Chen
J.
,
Yu
G. A.
,
Che
C. M.
,
Chem. – Eur. J.
,
2020
, vol.
26
pg.
5037
77.
Liu
R. Y.
,
Dennis
J. M.
,
Buchwald
S. L.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2020
, vol.
142
pg.
4500
78.
Sun
Y.
,
Zhao
Q.
,
Wang
H.
,
Yang
T.
,
Wen
J.
,
Zhang
X.
,
Chem. – Eur. J.
,
2020
, vol.
26
pg.
11470
79.
Boudjelel
M.
,
Declercq
R.
,
Mallet-Ladeira
S.
,
Bouhadir
G.
,
Bourissou
D.
,
Z. fur Anorg. Allg. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
646
pg.
561
80.
Radhakrishna
L.
,
Kunchur
H. S.
,
Namdeo
P. K.
,
Butcher
R. J.
,
Balakrishna
M. S.
,
Dalton Trans.
,
2020
, vol.
49
pg.
3434
81.
Chao
Z.
,
Ma
M.
,
Gu
Z.
,
Org. Lett.
,
2020
, vol.
22
pg.
6441
82.
Ghorai
S.
,
Ur Rehman
S.
,
Bin Xu
W.
,
Huang
W. Y.
,
Li
C.
,
Org. Lett.
,
2020
, vol.
22
pg.
3519
83.
Li
K.
,
Li
C.
,
Org. Lett.
,
2020
, vol.
22
pg.
9456
84.
Talavera
M.
,
Hinze
S.
,
Braun
T.
,
Laubenstein
R.
,
Herrmann
R.
,
Molecules
,
2020
, vol.
25
pg.
3977
85.
Holz
J.
,
Wenzel
G.
,
Spannenberg
A.
,
Gandelman
M.
,
Börner
A.
,
Tetrahedron
,
2020
, vol.
76
pg.
131142
86.
Popp
J.
,
Caminade
A. M.
,
Hey-Hawkins
E.
,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
2020
pg.
1654
87.
Brand
A.
,
Hentschel
A.
,
Hepp
A.
,
Uhl
W.
,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
2020
pg.
361
88.
Korb
M.
,
Schaarschmidt
D.
,
Grumbt
M.
,
König
M.
,
Lang
H.
,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
2020
pg.
2968
89.
Mokrai
R.
,
Holczbauer
T.
,
Fekete
C.
,
Volk
B.
,
Dorcet
V.
,
Bouit
P. A.
,
Nyulászi
L.
,
Hissler
M.
,
Kovács
I.
,
Benkő
Z.
,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
2020
pg.
1794
90.
Johannsen
T.
,
Golz
C.
,
Alcarazo
M.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
22779
91.
Reichel
M.
,
Unger
C.
,
Dubovnik
S.
,
Roidl
A.
,
Kornath
A.
,
Karaghiosoff
K.
,
New J. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
44
pg.
14306
92.
Tay
D. W. P.
,
Nobbs
J. D.
,
Romain
C.
,
White
A. J. P.
,
Aitipamula
S.
,
Van Meurs
M.
,
Britovsek
G. J. P.
,
ACS Catal.
,
2020
, vol.
10
pg.
663
93.
Wang
J.
,
Alam
F.
,
Chang
Q.
,
Chen
Y.
,
Jiang
T.
,
Appl. Organomet. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
34
pg.
e5722
94.
Zubar
V.
,
Sklyaruk
J.
,
Brzozowska
A.
,
Rueping
M.
,
Org. Lett.
,
2020
, vol.
22
pg.
5423
95.
Mori
M.
,
Suzuki
T.
,
Inorg. Chim. Acta
,
2020
, vol.
512
pg.
119862
96.
Artem'ev
A. V.
,
Davydova
M. P.
,
Berezin
A. S.
,
Samsonenko
D. G.
,
Inorganics
,
2020
, vol.
8
pg.
46
97.
Zhang
Y.
,
Jian
Z.
,
Polymer
,
2020
, vol.
194
pg.
122410
98.
Kang
Q. K.
,
Lin
Y.
,
Li
Y.
,
Shi
H.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2020
, vol.
142
pg.
3706
99.
Pfeil
M.
,
Engesser
T. A.
,
Koch
A.
,
Junge
J.
,
Krahmer
J.
,
Näther
C.
,
Tuczek
F.
,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
2020
pg.
1437
100.
Cicač-Hudi
M.
,
Feil
C. M.
,
Birchall
N.
,
Nieger
M.
,
Gudat
D.
,
Dalton Trans.
,
2020
, vol.
49
pg.
17401
101.
Major
M. M.
,
Császár
Z.
,
Bényei
A. C.
,
Balogh
S.
,
Bakos
J.
,
Farkas
G.
,
J. Organomet. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
921
pg.
121332
102.
Lin
T. Y.
,
Pan
Z.
,
Tu
Y.
,
Zhu
S.
,
Wu
H. H.
,
Liu
Y.
,
Li
Z.
,
Zhang
J.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
22957
103.
Tao
M.
,
Tu
Y.
,
Liu
Y.
,
Wu
H.
,
Liu
L.
,
Zhang
J.
,
Chem. Sci.
,
2020
, vol.
11
pg.
6283
104.
Iwamoto
T.
,
Mizuhata
Y.
,
Tokitoh
N.
,
Nakamura
M.
,
Organometallics
,
2020
, vol.
39
pg.
1672
105.
Du
P.
,
Lu
X. B.
,
Eur. J. Org. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
2020
pg.
5003
106.
Leforestier
B.
,
Gyton
M. R.
,
Chaplin
A. B.
,
Dalton Trans.
,
2020
, vol.
49
pg.
2087
107.
Gaston
J. J.
,
McCosker
P. M.
,
Yu
H.
,
Keller
P. A.
,
J. Phys. Org. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
33
pg.
e4110
108.
Olaru
M.
,
Kögel
J. F.
,
Aoki
R.
,
Sakamoto
R.
,
Nishihara
H.
,
Lork
E.
,
Mebs
S.
,
Vogt
M.
,
Beckmann
J.
,
Chem. – Eur. J.
,
2020
, vol.
26
pg.
275
109.
Olaru
M.
,
Rychagova
E.
,
Ketkov
S.
,
Shynkarenko
Y.
,
Yakunin
S.
,
Kovalenko
M. V.
,
Yablonskiy
A.
,
Andreev
B.
,
Kleemiss
F.
,
Beckmann
J.
,
Vogt
M.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2020
, vol.
142
pg.
373
110.
Ye
J.
,
Zhang
J. Q.
,
Saga
Y.
,
Onozawa
S. Y.
,
Kobayashi
S.
,
Sato
K.
,
Fukaya
N.
,
Han
L. B.
,
Organometallics
,
2020
, vol.
39
pg.
2682
111.
Facchetti
G.
,
Christodoulou
M. S.
,
Binda
E.
,
Fusè
M.
,
Rimoldi
I.
,
Catalysts
,
2020
, vol.
10
pg.
914
112.
Yang
W.
,
Wang
W.
,
Cao
M.
,
Gao
N.
,
Liu
C.
,
Zhang
J.
,
Peng
Z.
,
Du
C.
,
Zhang
B.
,
Dyes Pigm.
,
2020
, vol.
180
pg.
108487
113.
Kerr
W. J.
,
Knox
G. J.
,
Reid
M.
,
Tuttle
T.
,
Bergare
J.
,
Bragg
R. A.
,
ACS Catal.
,
2020
, vol.
10
pg.
11120
114.
Riu
M. L. Y.
,
Jones
R. L.
,
Transue
W. J.
,
Müller
P.
,
Cummins
C. C.
,
Sci. Adv.
,
2020
, vol.
6
pg.
eaaz3168
115.
Zovko
C.
,
Bestgen
S.
,
Schoo
C.
,
Görner
A.
,
Goicoechea
J. M.
,
Roesky
P. W.
,
Chem. – Eur. J.
,
2020
, vol.
26
pg.
13191
116.
Leung
A.
,
Kang
J.
,
Cai
Y.
,
Chang
W.
,
Liu
K.
,
Xia
H.
,
Wang
X.
,
Organometallics
,
2020
, vol.
39
pg.
2991
117.
Hirakawa
F.
,
Nakagawa
H.
,
Honda
S.
,
Ishida
S.
,
Iwamoto
T.
,
J. Org. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
85
pg.
14634
118.
Mousa
A. H.
,
Polukeev
A. V.
,
Hansson
J.
,
Wendt
O. F.
,
Organometallics
,
2020
, vol.
39
pg.
1553
119.
Mousa
A. H.
,
Chakrabarti
K.
,
Isapour
G.
,
Bendix
J.
,
Wendt
O. F.
,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
2020
pg.
4270
120.
Gallardo-Villagrán
M.
,
Rivada-Wheelaghan
O.
,
Rahaman
S. M. W.
,
Fayzullin
R. R.
,
Khusnutdinova
J. R.
,
Dalton Trans.
,
2020
, vol.
49
pg.
12756
121.
Rogovoy
M. I.
,
Davydova
M. P.
,
Bagryanskaya
I. Y.
,
Artem'ev
A. V.
,
Mendeleev Commun.
,
2020
, vol.
30
pg.
305
122.
Zhang
J. Q.
,
Ye
J.
,
Huang
T.
,
Shinohara
H.
,
Fujino
H.
,
Han
L. B.
,
Commun. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
3
pg.
1
123.
Murphy
M. C.
,
Trofimova
A.
,
Lafortune
J. H. W.
,
Vogels
C. M.
,
Geier
S. J.
,
Binder
J. F.
,
Macdonald
C. L. B.
,
Stephan
D. W.
,
Westcott
S. A.
,
Dalton Trans.
,
2020
, vol.
49
pg.
5092
124.
Nolla-Saltiel
R.
,
Geer
A. M.
,
Taylor
L. J.
,
Churchill
O.
,
Davies
E. S.
,
Lewis
W.
,
Blake
A. J.
,
Kays
D. L.
,
Adv. Synth. Catal.
,
2020
, vol.
362
pg.
3148
125.
Cibuzar
M. P.
,
Dannenberg
S. G.
,
Waterman
R.
,
Isr. J. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
60
pg.
446
126.
Dannenberg
S. G.
,
Waterman
R.
,
Chem. Commun.
,
2020
, vol.
56
pg.
14219
127.
Khristolyubov
D. O.
,
Lyubov
D. M.
,
Shavyrin
A. S.
,
Cherkasov
A. V.
,
Fukin
G. K.
,
Trifonov
A. A.
,
Inorg. Chem. Front.
,
2020
, vol.
7
pg.
2459
128.
Lapshin
I. V.
,
Cherkasov
A. V.
,
Asachenko
A. F.
,
Trifonov
A. A.
,
Chem. Commun.
,
2020
, vol.
56
pg.
12913
129.
Barrett
A. N.
,
Sanderson
H. J.
,
Mahon
M. F.
,
Webster
R. L.
,
Chem. Commun.
,
2020
, vol.
56
pg.
13623
130.
Hajirahimkhan
S.
,
Chapple
D. E.
,
Gholami
G.
,
Blacquiere
J. M.
,
Xu
C.
,
Ragogna
P. J.
,
Chem. Commun.
,
2020
, vol.
56
pg.
10357
131.
Wilders
A. M.
,
Henle
J.
,
Haibach
M. C.
,
Swiatowiec
R.
,
Bien
J.
,
Henry
R. F.
,
Asare
S. O.
,
Wall
A. L.
,
Shekhar
S.
,
ACS Catal.
,
2020
, vol.
10
pg.
15008
132.
Kulish
K.
,
Boldrini
C.
,
Castiñeira Reis
M.
,
Pérez
J. M.
,
Harutyunyan
S. R.
,
Chem. – Eur. J.
,
2020
, vol.
26
pg.
15843
133.
Hou
F.
,
Du
X. P.
,
Alduma
A. I.
,
Li
Z. F.
,
De Huo
C.
,
Wang
X. C.
,
Wu
X. F.
,
Quan
Z. J.
,
Adv. Synth. Catal.
,
2020
, vol.
362
pg.
4755
134.
Sadeer
A.
,
Kojima
T.
,
Ng
J. S.
,
Gan
K.
,
Chew
R. J.
,
Li
Y.
,
Pullarkat
S. A.
,
Tetrahedron
,
2020
, vol.
76
pg.
131259
135.
Itazaki
M.
,
Matsutani
T.
,
Nochida
T.
,
Moriuchi
T.
,
Nakazawa
H.
,
Chem. Commun.
,
2020
, vol.
56
pg.
443
136.
McTernan
C. T.
,
De Bo
G.
,
Leigh
D. A.
,
Chem
,
2020
, vol.
6
pg.
2964
137.
Yan
W.
,
Li
S.
,
Yang
T.
,
Xia
Y.
,
Zhang
X.
,
Wang
C.
,
Yan
Z.
,
Deng
F.
,
Zhou
Q.
,
Deng
H.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2020
, vol.
142
pg.
16182
138.
Ji
W.
,
Wu
H. H.
,
Zhang
J.
,
ACS Catal.
,
2020
, vol.
10
pg.
1548
139.
Zhang
J.
,
Simon
M.
,
Golz
C.
,
Alcarazo
M.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
5647
140.
Xu
K.
,
Wang
Z.
,
Zhu
T.
,
Synlett
,
2020
, vol.
31
pg.
925
141.
Liu
Z. S.
,
Hua
Y.
,
Gao
Q.
,
Ma
Y.
,
Tang
H.
,
Shang
Y.
,
Cheng
H. G.
,
Zhou
Q.
,
Nat. Catal.
,
2020
, vol.
3
pg.
727
142.
Long
P. W.
,
Le Xie
J.
,
Yang
J. J.
,
Lu
S. Q.
,
Xu
Z.
,
Ye
F.
,
Xu
L. W.
,
Chem. Commun.
,
2020
, vol.
56
pg.
4188
143.
Zhang
Z.
,
Smal
V.
,
Retailleau
P.
,
Voituriez
A.
,
Frison
G.
,
Marinetti
A.
,
Guinchard
X.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2020
, vol.
142
pg.
3797
144.
Xi
Y.
,
Su
B.
,
Qi
X.
,
Pedram
S.
,
Liu
P.
,
Hartwig
J. F.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2020
, vol.
142
pg.
18213
145.
Xi
Y.
,
Ma
S.
,
Hartwig
J. F.
,
Nature
,
2020
, vol.
588
pg.
254
146.
Hu
H.
,
Ichiryu
H.
,
Seki
N.
,
Nakajima
K.
,
Ohki
Y.
,
Ogasawara
M.
,
Organometallics
,
2020
, vol.
39
pg.
788
147.
Zhang
F. H.
,
Zhang
F. J.
,
Li
M. L.
,
Xie
J. H.
,
Zhou
Q. L.
,
Nat. Catal.
,
2020
, vol.
3
pg.
621
148.
Chen
C.
,
Sun
W.
,
Yan
Y.
,
Yang
F.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Zhu
Y. P.
,
Liu
L.
,
Zhu
B.
,
Adv. Synth. Catal.
,
2020
, vol.
362
pg.
2970
149.
Pietrusiewicz
K. M.
,
Koprowski
M.
,
Drzazga
Z.
,
Parcheta
R.
,
Łastawiecka
E.
,
Demchuk
O. M.
,
Justyniak
I.
,
Symmetry
,
2020
, vol.
12
pg.
346
150.
Dziuba
K.
,
Lubańska
M.
,
Pietrusiewicz
K. M.
,
Synth.
,
2020
, vol.
52
pg.
909
151.
Zhu
R. Y.
,
Chen
L.
,
Hu
X. S.
,
Zhou
F.
,
Zhou
J.
,
Chem. Sci.
,
2020
, vol.
11
pg.
97
152.
Liu
Z.
,
Li
T.
,
Zhao
J.
,
Tang
W.
,
Tetrahedron
,
2020
, vol.
76
pg.
131216
153.
Saito
H.
,
Matsumoto
Y.
,
Hashimoto
Y.
,
Fujii
S.
,
Bioorg. Med. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
28
pg.
115310
154.
Wang
S. J.
,
Wang
Z.
,
Tang
Y.
,
Chen
J.
,
Zhou
L.
,
Org. Lett.
,
2020
, vol.
22
pg.
8894
155.
He
J.
,
Feng
Y.
,
Yang
F.
,
Dai
B.
,
Liu
P.
,
Eur. J. Org. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
2020
pg.
5857
156.
Wang
J.
,
Deng
Y. J.
,
Yan
X. X.
,
Liu
Y. J.
,
Ge
C. P.
,
Yan
Y.
,
Chao
S.
,
Zhou
P. X.
,
Org. Chem. Front.
,
2020
, vol.
7
pg.
715
157.
Han
J.
,
Kim
J.
,
Lee
J.
,
Kim
Y.
,
Lee
S. Y.
,
J. Org. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
85
pg.
15476
158.
Hou
L.
,
Kikuchi
J.
,
Ye
H.
,
Bao
M.
,
Terada
M.
,
J. Org. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
85
pg.
14802
159.
Krug
M.
,
Wagner
M.
,
Schaub
T. A.
,
Zhang
W. S.
,
Schüßlbauer
C. M.
,
Ascherl
J. D. R.
,
Münich
P. W.
,
Schröder
R. R.
,
Gröhn
F.
,
Dral
P. O.
,
Barbatti
M.
,
Guldi
D. M.
,
Kivala
M.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
16233
160.
Yue
W. J.
,
Xiao
J. Z.
,
Zhang
S.
,
Yin
L.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
7057
161.
Kondoh
A.
,
Ishikawa
S.
,
Terada
M.
,
Org. Biomol. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
18
pg.
7814
162.
Buchcic
A.
,
Zawisza
A.
,
Leśniak
S.
,
Rachwalski
M.
,
Catalysts
,
2020
, vol.
10
pg.
971
163.
Shen
R.
,
Wang
X.
,
Zhang
S.
,
Dong
C.
,
Zhu
D.
,
Han
L. B.
,
Adv. Synth. Catal.
,
2020
, vol.
362
pg.
942
164.
Szabó-Szentjóbi
H.
,
Majoros
I.
,
Márton
A.
,
Leveles
I.
,
Vértessy
B. G.
,
Dékány
M.
,
Tóth
T.
,
Huszthy
P.
,
Synth.
,
2020
, vol.
52
pg.
2870
165.
Buonomo
J. A.
,
Cole
M. S.
,
Eiden
C. G.
,
Aldrich
C. C.
,
Synth.
,
2020
, vol.
52
pg.
3583
166.
Kirk
A. M.
,
O'Brien
C. J.
,
Krenske
E. H.
,
Chem. Commun.
,
2020
, vol.
56
pg.
1227
167.
Dai
Q.
,
Liu
L.
,
Qian
Y.
,
Li
W.
,
Zhang
J.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
20645
168.
Bin Huang
W.
,
Ren
F. Y.
,
Wang
M. W.
,
Qiu
L. Q.
,
Chen
K. H.
,
He
L. N.
,
J. Org. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
85
pg.
14109
169.
Yamamoto
Y.
,
Kawaguchi
S. I.
,
Nishimura
M.
,
Sato
Y.
,
Shimada
Y.
,
Tabuchi
A.
,
Nomoto
A.
,
Ogawa
A.
,
J. Org. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
85
pg.
14684
170.
Itoh
H.
,
Miura
K.
,
Kamiya
K.
,
Yamashita
T.
,
Inoue
M.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
4564
171.
Pedroarena
J. R.
,
Nell
B. P.
,
Zakharov
L. N.
,
Tyler
D. R.
,
J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater.
,
2020
, vol.
30
pg.
196
172.
Manabe
S.
,
Wong
C. M.
,
Sevov
C. S.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2020
, vol.
142
pg.
3024
173.
Chakraborty
B.
,
Menezes
P. W.
,
Driess
M.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2020
, vol.
142
pg.
14772
174.
Wang
H.
,
Zhang
Y.
,
Yang
T.
,
Guo
X.
,
Gong
Q.
,
Wen
J.
,
Zhang
X.
,
Org. Lett.
,
2020
, vol.
22
pg.
8796
175.
Kato
Y.
,
Otomura
N.
,
Hirano
K.
,
Miura
M.
,
J. Org. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
85
pg.
5981
176.
Boursalian
G. B.
,
Nijboer
E. R.
,
Dorel
R.
,
Pfeifer
L.
,
Markovitch
O.
,
Blokhuis
A.
,
Feringa
B. L.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2020
, vol.
142
pg.
16868
177.
Ascherl
J. D. R.
,
Neiß
C.
,
Vogel
A.
,
Graf
J.
,
Rominger
F.
,
Oeser
T.
,
Hampel
F.
,
Görling
A.
,
Kivala
M.
,
Chem. – Eur. J.
,
2020
, vol.
26
pg.
13157
178.
Bayardon
J.
,
Rousselle
B.
,
Rousselin
Y.
,
Bonnin
Q.
,
Malacea-Kabbara
R.
,
European J. Org. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
2020
pg.
4723
179.
Wang
C.
,
Yue
C. D.
,
Yuan
J.
,
Zheng
J. L.
,
Zhang
Y.
,
Yu
H.
,
Chen
J.
,
Meng
S.
,
Yu
Y.
,
Yu
G. A.
,
Che
C. M.
,
Chem. Commun.
,
2020
, vol.
56
pg.
11775
180.
Zhang
M.
,
Ma
Z.
,
Du
H.
,
Wang
Z.
,
Tetrahedron Lett.
,
2020
, vol.
61
pg.
152125
181.
Terashima
N.
,
Sakata
Y.
,
Meguro
T.
,
Hosoya
T.
,
Yoshida
S.
,
Chem. Commun.
,
2020
, vol.
56
pg.
14003
182.
Bazhin
A. A.
,
Sinisi
R.
,
De Marchi
U.
,
Hermant
A.
,
Sambiagio
N.
,
Maric
T.
,
Budin
G.
,
Goun
E. A.
,
Nat. Chem. Biol.
,
2020
, vol.
16
pg.
1385
183.
Sanz
C. A.
,
Stein
C. A. M.
,
Fryzuk
M. D.
,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
2020
pg.
1465
184.
Hwang
S. J.
,
Tanushi
A.
,
Radosevich
A. T.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2020
, vol.
142
pg.
21285
185.
Guo
W.
,
Liu
Q.
,
Jiang
J.
,
Wang
J.
,
Org. Lett.
,
2020
, vol.
22
pg.
3110
186.
Abelha
T. F.
,
Morris
G.
,
Lima
S. M.
,
Andrade
L. H. C.
,
McLean
A. J.
,
Alexander
C.
,
Calvo-Castro
J.
,
McHugh
C. J.
,
Chem. – Eur. J.
,
2020
, vol.
26
pg.
3173
187.
Beránek
T.
,
Žádný
J.
,
Strašák
T.
,
Karban
J.
,
Císařová
I.
,
Sýkora
J.
,
Storch
J.
,
ACS Omega
,
2020
, vol.
5
pg.
882
188.
Wang
H.
,
Luo
H.
,
Zhang
Z. M.
,
Zheng
W. F.
,
Yin
Y.
,
Qian
H.
,
Zhang
J.
,
Zhang
J.
,
Ma
S.
,
Ma
S.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2020
, vol.
142
pg.
9763
189.
Pandey
M. K.
,
Kunchur
H. S.
,
Mondal
D.
,
Radhakrishna
L.
,
Kote
B. S.
,
Balakrishna
M. S.
,
Inorg. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
3642
190.
Green
J. P.
,
Salazar
D. M.
,
Gupta
A. K.
,
Orthaber
A.
,
J. Org. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
85
pg.
14619
191.
Sinai
Á.
,
Simkó
D. C.
,
Szabó
F.
,
Paczal
A.
,
Gáti
T.
,
Bényei
A.
,
Novák
Z.
,
Kotschy
A.
,
Eur. J. Org. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
2020
pg.
1122
192.
Barber
T.
,
Argent
S. P.
,
Ball
L. T.
,
ACS Catal.
,
2020
, vol.
10
pg.
5454
193.
Costil
R.
,
Crespi
S.
,
Pfeifer
L.
,
Feringa
B. L.
,
Chem. – Eur. J.
,
2020
, vol.
26
pg.
7783
194.
Chen
X. Y.
,
Zhou
X.
,
Wang
J.
,
Dong
G.
,
ACS Catal.
,
2020
, vol.
10
pg.
14349
195.
MacKenzie
H. K.
,
Rawe
B. W.
,
Samedov
K.
,
Walsgrove
H. T. G.
,
Uva
A.
,
Han
Z.
,
Gates
D. P.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2020
, vol.
142
pg.
10319
196.
Giereth
R.
,
Mengele
A. K.
,
Frey
W.
,
Kloß
M.
,
Steffen
A.
,
Karnahl
M.
,
Tschierlei
S.
,
Chem. – Eur. J.
,
2020
, vol.
26
pg.
2675
197.
Liu
H.
,
Cai
C.
,
Ding
Y.
,
Chen
J.
,
Liu
B.
,
Xia
Y.
,
ACS Omega
,
2020
, vol.
5
pg.
11655
198.
Li
Z.
,
Wang
K. F.
,
Zhao
X.
,
Ti
H.
,
Liu
X. G.
,
Wang
H.
,
Nat. Commun.
,
2020
, vol.
11
pg.
5036
199.
Arockiam
P. B.
,
Lennert
U.
,
Graf
C.
,
Rothfelder
R.
,
Scott
D. J.
,
Fischer
T. G.
,
Zeitler
K.
,
Wolf
R.
,
Chem. – Eur. J.
,
2020
, vol.
26
pg.
16374
200.
Luo
H.
,
Wang
D.
,
Wang
M.
,
Shi
Z.
,
Synlett
,
2021
, vol.
32
pg.
64
201.
Li
J. W.
,
Wang
L. N.
,
Li
M.
,
Tang
P. T.
,
Zhang
N. J.
,
Li
T.
,
Luo
X. P.
,
Kurmoo
M.
,
Liu
Y. J.
,
Zeng
M. H.
,
Org. Lett.
,
2020
, vol.
22
pg.
1331
202.
Morris
K. C.
,
Wright
S. E.
,
Meyer
G. F.
,
Clark
T. B.
,
J. Org. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
85
pg.
14795
203.
Córdoba
J. C.
,
Vidal-Ferran
A.
,
Font-Bardia
M.
,
Grabulosa
A.
,
Organometallics
,
2020
, vol.
39
pg.
2511
204.
Mu
H. L.
,
Ye
J. H.
,
Zhou
G. L.
,
Li
K. K.
,
Jian
Z. B.
,
Chin. J. Polym. Sci.
,
2020
, vol.
38
pg.
579
205.
Lange
H.
,
Schröder
H.
,
Oberem
E.
,
Villinger
A.
,
Rabeah
J.
,
Ludwig
R.
,
Neymeyr
K.
,
Seidel
W. W.
,
Chem. – Eur. J.
,
2020
, vol.
26
pg.
11492
206.
Yanbe
T.
,
Mizuguchi
K.
,
Yamakado
R.
,
Okada
S.
,
Chem. Commun.
,
2020
, vol.
56
pg.
10654
207.
Yang
Y.
,
Yang
Y.
,
Wang
T.
,
Tian
Y.
,
Jing
X.
,
Zhu
G.
,
Microporous Mesoporous Mater.
,
2020
, vol.
306
pg.
110393
208.
Pacholak
P.
,
Gontarczyk
K.
,
Kamiński
R.
,
Durka
K.
,
Luliński
S.
,
Chem. – Eur. J.
,
2020
pg.
12758
209.
Chen
J. F.
,
Li
C.
,
ACS Catal.
,
2020
, vol.
10
pg.
3881
210.
Foley
B. J.
,
Bhuvanesh
N.
,
Zhou
J.
,
Ozerov
O. V.
,
ACS Catal.
,
2020
, vol.
10
pg.
9824
211.
Brunner
F. M.
,
Neville
M. L.
,
Kubiak
C. P.
,
Inorg. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
16872
212.
Nejman
P. S.
,
Curzon
T. E.
,
Bühl
M.
,
McKay
D.
,
Woollins
J. D.
,
Ashbrook
S. E.
,
Cordes
D. B.
,
Slawin
A. M. Z.
,
Kilian
P.
,
Inorg. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
5616
213.
Kameo
H.
,
Yamamoto
H.
,
Ikeda
K.
,
Isasa
T.
,
Sakaki
S.
,
Matsuzaka
H.
,
García-Rodeja
Y.
,
Miqueu
K.
,
Bourissou
D.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2020
, vol.
142
pg.
14039
214.
Holsten
S.
,
Hupf
E.
,
Lork
E.
,
Mebs
S.
,
Beckmann
J.
,
Dalton Trans.
,
2020
, vol.
49
pg.
1731
215.
Sasaki
S.
,
Kato
K.
,
Sasaki
K.
,
Yoshifuji
M.
,
Tetrahedron Lett.
,
2020
, vol.
61
pg.
151366
216.
Zeng
L.
,
Yang
H.
,
Zhao
M.
,
Wen
J.
,
Tucker
J. H. R.
,
Zhang
X.
,
ACS Catal.
,
2020
, vol.
10
pg.
13794
217.
Kim
J. T.
,
Lee
J.
,
Jang
S.
,
Yu
Z.
,
Park
J. H.
,
Jung
E. D.
,
Lee
S.
,
Song
M. H.
,
Whang
D. R.
,
Wu
S.
,
Park
S. H.
,
Chang
D. W.
,
Lee
B. R.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2020
, vol.
8
pg.
13501
218.
Satpathi
H.
,
Pospiech
D.
,
Banerjee
S.
,
Voit
B.
,
Eur. Polym. J.
,
2020
, vol.
140
pg.
110045
219.
Trampert
J.
,
Sun
Y.
,
Thiel
W. R.
,
J. Organomet. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
915
pg.
121222
220.
Quan
X.
,
Kerdphon
S.
,
Peters
B. B. C.
,
Rujirawanich
J.
,
Krajangsri
S.
,
Jongcharoenkamol
J.
,
Andersson
P. G.
,
Chem. – Eur. J.
,
2020
, vol.
26
pg.
13311
221.
Groß
C.
,
Sun
Y.
,
Jost
T.
,
Grimm
T.
,
Klein
M. P.
,
Niedner-Schatteburg
G.
,
Becker
S.
,
Thiel
W. R.
,
Chem. Commun.
,
2020
, vol.
56
pg.
368
222.
Yilmaz
M. K.
,
Ince
S.
,
Keles
M.
,
Güzel
B.
,
J. CO2 Util.
,
2020
, vol.
42
pg.
101309
223.
Wu
Q.
,
Wang
W.
,
Xu
G.
,
Pang
W.
,
Li
Y.
,
Tan
C.
,
Wang
F.
,
Appl. Organomet. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
34
pg.
e5428
224.
Liu
W.
,
Yang
W.
,
Zhu
J.
,
Guo
Y.
,
Wang
N.
,
Ke
J.
,
Yu
P.
,
He
C.
,
ACS Catal.
,
2020
, vol.
10
pg.
7207
225.
Nie
X.
,
Zheng
Y.
,
Ji
L.
,
Fu
H.
,
Chen
H.
,
Li
R.
,
J. Catal.
,
2020
, vol.
391
pg.
378
226.
Tao
R.
,
Shen
X.
,
Hu
Y.
,
Kang
K.
,
Zheng
Y.
,
Luo
S.
,
Yang
S.
,
Li
W.
,
Lu
S.
,
Jin
Y.
,
Qiu
L.
,
Zhang
W.
,
Small
,
2020
, vol.
16
pg.
1906005
227.
Liu
Y.
,
Dikhtiarenko
A.
,
Xu
N.
,
Sun
J.
,
Tang
J.
,
Wang
K.
,
Xu
B.
,
Tong
Q.
,
Heeres
H. J.
,
He
S.
,
Gascon
J.
,
Fan
Y.
,
Chem. – Eur. J.
,
2020
, vol.
26
pg.
12134
228.
Wang
Z.
,
Reddy
C. B.
,
Zhou
X.
,
Ibrahim
J. J.
,
Yang
Y.
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
,
2020
, vol.
12
pg.
53141
229.
Gradiski
M. V.
,
Kharat
A. N.
,
Ong
M. S. E.
,
Lough
A. J.
,
Smith
S. A. M.
,
Morris
R. H.
,
Inorg. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
11041
230.
Škoch
K.
,
Vosáhlo
P.
,
Císařová
I.
,
Štěpnička
P.
,
Dalton Trans.
,
2020
, vol.
49
pg.
1011
231.
Pálvölgyi
Á. M.
,
Schnürch
M.
,
Bica-Schröder
K.
,
Tetrahedron
,
2020
, vol.
76
pg.
131246
232.
Philipova
I.
,
Stavrakov
G.
,
Dimitrov
V.
,
Vassilev
N.
,
J. Mol. Struct.
,
2020
, vol.
1219
pg.
128568
233.
He
P. Y.
,
Chen
H.
,
Hu
H. G.
,
Hu
J. J.
,
Lim
Y. J.
,
Li
Y. M.
,
Chem. Commun.
,
2020
, vol.
56
pg.
12632
234.
Clements
J. L.
,
Pohl
F.
,
Muthupandi
P.
,
Rogers
S. C.
,
Mao
J.
,
Doctor
A.
,
Birman
V. B.
,
Held
J. M.
,
Redox Biol.
,
2020
, vol.
37
pg.
101707
235.
Liu
Z.
,
Sun
Q.
,
Spectrochim. Acta – Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc.
,
2020
, vol.
241
pg.
118680
236.
Li
Z.
,
Li
J.
,
Zhang
D.
,
Zhu
X.
,
Ye
Y.
,
Zhao
Y.
,
Sens. Actuat., B Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
312
pg.
127944
237.
Palanisamy
S.
,
Chen
L. F.
,
Tzou
S. C.
,
Wang
Y. M.
,
Sens. Actuat., B Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
310
pg.
127839
238.
Biancalana
L.
,
Gruchała
M.
,
Batchelor
L. K.
,
Błauż
A.
,
Monti
A.
,
Pampaloni
G.
,
Rychlik
B.
,
Dyson
P. J.
,
Marchetti
F.
,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
2020
pg.
1061
239.
Gurrentz
J. M.
,
Rose
M. J.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2020
, vol.
142
pg.
5657
240.
Zhang
H.
,
Jiang
C.
,
Tan
J. P.
,
Hu
H. L.
,
Chen
Y.
,
Ren
X.
,
Zhang
H. S.
,
Wang
T.
,
ACS Catal.
,
2020
, vol.
10
pg.
5698
241.
Wang
H.
,
Li
X.
,
Tu
Y.
,
Zhang
J.
,
iScience
,
2020
, vol.
23
pg.
101138
242.
Cui
H.
,
Li
K.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Song
M.
,
Wang
C.
,
Wei
D.
,
Li
E. Q.
,
Duan
Z.
,
Mathey
F.
,
Org. Biomol. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
18
pg.
3740
243.
Li
M.
,
Zhou
W.
,
Chem. Commun.
,
2020
, vol.
56
pg.
8842
244.
Du
M.
,
Yu
L.
,
Du
T.
,
Li
Z.
,
Luo
Y.
,
Meng
X.
,
Tian
Z.
,
Zheng
C.
,
Cao
W.
,
Zhao
G.
,
Chem. Commun.
,
2020
, vol.
56
pg.
1581
245.
Feng
J.
,
Huang
Y.
,
ACS Catal.
,
2020
, vol.
10
pg.
3541
246.
Ma
C.
,
Sheng
F. T.
,
Wang
H. Q.
,
Deng
S.
,
Zhang
Y. C.
,
Jiao
Y.
,
Tan
W.
,
Shi
F.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2020
, vol.
142
pg.
15686
247.
Bárta
O.
,
Gyepes
R.
,
Císařová
I.
,
Alemayehu
A.
,
Štěpnička
P.
,
Dalton Trans.
,
2020
, vol.
49
pg.
4225
248.
Kim
Y.
,
Lee
J.
,
Son
Y. H.
,
Choi
S. U.
,
Alam
M.
,
Park
S.
,
J. Inorg. Biochem.
,
2020
, vol.
205
pg.
111015
249.
Anzaldo
B.
,
Villamizar
C. P.
,
Sharma
P.
,
Gutiérrez
R.
,
Toscano
A. R.
,
Gaviño
R.
,
J. Organomet. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
929
pg.
121577
250.
Ling
F.
,
Chen
J.
,
Nian
S.
,
Hou
H.
,
Yi
X.
,
Wu
F.
,
Xu
M.
,
Zhong
W.
,
Synlett
,
2020
, vol.
31
pg.
285
251.
Eliseenko
S. S.
,
Bhadbhade
M.
,
Liu
F.
,
Chirality
,
2020
, vol.
32
pg.
1311
252.
Li
H.
,
Li
B.
,
Zeng
J.
,
Jiang
C.
,
He
Z.
,
Adv. Synth. Catal.
,
2020
, vol.
362
pg.
2760
253.
Zhou
L.
,
Xu
B.
,
Ji
D.
,
Zhang
Z. M.
,
Zhang
J.
,
Chin. J. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
38
pg.
577
254.
A.
Joumaa
,
F.
Gayet
,
E. J.
Garcia-Suarez
,
J.
Himmelstrup
,
A.
Riisager
,
R.
Poli
and
E.
Manoury
,
Polymers
,
2020
,
12
, 1107
255.
Fokwa
H. D.
,
Vidlak
J. F.
,
Weinberg
S. C.
,
Duplessis
I. D.
,
Schley
N. D.
,
Johnson
M. W.
,
Dalton Trans.
,
2020
, vol.
49
pg.
9957
256.
Srungavruksham
N. K.
,
Liu
Y. H.
,
Tsai
M. K.
,
Chiu
C. W.
,
Inorg. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
4468
257.
Lai
Q.
,
Bhuvanesh
N.
,
Ozerov
O. V.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2020
, vol.
142
pg.
20920
258.
Bestgen
S.
,
Mehta
M.
,
Johnstone
T. C.
,
Roesky
P. W.
,
Goicoechea
J. M.
,
Chem. – Eur. J.
,
2020
, vol.
26
pg.
9024
259.
Guo
W.
,
Zhang
Q.
,
Cao
Y.
,
Cai
K.
,
Zhang
S.
,
Chai
Y.
,
Green Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
22
pg.
2873
260.
Wang
L.
,
Yu
Y.
,
Razgoniaev
A. O.
,
Johnson
P. N.
,
Wang
C.
,
Tian
Y.
,
Boulatov
R.
,
Craig
S. L.
,
Widenhoefer
R. A.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2020
, vol.
142
pg.
17714
261.
Williams
C.
,
Ferreira
M.
,
Tilloy
S.
,
Monflier
E.
,
Mapolie
S. F.
,
Smith
G. S.
,
Inorganica Chim. Acta
,
2020
, vol.
502
pg.
119341
262.
Gilbert
S. H.
,
Fuentes
J. A.
,
Cordes
D. B.
,
Slawin
A. M. Z.
,
Clarke
M. L.
,
Eur. J. Org. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
2020
pg.
3071
263.
Kondo
H.
,
Kochi
T.
,
Kakiuchi
F.
,
Chem. – Eur. J.
,
2020
, vol.
26
pg.
1737
264.
Yan
D.
,
Wang
N.
,
Xue
T.
,
Wu
H.
,
Zhang
J.
,
Wu
P.
,
ChemCatChem
,
2020
, vol.
12
pg.
4067
265.
Rodrigues
F. M. S.
,
Calvete
M. J. F.
,
Monteiro
C. J. P.
,
Carabineiro
S. A. C.
,
Maria
T. M. R.
,
Figueiredo
J. L.
,
Pereira
M. M.
,
Catal. Today
,
2020
, vol.
356
pg.
456
266.
Honegger
P.
,
Widhalm
M.
,
Molbank
,
2020
, vol.
2020
pg.
M1105
267.
Wang
Z. Y.
,
Wang
J. Y.
,
Zhang
L. Y.
,
Yang
M.
,
Zhang
X.
,
Chen
Z. N.
,
J. Mater. Chem. C
,
2020
, vol.
8
pg.
5174
268.
Arnett
C. H.
,
Agapie
T.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2020
, vol.
142
pg.
10059
269.
Sedghi
A.
,
Sabounchei
S. J.
,
Yousefi
A.
,
Sayadi
M.
,
Bayat
M.
,
Gable
R. W.
,
J. Mol. Struct.
,
2020
, vol.
1214
pg.
128216
270.
Klein
M.
,
Demirel
N.
,
Schinabeck
A.
,
Yersin
H.
,
Sundermeyer
J.
,
Molecules
,
2020
, vol.
25
pg.
3990
271.
Kameo
H.
,
Baba
Y.
,
Sakaki
S.
,
Tanaka
Y.
,
Matsuzaka
H.
,
Inorg. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
4282
272.
Uebing
M.
,
Hepp
A.
,
Uhl
W.
,
Organometallics
,
2020
, vol.
39
pg.
2695
273.
Dajnak
A.
,
Maerten
E.
,
Saffon-Merceron
N.
,
Baceiredo
A.
,
Kato
T.
,
Organometallics
,
2020
, vol.
39
pg.
3403
274.
Fritzemeier
R. G.
,
Nekvinda
J.
,
Vogels
C. M.
,
Rosenblum
C. A.
,
Slebodnick
C.
,
Westcott
S. A.
,
Santos
W. L.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
14358
275.
Szkop
K. M.
,
Jupp
A. R.
,
Razumkov
H.
,
Stephan
D. W.
,
Dalton Trans.
,
2020
, vol.
49
pg.
885
276.
Liu
Y.
,
Zhang
K.
,
Tian
R.
,
Duan
Z.
,
Mathey
F.
,
Org. Lett.
,
2020
, vol.
22
pg.
6972
277.
Yang
Z.
,
Sun
Z.
,
Zhu
N.
,
Li
W.
,
Han
M.
,
Qiao
Y.
,
Yang
C. H.
,
Chang
J.
,
J. Org. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
85
pg.
15686
278.
Gasnot
J.
,
Botella
C.
,
Comesse
S.
,
Lakhdar
S.
,
Alayrac
C.
,
Gaumont
A. C.
,
Dalla
V.
,
Taillier
C.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
11769
279.
Ji
J.
,
Shi
L. M.
,
Wu
F.
,
Xin
Z. F.
,
Jia
A. Q.
,
Zhang
Q. F.
,
J. Coord. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
73
pg.
1314
280.
Wang
F.
,
Cannon
A. T.
,
Bhattacharya
M.
,
Baumgarten
R.
,
VanderLinden
R. T.
,
Saouma
C. T.
,
Chem. Commun.
,
2020
, vol.
56
pg.
12142
281.
Cui
P.
,
Xiong
C.
,
Du
J.
,
Huang
Z.
,
Xie
S.
,
Wang
H.
,
Zhou
S.
,
Fang
H.
,
Wang
S.
,
Dalton Trans.
,
2020
, vol.
49
pg.
124
282.
Musina
E. I.
,
Musin
L. I.
,
Litvinov
I. A.
,
Karasik
A. A.
,
Russ. J. Gen. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
90
pg.
224
283.
Spiridonova
Y. S.
,
Nikolaeva
Y. A.
,
Balueva
A. S.
,
Musina
E. I.
,
Litvinov
I. A.
,
Strelnik
I. D.
,
Khrizanforova
V. V.
,
Budnikova
Y. G.
,
Karasik
A. A.
,
Molecules
,
2020
, vol.
25
pg.
3775
284.
Karasik
A. A.
,
Heinicke
J. W.
,
Balueva
A. S.
,
Thede
G.
,
Jones
P. G.
,
Sinyashin
O. G.
,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
2020
(pg.
3682
-
3691
)
285.
Musina
E. I.
,
Wittmann
T. I.
,
Musin
L. I.
,
Balueva
A. S.
,
Shpagina
A. S.
,
Litvinov
I. A.
,
Lönnecke
P.
,
Hey-Hawkins
E.
,
Karasik
A. A.
,
Sinyashin
O. G.
,
J. Org. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
85
pg.
14610
286.
Musina
E. I.
,
Wittmann
T. I.
,
Shpagina
A. S.
,
Karasik
A. A.
,
Lönnecke
P.
,
Hey-Hawkins
E.
,
Mendeleev Commun.
,
2020
, vol.
30
pg.
697
287.
Malhotra
I.
,
Basir
S. F.
,
Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.
,
2020
, vol.
191
pg.
838
288.
Bhilare
S.
,
Kori
S.
,
Shet
H.
,
Balaram
G.
,
Mahendar
K.
,
Sanghvi
Y. S.
,
Kapdi
A. R.
,
Synth.
,
2020
, vol.
52
pg.
3595
289.
Aluri
B. R.
,
Ghalib
M.
,
Jones
P. G.
,
Frauendorf
H.
,
Heinicke
J. W.
,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
2020
pg.
182
290.
Soficheva
O. S.
,
Kislitsyn
Y. A.
,
Nesterova
A. A.
,
Dobrynin
A. B.
,
Yakhvarov
D. G.
,
Russ. J. Electrochem.
,
2020
, vol.
56
pg.
431
291.
Soficheva
O. S.
,
Nesterova
A. A.
,
Dobrynin
A. B.
,
Zueva
E. M.
,
Heinicke
J. W.
,
Sinyashin
O. G.
,
Yakhvarov
D. G.
,
Mendeleev Commun.
,
2020
, vol.
30
pg.
516
292.
Komarnicka
U. K.
,
Kozieł
S.
,
Zabierowski
P.
,
Kruszyński
R.
,
Lesiów
M. K.
,
Tisato
F.
,
Porchia
M.
,
Kyzioł
A.
,
J. Inorg. Biochem.
,
2020
, vol.
203
pg.
110926
293.
Tendyck
J. C.
,
Klöcker
H.
,
Schürmann
L.
,
Würthwein
E. U.
,
Hepp
A.
,
Layh
M.
,
Uhl
W.
,
J. Org. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
85
pg.
14315
294.
Tendyck
J. C.
,
Hepp
A.
,
Würthwein
E. U.
,
Uhl
W.
,
Chem. – Eur. J.
,
2020
, vol.
26
pg.
15977
295.
Brand
A.
,
Wegener
P.
,
Hepp
A.
,
Uhl
W.
,
Organometallics
,
2020
, vol.
39
pg.
1384
296.
Peñas-Defrutos
M. N.
,
Vélez
A.
,
Espinet
P.
,
Organometallics
,
2020
, vol.
39
pg.
841
297.
Tang
Y.
,
Li
M.
,
Gao
H.
,
Rao
G.
,
Mao
Z.
,
RSC Adv.
,
2020
, vol.
10
pg.
14317
298.
Wang
G.
,
Jiang
M.
,
Ji
G.
,
Sun
Z.
,
Li
C.
,
Yan
L.
,
Ding
Y.
,
ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng.
,
2020
, vol.
8
pg.
5576
299.
Matsumoto
H.
,
Hoshino
Y.
,
Iwai
T.
,
Sawamura
M.
,
Miura
Y.
,
ChemCatChem
,
2020
, vol.
12
pg.
4034
300.
Matsumoto
H.
,
Hoshino
Y.
,
Iwai
T.
,
Sawamura
M.
,
Miura
Y.
,
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
15179
301.
Lei
Y.
,
Chen
Z.
,
Lan
G.
,
Wang
R.
,
Zhou
X. Y.
,
New J. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
44
pg.
3681
302.
Zhang
P.
,
Behl
M.
,
Balk
M.
,
Peng
X.
,
Lendlein
A.
,
Macromol. Rapid Commun.
,
2020
, vol.
41
pg.
1900658
303.
Zeng
R.
,
Chen
L.
,
Yan
Q.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
18418
304.
Knöfel
N. D.
,
Rothfuss
H.
,
Tzvetkova
P.
,
Kulendran
B.
,
Barner-Kowollik
C.
,
Roesky
P. W.
,
Chem. Sci.
,
2020
, vol.
11
pg.
10331
305.
Shaikh
A. C.
,
Veleta
J. M.
,
Bloch
J.
,
Goodman
H. J.
,
Gianetti
T. L.
,
Eur. J. Org. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
2020
pg.
2553
306.
Li
N.
,
Zhang
W. X.
,
Chin. J. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
38
pg.
1360
307.
Sreejyothi
P.
,
Mandal
S. K.
,
Chem. Sci.
,
2020
, vol.
11
pg.
10571
308.
Li
Y.
,
Fu
H.
,
ChemistryOpen
,
2020
, vol.
9
pg.
835
309.
Bednarek
C.
,
Wehl
I.
,
Jung
N.
,
Schepers
U.
,
Bräse
S.
,
Chem. Rev.
,
2020
, vol.
120
pg.
4301
310.
Jafarpour
F.
,
Ghasemi
M.
,
Navid
H.
,
Safaie
N.
,
Rajai-Daryasarei
S.
,
Habibi
A.
,
Ferrier
R. C.
,
Org. Lett.
,
2020
, vol.
22
pg.
9556
311.
Wu
L.
,
Yu
B.
,
Li
E. Q.
,
Adv. Synth. Catal.
,
2020
, vol.
362
pg.
4010
312.
Zhu
Y.
,
Huang
Y.
,
Synth.
,
2020
, vol.
52
pg.
1181
313.
Wei
Y.
,
Shi
M.
,
Chin. J. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
38
pg.
1395
314.
Zhang
H.
,
Zhou
R.
,
Eur. J. Org. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
2020
pg.
4098
315.
Zhao
Q.
,
Peng
C.
,
Zhan
G.
,
Han
B.
,
RSC Adv.
,
2020
, vol.
10
pg.
40983
316.
Huang
Y.
,
Liao
J.
,
Wang
W.
,
Liu
H.
,
Guo
H.
,
Chem. Commun.
,
2020
, vol.
56
pg.
15235
317.
Li
E. Q.
,
Huang
Y.
,
Chem. Commun.
,
2020
, vol.
56
pg.
680
318.
Babu
K. R.
,
He
X.
,
Xu
S.
,
Synlett
,
2020
, vol.
31
pg.
117
319.
Mthembu
S. N.
,
Sharma
A.
,
Albericio
F.
,
de la Torre
B. G.
,
ChemBioChem
,
2020
, vol.
21
pg.
1947
320.
Shao
X.
,
Zheng
Y.
,
Ramadoss
V.
,
Tian
L.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Org. Biomol. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
18
pg.
5994
321.
Hu
X. Q.
,
Hou
Y. X.
,
Liu
Z. K.
,
Gao
Y.
,
Org. Chem. Front.
,
2020
, vol.
7
pg.
2319
322.
Rondon
A.
,
Degoul
F.
,
Bioconjugate Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
31
pg.
159
323.
Wang
Y.
,
Xu
S.
,
Xian
M.
,
Chem. – Eur. J.
,
2020
, vol.
26
pg.
11673
324.
Wadekar
K.
,
Aswale
S.
,
Yatham
V. R.
,
RSC Adv.
,
2020
, vol.
10
pg.
16510
325.
Wang
X.
,
Wang
Z.
,
Ishida
T.
,
Nishihara
Y.
,
J. Org. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
85
pg.
7526
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal