Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination

Chalcogenides with a variety of compositions, structures, and properties have attracted world-wide attention in various fields, such as batteries, supercapacitors, thermoelectrics, solar cells, and catalysis. This chapter summarises the fundamental classifications, structural characteristics and physicochemical properties of metal chalcogenides, introduces the conventional and emerging methods to synthesise chalcogenide single crystals, polycrystalline materials, nanomaterials and thin films and concludes by highlighting their promising applications in sustainable energy conversion and storage.

Chalcogenides, as the name suggests, are chemical compounds containing at least one chalcogenide anion and at least one electropositive element. Generally, oxides are considered separately from chalcogenides—sulfides, selenides, tellurides (and polonides)—because of their quite different chemical properties. In addition, metal chalcogenides, notably containing selenium or tellurium as the chalcogen species, are less known and have not been systematically studied to the same extent as the corresponding oxides.

Here, we focus on compounds consisting of metal cation(s) and three important Group 16 chalcogens (i.e., sulfur, selenium and tellurium), which are defined as metal chalcogenides. Considering binary metal chalcogenides as an example, the relevant chemical formulae can be written as M a X b , where M is a metallic element and X = S, Se, Te. Metal chalcogenides constitute a tremendous number of chemical compounds with a huge library of component elements drawn from across the periodic table. They form with a vast variety of crystal structures and exhibit an extraordinary array of physical and chemical properties that range from intriguing optical, electrical, thermal, and electrochemical properties to novel magnetic, superconducting, and topological properties. Therefore, they have been investigated and utilised in various fields, such as photovoltaics, thermoelectrics and many aspects of solid-state electrochemistry among others.

Chalcogens possess a rich metal chemistry both in the solid state and in molecular compounds, which can be ascribed to their ability to catenate and bond with multiple metal centres. 1–3 Hence, metal chalcogenides involve numerous compounds that range from straightforward stoichiometric metal-based sulfides, selenides, and tellurides to complex compounds or solid solutions containing diverse metal and/or chalcogen elements with a variety of valence states and proportions. 3–6 Chalcogens tend to form electron-pair compounds where the chalcogens exhibit the divalent state with two lone pairs of electrons. 1  

The chemistry of binary metal chalcogenides is so rich because many of the metal and metalloid elements that bond with a specific chalcogen can form several compounds of different stoichiometry and occasionally the series of such compounds (for a given metal) can be extensive. 1 An example is indium selenide, which exists in the form of InSe, In2Se3, In3Se4, In4Se3, In6Se7 (note InSe and In2Se3 themselves also form as different phases—polytypes—with different structures). 7 Although complicated structures are not infrequent, generally, the majority of binary metal chalcogenides are derived from basic crystal structure types and can be easily described accordingly. 1,8 Three-dimensional crystal structure types, usually rock salt (NaCl), hexagonal NiAs, zinc blende and wurtzite structures, as well as two-dimensional layered lattice types related to the trigonal CdI2, constitute the structures of the majority of such chalcogenides. 1,8 Noteworthy is that simple selenides and tellurides can often share the same crystal structure types as the corresponding sulfide analogues, although important variations can exist, especially for tellurides. 1,9 For example, while PbX (X = S, Se, Te) compounds each form with the rock salt (NaCl-type) structure, 10 SnS and SnSe crystallise in an orthorhombic structure whereas SnTe exists with the same rock-salt structure as its lead congener. 11  

Alkali and alkaline earth metal monochalcogenides are colourless, salt-like compounds that are often soluble in water (especially alkali metal monochalcogenides). 12 Alkali metal chalcogenides usually crystallise in the antifluorite structure, while those of the alkaline earth metals crystallise with the cubic NaCl structure. 12 By contrast, transition metal chalcogenides possess various stoichiometries and numerous crystal structures, and the most important and widely studied ones are simple stoichiometries, such as metal : chalcogen atomic ratios of 1 : 1 and 1 : 2. 12 Several metals, principally the early transition metals (e.g., Groups 4–7) can also form corresponding trichalcogenides, such as NbSe3, ZrSe3 and ZrTe3. 1,12,13

Transition-metal chalcogenides can demonstrate highly covalent and non-ionic behaviours typified by the zinc blend or wurtzite crystal structures in 1 : 1 compounds of the later transition metals (e.g., ZnS). 1 Many transition metals combine with chalcogens to yield MX2 dichalcogenides with a relatively precise 1 : 2 stoichiometry, which crystallise in either two-dimensional or three-dimensional structures. 1 About two thirds of MX2 chalcogenides form layered structures, especially for the dichalcogenides of nearly all of the early transition metals in Groups 4–7 (with the exception of Mn). 1 The layered dichalcogenides exhibit a variety of electrical transport properties, which range from insulators (e.g., HfS2) through semiconductors (e.g., MoS2) and semi-metals (e.g., WTe2) to metals (e.g., VSe2). 1 The M–X units in layered MX2 typically adopt either a trigonal prismatic coordination similar to that in MoS2 or an octahedral coordination as in CdI2. 1,12 The strong chemical bonding between metal atoms and chalcogens is in striking contrast to the weak chalcogen–chalcogen bonding between the layers. Generally, transition metal atoms in MX2 contribute four electrons to form the bonding state; thus, the metals and chalcogens are endowed with the formal charges of +4 and −2, respectively. For example, the disulfides containing early transition metals such as Ti, V, Mo and W possess valence states of 4, bonding with two chalcogen dianions. 12 By contrast to the above examples, the disulfides containing late transition metals such as Fe, Co and Ni (and including Mn) generally adopt the pyrite (FeS2, distorted NaCl type) or related marcasite (FeS2, orthorhombic; space group Pnnm) structural motif. 12 Both structure types contain the disulfide S2 2− anion.

Group 13 metal elements (e.g., Al, Ga, In) can combine with chalcogens to form metal chalcogenides with multiple stoichiometries, 7,14–16 which is especially notable for indium selenides. 7,17 For example, with increasing temperature, In2Se3 transforms from the room-temperature form, α-In2Se3 18,19 to the β-In2Se3, 20 γ-In2Se3 18,21 and δ-In2Se3 18,21 phases consecutively. Specifically, α-In2Se3 itself can crystallise in both hexagonal (2H) and rhombohedral (3R) layered structures, with different stacking of Se–In–Se–In–Se layers in which In is both tetrahedrally and octahedrally coordinated by Se. 18,19 In4Se3 is also layered but has a very different crystal structure to α-In2Se3 in which (In3)5+ clusters are bonded to Se ions along the bc plane, while the remainder of the In atoms form quasi one-dimensional chains. 22,23 The relative newcomer, In3Se4, (synthesised via solvothermal methods) also crystallises with a layered rhombohedral structure, here consisting of Se–In–Se–In–Se–In–Se layers and lattice parameters of a = 3.964(2) Å and c = 39.59(2) Å. 24–26 The chalcogenides of Group 13 metals have found applications in thermoelectric conversion devices, 7,23,27,28 photodetectors, 29–31 Li-ion batteries 32 and in phase-change memory. 33  

Group 14 and 15 elements bond with chalcogens to form MX (M = Ge, Sn, Pb, X = S, Se, Te), MX2 (M = Ge, Sn, X = S, Se) and M2X3 (M = Sb, Bi, X = S, Se, Te) compounds. Specifically, (i) GeS, GeSe, SnS, and SnSe crystallise in orthorhombic layered structures at room temperature, 34 while PbX (X = S, Se, Te) compounds possess a rock salt structure; 8 (ii) Ge, Sn-based MX2 chalcogenides form layered crystal structures, containing X–M–X covalently bonded layers separated in the third dimension by van der Waals forces; 35–37 (iii) Bi2Se3, Bi2Te3, and Sb2Te3 crystallise in rhombohedral, layered structures, while Sb2S3, Sb2Se3, and Bi2S3 have orthorhombic, non-layered structures. 38–42 The Group 14 and 15 chalcogenides are typically semiconductors with a diverse range of band gaps, which demonstrate potential applications in thermoelectric conversion and photodetectors as well as solar cells and lithium/sodium-ion batteries. 1,43,44

Ternary metal chalcogenides, containing two different metallic elements or two types of chalcogens, comprise numerous classes of materials. Taking AB2X4 (A, B = metallic elements, X = S, Se, Te) as one exemplar stoichiometry, these chalcogenides adopt a variety of structures, exhibit intriguing properties and find widespread applications. 45–47 Particularly, chalcogenide spinels (AB2X4), such as chalcochromites MCr2X4 (M = Ba, Cd, Co, Zn, Fe, Cu, Hg, Mn, Ni), thiocobaltite CuCo2S4, thiorhodites M x Rh3−x S4 (M = Cu, Co, Fe), and thioaluminates MAl2S4 (M = Zn, Cr) often combine a distinctive tranche of semiconducting, magnetic and optical properties. 48 Among other ternary chalcogenides of note, CuMX2 (M = Ga, In; X = S, Se, Te) chalcopyrites are well-known semiconductors with high absorption coefficients, which have strong potential for utilisation as light absorbing materials in photovoltaic devices. 49–51 Cu2SnSe3, a typical ternary diamond-like compound, 52 has been regarded as a good thermoelectric material, 53 while CuAgSe 54 and Cu5FeS4 (bornite) 55,56 also behave as promising thermoelectric materials, principally arising from inherently low lattice thermal conductivity. Considering examples of further compositional complexity, quaternary metal chalcogenides, such as Cu2ABX4 (A = Zn, Mn, Cd, Co, Fe, Hg; B = Sn, Ge; X = S, Se), have attracted intensive attention due to their promising applications in both photovoltaics and thermoelectrics. 1,44,57–59

Aside from the many stoichiometric chalcogenides such as those highlighted above, solid solutions are common among structurally-related chalcogenide materials and members of such series (such as Bi2Se3–Bi2Te3 and Sb2Te3–Bi2Te3) 60,61 may achieve extraordinary properties that do not exist in either of the individual binary end members. 1 Combinations of different metal chalcogenides can be of significant scientific and technological value since their functional and mechanical properties can be modulated accordingly over a wide range through compositional regulation. 1  

One of the important characteristics of metal chalcogenides is that they can exist in various structural configurations, such as amorphous, crystalline and nanocrystalline forms. 12 Obviously, atomic radii, metal-to-chalcogen proportion, and valence electron concentration play decisive roles in determining the structural types and features. 1 Here, we focus on the structural characteristics of typical metal chalcogenides with layered structures.

The development of layered metal chalcogenides has a long-standing history. For example, the crystal structure of the well-known material MoS2 was first determined by Dickinson and Pauling as early as 1923. 62 Much later, Feldman et al. first synthesised MoS2 as nanotubes (in large quantities with uniform morphology) by utilising the gas-phase reaction between MoO3−x and H2S in a reducing atmosphere at elevated temperatures (800–950 °C). 63 Various nanostructured layered metal chalcogenides have subsequently appeared within researchers' sights, and the momentum of this research built considerably following the successful exfoliation of two-dimensional monolayer graphene by Novoselov et al. in 2004. 64 These two-dimensional chalcogenides, possessing finite band gaps in a departure from graphene's zero band gap, are currently at the forefront of research in the disciplines of physics, chemistry, and materials science. 65 Layered metal chalcogenides are epitomised by stacking stratiform structures composed of covalently bonded two-dimensional planes supported by interplanar van der Waals forces. These materials have rich chemical compositions and exhibit various exotic, anisotropic physicochemical phenomena such as tuneable energy gaps, superconductivity, magnetism, topological properties and charge density waves. 66–68 In addition, layered chalcogenides can be exfoliated relatively easily into materials of N layers (N ≥ 1) with different physical and chemical characteristics. 69–71 For example, several layered metal chalcogenides (e.g., MoS2, MoSe2, WS2 and WSe2) exhibit a transformation from indirect-band gap semiconductors in the bulk to direct-band gap semiconductors in monolayer form. 65 Such exfoliated chalcogenide layers can be widely applied in the fields of electronics, photoelectronics, energy and catalysis. 69,70

The electronic structures and functional properties of layered metal chalcogenides can be manipulated through various strategies. 13,72 Other unknown and novel properties are also expected to be discovered by following these strategies. 68,73 Generally, the ‘standard’ approaches that have been developed over time for modifying bulk materials fall into the following categories: (i) defect engineering, the manipulation of zero-dimensional (point), one-dimensional (dislocation) and two-dimensional (stacking) defects; 74–76 (ii) intercalation, the insertion of guest species such as metal ions and/or molecules between the layers of metal chalcogenide hosts; 77,78 (iii) substitution, the chemical substitution of constituent elements with other (extrinsic) elements, including cation substitution and anion substitution; 79,80 (iv) layer-number tuning, the exfoliation of bulk layered chalcogenides into specific numbers of layers, i.e., single, double, and multiple layer(s); 70,71 and (v) interfacial interaction, the formation of hetero-interfaces and deposition of chalcogenides on a substrate surface. 81,82

Layered metal chalcogenides present a great variety of compositions and crystal structures, as exemplified by the dichalcogenides of transition and Group 13–15 metals. Generally, the structural configuration of layered chalcogenides is that the bonding of metal cations and chalcogens leads to the formation of independent monolayers, and the layers are stacked to form stratiform structures via van der Waals interactions. For different layered chalcogenides, the structural configuration of individual monolayers and the stacking pattern between layers can be different.

Here, we will take MX2 (M = transition metal elements, X = S, Se, Te) as examples to illustrate the variance in crystal structure in detail. Each independent monolayer of MX2 has a ‘sandwich’ structure consisting of upper and lower layers of X atoms and a middle layer of M atoms in the form of X–M–X stacking. 65,83 The basic MX2 ‘sandwich’ has two different types: (i) MX6 trigonal prisms, in which the upper and lower chalcogen layers both form equilateral triangles in the ab plane, which are aligned directly above one-another along the c axis with the transition metal between them (i.e., located in the centres of each trigonal prism); (ii) MX6 octahedra, where the upper chalcogen triangle is rotated by 180° in the ab plane with respect to the lower (and again M is located between the respective triangles). 83,84 We use three letters to represent the positions of the three layers in the ‘sandwich’ structure from top to bottom, with capital letters representing chalcogens and lowercase letters representing transition metals. Hence, the trigonal prismatic and the octahedral coordination environments (layers) can be expressed as AbA (upper and lower X layers are similarly aligned) and AbC (upper and lower X layers are differently aligned), respectively.

The adjacent MX2 layers are connected in the third dimension via weak van der Waals interactions. Due to the different ‘sandwich’ units and the ways in which the layers are stacked, MX2 exist in a variety of related structural types. These structures are classified as follows: using Arabic numbers to represent the number of independent monolayers contained within a unit cell, and the letters T, H and R to denote either the trigonal, hexagonal, or rhombohedral crystal systems, respectively, of the unit cell. 65,83 By considering this formalism, we can introduce the three major crystal structure types, that is, 1T, 2H and 3R (Figure 1.1). The 1T type structure contains ‘sandwich’ layers with octahedral configuration that stack with the sequence …AbC AbC…, possessing a trigonal rotational symmetry. 65,83 As for the 2H type, the unit cell contains two ‘sandwich’ layers with trigonal prismatic configuration; thus in each ‘sandwich’ the X atoms in the lower layer are vertically aligned with the X atoms in the upper layer, leading to a stacking sequence of …AbA BaB AbA BaB… with a hexagonal rotational symmetry. 65,83 The configuration of each ‘sandwich’ layer in the 3R type is the same as that in 2H type, (i.e., trigonal prismatic) with the main distinction between structures being the stacking pattern of the ‘sandwich’ layers, which is …AbA CaC BcB AbA CaC BcB… in the 3R type structure, which possess a rhombohedral symmetry. 65,83

Figure 1.1

Schematic illustration of three structural polytypes of layered metal chalcogenides: 1T, 2H and 3R. Reproduced from ref. 83 with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.

Figure 1.1

Schematic illustration of three structural polytypes of layered metal chalcogenides: 1T, 2H and 3R. Reproduced from ref. 83 with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.

Close modal

Since the discovery of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) in 1991, 85 nanomaterials have sparked tremendous interest, which can be ascribed to their peculiar physicochemical properties and great potential in advanced miniaturised functional devices. The term ‘nanostructure’ requires that at least one dimension of a material falls in the nanoscale, thus comprising zero-dimensional nanoparticles (e.g., quantum dots), one-dimensional nanostructures (e.g., nanowires, nanotubes, nanorods, nanobelts, etc.), two-dimensional nanostructures (e.g., nanosheets) and three-dimensional bulk structures consisting of nanograins and/or incorporating nano-inclusions. The main differences between nanomaterials and bulk materials are the high specific surface area and high surface-to-volume ratios of the former as compared with the latter. With a typical dimension spanning from 1–100 nm, nanomaterials bridge the gap between molecules and bulk materials (such as crystalline solids). Aside from a high specific surface area, materials in this size range exhibit unique and fascinating features compared with their bulk analogues, such as a reduced melting point, improved catalytic activity, enhanced electron transport and a modified band structure. 43,44,86

The two design strategies for fabricating nanostructured materials are often referred to as ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ methods. Both are of great significance to nanotechnology and modern industry and each is highly applicable to the synthesis of nanostructured chalcogenides. Top-down methods generally obtain desired nanostructures through breaking down bulk materials via mechanical, physical or chemical approaches. The major drawback of these methods is the difficulty in maintaining order in extended structures and retaining structural periodicity. Moreover, surface structure imperfections may be introduced into materials in this way. 86–88 The defects that are introduced by top-down approaches can exert a significant influence on the physical properties and surface chemistry of nanomaterials, because the surface-to-volume ratio of nanomaterials is crucial. As the name suggests, bottom-up methods involve building materials from the bottom, such as atom-by-atom, molecule-by-molecule, and cluster-by-cluster. This procedure is expected to produce nanomaterials with more homogeneous compositions and controllable morphologies, while permitting particle size to be tuned and the surface to be functionalised. A drawback, however, can be the necessary utilisation of toxic precursors or the employment of reagents with difficult or restricted handling requirements. 86,89–91

Since the first report of the bottom-up syntheses of MoS2 and WS2 nanotubes in the 1990s, 63,92,93 other nanostructured metal chalcogenides have attracted tremendous attention due to their distinctive morphological characteristics and promising physicochemical properties. Among chalcogenide nanostructures, nanocrystals or quantum dots of semiconductors consisting of chalcogens and Group 12 and 14 elements, such as CdX, ZnX and PbX (X = S, Se, Te), offer unusual and frequently useful functional properties. 12,94 A few Group 4, 5 and 6 metal dichalcogenides, such as HfS2, ZrS2, NbS2, NbSe2, MoS2, MoSe2, WS2 and WSe2, possess layered structures that are beneficial to nanotube formation. 95 In addition, two-dimensional layer-structured metal chalcogenides, such as Bi2Se3 and Bi2Te3, normally grow in a thermodynamically favoured manner, which can grow into a nanoplate/nanosheet form even without the assistance of shape-controlling agents. 43,96

Nanostructured metal chalcogenides and their heterostructures have aroused extensive interest in multifarious applications, such as thermoelectric devices, solar cells, lithium-ion batteries, supercapacitors, catalysis, fuel cells, sensors, light-emitting diodes, and phase-change memory materials. 1,43,44,97 The properties of nanostructured metal chalcogenides can be intentionally regulated depending on their specific applications. For example, Bi2Te3-based thermoelectric materials consisting of nanoscale grains and nano-inclusions display reduced lattice thermal conductivity, due to strengthened phonon scattering. 98–100 Many nanostructured metal chalcogenides (e.g., CuS) have become popular options for solar absorber materials. 101 Nanostructured transition metal chalcogenides are hailed as promising non-noble metal catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction and are expected to be effective replacements for precious Pt-based electrocatalysts. 102,103 The use of germanium chalcogenide nanostructures (e.g., GeSb2Te4) for data storage devices could hopefully pave the way for future large-scale applications 104,105 and finally CdSe can produce any colour across the visible spectrum by adjusting the size of its constituent particles. 106 Hence it can be seen, just from this selection of examples, that many efforts can be made to optimise the fundamental properties of metal chalcogenides by modifying their size, morphology, crystallinity, and defect structure through nanostructuring.

In the 21st century, with the exploration of several novel physical phenomena, various new metal chalcogenide systems have been discovered and corresponding application fields have been further expanded. 107–109 A great diversity of multiple-element combinations and stoichiometries have been demonstrated to exist in solid state metal chalcogenides. 1 In addition, non-stoichiometric phases are abundant for metal chalcogenides, especially for those containing transition metals, where variable valences are favoured and electronegativity differences are minimal. 1 In this section, we concentrate on two archetypal metal chalcogenide materials systems, MoS2 and Bi2Te3, for the reason that the diverse chemical and physical properties of these layered chalcogenides have enabled their successful application across different fields. 38,61,65,110–112 Here, we focus on their intrinsic structure and property characteristics and briefly introduce their corresponding fields of application. It should be noted that there are a wide variety of other chalcogenides with many other attractive properties and applications, but these cannot be covered here due to limited space and scope.

Molybdenum sulfide (MoS2), with a layered crystal structure and available in nature as the mineral molybdenite, is perhaps the most studied transition metal dichalcogenide. It has been investigated in the fields of dry lubrication, 113 photovoltaics, 114 catalysis 115 and batteries 116 since the 1960s. Recently, few-layer MoS2 has attracted considerable attention due to its semiconducting characteristics and the potential for its application in electronics and optoelectronics. 65 Different from graphene, which has a single plane of atoms per sheet, mono-layer MoS2, comprises a plane of Mo atoms sandwiched between two planes of covalently bonded S atoms, lacks the ‘wrinkled’ morphology of graphene and characteristically forms smoother, more planar sheets at the nanoscale. 117 Each single layer of MoS2 is about 6.5 Å thick. 65,118 The crystal structure of MoS2 is composed of stacked S–Mo–S layers held together by weak van der Waals forces 65,118 and the van der Waals gap has been measured to be about 3.49 Å. 119 Within the S–Mo–S layer, the electronegativity difference between Mo and S results in covalent bonds that are partially polarised. Mo relinquishes (primarily d-band) valence electrons to S, and is left in an oxidation state of +4, while the oxidation state of the S anions becomes −2. 120  

Bulk MoS2 is composed of vertically stacked, weakly interacting S–Mo–S layers, which can be easily sheared by mechanical cleavage and liquid exfoliation. 121 Hence, single- or few-layer MoS2 can be produced easily and the sheets studied individually. 110 Previous studies revealed that MoS2 is a polytypic material based on the coordination of S atoms with Mo atoms within the sheets and the manner in which the sheets are assembled, 122 MoS2 is categorised into three fundamental structural polytypes, that is, 1T-MoS2, 2H-MoS2, and 3R-MoS2, 65,67 the space groups of which are Pm1, P63/mmc, and R3m, respectively. 123,124 Although the three polytypes have different lattice parameters and cell symmetries, the Mo–S bond lengths are approximately 2.4 Å for all of them. 125  

Among the three polymorphs of MoS2, the 2H and 3R polytypes are found to be naturally occurring, while the metastable 1T polytype is a purely synthetic phase. 126 Density functional theory calculations 127 and X-ray diffraction experiments 128 have indicated that in fact the 1T structure of MoS2 should indeed be thermodynamically unstable. 2H- and 3R-MoS2 possess Mo in trigonal prismatic coordination, while 1T-MoS2 contains octahedrally coordinated Mo atoms. 126 The alternative stacking arrangements of the trigonal prismatic Mo–S layers lead to the structural difference between 2H- and 3R-MoS2. Despite some small differences in band structures, 2H- and 3R-MoS2 have nearly indistinguishable properties, such as n-type semiconducting properties and intrinsic diamagnetism. 129 On the contrary, 1T-MoS2 is paramagnetic and metallic, consistent with the change in coordination geometry of the Mo atoms. 130 As expected, the complete filling of orbitals (bands) results in semiconducting behaviour while partial filling leads to metallic behaviour. 131 Therefore, as the orbital occupation varies, the electronic properties of MoS2 gradually change from metal through semiconductor to topological insulator, which provides a diversity of chemical and physical properties for wide varieties of applications. 67,131

For 2H-MoS2, the stacking of the trigonal prismatic Mo–S layers yields a thermodynamically-stable structure, 132 which is the most ubiquitous polytype and its widespread application benefits from its plenitude in the Earth's crust. 133 In the majority of studies, it is the 2H-MoS2 polytype that has been utilised as a precursor to prepare mono- or few-layer MoS2 nanosheets. 67 Given the stability of the 2H polytype, it is also worth noting that 3R- and 1T-MoS2 can easily transform into the 2H form. 129 For example, 3R-MoS2 can be converted to the 2H phase through heating, while 1T-MoS2 can be converted to the 2H phase by elemental doping, annealing or by applying strain. 134–138 Interestingly, the semiconducting 2H and metallic 1T phases can coexist in chemically exfoliated MoS2 mono-layers, which was observed utilizing scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM). 139  

Basically, due to the changes in degree of quantum confinement, interlayer coupling and symmetry elements, exfoliated thin-layer MoS2 nanosheets exhibit dramatically distinct physicochemical properties from bulk MoS2. 84 For example, bulk MoS2 has an indirect band gap of ∼1.3 eV (Figure 1.2), a valence-band maximum (VBM) that is highly dependent on the interlayer interactions and is black in colour due to the absorption of all visible light. 140,141 In contrast, mono-layer MoS2 is a direct band gap semiconductor with a conduction-band minimum (CBM) and VBM coinciding at the K-point (Figure 1.2), 84 meanwhile its band gap increases from ∼1.3 eV to ∼1.9 eV due to the quantum confinement effect. Accordingly, a strong photoluminescence, which is absent in bulk MoS2, emerges in single-layer 2H-MoS2. 142 In addition, the colour of MoS2 samples, prepared from MoS2 powders in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone by sonication and centrifugation, varies from black to light-yellow with decreasing layer number and size, indicating the widening of the band gap. 143 Moreover, the crossover from an indirect to a direct band gap semiconductor accounts for the luminescence enhancement in single-layer MoS2. 67  

Figure 1.2
Six line graphs showing the band structures for M o S 2 with different numbers of layers.Six line graphs showing the band structures for M o S 2 with the following different numbers of layers: bulk, 8-layer, 6-layer, quadrilayer, bilayer, and monolayer. The horizontal axis represents the momentum of the electrons, (uppercase gamma, M, K). The vertical axis is labeled E F [Hartree] and shows the markings minus 0.2, 0, and 0.2, from bottom to top. A horizontal dashed line extends from 0 on the vertical axis. In each graph, a horizontal blue line with peaks and valleys is shown below 0 and a horizontal green line with peaks and valleys is shown above 0. An arrow between the blue line and the green line indicates the band gap. In M o S 2 bulk, the V B M is located at the uppercase gamma-point, while the C B M is located near the K-point. The indirect band gap is approximately 1.3 e V. From M o S 2 8-layer to M o S 2 bilayer, as the number of layers decreases, the indirect band gap behaviour persists but shows slight modifications. The band gap size begins to increase slightly with fewer layers. In the M o S 2 monolayer, the V B M and C B M are both located at the K-point, indicating a direct band gap of approximately 1.9 e V.

Band structures calculated from first-principles density functional theory for bulk and thin-layer MoS2. The horizontal dashed line indicates the Fermi level. The arrows indicate the functional band gap (indirect or direct). Reproduced from ref. 141 with permission from American Physical Society, Copyright 2011.

Figure 1.2
Six line graphs showing the band structures for M o S 2 with different numbers of layers.Six line graphs showing the band structures for M o S 2 with the following different numbers of layers: bulk, 8-layer, 6-layer, quadrilayer, bilayer, and monolayer. The horizontal axis represents the momentum of the electrons, (uppercase gamma, M, K). The vertical axis is labeled E F [Hartree] and shows the markings minus 0.2, 0, and 0.2, from bottom to top. A horizontal dashed line extends from 0 on the vertical axis. In each graph, a horizontal blue line with peaks and valleys is shown below 0 and a horizontal green line with peaks and valleys is shown above 0. An arrow between the blue line and the green line indicates the band gap. In M o S 2 bulk, the V B M is located at the uppercase gamma-point, while the C B M is located near the K-point. The indirect band gap is approximately 1.3 e V. From M o S 2 8-layer to M o S 2 bilayer, as the number of layers decreases, the indirect band gap behaviour persists but shows slight modifications. The band gap size begins to increase slightly with fewer layers. In the M o S 2 monolayer, the V B M and C B M are both located at the K-point, indicating a direct band gap of approximately 1.9 e V.

Band structures calculated from first-principles density functional theory for bulk and thin-layer MoS2. The horizontal dashed line indicates the Fermi level. The arrows indicate the functional band gap (indirect or direct). Reproduced from ref. 141 with permission from American Physical Society, Copyright 2011.

Close modal

Because of the strong in-plane Mo–S bonding and weak out-of-plane van der Waals interaction, the mechanical and functional properties of MoS2 are highly anisotropic. 144 For example, thermal expansion in the direction perpendicular to the basal plane (i.e., parallel to the c-axis) is more substantial compared with that of the corresponding planar direction(s), while the thermal conductivity is orders of magnitude lower in the c-direction, normal to the basal ab plane. 120 Moreover, the crystal structure of MoS2 offers two-dimensional penetrable channels for electron transport, whereas the movement of electrons in the perpendicular direction is hampered by an interlayer potential difference. 65,118 Therefore, the electrical conductivity within layers is higher than that across adjacent layers. Thus, decreasing the layer numbers contributes to less constrained electron transport and improved electrical conductivity. Additionally, MoS2 possesses structural defects, such as point defects (vacancies), grain boundaries and edges. 145 These defects offer the feasibility of surface modification and functionalisation, which increase the options for the further manipulation of the physicochemical properties of MoS2. 145 For example, functionalisation of MoS2 can be achieved via the step-by-step covalent assembly of lipoic acid and fluorescein isothiocyanate, contributing to the simultaneous tailoring of fluorescent and electronic properties. 146  

MoS2 is widely explored in various applications due to its unusual combination of physical properties such as high carrier mobility and tuneable band structure. 147,148 Altering the morphology provides another route by which the physical properties of MoS2 can be modified; particularly relevant are variations in structural stability, band gap and optical properties. 129 In terms of mechanical properties, MoS2 has an ultrahigh mechanical strength and a larger Young's modulus than steel. 149,150 Single-layer MoS2 is marginally stronger than its bulk counterpart. 150 In addition, MoS2 layers exhibit remarkably high mechanical flexibility. For example, single-layer MoS2 can be deformed by an effective strain of up to 11% without fracture, 150 such that fabricated MoS2 thin-film transistors can be bent to a curvature radius of 0.75 mm without obvious damage or denigration of electrical properties. 151 These features emphasise the role of MoS2 as a promising material for flexible electronics.

In the tribology field, MoS2 has long been recognised as an exceptional lubricant due to the relative inertness of sulfur basal planes and the weak van der Waals forces between S–Mo–S layers. 152 It is a favoured dry lubricant for aerospace applications; a status which can be ascribed to its outstanding lubricity under high load and in vacuo. 153 In terms of energy storage, MoS2 is a promising electrode material for lithium-ion batteries, where the rather mediocre intermediate insertion voltage (∼2 V vs. Li/Li+) can be at least part-compensated by an outstanding reversible capacity (∼1290 mA h g−1 at 100 mA g−1 after 50 cycles) and a good rate capability (e.g., a capacity of ∼554 mA h g−1 after 20 cycles at 50C). 126 Additionally, with respect to energy conversion, the characteristic tuneable direct band gap endows single-layer MoS2 with the possibility to serve as a viable semiconductor in photovoltaic applications. 154 In the sensing field, the layered structure and large specific surface area of MoS2 nanosheets also offer promise for high sensitivity, high-efficiency field effect transistor (FET), optical and electrochemical devices. 117 MoS2 nanosheets/nanoflakes also exhibit piezoelectric properties, which facilitate their applications in mechanical transducers and piezo-electrocatalysis. 155,156

MoS2 is widely feted in various branches of catalysis, for example due to a band gap that couples well with the solar spectrum and on account of the high activity of its edge sites (i.e., the coordinatively-unsaturated sites exposed at the sheet edges). 157 It has also served as a synergistic catalytic support for gold nanoparticles 158 and for nickel–iron alloys utilised in the electrooxidation of hydrazine. 159 Meanwhile, when MoS2 is grown on the surface of a photocatalyst (e.g., oxygenated monolayer graphitic carbon nitride, O–g-C3N4), the chalcogenide's layered S–Mo–S structure is able to suppress agglomeration of the photocatalyst host, which is essential for maintaining the high activity and stability of the photocatalyst. 160 A further useful feature of exfoliated single-layer MoS2 is the availability of a myriad of S atoms exposed on the surface of the nanostructure. Sulfur is a soft Lewis base exhibiting a high affinity for heavy metal ions that act as corresponding soft Lewis acids. 139,147 MoS2 nanosheets therefore show both a high selective adsorption capacity for certain metal ions, which can be ascribed to abundant sulfur adsorption sites and fast kinetics due to the easy access to these sites. 135 Hence, single-layer MoS2 is among the most effective adsorbent materials for removing heavy metal ions such as mercury from industrial waste water. 161  

Layered bismuth telluride (Bi2Te3) crystallises with a rhombohedral structure (space group Rm), comprising quintuple layers that are stacked periodically along the c-axis (Figure 1.3(a)). 42 As the term suggests, each quintuple layer is composed of five atomic layers that are arranged in the order of –Te(1)–Bi–Te(2)–Bi–Te(1)–, where the numbers in parentheses designate two inequivalent Te sites. Bi atoms are octahedrally coordinated by Te atoms; Te(1) site atoms are bonded with three Bi atoms and three other Te(1) atoms, and Te(2) site atoms are octahedrally coordinated by Bi atoms. 42 A complete unit cell is formed by stacking three such quintuple layers in the [0001] direction. 162 Because the strengths of the ionic and covalent bonds within the quintuple layers are much higher than the van der Waals interactions between them, Bi2Te3 is liable to slip along the Te(1) plane during mechanical deformation (i.e., the (0001) acts as a cleavage plane), which is the primary reason for the poor mechanical properties of Bi2Te3 single crystals. Bi2Se3 and Sb2Te3 are isostructural with Bi2Te3, and thus the corresponding quintuple layers are –Se(1)–Bi–Se(2)–Bi–Se(1)– and –Te(1)–Sb–Te(2)–Sb–Te(1)–, respectively. These three compounds can form ternary or quaternary continuous solid solutions with tuneable crystal defects, adjustable band gaps and thermoelectric properties that improve upon those of the respective binary compounds. In contrast, Bi2S3, Sb2Se3 and Sb2S3, however, crystallise in an entirely different orthorhombic structure. 163,164 Nevertheless, rhombohedral Bi2Te3, Bi2Se3, and Sb2Te3, can also form solid solutions with the aforementioned orthorhombic binary chalcogenides over limited compositional ranges without altering their rhombohedral (Rm) structure. 164,165 Beyond these limits rhombohedral and orthorhombic phase separation occurs until a single-phase region of the orthorhombic structure is reached. 164,165 It is worth mentioning that when more electronegative S or Se substitutes for Te, it is the Te(2) sites that are preferentially occupied compared with Te(1). 166,167 Such site-selective ordered occupation leads to the minimum energy structure in the system. 167,168

Figure 1.3
The crystal structure of bismuth telluride and a line graph for the band structure of B i 2 T e 3.Part (a) shows the crystal lattice structure of bismuth telluride in the a-b-c Cartesian coordinate system that has a quintuple layer consisting of five atomic planes arranged as: T e (1) - B i - T e (2) - B i - T e (1). The first T e (1) layer contains seven yellow tellurium atoms arranged hexagonally with a central atom. The first B i layer contains three blue spheres (bismuth atoms) arranged in a triangularly. T e (2) contains three red spheres (tellurium atoms) arranged triangularly. The second B i layer contains seven blue spheres (bismuth atoms) arranged hexagonally with a central atom. The second T e (1) layer contains three yellow spheres (tellurium atoms) arranged triangularly. Adjacent quintuple layers are separated by weak van der Waals forces. Part (b) shows a line graph representing the electronic band structure of B i 2 T e 3. The horizontal axis represents a, uppercase gamma, Z, F, L. The vertical axis represents E e (e V) and ranges from minus 2.0 to 2.0. The Fermi energy (E F) is marked as a dashed horizontal line at E e equals 0.0 e V. The line graph shows different coloured horizontal solid and dashed lines with multiple peaks and troughs. The V B M is just below E F, and the C B M is slightly above E F and the band gap is small.

(a) Crystal structural model of Bi2Te3. (b) The calculated electronic band structure of Bi2Te3 along the high-symmetry lines with spin–orbit coupling. The solid and dashed lines are the results with and without the p 1/2 corrections included. Reproduced from ref. 169 with permission from American Physical Society, Copyright 2008.

Figure 1.3
The crystal structure of bismuth telluride and a line graph for the band structure of B i 2 T e 3.Part (a) shows the crystal lattice structure of bismuth telluride in the a-b-c Cartesian coordinate system that has a quintuple layer consisting of five atomic planes arranged as: T e (1) - B i - T e (2) - B i - T e (1). The first T e (1) layer contains seven yellow tellurium atoms arranged hexagonally with a central atom. The first B i layer contains three blue spheres (bismuth atoms) arranged in a triangularly. T e (2) contains three red spheres (tellurium atoms) arranged triangularly. The second B i layer contains seven blue spheres (bismuth atoms) arranged hexagonally with a central atom. The second T e (1) layer contains three yellow spheres (tellurium atoms) arranged triangularly. Adjacent quintuple layers are separated by weak van der Waals forces. Part (b) shows a line graph representing the electronic band structure of B i 2 T e 3. The horizontal axis represents a, uppercase gamma, Z, F, L. The vertical axis represents E e (e V) and ranges from minus 2.0 to 2.0. The Fermi energy (E F) is marked as a dashed horizontal line at E e equals 0.0 e V. The line graph shows different coloured horizontal solid and dashed lines with multiple peaks and troughs. The V B M is just below E F, and the C B M is slightly above E F and the band gap is small.

(a) Crystal structural model of Bi2Te3. (b) The calculated electronic band structure of Bi2Te3 along the high-symmetry lines with spin–orbit coupling. The solid and dashed lines are the results with and without the p 1/2 corrections included. Reproduced from ref. 169 with permission from American Physical Society, Copyright 2008.

Close modal

The band structure of a semiconductor greatly influences its carrier transport properties. 169 The critical band features, including band shape, band gap, and the number of energy valleys/valley degeneracy (where an energy valley represents the local extreme of the electron energy in the momentum space of the band structure), 170,171 heavily determine the electrical transport properties of materials. From the band structure of Bi2Te3 calculated by density functional theory (DFT) (Figure 1.3(b)), it can be clearly observed that Bi2Te3 is a typical indirect band gap semiconductor with multiple valleys, and a narrow band gap of ∼0.13 eV. 172 The conduction and valence band structure can be represented as a multi-ellipsoidal model with six constant ellipsoids on a reflection plane. 172 Crystal symmetry causes six degenerate carrier pockets in both the conduction band and valence band of Bi2Te3, which benefit the higher density of states and effective mass and in turn contribute to the excellent electrical transport properties. 169 Similarly, isostructural Sb2Te3 and Bi2Se3 also have complex, multi-valley band structures. 42,173

Manipulating point defects and their interplay makes it possible to regulate the carrier concentration and band structure of Bi2Te3 and the point defects in Bi2Te3 can be categorised into intrinsic and extrinsic types. The former refers to antisite defects and vacancies, while the latter refers to guest atoms introduced generally by doping or alloying. Bi2Te3 produced via zone-melting as an ingot is a p-type semiconductor due to antisite defects denoted as Bi′Te (i.e., Bi atoms occupy the Te positions, providing one hole per antisite defect as Bi has one less electron in the outermost shell than Te). 174 Halogens are most often used as donor level dopants to tune the electron concentration of n-type Bi2Te3, 175,176 while acceptor levels in p-type Bi2Te3 are commonly provided by Ag, 177 Cu, 178 Pb, 179 and Mn dopants. 180  

Due to its distinctive layered structure and heterogenous bonding features, Bi2Te3 inevitably exhibits anisotropic electron/phonon transport. For example, Bi2Te3 has both higher electrical and thermal conductivity along the direction(s) perpendicular to the c-axis (in-plane). Previous studies showed that the in-plane electron mobility and hole mobility of Bi2Te3 single crystals reached 1200 cm2 V−1 s−1 and 510 cm2 V−1 s−1, respectively, at 293 K. 181 These figures are accordingly approximately four times and three times those measured for the out-of-plane direction (along the c-axis). 181 Correspondingly, the in-plane electrical conductivity and thermal conductivity are 3–7 times and 2–2.5 times higher than those in the out-of-plane direction. 182,183 Interestingly, it has been observed that polycrystalline n-type Bi2Te3 is easier to texture—i.e., align in the (00l) direction—than its p-type counterpart under the same preparation conditions. 184 One can hence optimise the anisotropic properties of polycrystalline doped Bi2Te3 along a certain direction by regulating the degree of orientation.

It is the small difference in electronegativity between the Bi and Te atoms in Bi2Te3 that accounts for the predominantly covalent nature of the Bi–Te bonding. This feature contributes to sharpened electronic bands and in turn the high carrier mobility, ensuring good electrical transport as seen in materials like PbSe. 185 Meanwhile, it is the high atomic masses of both Bi and Te in Bi2Te3, combined with the relatively low melting point of the telluride (∼858 K), that endows phonon vibration with high anharmonicity, thus leading to low lattice thermal conductivity. 183,186 These qualities combine to make Bi2Te3 the most outstanding thermoelectric material currently available for operation near room temperature, and account for its commercialisation in solid-state refrigeration. 112,187,188 The formation of solid solutions with Sb and Se as substituents engenders a high level of control over the band structure and carrier concentration of Bi2Te3, leading to a range of excellent p- and n-type Bi2Te3-based thermoelectric materials capable of working across different temperature ranges. 60,61,188–190 These solid solutions generally possess better thermoelectric properties and consequently find wider application than the corresponding binary compounds. In addition, Bi2Te3 also serves as an example of an important topological insulator with a number of thickness-dependent physicochemical properties. 191 By exploiting its fascinating functional properties, Bi2Te3 has already been utilised widely to fabricate various devices for power generation, precision temperature control of microchips, and as a component of self-powered wearable electronics. 192,193

The development of materials heavily depends on the ability to synthesise them, to explore more cost-effective, energy-efficient synthetic methodologies, and to design novel materials with appropriate compositions and desired functionalities. Synthesis methods make various configurations and microstructures possible for solid materials, which therefore play essential roles in materials innovation. During the past three decades, a variety of synthetic methods have been introduced and implemented in the synthesis of solid-state metal chalcogenides, which include but are not limited to conventional high-temperature melting/heating, hydrothermal (or more broadly, solvothermal) synthesis, vacuum/high-temperature deposition from the gas phase, and emerging techniques such as microwave-assisted synthesis.

Utilising different preparation techniques can generate metal chalcogenides with distinct properties, which depend primarily on chemical composition, crystal structures, microstructure, and crystal defects. The preparation of specific materials requires appropriate regulation and optimisation of synthesis conditions. The following section will discuss the synthetic methodology of metal chalcogenides, which can be divided into three thematic areas: synthesis methods for bulk materials, synthesis of thin films, and nanomaterials synthesis.

The Bridgman–Stockbarger technique is widely utilised for single crystal growth and purification. 194,195 Raw materials are loaded into a crucible or boat, melted and then resolidified by applying a positive temperature gradient across the melt. This growth process from the melt can be performed in either a vertical or horizontal configuration, 196 from which the grown crystals generally exhibit either circular or D-shaped cross-sections, respectively. 197 Crystals with circular cross-section from vertical Bridgman growth are preferred for large-scale epitaxial growth and device fabrication, while horizontal growth encourages high crystal quality due to the reduced thermal stress that results from the configuration. 197 This method has been applied for the crystal preparation of various metal chalcogenides, such as MSe (M = Ga, Ge, Cd, Sn), 198–201 MTe (M = Zn, Ga, Cd, Pb), 198,199,202,203 SnSe2, 204 Bi2X3 (X = Se, Te), 205 AgSbTe2, 206 Cu2SnSe3, 207 CuInSe2, 208 Cs2Hg6S7, 209 Cs2Cd3Te4, 209 TlMSe2 (M = Bi, Sb), 210 Tl2GaInSe4 211 and AgGaGe3Se8. 212  

The Czochralski technique has been also used for the preparation of metal chalcogenide single crystals. 7,197 The apparatus consists of three main components: a crucible, a heater, and a pulling rod positioned axially above the crucible. The growth process starts with melting the required material in a crucible. A seed crystal attached to the end of the pulling rod is then dipped into the melt and slowly lifted while being rotated simultaneously. 197 The melt temperature and pulling speed are regulated to yield a small meniscus at the end of the seed crystal. This is performed in order to eliminate dislocations and reduce the effects of thermal asymmetry on crystal growth. 197 The main advantage of this method is the absence of a container for the crystal and so there is no contact between the rod on which the crystal is grown and the melt-containing crucible during cooling. This arrangement eliminates the thermal stress that is normally generated by the mismatch in the thermal expansion coefficients of the container and the crystal, which is important in the production of dislocation-free crystals. 197 Numerous metal chalcogenide single crystals such as MTe (M = Ge, Sn, Pb), 213,214 M2Se3 (M = Sb, Bi) 215 and M2Te3 (M = Sb, Bi) 190,215–217 have been successfully prepared using the Czochralski technique.

Perhaps the most common way to synthesise polycrystalline metal chalcogenides is by traditional high-temperature solid-state methods, which involves the direct reaction of stoichiometric quantities of high-purity metal and chalcogen element precursors in a sealed ampoule (typically quartz) at relatively high temperatures (ca. 400–1000 °C) in a furnace. 1 Briefly, certain proportions of reactants are weighed and ground together, pressed into a pellet and then heated to high temperatures to facilitate interdiffusion and compound formation. Considering the propensity of chalcogenides to convert to their corresponding oxides at high temperatures, even when only trace amounts of oxygen are present, reactions are preferentially conducted in either a vacuum-sealed container or an inert-gas stream. After reaction for hours or days, the ampoule is either quenched or slow-cooled to room temperature. Notably, covering reaction crucibles are beneficial to prevent the evaporation of highly volatile components (such as the chalcogen), thus avoiding significant deviation in the composition of the anticipated product materials.

The method typically yields powders that can initially be multiphasic. Post-annealing of the products for several days under vacuum or inert atmosphere without melting is usually required to obtain higher-quality crystals and/or single-phase thermodynamically stable end-products. Many metal chalcogenides can be prepared using this route, including the binary sulfides, selenides and tellurides of transition and main group metals such as Co, Cd, Hg, Pb, Sn, Sb and Ge, 1,61,218 as well as a variety of complex ternary, quaternary and higher compounds containing elements from all parts of the periodic table (e.g., AgCuTe, 219 Pt3Pb2Se2, 220 K2MnGe3S8, 221 EuHgSnS4, 222 EuHgGeSe4, 222 Rb3Ga3Ge7S20 223 ).

Chemical vapour deposition (CVD) is a process in which desired thin films or nanostructures are deposited on solid substrates by a heterogeneous chemical reaction of vapour-phase precursors. 224 In CVD, multispecies of precursors are transported in the gas phase either by evaporation or sublimation through heating, plasma excitation or optical radiation and introduced into a reaction chamber. For example, the synthesis of phase-pure iron pyrite (FeS2) thin films use di-tert-butyl disulfide and FeCl3 as the sulfur and iron precursors, respectively, 225 and the syntheses of MoX2 (X = S, Se) use Mo(CO)6 and X (S or Se) as the sources of the respective elements. 226 When the gas flows over a heated substrate, surface chemical reactions occur to form a desired thin film or nanostructures on a particular substrate, during which further decomposition of the precursors takes place. Defects present in the substrate can act as nucleation sites from which further growth can occur to form desired materials over time. 197 Surface diffusion and nucleation affect the morphology of the prepared films that can be epitaxial, amorphous or polycrystalline. 197 Additionally, several factors, such as the deposition temperature, substrate, gas pressure and gas flow rate can strongly affect the crystallinity and morphology of materials prepared by CVD. 197,227,228 CVD offers a variety of advantages in the deposition of ordered nanostructured thin films with varied compositions, and the technique is suitable for both batch and semicontinuous operations. A series of metal chalcogenide films have been successfully fabricated, ranging from films of binary and ternary compounds such as PbX (X = S, Se), 229 CuX (X = S, Se), 230 SnX (X = Se, Te), 231 MTe (M = Ge, Cd), 232,233 MoX2 (X = S, Se), 234 WX2 (X = S, Se), 234 ReSe2, 235 M2X (M = Cu, Ag; X = Se, Te), 231 M2S3 (M = Cr, Bi), 236,237 Bi2Se3, 237 M2Te3 (M = In, Sb), 233,238 CdCr2S4 239 and In3SbTe2 240 films, to uniquely structured films such as Fe-intercalated ZrSe2, 241 NbS2/MoS2 heterostructures 242 and ReS2/WS2 243 heterostructured films.

Physical vapour deposition (PVD) is a commonly utilised technique for the preparation of metal chalcogenide thin films. 197 In contrast to chemical vapour deposition, PVD realises the synthesis of thin films without chemical transitions from precursors to products. In a typical PVD procedure, target materials with desired compositions are evaporated by various physical means such as by the application of a laser, magnetron or electron-beam under vacuum. 86 The generated vapour is deposited onto a heated substrate to form the desired film. 86 The substrate is heated to an appropriate temperature and continuously rotated as needed to achieve improved growth homogeneity. 86 The basic PVD process is generally divided into three categories: evaporation, sputtering and ion plating in terms of the physical mechanisms of deposition. 86,197,244 PVD has been applied in the film preparation of a host of chalcogenides such as SnS, 245 Ag2S, 246 Sb2X3 (X = S, Te), 247,248 M2Se3 (M = Bi, As), 247,249 Ba-doped Ag2S (Ba:Ag2S), 246 BaS-doped Sb2S3 (BaS:Sb2S3) 250 and SnS-doped PbS (SnS:PbS) 251 among others.

Chemistry plays a major role in developing new nanomaterials with novel properties of technological importance. 252 Chemical fabrication routes are generally bottom-up strategies that allow a better control of the morphology and dimensions of synthesised nano/microstructures, since various parameters can be regulated individually or simultaneously during preparation. The primary advantage that chemical methods provide is good homogeneity of samples, because chemical synthesis offers mixing and reaction at the molecular level. Methods can be designed to prepare new materials/crystal structures by understanding how matter is assembled and constructed on an atomic and molecular level and the consequent effects on the material's properties. 106 In this section, several typical chemical synthesis methods of metal chalcogenides are discussed, while other methods for chalcogenide nanomaterials synthesis, such as mechanical alloying and melt spinning, are also introduced.

Hydrothermal and solvothermal methods have been applied for the synthesis of various metal chalcogenide nano/microstructures with specific sizes and shapes. 102,253–259 Hydrothermal synthesis involves chemical reactions in an aqueous medium within a closed vessel at temperatures above 373 K and under elevated autogenous pressure (˃0.1 MPa). More broadly, solvothermal synthesis utilises alternative non-aqueous solvents in a similar process. Since such non-aqueous solvents can possess boiling temperatures rather different from water, synthesis can demand modifications to the heating temperature, in turn altering the internal pressure, which provides additional variables towards the successful synthesis of various metal chalcogenides. 260 In addition, solvent properties, such as polarity and viscosity directly impact the solubility, reactivity, and diffusion behaviour of precursors in liquid-phase synthesis, which will further tune the phase, shape, and size of products. 261 Various organic solvents, with very different physiochemical properties, are often utilised as reaction media to replace water. Following the successes of hydrothermal and solvothermal syntheses, a promising derivative approach, known as the mixed solvent method, has evolved, which utilises at least two solvents together. The properties of mixed solvents can be regulated by adjusting the components and volume ratios of solvents to achieve the most appropriate synthetic conditions to obtain certain desired products. 102,258

Solvothermal synthesis methods typically involve the utilisation of sealable reactors composed of a Teflon™-lined vessel and a stainless-steel autoclave. Inert Teflon™ liners are used to avoid any reaction between the reactants and the reaction vessels and to protect the stainless-steel outer shell of the autoclave from corrosive reagents. Figure 1.4(a) provides a schematic diagram of an autoclave and the solvothermal preparation processes. Specifically, chemical precursors in the appropriate ratios are added to pre-added solvent—serving as the reaction medium—in a Teflon™ liner. The Teflon™ liner is sealed in a stainless-steel autoclave, which is heated to a prescribed temperature above the boiling point of the solvent for a certain duration. In the typical solvothermal syntheses of metal chalcogenides, reaction temperatures are usually in the range of 373–523 K and chalcogen sources can include reagents such as S, Se, Te, Na2S, Na2SeO3, Na2TeO3, thiourea, SeO2, TeO2 and others. 108 During solvothermal synthesis, pressure is generated in the closed vessel due to solvent vaporisation at elevated temperatures and this increases rapidly with rising temperature. 262 The generated pressure within the reactors also strongly relies on the percentage fill, which is defined in terms of the solvent volume and container volume. The autogenous pressure will rise more rapidly to a higher value when the percentage fill is large. 263 One should be cautious that if the autogenous pressure is higher than the maximum pressure tolerated by the autoclave, it is possible that the autoclave could explode, causing safety issues. As such, the percentage fill in solvothermal synthesis reported previously is generally not higher than 80%. 263 It should be also mentioned that most autoclaves have a bursting disc/pressure release valve to prevent such explosions. The starting materials in solvothermal syntheses should be selected with sufficient solubility in the utilised solvent at elevated temperature, so that reactions can continue until completion. The crystallisation of the desired (insoluble) products then occurs at elevated pressure and temperature. It should be noted that variations of solvothermal syntheses can be performed in a microwave field (Figure 1.4(b)), which will be discussed in detail in the section on microwave-assisted solution synthesis.

Figure 1.4
Three diagrammatic representations showing different experimental setups for a chemical synthesis.Part (a) shows a stainless steel autoclave with a Teflon vessel inside, within which is a precursor solution. Part (b) shows a Teflon vessel within a polymer autoclave and a microwave for heating. The autoclave is fitted with a pressure sensor and a temperature sensor. Part (c) shows a round-bottom flask fitted with a reflux condenser placed on a heating mantle. Either the metallic or chalcogen precursor is placed in the round-bottom flask, chalcogen or metallic precursors are added via a syringe.

Schematic illustration of solvothermal and hot injection methods for metal chalcogenide preparation: (a) solvothermal synthesis, (b) microwave-assisted solvothermal synthesis, and (c) hot injection synthesis.

Figure 1.4
Three diagrammatic representations showing different experimental setups for a chemical synthesis.Part (a) shows a stainless steel autoclave with a Teflon vessel inside, within which is a precursor solution. Part (b) shows a Teflon vessel within a polymer autoclave and a microwave for heating. The autoclave is fitted with a pressure sensor and a temperature sensor. Part (c) shows a round-bottom flask fitted with a reflux condenser placed on a heating mantle. Either the metallic or chalcogen precursor is placed in the round-bottom flask, chalcogen or metallic precursors are added via a syringe.

Schematic illustration of solvothermal and hot injection methods for metal chalcogenide preparation: (a) solvothermal synthesis, (b) microwave-assisted solvothermal synthesis, and (c) hot injection synthesis.

Close modal

When compared to solid state ceramic techniques, for example, solvothermal, and mixed solvent methods have many advantages, such as fast reaction kinetics, short processing times, low energy consumption and the high crystallinity of synthesised samples. 254 These methods can realise effective control on the composition, crystallinity, particle size, and microstructure of products by simply regulating reaction variables such as reagent type, temperature, pressure, the presence of additives (e.g., mineralisers, surfactants), reaction duration, solvent ratio, and pH. 260 Considering pH as an example, in alkaline solution OH can realise the disproportionation of Te into [TeO3]2− and Te2− through 3Te + 6OH → 2Te2− + [TeO3]2− + 3H2O 264,265 and in turn promote the formation of metal chalcogenide via the reaction between metal ions and Te2−. In contrast, acidic conditions would facilitate the formation of metal–halide bonds by ligand replacement, which is vital to achieving the controllable doping of halides into metal chalcogenides. 266,267 Variations of solvothermal methods have achieved great success in the preparation of metal chalcogenide nano/microstructures, such as FeS2 nanowires, 268 FeSe2 nanoflowers, 269 MnX (X = S, Se) nanorods, 270,271 ZnSe nanobelts, 272 CoTe nanotubes, 273 Bi2Te3 nanotubes 274 (Figure 1.5(a)), PbTe nanowires 275 (Figure 1.5(b)), T-shaped Bi2Te3-Te heteronanojunctions 276 (Figure 1.5(c)), SnS2 hexagonal nanoplates 277 (Figure 1.5(d)), nano-string-clusters of Bi2Te3 278 (Figure 1.5(e)) and hierarchical flowerlike In3Se4 279 (Figure 1.5(f)). In addition, crystalline products are obtained at relatively lower temperature in solvothermal synthesis methods as compared to melting techniques, for example. However, it should be noted that solvothermal synthesis also presents some clear disadvantages. For example, it is difficult to study the nucleation and growth processes of products in situ as reactions are performed in closed, non-transparent reactors.

Figure 1.5
Six S E M / T E M images of different nanostructures.Part (a) shows tube-like structures with a 300 nanometre scale bar. Part (b) shows a network of interconnected nanowires with a 200 nanometre scale bar. Part (c) shows heterojunction structures formed by connected hexagonal nanoplates and nanorods with a 300 nanometre scale bar. Part (d) shows a dense collection of hexagonal nanoplates with a 1 micrometre scale bar. Part (e) shows nanostring-cluster structures with a 500 nanometre scale bar. Part (f) shows several flower-like structures with a 1 micrometre scale bar.

Electron microscopy images of some typical metal chalcogenides prepared via hydrothermal and solvothermal methods. (a) Bi2Te3 nanotubes. Reproduced from ref. 274 with permission from AIP Publishing, Copyright 2005. (b) PbTe nanowires. Reproduced from ref. 275 with permission from American Chemical Society, Copyright 2008. (c) Bi2Te3-Te heterojunctions. Reproduced from ref. 276 with permission from American Chemical Society, Copyright 2013. (d) SnS2 hexagonal nanoplates. Reproduced from ref. 277 with permission from Elsevier, Copyright 2022. (e) Bi2Te3 nanostring-clusters. Reproduced from ref. 278 with permission from American Chemical Society, Copyright 2010. (f) In3Se4 flowers. Reproduced from ref. 279 with permission from American Chemical Society, Copyright 2013.

Figure 1.5
Six S E M / T E M images of different nanostructures.Part (a) shows tube-like structures with a 300 nanometre scale bar. Part (b) shows a network of interconnected nanowires with a 200 nanometre scale bar. Part (c) shows heterojunction structures formed by connected hexagonal nanoplates and nanorods with a 300 nanometre scale bar. Part (d) shows a dense collection of hexagonal nanoplates with a 1 micrometre scale bar. Part (e) shows nanostring-cluster structures with a 500 nanometre scale bar. Part (f) shows several flower-like structures with a 1 micrometre scale bar.

Electron microscopy images of some typical metal chalcogenides prepared via hydrothermal and solvothermal methods. (a) Bi2Te3 nanotubes. Reproduced from ref. 274 with permission from AIP Publishing, Copyright 2005. (b) PbTe nanowires. Reproduced from ref. 275 with permission from American Chemical Society, Copyright 2008. (c) Bi2Te3-Te heterojunctions. Reproduced from ref. 276 with permission from American Chemical Society, Copyright 2013. (d) SnS2 hexagonal nanoplates. Reproduced from ref. 277 with permission from Elsevier, Copyright 2022. (e) Bi2Te3 nanostring-clusters. Reproduced from ref. 278 with permission from American Chemical Society, Copyright 2010. (f) In3Se4 flowers. Reproduced from ref. 279 with permission from American Chemical Society, Copyright 2013.

Close modal

Hot injection is an effective synthetic method for the preparation of metal chalcogenides with good crystallinity and narrow particle size distributions. In a hot injection route, a stock solution containing reactive chalcogen precursors is injected quickly into a pre-heated solution containing metal salts. This induces a high level of supersaturation in the reaction mixtures, which in turn leads to a short burst of nucleation that is followed by subsequent growth by aging at a prescribed temperature. 280,281 Figure 1.4(c) illustrates the hot injection method schematically. The corresponding nucleation takes place instantaneously at a particular temperature. 282 The kinetics of hot injection is such that there is close to negligible time between injection and precipitation. Mechanistic insights have indicated that the separation of the nucleation and growth steps is critical for the formation of monodisperse nanocrystals. 283 The diameter and morphology of synthesised metal chalcogenide nanocrystals can be effectively tuned by judiciously adjusting the experimental parameters such as type and ratios of starting reagents, injection temperature, reaction duration and use of a surfactant. 108,284 For example, inclusion of an appropriate surfactant can reduce the surface tension between two liquids or between a solid and a liquid during hot injection synthesis and can also prevent nanoparticle agglomeration by acting as a capping reagent. 260 Hence, the surfactant enhances colloidal stability so that monodispersed nanoparticles can remain stable in a liquid for a long time. Generally, the polar groups of surfactants are used in a reaction medium to bind to the surface of nanocrystals. 260 However, if the surfactant is not completely removed from nanocrystals during the post-synthesis treatment, the residual surfactant may have an adverse effect on the physiochemical properties (e.g., electrical conductivity) of the products. 285,286

The hot injection method was first used by Murray et al. to prepare monodisperse CdSe nanocrystals in 1993. 94 Since then, many other metal chalcogenide nanocrystals have been successfully synthesised via this method, such as CdSe 94 (Figure 1.6(a)), Cu3SbSe4 287 (Figure 1.6(b)), ZnS 288 (Figure 1.6(c)), SnSe 289,290 (Figure 1.6(d) and (e)), Cu5FeS4 56 (Figure 1.6(f)), CuS, 291 Cu2S, 292 In2S3, 293 SnTe, 294 GeTe, 295 Ag2X, 296 PbX, 297,298 Bi2X3, 299,300 CuInX2, 301–303 CuGaX2 (X = S, Se, Te), 304 SnSe/rGO nanocomposite (rGO = reduced graphene oxide), 305 Cu2SnS3, 306 Cu2ZnSnSe4, 307 Cu2CdSnSe4 308 and Cu2ZnGeSe4 309 nanocrystals. The particle size and morphology of the metal chalcogenide nanostructures prepared this way are diverse, ranging from nanoparticles and nanorods to nanoplates and nanoflowers. The dominant form depends on the crystal structures of the chalcogenides as well as the synthetic conditions, such as reaction temperature, reaction duration and types of precursors/solvents/surfactants. 80,289,310–313

Figure 1.6
Six S E M / T E M images of different metal chalcogenides.Part (a) shows nanocrystals with a 20 nanometre scale bar. Part (b) shows a densely packed nanoparticles with a 500 nanometre scale bar. Part (c) shows nanorods with a 100 nanometre scale bar. Part (d) shows a cluster of nanoplates with irregular shapes with a 100 nanometre scale bar. Part (e) shows nanoparticles with a 100 nanometre scale bar. Part (f) shows icosahedral nanoparticles with a 100 nanometre scale bar.

Electron microscopy images of some typical metal chalcogenides prepared through hot injection method. (a) CdSe nanocrystals. Reproduced from ref. 94 with permission from American Chemical Society, Copyright 1993. (b) Cu3SbSe4 nanocrystals. Reproduced from ref. 287 with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry. (c) ZnS nanorods. Reproduced from ref. 288 with permission of American Chemical Society, Copyright 2005. (d) SnSe nanoplates. Reproduced from ref. 289 with permission of John Wiley & Sons, Copyright 2016. (e) SnSe nanoparticles. Reproduced from ref. 290 with permission of John Wiley & Sons, Copyright 2017. (f) Cu5FeS4 icosahedrons. Reproduced from ref. 56 with permission from John Wiley & Sons, Copyright 2018.

Figure 1.6
Six S E M / T E M images of different metal chalcogenides.Part (a) shows nanocrystals with a 20 nanometre scale bar. Part (b) shows a densely packed nanoparticles with a 500 nanometre scale bar. Part (c) shows nanorods with a 100 nanometre scale bar. Part (d) shows a cluster of nanoplates with irregular shapes with a 100 nanometre scale bar. Part (e) shows nanoparticles with a 100 nanometre scale bar. Part (f) shows icosahedral nanoparticles with a 100 nanometre scale bar.

Electron microscopy images of some typical metal chalcogenides prepared through hot injection method. (a) CdSe nanocrystals. Reproduced from ref. 94 with permission from American Chemical Society, Copyright 1993. (b) Cu3SbSe4 nanocrystals. Reproduced from ref. 287 with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry. (c) ZnS nanorods. Reproduced from ref. 288 with permission of American Chemical Society, Copyright 2005. (d) SnSe nanoplates. Reproduced from ref. 289 with permission of John Wiley & Sons, Copyright 2016. (e) SnSe nanoparticles. Reproduced from ref. 290 with permission of John Wiley & Sons, Copyright 2017. (f) Cu5FeS4 icosahedrons. Reproduced from ref. 56 with permission from John Wiley & Sons, Copyright 2018.

Close modal

Physical properties can also be modified by variations in the hot injection protocol. For example, Han et al. could regulate the type of charge carrier in SnSe by changing the Sn precursor and surfactant using an aqueous hot injection method. 289,290 Following this demonstration, p-type SnSe/rGO nanocomposites were also successfully fabricated through a facile in situ hot injection synthesis method. 305 From these principles, a general surfactant-free, hot injection method was subsequently developed for synthesising binary silver chalcogenides Ag2X (X = S, Se, Te). 296 Among other examples, Ithurria and Dubertret pioneered the synthesis of ultrathin CdSe nanoplates via hot injection and achieved a precise control of the geometrical parameters of the product crystals (i.e., thickness, crystal shape, lateral size), 314 while Ibáñez et al. exerted morphological control in their synthesis of Cu2CdSnSe4 to obtain either tetrahedral or penta-tetrahedral shapes. 308 Allen and Bawendi have also reported the controllable hot injection synthesis of Cu–In–Se quantum dots of variable composition and size. 303 The nanocrystals exhibit red to near-infrared photoluminescence with a direct dependence on both the composition and size of the dots. 303 The above are just a few examples that demonstrate how the hot injection method can be applied across multiple systems at multiple scales while also providing significant synthetic flexibility in the preparation of metal chalcogenide nano/microstructures.

The utilisation of microwaves in liquid-phase inorganic synthesis was first explored by Komarneni and Roy in 1985. 315 Microwaves are electromagnetic waves of frequencies between 0.3–300 GHz, flanked by the infrared and radiofrequency regions of the electromagnetic spectrum. To avoid interference with cable communication and mobile phone frequencies, microwave reactors for chemical synthesis predominantly operate at a specific regulated frequency of 2.45 GHz. 260,316 This equates to an energy that is insufficient in itself to break typical chemical bonds but is capable of inducing molecular rotations. 260 After decades of development, microwave-assisted synthesis has been widely applied in the fabrication of metal chalcogenides, which is considered as a green synthesis technique. Figure 1.4(b) illustrates the microwave-assisted solvothermal method schematically. Microwaves are non-ionising and only act so as to activate a materials system thermally. 260 Notably, microwave radiation is directly applied to reactants not to reaction vessels. By design, the vessel is effectively transparent to microwave energy, which is absorbed by the reactants and solvents, resulting in efficient heat transfer, principally through dielectric heating. The heating effect of microwaves is triggered by dipolar polarisation, ionic conduction or electrical conduction mechanisms depending on the materials used for reaction. 260,316 Microwave heating via electromagnetic waves can result in faster reaction kinetics and shorter reaction times (often by orders of magnitude) compared to conventional heating.

The intensity of microwave heating in a reaction mainly depends on the physical properties of the substance placed in the microwave field. 260 The ability of a specific substance to convert microwave energy into heat is determined by the so-called loss tangent (tan δ). 260 A high tan δ material usually has a high dielectric loss, which represents the microwave energy converted to heat. 260,261 In fact, the microwave-assisted synthesis of bulk chalcogenides can be performed both in the liquid phase and the solid state, as long as the solvent, liquid or solid reactants possess high tan δ values. Microwave-assisted solution synthesis, however, is more appropriate for the syntheses of chalcogenide nanomaterials specifically. Solvents that possess high tan δ values typically also demonstrate good microwave absorption capacity and thus are favoured in the exploitation of the thermal effects achievable using microwave radiation. 260,261,317 Consequently, polar solvents such as water and alcohol are considered as good media for the microwave-assisted syntheses of inorganic nanostructures in solution. With a high boiling point (471 K), a chemically reducing capability, and a high value of tan δ, ethylene glycol finds wide application in the microwave-assisted syntheses of metal chalcogenides. 260 Generally, therefore, solvents containing dipolar species couple most effectively with microwaves, leading to a rapid rise in temperature and reaction rate.

Microwave heating offers the possibility of rapid chemical synthesis in solution in a very short duration compared to conventional heating, resulting in the potential advantages of lower cost, higher yields, side reaction suppression, and energy saving for chalcogenide nanomaterials production. 108,260,261 Microwave-assisted solvothermal synthesis employs autoclaves made of high-strength polymeric materials that are transparent to microwaves. 318 Apart from the incident microwave power, other reaction parameters, such as the reaction temperature, reaction duration, solvent type and pH also affect microwave-assisted solution synthesis. Through rational design of these parameters, metal chalcogenides with desired chemical composition, diameter, and morphology can be effectively synthesised. For example, Mehta et al. developed a rapid and scalable microwave-assisted solvothermal synthesis of sulfurised Sb2Se3 nanowires and nanotubes. 319 By adjusting the microwave dose, which represents the product of microwave power and time, the diameter and length of these 1D nanostructures can be controlled. Panda et al. also reported a similar morphology control for metal chalcogenide nanostructures in the microwave synthesis: 320 by simply tuning the microwave radiation times, the stepwise formation of the ZnS and ZnSe nanowires from small spherical or elongated particles through short rods to long nanowires was observed. Up to now, a variety of metal chalcogenides have been successfully prepared by microwave-assisted solution methods, including binary materials such as HgS, 321 MoSe2, 322 SnS2, 323 CdX, 324–327 ZnX, 327–330 SnX, 331–333 PbX, 327,334,335 CuX, 336–339 Cu2X, 340–342 Ag2X, 343–345 Sb2X3, 346–348 and Bi2X3 349–351 (X = S, Se, Te), as well as ternary and quaternary metal chalcogenides such as AglnS2, 352 AgIn5S8, 353 CulnX2 (X = S, Se), 354 CuIn2S4, 355 Cu3SbSe4 356 and Cu2ZnSnS4. 357  

Liquid exfoliation is regarded as a highly scalable and achievable solution-based method for producing large quantities of thin-layer metal chalcogenides with good crystallinity using mild conditions. 358–360 This method utilises high shearing or ultrasonication of crystal layers dispersed in a stabilising solvent (such as polymer solutions, ionic liquids, etc.) to produce nanosheets. The thin flakes are then separated from the solvent by centrifugation. Further, two-dimensional metal chalcogenides can be intercalated between layers by various guest species 361 and subsequently exfoliated into mono- and few-layer nanosheets by simple ultrasonication. 135,362–365 A typical chemical liquid exfoliation procedure involves submerging bulk powders in a solution of an oxidisable Li-containing compound (e.g., n-butyl lithium) for a specific duration to allow the Li ions to intercalate. If this procedure is followed by exposing the intercalated materials to water, then the water will react with the Li between layers, resulting in H2 generation and in turn the separation of the layers. 135,363

The type of solvent used in liquid exfoliation directly affects the layer number, thickness, yield, stability and defect chemistry of the exfoliated material. 244 To inhibit the reaggregation of exfoliated materials, the selected solvent must have a surface tension comparable with the surface energy of the layered materials. 244 Coleman et al. reported a universally effective liquid exfoliation method to produce various nanosheets by the dispersion and ultrasonication of a series of layered metal chalcogenides in dozens of solvents with varying surface tensions. 360 Studies of the corresponding correlations were performed using optical absorption spectroscopy to measure the quality of the dispersed materials. Based on the application of theory to the analysis, they proposed that ideal solvents are those that minimise the energy of exfoliation. 360 For example, N-methyl-pyrrolidone and isopropanol emerge as promising solvents for exfoliating numerous layered compounds. Through this method, layered compounds, such as NbSe2, 360,366,367 NiTe2, 360 TiS2, 368 MoX2 (X = S, Se, Te), 360,366,367,369 WX2 (X = S, Se), 360,366,367,369 TaX2 (X = S, Se), 360,367 M2Se3 (M = Bi, In) 366 and M2Te3 (M = Sb, Bi), 360,366 can be successfully dispersed, exfoliated and deposited as individual flakes or films.

Mechanical alloying, which is a process of alloy formation in the solid state through the ball milling of high-purity elemental components, has proven to be an efficient method for the preparation of metal chalcogenide nanoparticles. 370–373 In a typical process, a certain proportion of the respective reactant elemental pieces or powders are loaded into a jar/vessel made of cemented carbides (such as WC), steel or agate, together with a specific number of grinding balls (also manufactured from the equivalent jar material). The tightly sealed jars containing the elemental mixtures are rotated at a predefined frequency, so that the grinding balls experience repeatable mechanical forces resulting from collision, friction, compression, shearing, and grinding. 370,374 These processes impart mechanical energy to the powders, which makes the powders undergo continuous fracture and welding. The high-intensity, long-duration effects of ball milling ensure that the products are homogeneous, usually resulting in evenly dispersed, ultrafine alloyed particles. 370  

Factors directly affecting the degree of alloying include the type of ball mill, the composition of the grinding balls and the milling conditions employed (e.g., time, speed, ball–powder ratio). 375 The types of instruments for mechanical alloying can vary in the way that energy is imparted and include vibrating, planetary, rotational and high-energy (vibrating–rotational) machines. 263 It is also possible to mill cryogenically and under different gaseous atmospheres. Tungsten carbide, agate, zirconia, and hardened stainless steel are usually utilised for the construction of jars and the grinding media. The combination of high-energy ball milling and hardened-steel grinding balls generally provides optimal mechanical alloying strength. A reasonable selection of technological parameters, such as the materials of manufacture, the size/dimension of the vessels and the ratio of grinding balls, can improve the ball milling efficiency. 370 As the materials used to manufacture the milling jars and media directly determine key characteristics such as density and hardness, it is necessary to choose the appropriate jars and balls in accordance with the intrinsic properties of the samples to be milled and the desired features of products. The matching of grinding ball material to the jars/vessel material helps avoid erosion and the introduction of unintended impurities into milled mixtures. Additionally, the ball to powder weight ratio is also crucial. 370 Usually, the ball-milling energy increases with the increase of ball to powder weight ratio. However, when the weight ratio exceeds a certain threshold, the limited acceleration space will reduce the collision energy. 370 Ball milling duration also has a significant impact on the phase and microstructure of products; therefore, selecting an appropriate ball milling time is critical for highly efficient preparation and controlled energy consumption. By combining mechanical alloying with various phase and microstructure characterisation techniques, the optimal milling parameters can be tuned to specific metal chalcogenide systems.

Mechanical alloying allows for solid-state reactions without high treatment temperatures. The structural defects of milled products, which are generated by the strong mechanical collisions between balls and between balls and the walls of the container, present plentiful possibilities to obtain various metastable and defect-rich materials with functionalities modulated by these features. 100,370 For example, p-type nanocrystalline BiSbTe bulk fabricated as a thermoelectric through hot pressing the ball-milled nanopowders, achieved a peak dimensionless figure of merit of 1.4 at 373 K owing to the low thermal conductivity caused by the increased phonon scattering by grain boundaries and defects. 100 Given the propensity of the method to shift away from equilibrium conditions, milling can enable the generation of alloys that are difficult to obtain via solidification processes due to unfavourable thermodynamics (as depicted by phase diagrams). 373 A tremendous variety of metal chalcogenide nanomaterials, including stoichiometric compounds such as PbTe, 376 SnS2, 377 SnX, 378–380 Ag2X, 381 AgCuTe, 382 CuInX2, 224 CuCrS2 383 and CuCr2X4 (X = S, Se, Te), 384 as well as solid solutions and composite architectures such as Sn(S,Se)2, 377 (Bi,Sb)2Te3 100 and CNTs/Cu2Se 385 have been prepared this way.

Solidification is a conventional method to fabricate metals and alloys, which involves heating a material above its melting point and then allowing the melt to cool to room temperature at various speeds. 386 The heating sources for melting are versatile, such as electrical resistance heating, induction heating, arc melting, and levitation melting. 387,388 In particular, the melt spinning technique, involving the rapid cooling of melts, has been widely applied to prepare amorphous alloys. 389,390 Figure 1.7(a) presents a schematic illustration of melt spinning, revealing that in a typical process, a thin stream of melt is ejected onto a high-speed rotating Cu wheel (that is cooled internally, usually by water) under a protective Ar atmosphere. Due to the ultra-high cooling rate of 104–107 K s−1, 391 the melt contacting the Cu wheel will cool relatively quickly and form a nanostructured ribbon-like material with a relatively uniform grain size distribution or even an amorphous material. 386,392 This method has been applied to prepare a variety of nanostructured metal chalcogenides, such as Bi2Te3–, 393–395 AgSbTe2–, 396,397 SnTe–, 398 and PbTe–based materials. 399  

Figure 1.7

(a) Schematic illustration of melt spinning in the synthesis of SnTe-based ribbons. Reproduced from ref. 398 with permission from Elsevier, Copyright 2021. (b) and (c) TEM images of the contact surface and free surface, respectively of BiSbTe melt-spun ribbons. Reproduced from ref. 400 with permission from American Chemical Society, Copyright 2010. (d) and (e) SEM images collected from the free surfaces of SnTe and Sn0.84Sb0.16Te melt-spun ribbons, respectively. Reproduced from ref. 398 with permission from Elsevier, Copyright 2021.

Figure 1.7

(a) Schematic illustration of melt spinning in the synthesis of SnTe-based ribbons. Reproduced from ref. 398 with permission from Elsevier, Copyright 2021. (b) and (c) TEM images of the contact surface and free surface, respectively of BiSbTe melt-spun ribbons. Reproduced from ref. 400 with permission from American Chemical Society, Copyright 2010. (d) and (e) SEM images collected from the free surfaces of SnTe and Sn0.84Sb0.16Te melt-spun ribbons, respectively. Reproduced from ref. 398 with permission from Elsevier, Copyright 2021.

Close modal

The microstructures generated in melt spun materials are sensitive to their positions relative to the rotating Cu wheel. 398,400,401 In general, melt spinning will create ribbons with two entirely different surfaces: the surface that contacts the Cu wheel is defined as the contact surface, while the opposing one is called the free surface. These two surfaces have significantly distinct cooling rates, temperatures, critical radii of nucleation and growth rates of nucleation sites, leading to the formation of multiscale microstructures. 391,400 Progressing from the contact surface towards the free surface of the ribbons, one can observe an evolution from amorphous microstructures, through fine nanocrystalline regions, to larger nano/micro-sized crystals. 263,400 This is what occurs in Bi2Te3-based materials for example (Figure 1.7(b) and (c)) and the contact surface of a Bi0.48Sb1.52Te3 ribbon features an amorphous structure embedded with 5–10 nm nanocrystalline domains, while the free surface is characterised by micro-sized dendritic crystals with nanoscale features. 400 Significantly, the nanostructures of melt-spun ribbons are determined not only by the melt spinning process but also by the properties of the starting materials, so different materials could possess totally different nano/microstructures. 398,402 For example, Yan et al. controllably synthesised SnTe ribbons consisting of columnar grains via melt spinning (Figure 1.7(d) and (e)) and found that Sb doping effectively hindered crystal growth during solidification, leading to a decrease in the diameters of the SnTe-based columnar grains. 398 To summarise, adjusting the chemical compositions of the raw materials and the cooling conditions during melt spinning can effectively dictate the growth of different nanostructured chalcogenide materials.

Energy serves as the backbone for modern society. The accomplishments of civilisation have mainly been achieved through the increasingly extensive and efficient harnessing of multi-form energy to extend human ingenuity and capability. The world's routine consumption of energy is confronted by a series of serious challenges in the context of long-term sustainability, which include the depletion of traditional non-renewable fossil fuel reserves, rapidly surging energy demands, global warming, and other energy-relevant environmental problems. 403,404 As a sustainable energy supply is essential for global development, the exploration of novel high-efficiency strategies for clean, renewable energy storage and conversion is becoming increasingly urgent. 404,405 Among different types of materials, metal chalcogenides, exhibiting rich chemical compositions, diverse crystal structures, tuneable nano/microstructures, and fascinating physicochemical properties, have been considered as promising building blocks for renewable energy conversion and storage devices. 6,72,108,406–408 In addition, many metal chalcogenides possess several other advantages with respect to the selection of materials for devices, such as relatively low cost and high Earth abundance, each of which are of great significance for practical (commercial) application. 108 Metal chalcogenides have attracted wide attention in a variety of promising energy-related applications, such as lithium-ion batteries, 409–412 supercapacitors, 413–418 thermoelectric conversion, 109,188,419–425 solar cells 9,58,298,426,427 and catalysis. 428–432 This section will focus on these typical applications of metal chalcogenides.

Efficient energy storage is a long-standing scientific and technological issue that has global effects on humanity. Electrochemical techniques with the advantages of environmental friendliness and high efficiency are regarded as ones of the most promising candidates for clean energy storage. 433–435 Secondary batteries, also called rechargeable batteries, comprise cells constructed for storing and releasing electrical energy in which each cell, after discharge, can be restored to its original charged state. Metal chalcogenides feature in various battery chemistries, including lithium-ion, sodium-ion and lithium–sulfur batteries among others. 436–440  

A lithium-ion battery (LIB) refers to a type of secondary battery, which utilises internal lithium ions and external electrons to move between the positive and negative electrodes to convert chemical energy into electricity and vice versa. LIBs entered the energy stage in the early 1970s and have been quickly developed since their first commercialisation by the Sony Corporation in 1991. 441,442 The main components of a LIB include a positive electrode (i.e., cathode), a negative electrode (i.e., anode), an electrolyte and a separator. The operation principles of LIBs can be summarised as follows (Figure 1.8): (1) when LIBs are charging, Li+ ions de-intercalate under an applied potential from the cathode and then intercalate into (react with) the anode; (2) when discharging, Li+ ions transport through the electrolyte to intercalate back into (react with) the cathode, generating a current. 443,444 During such charge/discharge cycles, Li+ ions shuttle back and forth between the cathode and anode, realising the interconversion between chemical energy and electrical energy and enabling electrochemical energy storage within a battery. Accordingly, LIBs are also referred as ‘rocking chair batteries’, as originally proposed by Armand et al. in 1980. 445  

Figure 1.8
A diagrammatic representation of a lithium-ion battery.The lithium-ion battery consists of a cathode (represented by blue layers), an anode (composed of a layered structure), and an electrolyte. The cathode and anode have golden spheres (lithium ions) intercalated within them. During charging, lithium ions move from the cathode to the anode through the electrolyte, and electrons flow from the cathode to the anode through the external circuit. During discharging, lithium ions move from the anode to the cathode and electrons flow from the anode to the cathode.

Schematic illustration of the working principle for LIBs.

Figure 1.8
A diagrammatic representation of a lithium-ion battery.The lithium-ion battery consists of a cathode (represented by blue layers), an anode (composed of a layered structure), and an electrolyte. The cathode and anode have golden spheres (lithium ions) intercalated within them. During charging, lithium ions move from the cathode to the anode through the electrolyte, and electrons flow from the cathode to the anode through the external circuit. During discharging, lithium ions move from the anode to the cathode and electrons flow from the anode to the cathode.

Schematic illustration of the working principle for LIBs.

Close modal

LIBs have already broadly served as the predominant power supply for consumer electronics and electric vehicles for several decades, owing to their relatively high energy density, low self-discharge rate and good cycle life. 446–451 Commercial LIBs generally utilise graphite as anodes and oxide Li-ion intercalation host materials (e.g., LiCoO2) as cathodes. However, these electrode materials experience several limitations. For example, the relatively low theoretical capacity (372 mA h g−1) and slow Li+ diffusion rate (10−8 cm2 s−1) of the graphite anode impose restrictions on the energy density and power density of LIBs, respectively. 108 Moreover, the growing demands for lighter and thinner LIBs with higher capacity has boosted ongoing research for new electrode materials with superior properties. Therefore, tremendous efforts have been devoted to the exploration and design of alternative electrode materials with high energy storage performance. 452–455 Among them, metal chalcogenides especially layered ones have been regarded as electrode materials of immense potential for LIBs due to the possibilities of high capacity and long cycling life. 409,456

Typically, MoS2 has been widely investigated as an anode material for rechargeable batteries since its layered structure and large specific surface area can provide plentiful active sites for the reversible electrochemical insertion of guest ions. 457–459 Additionally, MoS2 exhibits good capacity retention given the high reversibility of redox reactions with Li ions. 436 A high specific capacity of 750 mA h g−1 has been reported when using restacked MoS2 single layers as electrodes. 460 However, MoS2 has some intrinsic shortcomings: for example, the electrochemical performance is downgraded by the unfavourable reaction kinetics caused by its low electrical conductivity and the relatively large volume changes that occur during the charge and discharge processes. 461 Fortunately, the above problems can be mitigated via the modification of MoS2 using a number of different strategies. Introducing defects—defect engineering—has been shown to endow MoS2 with beneficial characteristics, such as providing additional electrochemically active sites for Li+, resulting in optimised electrochemical performance. 410,412,462 For example, vacancies introduced into MoS2 break the periodic crystal structure, leading to a much decreased interlayer diffusion energy barrier; 462 Qin et al. reported N-doped mesoporous MoS2 nanosheets with enhanced Li+ ion storage performance (a consistent capacity of 998 mA h g−1 after 100 cycles), which is a consequence of their large surface area, porous microstructure and enlarged interlayer distance. 410  

Additionally, the interplanar distance can play a decisive role in facilitating Li ion intercalation and diffusion in an MoS2 anode. Liu et al. prepared a highly ordered mesoporous MoS2 material with an expanded (002) interplanar spacing of 0.66 nm, providing sufficient space for ultra-fast Li+ ion intercalation. 463 In fact, the three-dimensional diffusion of Li+ is of vital importance to achieve fast charge/discharge kinetics. Tao et al. synthesised defect-enriched few-layer MoS2 nanosheets for Li+ ion storage and determined that the energy barrier for Li+ ions to pass through the double-vacancy MoS2 layer is only 0.238 eV, which is dramatically lower than the zero-defect (3.14 eV) and single-defect (7.97 eV) MoS2. 411 In addition, MoS2 can be incorporated with other capacitive and conductive materials to yield MoS2-based hybrid LIB electrodes with improved electrochemical performance and stability. 412,464–466 For example, MoS2/graphene composites exhibited a high reversible capacity of 1100 mA h g−1 at a current density of 100 mA g−1 and good cycling stability when applied as an anode in an LIB. 465 Similarly, MoS2/CNT hybrids achieved enhanced ionic transfer, thus yielding an extraordinary capacity of 1320 mA h g−1 at a current density of 100 mA g−1 and an impressive cycling stability of up to 1000 cycles without appreciable capacity fade. 466  

Apart from Mo2S, a variety of metal sulfides, selenides, and tellurides have also been explored and developed as high-performance LIB electrode materials. These include: MS (M = Zn, Mn, Fe, Sn, Cu, Ni, Co), 467–473 MSe (M = Sn, Zn, Fe), 474–476 SnTe, 477 MS2 (M = Mo, W, Sn, Zr, Ti, Fe, Ni, V, Co), 478–485 MSe2 (M = Mo, W, Co, Ni, Fe, Sn), 474,475,478,486,487 Cu2S, 488 M2S3 (M = In, Sb), 489,490 M2X3 (M = Sb, Bi; X = Se, Te), 491–495 VS4, 496 In3Se4, 497 Ni3S4 498 and Co9S8. 499  

The supercapacitor (SC) is considered as one of the most promising energy storage systems due to characteristic features such as high power density, fast charge/discharge, a long cycling lifespan, simple fabrication procedures and relatively low cost. This combination of features yields a device that bridges the gap between conventional capacitors and batteries. 500–505 Current commercial SCs are mainly based on carbon materials, which normally have limited energy densities (less than 10 W h kg−1). 506 A higher energy density is certainly desirable for almost all practical applications of SCs, so intensive efforts have been devoted to developing alternative electrode materials with higher specific capacitance. 414,507,508 Owing to the amalgamation of several intrinsic physicochemical properties coupled with good electrochemical performance, several metal chalcogenides have been proposed as electrode materials for SCs. 415 For example, two-dimensional layered architectures comprising metal chalcogenides and other conducting materials (e.g., chalcogenide/graphene) have been regarded as among the most promising electrode materials for high performance SCs. 509  

A SC consists of two working electrodes (composed of active materials deposited on current collectors), an electrolyte, and a separator that electrically isolates the two working electrodes. According to the different possible charge storage mechanisms, SCs can be classified into three types: electric double-layer capacitors (EDLCs), pseudo-capacitors and hybrid supercapacitors. 414,508,510,511 The function of EDLCs is controlled by the reversible adsorption/desorption of electrolyte ions at the electrode/electrolyte interface, which forms an electrical double layer region. 512,513 The energy storage achievable through this physical process is relatively low and highly dependent on the accessible surface area of the electrode materials for the adsorption/desorption of ions; high surface area carbon-based materials are typically excellent candidates to serve as EDLC electrodes. 514 In contrast, pseudo-capacitance is based on a quick and reversible faradaic charge transfer through redox and/or intercalation reactions in active materials. 515 These processes endow SCs with much higher charge storage capacities than EDLCs. The charge storage made possible via faradaic reactions in metal chalcogenides generates appreciably higher energy density in pseudo-capacitors when compared with carbon-based materials. 516 Hybrid SCs combine the concepts exploited in both EDLCs and pseudo-capacitors and contain two electrodes with very different characteristics; the electrode on one side demonstrates electrostatic capacitance, while the electrode on the other side functions via pseudo-capacitance. 413,511,517 Similar to any other energy storage system, the performance of an SC is mainly evaluated in terms of the specific capacity, the energy density and the power density.

Two-dimensional layered MoS2, which comes with the advantages of an ultrahigh surface area, excellent mechanical properties, high ionic conductivity and high theoretical capacity, is regarded as one of the most outstanding candidates for SCs. 418,518–520 For example, Fan et al. successfully prepared flower-like MoS2/C nanospheres with a high specific capacitance of 201.4 F g−1 at a current density of 0.2 A g−1. 520 Acerce et al. reported that chemically exfoliated MoS2 nanosheets containing a high proportion of metallic 1T phase can electrochemically intercalate ions such as H+, Na+ and K+, which therefore obtain high capacitances ranging from 400 to 700 F cm−3 in different aqueous electrolytes. 418 The resulting 1T nanostructured MoS2 film electrode was operated at a high voltage of 3.5 V in organic electrolytes, exhibiting favourable volumetric energy and power densities, as well as a high Coulombic efficiency of 95% after 5000 cycles. The excellent electrochemical performance is ascribed to the hydrophilicity and high electrical conductivity of 1T MoS2, as well as the ability of the exfoliated layers to dynamically expand and intercalate various ions. 418 Further, the synergetic effects that exist between MoS2 and carbon materials can facilitate charge transport and electrolyte diffusion in C/MoS2 composites and relieve the volume expansion/contraction of the electrode during cycling. 509,521,522 For example, da Silveira Firmiano et al. reported that an rGO/MoS2 hybrid electrode achieved an energy density of 63 W h kg−1 and an exceptional cycling stability with 92% specific capacitance remained after 1000 cycles. 509 Additionally, the coating of transition metals/metal oxides/metal sulfides on MoS2 works so as to both improve the structural stability and electrochemical performance of MoS2. 417 For example, Ti/TiO2/MoS2 coaxial hybrids demonstrated a capacitance of 230.2 F g−1 and an energy density of 2.70 W h kg−1 when adopted in a symmetrical SC, in addition to possessing both mechanical flexibility and stability. 417  

Alternatively, NiCo2S4 with a high redox activity has become very attractive as an SC electrode due to its high electrical conductivity, electrochemical activity, and capacity compared to mono-metallic sulfides. 416,523 Chen et al. reported that sea-urchin-like NiCo2S4 exhibited dramatically improved electrochemical properties when compared to the sulfides of either of the individual metals, Ni or Co. 524 The NiCo2S4 electrodes also exhibited high storage stability and long lifetimes with a 91.4% specific capacity retention after 5000 cycles at a current density of 20 A g−1. 524 Later, Pu et al. successfully prepared hollow hexagonal nanoplates of the same chalcogenide, NiCo2S4, which displayed a high specific capacitance of 437 F g−1 at a current density of 1 A g−1 using 3 mol L−1 KOH electrolyte solution. 525 Crucially, it was Chen et al. that showed that the electrochemical performance of NiCo2S4 was strongly associated with the Ni/Co atomic ratio and that the best performance was found in a composition with an Ni/Co atomic ratio of 1. 526 In addition, Ouyang et al. reported that an S-Co3O4@NiCo2S4 hierarchical structure exhibited battery-like behaviour with a remarkably large areal capacity of 10.9 mA h cm−2 at a current density of 8 mA cm−2, together with an outstanding cycling stability, demonstrating a capacity retention of 97.3% after 5000 cycles. 523 The excellent electrochemical performance of this hierarchical composite was attributed to plentiful electrochemically active sites, fast electron transport paths and the expanded surface area provided by the binder-free core–shell structure. 523  

A large proportion of energy generated worldwide is lost as waste heat. Effective recovery of waste heat is crucial for solving energy and environmental problems by providing supplemental electrical power without burning additional fossil fuels. Fortunately, thermoelectric technology offers a reliable and environmentally friendly solution to harvest electrical energy from the recycling of waste heat. 109,405,527,528 Additionally, thermoelectric technology can be utilised to convert heat produced by concentrated or unconcentrated sunlight into electricity. 529,530 This is important because infrared radiation with photon energy below the band gap of photosensitisers is not absorbed in conventional photovoltaic cells and generates only waste heat. 529 The three thermoelectric phenomena have been known since the respective discoveries made by Thomas Johann Seebeck, Jean Charles Athanase Peltier, and William Thomson in the 19th century and enable the direct and reversible conversion between heat and electricity in an all-solid-state system without noise, vibration, or emissions of greenhouse gases. 531–533 Solid-state power generation and refrigeration systems, based on the Seebeck and Peltier effects, respectively, have received intensive and sustained attention. 527,534–536 Figure 1.9(a) and (b) provide schematic diagrams of the Seebeck and Peltier effects, respectively. Thermoelectric devices possess many advantages, such as no moving parts and long lifespans that require no maintenance for long periods. These traits favour their use in fields such as remote power supplies (e.g., radioisotope thermoelectric generators), 537–539 the automotive industry, 540,541 temperature sensing, 542 temperature control devices, 543 and implantable/wearable devices. 544–546  

Figure 1.9
Two diagrammatic representations of the thermoelectric effects in a thermoelectric generator and a thermoelectric cooler.Part (a) shows a thermoelectric generator. One side is heated (heat source), while the other side is cooled (heat sink). The heat source is applied to one side of a p-n junction. The temperature difference causes a voltage to be generated across the device, driving an electric current through an external load. Part (b) shows a thermoelectric cooler. A current is applied across a p-n junction, creating a temperature difference. One side of the junction becomes hot (heat rejection), while the other side becomes cold (active cooling).

Schematic illustration of thermoelectric effects: (a) Seebeck effect and (b) Peltier effect.

Figure 1.9
Two diagrammatic representations of the thermoelectric effects in a thermoelectric generator and a thermoelectric cooler.Part (a) shows a thermoelectric generator. One side is heated (heat source), while the other side is cooled (heat sink). The heat source is applied to one side of a p-n junction. The temperature difference causes a voltage to be generated across the device, driving an electric current through an external load. Part (b) shows a thermoelectric cooler. A current is applied across a p-n junction, creating a temperature difference. One side of the junction becomes hot (heat rejection), while the other side becomes cold (active cooling).

Schematic illustration of thermoelectric effects: (a) Seebeck effect and (b) Peltier effect.

Close modal
In a typical thermoelectric device, both n- and p-type thermoelectric materials are needed and assembled with electrodes and bonding materials. A junction is formed by a pair of p- and n-type semiconductors and a number of these junctions are connected electrically in series and thermally in parallel to form a thermoelectric device, as illustrated in Figure 1.10. The basic working principles are then as follows: 547 when applying a temperature gradient across the two ends of a thermoelectric material or device, the charge carriers will migrate from the hot side of the material to the cold side, creating a potential difference to power an external load (via the Seebeck effect, resulting in a voltage induced by a temperature gradient); conversely, if a thermoelectric material or device is connected to an external electric power source, it can function in an inverse fashion as a thermoelectric refrigerator (via the Peltier effect, generating a temperature gradient induced by an external voltage). The maximum energy conversion efficiency (η max) of a thermoelectric power generation device is given in eqn (1.1): 547  
(1.1)
Figure 1.10
A diagrammatic representation of a thermoelectric device.Several pairs of p-type (red) and n-type (blue) semiconductors are sandwiched between two ceramic plates. The p-type and n-type semiconductors in each pair are connected by a conductor plate.

Schematic illustration of a thermoelectric device.

Figure 1.10
A diagrammatic representation of a thermoelectric device.Several pairs of p-type (red) and n-type (blue) semiconductors are sandwiched between two ceramic plates. The p-type and n-type semiconductors in each pair are connected by a conductor plate.

Schematic illustration of a thermoelectric device.

Close modal
where ZT avg is the average figure of merit of thermoelectric material between T h and T c, where T h and T c are the temperatures of the hot and cold sides, The variable η c represents the Carnot efficiency, which is expressed in eqn (1.2): 547  
(1.2)
The η max value of a thermoelectric device is strongly dependent on the corresponding thermoelectric performance of the materials employed, which is evaluated (eqn (1.3)) by the dimensionless figure of merit (ZT): 547  
(1.3)

where S, σ, T, κ e and κ l are the Seebeck coefficient, electrical conductivity, absolute temperature, electronic thermal conductivity and lattice thermal conductivity, respectively.

High thermoelectric efficiency requires materials with high dimensionless figures of merit—high ZT materials—which are essential to make thermoelectric generation technologies competitive with other energy conversion methods that utilise heat as the energy source. 109 From eqn (1.3), we can intuitively see that an excellent thermoelectric material simultaneously requires a high power factor S 2 σ (representing good electrical transport) and a suppressed thermal conductivity κ (representing hindered thermal transport). The expressions defining σ, S and κ e are given in eqn (1.4)–(1.6), respectively: 548–550  
(1.4)
(1.5)
(1.6)

where n is the carrier concentration, e is the electron charge, µ is the carrier mobility, k B is the Boltzmann constant, T is the absolute temperature, h is the Planck constant, m* is the density of states effective mass, and L is the Lorenz number. Note that the expression for S (eqn (1.5)) is valid for a degenerate semiconductor with a parabolic band dispersion. It can be seen that these three parameters (σ, S and κ e) are coupled strongly through the carrier concentration n, which makes it difficult to optimise one parameter without (adversely) affecting the other parameters. Therefore, it is necessary to explore strategies that can realise either independent or synergistic regulation of electron/phonon transport in order to optimise thermoelectric performance. After long-term development, researchers have learnt to exploit numerous strategies to improve thermoelectric performance. This might be achieved by enhancing S 2 σ via energy band engineering, 170 optimising carrier concentration, 551 introducing resonant states 552,553 and/or utilising energy filtering effects. 554 Alternatively, performance could be improved via suppressing κ l through nanostructure engineering, 555 defect engineering 556,557 and/or by forming nanocomposites 305,385 and constructing multi-scale hierarchical structures, 558   etc. The current priority for developing high performance materials in the thermoelectric field remains to optimise the property parameters synergistically and to integrate all the above strategies effectively.

Generally, a good thermoelectric material behaves as a ‘phonon-glass electron-crystal’ (PGEC), with the excellent electrical properties typical of a crystalline solid and the ultralow thermal conductivity typical of a glass. 559,560 To date a number of thermoelectric materials, including metal chalcogenides, 100,108,424,425,561–566 skutterudites, 567–569 clathrates, 570–572 Zintl phase compounds, 573–576 complex alloys, 422,577,578 conductive polymers, 579–581 and some oxides, 582–584 have been identified as promising systems. Among them, metal chalcogenides have already demonstrated outstanding thermoelectric performance and with the huge structural and compositional flexibility that is manifest with chalcogenides, they offer a good platform for designing new and improved materials. 181,263,547,560 For example, Bi2Te3 and its solid solutions with Se or Sb are archetypal thermoelectric materials for operation in devices near room temperature, 112,187,193 and PbTe-related materials are prime candidates for medium-temperature applications; 419,585–587 both these systems are representative of traditional and well-established thermoelectric materials. In recent years, many new high performance thermoelectric chalcogenide materials have been identified and widely explored. SnSe- and Cu2Se-based materials are typical of the new focus for thermoelectrics providing not only some of the highest ZT values in existence, but also meeting ecological requirements of Earth-abundant component elements and low environmental impact. 385,421,425,588–590 We now focus principally on these four metal chalcogenide systems (Bi2X3, PbX, SnX and Cu2X), their fundamental chemistry and their progress to date as bulk thermoelectrics.

As state-of-the-art near-room-temperature thermoelectric materials, (Bi,Sb)2(Te,Se)3 were first commercialised and utilised in thermoelectric refrigerators several decades ago. 547 Across all the possible solid solutions, the compounds Bi2Te2.7Se0.3 and Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3 correspond to the optimal compositions of n- and p-type high-performing thermoelectric materials, respectively. 530 Layer-structured Bi2Te3 demonstrates anisotropic thermoelectric properties with higher ZT values in the ab plane than along the c-axis. 182,183 Therefore, one way to enhance the ZT of Bi2Te3-based compounds is to influence the orientation of crystals. For example, hot deformation has been proven to be an effective method to increase the degree of texturing (preferred orientation) and to optimise the concentration of defects in polycrystalline Bi2Te3. 591–594 Consequently, the ZT values of the corresponding n-type and p-type Bi2Te3-based materials can reach levels of 1.2 (445 K) 591 and 1.3 (380 K), 595 respectively. Nanostructuring can also enhance thermoelectric performance by way of reducing lattice thermal conductivity through introducing high-density grain boundaries. 100,112,596–598 For example, Poudel et al. achieved significantly improved ZT values (a peak ZT of 1.4 at 373 K) in a p-type Bi–Sb–Te nanostructured bulk material prepared by ball milling followed by hot pressing. 100 The magnitude of the figure of merit was mainly ascribed to the low lattice thermal conductivity resulting from the intensified phonon scattering by grain boundaries and defects; 100 similarly, p-type nanostructured Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3 prepared by combining melt spinning and spark plasma sintering reached a maximum ZT of 1.56 at 300 K. 598 The thermoelectric performance of Bi2Te3-based alloys can also be drastically improved through the introduction of nanoscale secondary phases into matrices. 599 For example, (Bi,Sb)2Te3 composites embedded with nanostructured SiC achieved a ZT of 1.33 at 373 K. 599 Additionally, anti-site defects and vacancies in Bi2Te3 can play decisive roles in the conduction type and carrier concentration. 561,597,600,601 Hence, defect engineering can be used very successfully to tune the thermoelectric performance of Bi2Te3-based compounds. A further example of this approach was provided by Kim et al. who adopted a liquid-phase compaction method to create dislocation arrays at grain boundaries in Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3. 600 In this way they were able to obtain very obvious reductions in lattice thermal conductivity, leading to a maximum ZT of 1.86 at 320 K. 600  

Lead chalcogenides, especially PbTe-based materials, are traditional high-performance thermoelectric materials for mid-range temperature (500–900 K) applications. 585,586,602,603 The compounds crystallise with the face-centred cubic NaCl crystal structure (space group Fmm). Various dopants have been applied to tune the conduction type and carrier concentration. For example, acceptor doping (p-type) can be achieved by placing Li, Na and K onto the Pb sites, while donor doping (n-type) is possible by either introducing Ga, In, La, Sb, Al, Bi onto the Pb sites or by doping Cl, Br, I on the Te sites. Among these options, Na has proved to be a very effective dopant for p-type PbX (X = S, Se, Te) systems, possessing the highest solubility in PbS (2 mol%) and somewhat lower solubilities in PbSe (0.9 mol%) and PbTe (0.5 mol%). 604 Na doping also introduces point defects and precipitates, leading to a reduced lattice thermal conductivity. 604 Regarding n-type PbX, the best performing materials have been proven to be Al-doped PbSe 605 (with a ZT of 1.3 at 850 K) and I-doped PbTe 606 (ZT = 1.4 at 700–850 K). Creating nanoprecipitates and/or building hierarchical structures can additionally significantly reduce the lattice thermal conductivity of PbX. 558,602,607–610 Wu et al. reported that 3% Na-doped (PbTe)0.8(PbS)0.2 achieved a maximum ZT of 2.3 at 923 K due mainly to the extremely low thermal conductivity arising from the phase boundaries, 610 whereas Biswas et al. achieved significantly reduced lattice thermal conductivity and dramatically enhanced thermoelectric performance (a ZT of 2.2 at 923 K) in PbTe-based materials by constructing multi-length scale hierarchical architectures that include point defects, nanoscale endotaxial precipitates and mesoscale grain boundaries in the same material. 558 Such architectures are capable of scattering phonons across different wavelengths. 558 Jiang et al. realised a superior ZT of 1.8 at 900 K in an n-type PbSe-based high-entropy material that consisted of each of Pb, Sb, Sn, Se, Te and S in a chalcogenide of chemical formula of Pb0.89Sb0.012Sn0.1Se0.5Te0.25S0.25. 611 Such a high ZT was attributed to first, the consistent electronic transport properties that result from a stabilised single-phase structure and second, the ultra-low lattice thermal conductivity that arises from the strong phonon scattering across a highly strained lattice. 611  

Tin selenide (SnSe) has a layered orthorhombic structure derived from a three-dimensional distortion of the rock-salt structure and possesses a strong anisotropy. 425,588 SnSe undergoes a second-order displacive phase transition from the Pnma space group to a higher-symmetry Cmcm space group when the temperature increases above ∼750 K. 588 SnSe is one of the most promising Te-free thermoelectric candidates emerging in the recent decade and meets requirements of environmental friendliness and low cost in addition to outstanding thermoelectric performance. 425,589,612 Specifically, the low lattice thermal conductivity is due to a strong anharmonicity, and the excellent electrical transport properties result from multiple electronic valence bands. 425,551,589 SnSe-based materials have garnered great attention and experienced vigorous development over a short period of time. 420,613 For example, high ZT values of ∼2.6 at 923 K  425 and ∼2.8 at 773 K  612 were reported in p-type Na-doped SnSe and n-type Br-doped SnSe single crystals, respectively, which originate from both a very low lattice thermal conductivity and the high magnitude of the power factor. Meanwhile, the relatively less impressive thermoelectric performance of polycrystalline SnSe has also been improved by various strategies, such as doping, 378,614–616 forming solid solutions with other chalcogens, 80,617–619 nanostructuring, 614,620,621 obtaining higher purity samples with minimal oxidation 331,622 and composite engineering. 305,340,623–626

p-Type Cu2Se-based materials constitute the other main group of candidate thermoelectrics that have been explored extensively in the past decade and their popularity originates from their phonon-liquid electron-crystal (PLEC) behaviour. 385,423,424,590,627 Cu2Se has a unusual cubic structure at elevated temperature, where ordered Se anions form a rigid sublattice and provide pathways for charge carriers, while Cu cations are randomly distributed around the static Se. 424 The mobile Cu ions in Cu2Se can scatter phonons significantly and eliminate partial transverse vibrational modes, which leads to extremely low lattice thermal conductivity while preserving good electrical conductivity. 424 Liu et al. first reported this liquid-like Cu+ transport behaviour in non-stoichiometric Cu2−x Se and realised a high ZT of 1.5 at 1000 K inspiring systematic investigations of the selenide's PLEC phenomenon and encouraging multiple efforts to enhance thermoelectric performance further. 424 Ball milling and hot pressing was found to induce an extremely low lattice thermal conductivity (0.4–0.5 W m−1 K−1) and a ZT of ∼1.6 at 973 K; 559 as with other chalcogenide thermoelectrics, substitution and nanostructuring strategies also proved extremely successful. 628 Cu1.94Se0.5S0.5 solid solutions achieved a remarkable ZT of 2.3 at 1000 K, 628 whereas formation of a Cu2Se/CuInSe2 nanocomposite doped with 1 mol% In improved chemical stability of the selenide and yielded an extraordinary peak ZT value of 2.6 at 850 K. 627 At a likely different length scale, Cu2Se/CNT hybrids achieved a remarkable high ZT of 2.4 at 1000 K due to the homogeneously dispersed CNTs inside the Cu2Se matrix and correspondingly formed Cu2Se/CNT hybrid interfaces. 385 Apart from Cu2Se, other Cu-based PLECs, such as Cu2S, 629 Cu5FeS4, 55,56,630,631 and CuAgSe, 632 have also attained excellent ZT due to low lattice thermal conductivity and improved electrical transport properties.

In addition to chalcogenides of Bi, Pb, Sn and Cu, Ag2X (X = S, Se, Te), 296,633–637 GeX (X = Se, Te) 638,639 and various indium selenides (e.g., In4Se3, In3Se4) 7,562 have also been explored for thermoelectric applications. Orthorhombic-structured Ag2Se, for example, demonstrates high ZT near room-temperature due to its large carrier mobility and low lattice thermal conductivity. 296,636,637 The former is related to the low band effective mass and the latter is ascribed to the low cut-off frequency and group velocity as well as the hybridisation of the optical and acoustic phonon branches. 636 Recently, Ag2Se/CNT composites were synthesised by in situ solution synthesis and spark plasma sintering; due to the interfacial phonon scattering and energy filtering effect, the optimal Ag2Se/CNT sample registers a remarkably low κ l of 0.27 W m−1 K−1 and a slightly enhanced power factor of 2.71 mW m−1 K−2 at 375 K, leading to an exceptional peak ZT of 0.97 at 375 K. 636 Similarly, the AgSbSe2 component in Ag2Se/AgSbSe2 composites enables intensified phonon scattering and impeded crack propagation, leading to an excellent average ZT of ∼0.89 between 300 and 375 K and a compressive strength of 197.3 MPa. 637 Undoubtedly, metal chalcogenides have established themselves as most promising thermoelectrics, particularly in the low and medium temperature ranges.

Sunlight is the most widely and abundantly distributed energy source and the solar energy that strikes the Earth in a day is much more than the total energy consumption of the world in a year. 640,641 Energy harvesting directly from sunlight provides a desirable solution for fulfilling the needs of clean energy without negative environmental impact. Solar cells or photovoltaics can capture sunlight and convert solar energy into electricity. These are therefore excellent devices for solar power generation and have already been commercialised, with most of the solar cells that have been utilised based on crystalline silicon. 427,642 High-purity silicon is expensive and so during the past few decades substantial efforts have been devoted to exploring and tailoring various semiconductors for solar cells with lower manufacturing costs compared to silicon without incurring a significant loss of conversion efficiency. 643–647 Metal chalcogenide semiconductors such as cadmium telluride (CdTe) and copper indium gallium selenide, Cu(In,Ga)(Se,S)2, possess outstanding photovoltaic performance but can be produced relatively cheaply compared to silicon. 426,648 The chalcogenide materials have therefore been considered as key materials in the development of high-efficiency solar cells. 649,650

A solar cell is a semiconductor-based device that serves to convert light energy (certain wavelengths) into electricity via the photovoltaic effect. The key indicator in assessing the performance of a solar cell is the amount of electrical power that can be extracted from the light available to it. The size (energy) of the band gap of the semiconducting photoelectrode is inherently important since it should be suitable for the utilisation of the maximal portion of the solar radiation spectrum. 651 The thickness of the semiconducting photoelectrode needs to be large enough to absorb the maximum number of photons of incident solar radiation. The working principle of energy conversion in a solar cell involves three basic processes, 643,652,653 as illustrated in Figure 1.11: (1) absorption of light, which generates electron–hole pairs in the semiconductor; (2) separation of charge carriers of opposite types; (3) separate withdrawal of these carriers to an external circuit. If one considers a p–n junction under illumination for example, the operation of the semiconducting solar cell can be interpreted as follows: the fundamental feature of the junction is the existence of a strong electric field and in equilibrium the electrochemical potentials on the two sides of the junction are equal, so no net electric current is generated; under illumination, however, electron–hole pairs are generated in the semiconductor and subsequently separated by the electric field effect of the junction. 654,655

Figure 1.11
A diagrammatic representation of a p-n junction solar cell.Four layers are shown, one below the other. From the top, the first layer is the surface electrode, followed by the n-type semiconductor, followed by the p-type semiconductor, and the bottom layer is the back electrode. Positive charges move downward, and negative charges move upward. Sunlight strikes the surface electrode. The surface electrode and the back electrode are connected to a lit bulb.

Schematic illustration of the working principle of a solar cell.

Figure 1.11
A diagrammatic representation of a p-n junction solar cell.Four layers are shown, one below the other. From the top, the first layer is the surface electrode, followed by the n-type semiconductor, followed by the p-type semiconductor, and the bottom layer is the back electrode. Positive charges move downward, and negative charges move upward. Sunlight strikes the surface electrode. The surface electrode and the back electrode are connected to a lit bulb.

Schematic illustration of the working principle of a solar cell.

Close modal

CdTe is an important candidate for solar cell applications because of its high optical absorption coefficient and direct band gap (1.45 eV) that closely matches to the solar spectrum for optimum conversion efficiency. 656 For example, a CdTe thin film with a thickness of ∼2 µm can absorb nearly 100% of incident solar radiation. 657 Various methods can be utilised for the deposition of CdTe thin films, such as electrodeposition and metal organic chemical vapour deposition. 658–661 In general, the most common CdTe-based solar cell configuration is composed of a p-type CdTe absorber layer and an n-type CdS window layer. 662 A key reason for choosing a CdS/CdTe heterojunction is that the two compounds are miscible and thus an interdiffusion reaction between these two materials will lead to the formation of a CdS1−x Te x interlayer, which benefits the solar cell performance. 663 CdS/CdTe thin-film solar cells possess an ideal band gap and a high absorption coefficient meaning that a high energy conversion efficiency above 20% can be achieved. 664  

Chalcopyrite Cu(In,Ga)(Se,S)2—known in shorthand as CIGS—has emerged as one of the most promising photovoltaic materials for low-cost, high-efficiency thin film solar cells. Its utility arises from a compositionally-tuneable band gap, high stability under extended periods of excitation and high optical absorption coefficients resulting from the direct band gap character. 665 A high efficiency of 20% for CIGS solar cells has been recorded, 666 which highlights them as probably the most viable substitute for Si in solar cells. The band gap in CIGS can approach ideal values by fine tuning the chemical composition; for example, the band gaps of CuInSe2 and CuGaSe2 are ∼1.0 and ∼1.7 eV, respectively. 667,668 Generally, the preparation of CIGS-based solar cells starts with the deposition of an absorber material on a Mo-coated glass substrate. 669 The absorber material yielding the highest efficiency is CIGS with a Ga/(Ga+In) ratio of approximately 20% prepared through co-evaporation from elemental sources. 44 Overall, the CIGS solar cell has become a relatively mature, highly efficient energy conversion technology that is commercially produced widely. 670–672  

The hydrogen economy has become a very promising alternative to the current hydrocarbon economy and green hydrogen generation typically involves the process of splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen to harvest renewable energy. The generated hydrogen can then be utilised as a fuel. 428 Metal chalcogenides have arisen as prime candidates for water splitting via catalytic reactions because of highly relevant features such as catalytic edge effects and tuneable band gaps. 673–676 Such catalytic processes are mainly driven by external electrons from either applied current (electrocatalysis) or light irradiation (photocatalysis).

Typically, in the electrocatalytic process of water splitting, the two half reactions—the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and the oxygen evolution reaction (OER)—occur at the cathode and anode of an electrolytic cell to produce gaseous molecular hydrogen and oxygen, 677 respectively, as illustrated in Figure 1.12. In electrocatalytic water splitting, the HER generally proceeds via two successive steps. The first step of the HER is the adsorption of H via the transfer of a proton and its combination with an electron (the Volmer reaction). The equivalent reaction step in alkaline media requires water dissociation to provide the proton (an energetically more demanding process). For the second step, there are two possibilities: one is the Heyrovsky reaction which tends to occur when the concentration of adsorbed H is relatively low. Here the adsorbed H atom combines with a proton from the electrolyte and an electron transferred from the electrode surface to form one equivalent of H2; the other possibility is the Tafel reaction, in which two adsorbed H atoms combine with each other to form one molecule of H2. The determination of which reaction step is rate-determining can be simply discerned by measuring the linear Tafel slope from the polarisation curves. 677 The Tafel slope (from a plot of the overpotential vs. log current density) represents the response of the reaction rate (current density) to the potential change. It reflects the difficulty of the electrode process; the higher the slope, the more difficult the electrode process. 428 The overall reaction pathways for the HER are given in eqn (1.7)–(1.10): 428,678

Figure 1.12
A diagrammatic representation of the process of electrocatalytic water splitting.A cathode and an anode are connected to an external power source. A membrane separates the anode and cathode compartments. Water molecules at the anode are oxidised, releasing oxygen gas and hydrogen ions. At the cathode, hydrogen ions combine with electrons to form hydrogen gas.

Schematic illustration of the process of electrocatalysis for water splitting in acidic media.

Figure 1.12
A diagrammatic representation of the process of electrocatalytic water splitting.A cathode and an anode are connected to an external power source. A membrane separates the anode and cathode compartments. Water molecules at the anode are oxidised, releasing oxygen gas and hydrogen ions. At the cathode, hydrogen ions combine with electrons to form hydrogen gas.

Schematic illustration of the process of electrocatalysis for water splitting in acidic media.

Close modal
In acidic media:
(1.7)
(1.8)
In alkaline media:
(1.9)
(1.10)

where the symbol ‘*’ represents the active sites on the catalyst surface, and the ‘ads’ represents adsorbed state of intermediates (Hads).

Compared to the HER, the anodic OER is a complicated multistep electron–proton transfer process accompanied by the absorption of different oxygen intermediates. 679 The generally accepted hypothesis behind the OER mechanism is that the oxygen precursor undergoes the stepwise adsorption–deprotonation–coupling–desorption process (namely, OHads → Oads → OOHads → O2ads), which is typically named the absorbate evolution mechanism (AEM). 679 Generally, the AEM is proposed to involve several concerted proton–electron transfer reactions. 679 Taking the alkaline OER as an example, OH is initially chemisorbed on the coordinatively unsaturated metal site and then effectively deprotonates to generate Oads species (and water + an electron). 679 Afterwards, O–O coupling occurs through nucleophilic attack of OH to form an OOHads intermediate. 679 Finally, the O2 molecule desorbs from the catalyst surface along with a second deprotonation (forming water), releasing the active metal site and looping the reaction. 679 The overall reaction pathways for the OER in acidic and alkaline media are given in eqn (1.11)–(1.20): 677,679

In acidic media:
(1.11)
(1.12)
(1.13)
(1.14)
(1.15)
In alkaline media:
(1.16)
(1.17)
(1.18)
(1.19)
(1.20)

where the symbol ‘*’ represents the active sites on the catalyst surface, and the ‘ads’ represents adsorbed state of intermediates (OHads, Oads, OOHads, and O2ads).

The different mechanistic steps of the HER depend on the nature of the electrode materials and the electrolyte media under investigation. 680,681 Notably, since the dissociation of water is required for HER in neutral and alkaline electrolytes, the reaction in such electrolytes is normally two to three orders of magnitude slower than the equivalent process in an acidic medium. 682,683 Overall, H2 production is strongly dependent on the adsorption/desorption processes, which in turn is governed by the corresponding Gibbs free energy. 678  

Currently, Ru/Ir-based materials work most efficiently for catalysing the OER and Pt-group metals possess the highest electrocatalytic HER activity. However, the high costs and scarcity of both types of catalyst hinder large-scale applications. 684,685 Over the past few decades, researchers have devoted intensive efforts to exploring and designing novel OER/HER catalyst candidates with high Earth abundance, reduced manufacturing cost, and excellent performance. 686–688 Among these candidates, metal chalcogenides are considered as among the most promising electrocatalysts, owing to their low cost and impressive catalytic performance. 689 There are generally two strategies to enhance the activity of an electrocatalyst: by improving the intrinsic catalytic activity and by increasing the number of exposed active sites. 690 As to the former, approaches such as phase engineering, 691,692 defect engineering, 693–695 crystal facet engineering, 696 and multi-metal engineering 697,698 have been developed. Meanwhile, processing a given catalyst by nanostructuring, hybridising with conductive carbon-based materials, and growing on three-dimensional substrates can effectively expose more active sites. 699–704 These strategies can be combined synergistically to achieve even better catalytic performance.

Among the recently developed OER catalysts based on metal chalcogenides, Ni-based and Co-based chalcogenides have been investigated extensively and exhibit excellent activity and stability. 705–708 Zhou et al. reported that Ni3S2 nanorod arrays had a notable OER activity with a low η 10 value of 187 mV (η 10 is used to evaluate the potential difference between the potential reaching a current density of 10 mA cm−2 and the thermodynamic potential of HER/OER). 707 Gao et al. reported that orthorhombic CoTe2 had better OER activity and stability compared with hexagonal CoTe, which is ascribed to its large active surface, high electrical conductivity and the low adsorption energy of the *OOH intermediate. 708 Furthermore, the incorporation of suitable foreign ions into metal chalcogenides can function well in terms of improving the OER activity. 431,705 For example, Gu et al. synthesised Fe-doped NiSe2 ultrathin nanowires with a small η 10 of 268 mV in 0.1 mol L−1 KOH, which was 99 mV and 121 mV lower than that of undoped NiSe2 and commercial RuO2, respectively. 431 Additionally, the surface properties of metal chalcogenides can be tuned by forming composites with other materials, such that the OER catalytic activity can be enhanced. 709–712 A representative case is the employment of lamellar CoSe2 nanobelts, 709 which have been investigated in some depth as a platform for the grafting of foreign materials successfully giving rise to high performing OER catalysts. 710–712 It was observed that chemically grafting an appropriate material (e.g., graphene, Mn3O4, and CeO2) onto CoSe2 significantly improved its OER activity. 710–712 For example, the obtained CeO2/CoSe2 composite catalyst had a much improved OER activity, with a small η 10 of 288 mV and a small Tafel slope of 44 mV dec−1 in 0.1 mol L−1 KOH, when compared to pure CoSe2 and RuO2 catalysts. It was hypothesised that the CeO2 nanoparticles contain highly mobile oxygen vacancies that could bind adsorbates much stronger than normal oxide sites and additionally act so as to transfer electrons to CoSe2. Much of the activity of the catalyst is envisaged to originate from the Co(iv) in CoSe2, which facilitates the formation of OOH and subsequent oxidation to O2. Therefore, the introduction of CeO2 appears beneficial in forming OOHads on the composite surface and given the high mobility of oxygen vacancies at the nanoscale, promotes water oxidation to produce O2 on the CeO2/CoSe2 composite. 712  

The research on chalcogenide HER catalysts begins with MoS2, which has been identified as an efficient HER catalyst both theoretically and experimentally. 713,714 The HER activity of MoS2 arises from exposed edge surfaces that possess an optimised H* adsorption behaviour similar to Pt. 713–715 This motivated the development of numerous MoS2 nanostructures to maximise the exposure fraction of edge sites, 157,685,692,715–717 leading to a substantially reduced η 10 value of ∼100 mV in acidic electrolytes. However, the HER performance of MoS2 in alkaline electrolytes is relatively poor due to unfavourable water adsorption and a slow water dissociation step. 718,719 Doping suitable transition metals (e.g., Ni, Co) into MoS2 has been shown to accelerate the water dissociation process, thus enabling improved HER activity in alkali electrolytes. 718–720 Nevertheless, substantial efforts have also been devoted to exploring other metal chalcogenide catalysts for the HER in alkaline electrolytes. 429,430,704,721,722 For example, Miao et al. reported a mesoporous FeS2 material with a η 10 of merely 96 mV and a low Tafel slope of 78 mV dec−1 in 0.1 mol L−1 KOH. 721 Alternatively, Yin et al. studied the influence of various metal dopants (Co, Fe and Cu) on the HER activity of NiS2, and found that Co-doped NiS2 had the best HER activity and excellent long-term stability. 722 Intriguingly, it has also been reported that P doping can have beneficial effects on dichalcogenide HER catalysts, for example, inducing a phase change of CoSe2 from cubic to orthorhombic, which resulted in the orthorhombic-CoSe2|P (8 wt% dopant) exhibiting a much enhanced HER activity (η 10 of 104 mV in 1 mol L−1 KOH) as compared to the cubic form of CoSe2 (η 10 of 330 mV). 429 Similarly, N doping can have a positive effect, as demonstrated in NiCo2S4. 430 The presence of N was proposed to accelerate the desorption of H* from the S sites and promoted water dissociation, delivering a η 10 value of 41 mV—a significant decrease from the value of 104 mV for undoped NiCo2S4. 430  

As seen from previous sections, the effective utilisation of solar energy is essential for the achievement of sustainable energy systems. Solar energy collection, conversion and storage are three key processes for practical applications, and these processes can be integrated in a single monolithic photocatalytic water splitting cell, within which solar energy is converted and then stored in simple H–H chemical bonds. 723 Since Fujishima and Honda's ground-breaking work in 1972 on hydrogen generation utilising an n-type TiO2 electrode, 724 the research in the photocatalysis field has concentrated on the exploration of suitable catalytic materials. 725–743 A number of oxide photocatalysts reported show high activities for water splitting, including TiO2, 725–730 ZnO, 731–736 Cu2O, 737,738 and WO3. 739–743 However, without doping or other optimisation, these oxide photocatalysts are generally active only under ultraviolet light, which accounts for only 5% of the solar spectrum at the Earth surface. 744 As a large fraction of solar light is visible light, it is indispensable to explore and develop novel visible-light-driven photocatalysts for water splitting. In this respect, metal chalcogenides have received considerable attention as candidates for visible-light-driven photocatalysts for water splitting, owing to their suitably narrow band gaps and the position of their valence bands at relatively negative potentials compared to oxides. 744  

While the source of electrons is supplied by an applied external current in electrocatalytic reactions, photocatalysis is driven purely by light and involves five successive processes, including light-material interaction, photogenerated electron–hole excitation and separation, molecular adsorption, surface redox reaction, and product desorption. 745,746 When a semiconductor is irradiated by light (where the incident energy is larger than the band gap), electrons and holes are generated in the conduction band (CB) and valence band (VB), respectively. The photogenerated electrons and holes cause redox reactions similar to electrolysis and water molecules are oxidised by the holes to form oxygen and are reduced by the electrons to form hydrogen for overall water splitting. 744,747 Efficient photocatalytic water splitting relies on the band gap and position of the CB and VB in the electronic structure of the photocatalyst. 748 The band gap determines the energy of the absorbed photons and the produced excitons; viz. a narrower band gap implies a wider optical absorption region. In addition, the bottom of the CB must be more negative than the redox potential of H+/H2, while the top of VB should be more positive than the redox potential of O2/H2O. 749 These criteria indicate that the band gap should be wider than 1.23 eV. 749  

Cadmium chalcogenides (such as CdS) are among the most popular visible-light-driven photocatalysts. 744,750–753 CdS is a well-established photocatalyst with a band gap of 2.4 eV and demonstrates high activity for hydrogen production under visible-light irradiation. 751–753 Nanostructured, high surface area cadmium chalcogenides have proved to be extremely effective photocatalysts for several decades. For example, CdS nanoparticles within a narrow particle size envelope (6–12 nm) and with higher hydrogen evolution rates than bulk materials can be prepared by a precipitation process using different zeolite matrices as templates; 752 CdS nanostructures containing nanopores with a diameter of ∼3 nm are able to yield a very large BET surface area of ∼112.8 m2 g−1 and delivered a hydrogen yield of about 4.1 mmol h−1 under visible-light irradiation. 753 Nanocomposite photocatalysts formed with other metal chalcogenides have also been shown to be successful. 751,754,755 In one case, MoS2–CdS and WS2–CdS nanocomposites could be fabricated from few layers of MoS2 or WS2 grown upon the surface of CdS, and the resulting nanohybrids rapidly produced astonishingly high yields of hydrogen (1472 mmol h−1 g−1 for MoS2–CdS, 1984 mmol h−1 g−1 for WS2–CdS) suggesting that the surface of the nanocomposites contained a higher concentration of active sites than CdS itself. 755 In fact, MoS2 and WS2 are increasingly finding application more widely as components in composites and heterostructures formed with photocatalytically-active oxides such as TiO2 and other chalcogenides such as ZnIn2S4. By forming the composites increased visible light absorption and enhanced charge carrier mobility have been observed. 756,757 All these efforts indicate the immense potential of non-precious metal chalcogenide-based catalysts in terms of the photocatalytic production of hydrogen.

This chapter aims to serve as a valuable introduction to the diverse and exciting contemporary solid-state materials chemistry of chalcogenides. In the opening sections it seeks to summarise the basic structures and properties of metal chalcogenides, focuses on the structural characteristics of typical layered metal chalcogenides, briefly captures the development of nanostructured metal chalcogenides and then introduces MoS2 and Bi2Te3, two typical chalcogenide materials with a wide range of applications. The chapter subsequently considers some of the principal synthesis methods that are available to produce single crystals, polycrystalline bulk powders, thin films and nanostructures of metal chalcogenides. Finally, the chapter concentrates on some of the most important fields of development in chalcogenide chemistry today, emphasising the energy storage and energy conversion applications of metal chalcogenides, including the basic principles behind these technologies, some of the foremost metal chalcogenides in use and some of the properties that lie behind their performance.

Chalcogenides with diverse structures and rich compositions exhibit an intriguing mix of electronic, physical and chemical characteristics which not only lead to unusual and rare phenomena but also carve a path to useful applications. There is still plenty of scope for the further manipulation of such a plentiful array of chemical and physical properties and there are many chalcogenide systems that are yet to see their remarkable features exploited. Behind such developments, the understanding of the function of chalcogenides and the underpinning chemistry responsible is critical. We hope that this introduction to some of the fundamentals of chalcogenide chemistry—including crystal chemistry, synthesis approaches and key properties and applications—might inspire the reader to read, learn further and to go on to discover still more regarding these fascinating materials.

1.
Bouroushian
M.
,
Electrochemistry of Metal Chalcogenides
,
Springer-Verlag
,
Berlin Heidelberg
, 1st edn,
2010
.
2.
Devillanova
F. A.
,
Handbook of Chalcogen Chemistry: New Perspectives in Sulfur, Selenium and Tellurium
,
Royal Society of Chemistry
,
United Kingdom
,
2007
.
3.
Ghorpade
U. V.
,
Suryawanshi
M. P.
,
Green
M. A.
,
Wu
T.
,
Hao
X.
,
Ryan
K. M.
,
Chem. Rev.
,
2023
, vol.
123
pg.
327
4.
Roof
L. C.
,
Kolis
J. W.
,
Chem. Rev.
,
1993
, vol.
93
pg.
1037
5.
Chivers
T.
,
Laitinen
R. S.
,
Chem. Soc. Rev.
,
2015
, vol.
44
pg.
1725
6.
Woods-Robinson
R.
,
Han
Y. B.
,
Zhang
H. Y.
,
Ablekim
T.
,
Khan
I.
,
Persson
K. A.
,
Zakutayev
A.
,
Chem. Rev.
,
2020
, vol.
120
pg.
4007
7.
Han
G.
,
Chen
Z.-G.
,
Drennan
J.
,
Zou
J.
,
Small
,
2014
, vol.
10
pg.
2747
8.
Liu
X.
,
Lee
S.
,
Furdyna
J. K.
,
Luo
T.
and
Zhang
Y.
,
Chalcogenide: From 3D to 2D and Beyond
,
Woodhead
,
United Kingdom
, 1st edn,
2019
.
9.
Wang
X.
,
Tang
R.
,
Wu
C.
,
Zhu
C.
,
Chen
T.
,
J. Energy Chem.
,
2018
, vol.
27
pg.
713
10.
Dalven
R.
,
Infrared Phys.
,
1969
, vol.
9
pg.
141
11.
Li
S.
,
Li
X.
,
Ren
Z.
,
Zhang
Q.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2018
, vol.
6
pg.
2432
12.
Ahluwalia
G. K.
,
Applications of Chalcogenides: S, Se, and Te
,
Springer Nature
,
Switzerland
,
2017
.
13.
Cui
Y.
,
Zhou
Z.
,
Li
T.
,
Wang
K.
,
Li
J.
,
Wei
Z.
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
,
2019
, vol.
29
pg.
1900040
14.
Kuhn
A.
,
Chevy
A.
,
Chevalier
R.
,
Phys. Status Solidi A
,
1975
, vol.
31
pg.
469
15.
Wang
H.
,
Chen
M.-L.
,
Zhu
M.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Dong
B.
,
Sun
X.
,
Zhang
X.
,
Cao
S.
,
Li
X.
,
Huang
J.
,
Zhang
L.
,
Liu
W.
,
Sun
D.
,
Ye
Y.
,
Song
K.
,
Wang
J.
,
Han
Y.
,
Yang
T.
,
Guo
H.
,
Qin
C.
,
Xiao
L.
,
Zhang
J.
,
Chen
J.
,
Han
Z.
,
Zhang
Z.
,
Nat. Commun.
,
2019
, vol.
10
pg.
2302
16.
Barnowsky
T.
,
Krasheninnikov
A. V.
,
Friedrich
R.
,
Adv. Electron. Mater.
,
2023
, vol.
9
pg.
2201112
17.
Han
G.
,
Gu
Q. F.
,
Yang
L.
,
Chen
Z. G.
,
Zou
J.
,
J. Mater. Chem. C
,
2019
, vol.
7
pg.
13573
18.
Popovic
S.
,
Tonejc
A.
,
Grzeta-Plenkovic
B.
,
Trojko
R.
,
J. Appl. Crystallogr.
,
1979
, vol.
12
pg.
416
19.
Popovic
S.
,
Celustka
B.
,
Bidjin
D.
,
Phys. Status Solidi A
,
1971
, vol.
6
pg.
301
20.
Osamura
K.
,
Murakami
Y.
,
Tomiie
Y.
,
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
,
1966
, vol.
21
pg.
1848
21.
Manolikas
C.
,
J. Solid State Chem.
,
1988
, vol.
74
pg.
319
22.
Hogg
J. H. C.
,
Sutherland
H. H.
,
Williams
D. J.
,
Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B
,
1973
, vol.
29
pg.
1590
23.
Rhyee
J.-S.
,
Lee
K. H.
,
Lee
S. M.
,
Cho
E.
,
Kim
S. I.
,
Lee
E.
,
Kwon
Y. S.
,
Shim
J. H.
,
Kotliar
G.
,
Nature
,
2009
, vol.
459
pg.
965
24.
Han
G.
,
Chen
Z. G.
,
Sun
C.
,
Yang
L.
,
Cheng
L.
,
Li
Z.
,
Lu
W.
,
Gibbs
Z. M.
,
Snyder
J.
,
Jack
K.
,
Drennan
J.
,
Zou
J.
,
CrystEngComm
,
2014
, vol.
16
pg.
393
25.
Han
G.
,
Chen
Z.-G.
,
Yang
L.
,
Cheng
L.
,
Drennan
J.
,
Zou
J.
,
Cryst. Growth Des.
,
2013
, vol.
13
pg.
5092
26.
Han
G.
,
Chen
Z.-G.
,
Yang
L.
,
Cheng
L.
,
Jack
K.
,
Drennan
J.
,
Zou
J.
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
,
2013
, vol.
103
pg.
263105
27.
Yin
X.
,
Liu
J. Y.
,
Chen
L.
,
Wu
L. M.
,
Acc. Chem. Res.
,
2018
, vol.
51
pg.
240
28.
Rhyee
J.-S.
,
Ahn
K.
,
Lee
K. H.
,
Ji
H. S.
,
Shim
J.-H.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2011
, vol.
23
pg.
2191
29.
Jacobs-Gedrim
R. B.
,
Shanmugam
M.
,
Jain
N.
,
Durcan
C. A.
,
Murphy
M. T.
,
Murray
T. M.
,
Matyi
R. J.
,
Moore
R. L.
,
Yu
B.
,
ACS Nano
,
2013
, vol.
8
pg.
514
30.
Zhai
T.
,
Fang
X.
,
Liao
M.
,
Xu
X.
,
Li
L.
,
Liu
B.
,
Koide
Y.
,
Ma
Y.
,
Yao
J.
,
Bando
Y.
,
Golberg
D.
,
ACS Nano
,
2010
, vol.
4
pg.
1596
31.
Lei
S. D.
,
Wen
F. F.
,
Ge
L. H.
,
Najmaei
S.
,
George
A.
,
Gong
Y. J.
,
Gao
W. L.
,
Jin
Z. H.
,
Li
B.
,
Lou
J.
,
Kono
J.
,
Vajtai
R.
,
Ajayan
P.
,
Halas
N. J.
,
Nano Lett.
,
2015
, vol.
15
pg.
3048
32.
Zhang
G.
,
Li
X.
,
Wei
D.
,
Yu
H.
,
Ye
J.
,
Chen
S.
,
Zhang
W.
,
Zhu
J.
,
Duan
X.
,
Chem. Eng. J.
,
2023
, vol.
453
pg.
139841
33.
Yu
B.
,
Ju
S.
,
Sun
X.
,
Ng
G.
,
Nguyen
T. D.
,
Meyyappan
M.
,
Janes
D. B.
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
,
2007
, vol.
91
pg.
133119
34.
Abutbul
R. E.
,
Segev
E.
,
Argaman
U.
,
Makov
G.
,
Golan
Y.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2018
, vol.
30
pg.
1706285
35.
Yan
H.-J.
,
Li
Z.
,
Liu
S.-C.
,
Wang
X.
,
Zhang
X.
,
Xue
D.-J.
,
Hu
J.-S.
,
Nano Res.
,
2022
, vol.
15
pg.
1013
36.
Lu
Y.
,
Warner
J. H.
,
ACS Appl. Electron. Mater.
,
2020
, vol.
2
pg.
1777
37.
Zhang
H.
,
Zhang
Z.
,
Zhan
Q.
,
Liu
D.
,
Zhao
P.
,
Cheng
Y.
,
J. Mater. Chem. C
,
2022
, vol.
10
pg.
7771
38.
Heremans
J. P.
,
Cava
R. J.
,
Samarth
N.
,
Nat. Rev. Mater.
,
2017
, vol.
2
pg.
17049
39.
Du
Y.
,
Yin
Z.
,
Zhu
J.
,
Huang
X.
,
Wu
X.-J.
,
Zeng
Z.
,
Yan
Q.
,
Zhang
H.
,
Nat. Commun.
,
2012
, vol.
3
pg.
1177
40.
Chen
G.
,
Zhou
J.
,
Zuo
J.
,
Yang
Q.
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
,
2016
, vol.
8
pg.
2819
41.
Wu
T.
,
Zhou
X.
,
Zhang
H.
,
Zhong
X.
,
Nano Res.
,
2010
, vol.
3
pg.
379
42.
Zhang
H.
,
Liu
C.-X.
,
Qi
X.-L.
,
Dai
X.
,
Fang
Z.
,
Zhang
S.-C.
,
Nat. Phys.
,
2009
, vol.
5
pg.
438
43.
Moon
G. D.
,
Anisotropic Metal Chalcogenide Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Assembly, and Applications
,
Springer
,
Cham, Switzerland
, 1st edn,
2019
.
44.
Qurashi
A.
,
Metal Chalcogenide Nanostructures for Renewable Energy Applications
,
Scrivener
,
United States of America
,
2014
.
45.
Tsurkan
V.
,
Von Nidda
H.-A. K.
,
Deisenhofer
J.
,
Lunkenheimer
P.
,
Loidl
A.
,
Phys. Rep.-Rev. Sec. Phys. Lett.
,
2021
, vol.
926
pg.
1
46.
Li
Q.
,
Zhu
Y.
,
Cheng
M.
,
Du
L.
,
Zhao
M.
,
Zhang
G.
,
Wang
G.
,
Wang
W.
,
Liu
H.
,
Chen
Y.
,
Xiao
W.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2023
, vol.
12
pg.
59
47.
Iglesias
J. E.
,
Steinfink
H.
,
J. Solid State Chem.
,
1973
, vol.
6
pg.
119
48.
Tretyakov
Y. D.
,
Gordeev
I. V.
,
Kesler
Y. A.
,
J. Solid State Chem.
,
1977
, vol.
20
pg.
345
49.
Liu
M.
,
Ding
Y.
,
Wang
L.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Wang
X.
,
Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater.
,
2022
, vol.
5
pg.
461
50.
Jackson
P.
,
Wuerz
R.
,
Hariskos
D.
,
Lotter
E.
,
Witte
W.
,
Powalla
M.
,
Phys. Status Solidi RRL
,
2016
, vol.
10
pg.
583
51.
Azimi
H.
,
Hou
Y.
,
Brabec
C. J.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2014
, vol.
7
pg.
1829
52.
Shi
X.
,
Xi
L.
,
Fan
J.
,
Zhang
W.
,
Chen
L.
,
Chem. Mater.
,
2010
, vol.
22
pg.
6029
53.
Hu
L.
,
Luo
Y.
,
Fang
Y.-W.
,
Qin
F.
,
Cao
X.
,
Xie
H.
,
Liu
J.
,
Dong
J.
,
Sanson
A.
,
Giarola
M.
,
Tan
X.
,
Zheng
Y.
,
Suwardi
A.
,
Huang
Y.
,
Hippalgaonkar
K.
,
He
J.
,
Zhang
W.
,
Xu
J.
,
Yan
Q.
,
Kanatzidis
M. G.
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
,
2021
, vol.
11
pg.
2100661
54.
Han
C.
,
Sun
Q.
,
Cheng
Z. X.
,
Wang
J. L.
,
Li
Z.
,
Lu
G. Q.
,
Dou
S. X.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2014
, vol.
136
pg.
17626
55.
Qiu
P.
,
Zhang
T.
,
Qiu
Y.
,
Shi
X.
,
Chen
L.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2014
, vol.
7
pg.
4000
56.
Zhang
A. J.
,
Zhang
B.
,
Lu
W.
,
Xie
D. D.
,
Ou
H. X.
,
Han
X. D.
,
Dai
J. Y.
,
Lu
X.
,
Han
G.
,
Wang
G. Y.
,
Zhou
X. Y.
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
,
2018
, vol.
28
pg.
1705117
57.
Doverspike
K.
,
Dwight
K.
,
Wold
A.
,
Chem. Mater.
,
1990
, vol.
2
pg.
194
58.
Guo
Q.
,
Hillhouse
H. W.
,
Agrawal
R.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2009
, vol.
131
pg.
11672
59.
Liu
M.-L.
,
Chen
I. W.
,
Huang
F.-Q.
,
Chen
L.-D.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2009
, vol.
21
pg.
3808
60.
Fang
T.
,
Li
X.
,
Hu
C.
,
Zhang
Q.
,
Yang
J.
,
Zhang
W.
,
Zhao
X.
,
Singh
D. J.
,
Zhu
T.
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
,
2019
, vol.
29
pg.
1900677
61.
Kim
H.-S.
,
Heinz
N. A.
,
Gibbs
Z. M.
,
Tang
Y.
,
Kang
S. D.
,
Snyder
G. J.
,
Mater. Today
,
2017
, vol.
20
pg.
452
62.
Dickinson
R. G.
,
Pauling
L.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
1923
, vol.
45
pg.
1466
63.
Feldman
Y.
,
Wasserman
E.
,
Srolovitz
D. J.
,
Tenne
R.
,
Science
,
1995
, vol.
267
pg.
222
64.
Novoselov
K. S.
,
Geim
A. K.
,
Morozov
S. V.
,
Jiang
D.
,
Zhang
Y.
,
Dubonos
S. V.
,
Grigorieva
I. V.
,
Firsov
A. A.
,
Science
,
2004
, vol.
306
pg.
666
65.
Wang
Q. H.
,
Kalantar-Zadeh
K.
,
Kis
A.
,
Coleman
J. N.
,
Strano
M. S.
,
Nat. Nanotechnol.
,
2012
, vol.
7
pg.
699
66.
Bonaccorso
F.
,
Colombo
L.
,
Yu
G.
,
Stoller
M.
,
Tozzini
V.
,
Ferrari
A. C.
,
Ruoff
R. S.
,
Pellegrini
V.
,
Science
,
2015
, vol.
347
pg.
1246501
67.
Zhang
G.
,
Liu
H.
,
Qu
J.
,
Li
J.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2016
, vol.
9
pg.
1190
68.
Li
S.-L.
,
Tsukagoshi
K.
,
Orgiu
E.
,
Samori
P.
,
Chem. Soc. Rev.
,
2016
, vol.
45
pg.
118
69.
Tan
C.
,
Lai
Z.
,
Zhang
H.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2017
, vol.
29
pg.
1701392
70.
Han
J. H.
,
Kwak
M.
,
Kim
Y.
,
Cheon
J.
,
Chem. Rev.
,
2018
, vol.
118
pg.
6151
71.
Cain
J. D.
,
Hanson
E. D.
,
Shi
F.
,
Dravid
V. P.
,
Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci.
,
2016
, vol.
20
pg.
374
72.
Manzeli
S.
,
Ovchinnikov
D.
,
Pasquier
D.
,
Yazyev
O. V.
,
Kis
A.
,
Nat. Rev. Mater.
,
2017
, vol.
2
pg.
17033
73.
Kolobov
A. V.
and
Tominaga
J.
,
Two-Dimensional Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides
,
Springer Nature
,
Switzerland
,
2016
.
74.
Wang
Q.
,
Lei
Y.
,
Wang
D.
,
Li
Y.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2019
, vol.
12
pg.
1730
75.
Zhang
T.
,
Sun
J.
,
Guan
J.
,
Nano Res.
,
2023
, vol.
16
pg.
8684
76.
Yang
Z.
,
Zhu
L.
,
Lv
C.
,
Zhang
R.
,
Wang
H.
,
Wang
J.
,
Zhang
Q.
,
Mater. Chem. Front.
,
2021
, vol.
5
pg.
5880
77.
Jung
Y.
,
Zhou
Y.
,
Cha
J. J.
,
Inorg. Chem. Front.
,
2016
, vol.
3
pg.
452
78.
Guo
Z.
,
Sun
F.
,
Yuan
W.
,
Cryst. Growth Des.
,
2017
, vol.
17
pg.
2238
79.
Liu
Z.
,
Tee
S. Y.
,
Guan
G.
,
Han
M.-Y.
,
Nano-Micro Lett.
,
2024
, vol.
16
pg.
95
80.
Han
G.
,
Popuri
S. R.
,
Greer
H. F.
,
Zhang
R. Z.
,
Ferre-Llin
L.
,
Bos
J. W. G.
,
Zhou
W. Z.
,
Reece
M. J.
,
Paul
D. J.
,
Knox
A. R.
,
Gregory
D. H.
,
Chem. Sci.
,
2018
, vol.
9
pg.
3828
81.
Min
Y.
,
Im
E.
,
Hwang
G.-T.
,
Kim
J.-W.
,
Ahn
C.-W.
,
Choi
J.-J.
,
Hahn
B.-D.
,
Choi
J.-H.
,
Yoon
W.-H.
,
Park
D.-S.
,
Hyun
D. C.
,
Moon
G. D.
,
Nano Res.
,
2019
, vol.
12
pg.
1750
82.
Jin
J.
,
Xiao
T.
,
Zhang
Y.-f.
,
Zheng
H.
,
Wang
H.
,
Wang
R.
,
Gong
Y.
,
He
B.
,
Liu
X.
,
Zhou
K.
,
Nanoscale
,
2021
, vol.
13
pg.
19740
83.
Zhu
C.
,
Gao
D.
,
Ding
J.
,
Chao
D.
,
Wang
J.
,
Chem. Soc. Rev.
,
2018
, vol.
47
pg.
4332
84.
Chhowalla
M.
,
Shin
H. S.
,
Eda
G.
,
Li
L.-J.
,
Loh
K. P.
,
Zhang
H.
,
Nat. Chem.
,
2013
, vol.
5
pg.
263
85.
Iijima
S.
,
Nature
,
1991
, vol.
354
pg.
56
86.
Cao
G.
,
Nanostructures and Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Properties and Applications
,
World Scientific
,
Singapore
,
2004
.
87.
Das
B.
,
Subramaniam
S.
,
Melloch
M. R.
,
Semicond. Sci. Technol.
,
1993
, vol.
8
pg.
1347
88.
Vieu
C.
,
Carcenac
F.
,
Pepin
A.
,
Chen
Y.
,
Mejias
M.
,
Lebib
A.
,
Manin-Ferlazzo
L.
,
Couraud
L.
,
Launois
H.
,
Appl. Surf. Sci.
,
2000
, vol.
164
pg.
111
89.
Zhai
Y.
,
Ren
X.
,
Wang
B.
,
Liu
S.
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
,
2022
, vol.
32
pg.
2207536
90.
Sha
S.
,
Ge
R.
,
Li
Y.
,
Cairney
J. M.
,
Zheng
R.
,
Li
S.
,
Liu
B.
,
Zhang
J.
,
Li
W.
,
Front. Energy
,
2023
, vol.
18
pg.
265
91.
Ikhmayies
S. J.
,
Advances in Energy Materials
,
Springer Nature
,
Switzerland
,
2020
.
92.
Tenne
R.
,
Margulis
L.
,
Genut
M.
,
Hodes
G.
,
Nature
,
1992
, vol.
360
pg.
444
93.
Feldman
Y.
,
Frey
G. L.
,
Homyonfer
M.
,
Lyakhovitskaya
V.
,
Margulis
L.
,
Cohen
H.
,
Hodes
G.
,
Hutchison
J. L.
,
Tenne
R.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
1996
, vol.
118
pg.
5362
94.
Murray
C. B.
,
Norris
D. J.
,
Bawendi
M. G.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
1993
, vol.
115
pg.
8706
95.
Rao
C. N. R.
,
Nath
M.
,
Dalton Trans.
,
2003
pg.
1
96.
Min
Y.
,
Roh
J. W.
,
Yang
H.
,
Park
M.
,
Kim
S. I.
,
Hwang
S.
,
Lee
S. M.
,
Lee
K. H.
,
Jeong
U.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2013
, vol.
25
pg.
1425
97.
Zhuang
T.-T.
,
Design, Synthesis and Applications of One-Dimensional Chalcogenide Hetero-Nanostructures: Novel Metal Sulfide Hetero-Nanorods for Enhancing Solar Energy Conversion
,
Springer Nature
,
Singapore
,
2018
.
98.
Jin
Q.
,
Jiang
S.
,
Zhao
Y.
,
Wang
D.
,
Qiu
J.
,
Tang
D.-M.
,
Tan
J.
,
Sun
D.-M.
,
Hou
P.-X.
,
Chen
X.-Q.
,
Tai
K.
,
Gao
N.
,
Liu
C.
,
Cheng
H.-M.
,
Jiang
X.
,
Nat. Mater.
,
2019
, vol.
18
pg.
62
99.
Zhang
Q.
,
Ai
X.
,
Wang
L.
,
Chang
Y.
,
Luo
W.
,
Jiang
W.
,
Chen
L.
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
,
2015
, vol.
25
pg.
966
100.
Poudel
B.
,
Hao
Q.
,
Ma
Y.
,
Lan
Y. C.
,
Minnich
A.
,
Yu
B.
,
Yan
X. A.
,
Wang
D. Z.
,
Muto
A.
,
Vashaee
D.
,
Chen
X. Y.
,
Liu
J. M.
,
Dresselhaus
M. S.
,
Chen
G.
,
Ren
Z. F.
,
Science
,
2008
, vol.
320
pg.
634
101.
Tian
J.
,
Zhang
W.
,
Gu
J.
,
Deng
T.
,
Zhang
D.
,
Nano Energy
,
2015
, vol.
17
pg.
52
102.
Gao
M. R.
,
Jiang
J.
,
Yu
S. H.
,
Small
,
2012
, vol.
8
pg.
13
103.
Wang
H.
,
Liang
Y.
,
Li
Y.
,
Dai
H.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2011
, vol.
50
pg.
10969
104.
Cao
T.
,
Wang
R.
,
Simpson
R. E.
,
Li
G.
,
Prog. Quantum Electron.
,
2020
, vol.
74
pg.
100299
105.
Tomforde
J.
,
Bensch
W.
,
Kienle
L.
,
Duppel
V.
,
Merkelbach
P.
,
Wuttig
M.
,
Chem. Mater.
,
2011
, vol.
23
pg.
3871
106.
Nalwa
H. S.
,
Nanostructured Materials and Nanotechnology
,
Academic Press
,
The United States of America
,
2000
.
107.
Zhang
J.
,
Chen
Y.
,
Wang
X.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2015
, vol.
8
pg.
3092
108.
Gao
M. R.
,
Xu
Y. F.
,
Jiang
J.
,
Yu
S. H.
,
Chem. Soc. Rev.
,
2013
, vol.
42
pg.
2986
109.
He
J.
,
Tritt
T. M.
,
Science
,
2017
, vol.
357
pg.
eaak9997
110.
Ganatra
R.
,
Zhang
Q.
,
ACS Nano
,
2014
, vol.
8
pg.
4074
111.
Tan
C.
,
Zhang
H.
,
Chem. Soc. Rev.
,
2015
, vol.
44
pg.
2713
112.
Mamur
H.
,
Bhuiyan
M. R. A.
,
Korkmaz
F.
,
Nil
M.
,
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
,
2018
, vol.
82
pg.
4159
113.
Fleischauer
P. D.
,
Bauer
R.
,
Tribol. Trans.
,
1988
, vol.
31
pg.
239
114.
Bernardi
M.
,
Palummo
M.
,
Grossman
J. C.
,
Nano Lett.
,
2013
, vol.
13
pg.
3664
115.
Wu
Z. Z.
,
Fang
B. Z.
,
Wang
Z. P.
,
Wang
C. L.
,
Liu
Z. H.
,
Liu
F. Y.
,
Wang
W.
,
Alfantazi
A.
,
Wang
D. Z.
,
Wilkinson
D. P.
,
ACS Catal.
,
2013
, vol.
3
pg.
2101
116.
Chang
K.
,
Chen
W.
,
Chem. Commun.
,
2011
, vol.
47
pg.
4252
117.
Zhang
W.
,
Zhang
P.
,
Su
Z.
,
Wei
G.
,
Nanoscale
,
2015
, vol.
7
pg.
18364
118.
Radisavljevic
B.
,
Radenovic
A.
,
Brivio
J.
,
Giacometti
V.
,
Kis
A.
,
Nat. Nanotechnol.
,
2011
, vol.
6
pg.
147
119.
Mattheis
L. F.
,
Phys. Rev. B
,
1973
, vol.
8
pg.
3719
120.
Bell
R. E.
,
Herfert
R. E.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
1957
, vol.
79
pg.
3351
121.
Radisavljevic
B.
,
Whitwick
M. B.
,
Kis
A.
,
ACS Nano
,
2011
, vol.
5
pg.
9934
122.
Wildervanck
J. C.
,
Jellinek
F.
,
Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.
,
1964
, vol.
328
pg.
309
123.
Vazirisereshk
M. R.
,
Martini
A.
,
Strubbe
D. A.
,
Baykara
M. Z.
,
Lubricants
,
2019
, vol.
7
pg.
57
124.
Fang
Y.
,
Pan
J.
,
He
J.
,
Luo
R.
,
Wang
D.
,
Che
X.
,
Bu
K.
,
Zhao
W.
,
Liu
P.
,
Mu
G.
,
Zhang
H.
,
Lin
T.
,
Huang
F.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2018
, vol.
57
pg.
1232
125.
Chen
X.
,
Chen
Z.
,
Li
J.
,
Chin. Sci. Bull.
,
2013
, vol.
58
pg.
1632
126.
Stephenson
T.
,
Li
Z.
,
Olsen
B.
,
Mitlin
D.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2014
, vol.
7
pg.
209
127.
Hu
T.
,
Li
R.
,
Dong
J. M.
,
J. Chem. Phys.
,
2013
, vol.
139
pg.
174702
128.
Yu
Y. F.
,
Nam
G. H.
,
He
Q. Y.
,
Wu
X. J.
,
Zhang
K.
,
Yang
Z. Z.
,
Chen
J. Z.
,
Ma
Q. L.
,
Zhao
M. T.
,
Liu
Z. Q.
,
Ran
F. R.
,
Wang
X. Z.
,
Li
H.
,
Huang
X.
,
Li
B.
,
Xiong
Q. H.
,
Zhang
Q.
,
Liu
Z.
,
Gu
L.
,
Du
Y. H.
,
Huang
W.
,
Zhang
H.
,
Nat. Chem.
,
2018
, vol.
10
pg.
638
129.
Yadav
V.
,
Roy
S.
,
Singh
P.
,
Khan
Z.
,
Jaiswal
A.
,
Small
,
2019
, vol.
15
pg.
1803706
130.
Wypych
F.
,
Schollhorn
R.
,
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
,
1992
pg.
1386
131.
Voiry
D.
,
Goswami
A.
,
Kappera
R.
,
Castro e Silva
C. d. C.
,
Kaplan
D.
,
Fujita
T.
,
Chen
M. W.
,
Asefa
T.
,
Chhowalla
M.
,
Nat. Chem.
,
2015
, vol.
7
pg.
45
132.
Lv
R.
,
Robinson
J. A.
,
Schaak
R. E.
,
Sun
D.
,
Sun
Y. F.
,
Mallouk
T. E.
,
Terrones
M.
,
Acc. Chem. Res.
,
2015
, vol.
48
pg.
56
133.
Braithwaite
E. R.
and
Haber
J.
,
Molybdenum: An Outline of its Chemistry and Uses
,
Elsevier
,
Amsterdam
,
1994
.
134.
Duerloo
K.-A. N.
,
Li
Y.
,
Reed
E. J.
,
Nat. Commun.
,
2014
, vol.
5
pg.
4214
135.
Eda
G.
,
Yamaguchi
H.
,
Voiry
D.
,
Fujita
T.
,
Chen
M.
,
Chhowalla
M.
,
Nano Lett.
,
2011
, vol.
11
pg.
5111
136.
Radisavljevic
B.
,
Kis
A.
,
Nat. Mater.
,
2013
, vol.
12
pg.
815
137.
Gan
X.
,
Lee
L. Y. S.
,
Wong
K.-y.
,
Lo
T. W.
,
Ho
K. H.
,
Lei
D. Y.
,
Zhao
H.
,
ACS Appl. Energy Mater.
,
2018
, vol.
1
pg.
4754
138.
Fan
X.
,
Xu
P.
,
Zhou
D.
,
Sun
Y.
,
Li
Y. C.
,
Nguyen
M. A. T.
,
Terrones
M.
,
Mallouk
T. E.
,
Nano Lett.
,
2015
, vol.
15
pg.
5956
139.
Eda
G.
,
Fujita
T.
,
Yamaguchi
H.
,
Voiry
D.
,
Chen
M.
,
Chhowalla
M.
,
ACS Nano
,
2012
, vol.
6
pg.
7311
140.
Bhattacharyya
S.
,
Singh
A. K.
,
Phys. Rev. B:Condens. Matter Mater. Phys.
,
2012
, vol.
86
pg.
075454
141.
Kuc
A.
,
Zibouche
N.
,
Heine
T.
,
Phys. Rev. B:Condens. Matter Mater. Phys.
,
2011
, vol.
83
pg.
245213
142.
Splendiani
A.
,
Sun
L.
,
Zhang
Y. B.
,
Li
T. S.
,
Kim
J.
,
Chim
C. Y.
,
Galli
G.
,
Wang
F.
,
Nano Lett.
,
2010
, vol.
10
pg.
1271
143.
Chang
K.
,
Li
M.
,
Wang
T.
,
Ouyang
S.
,
Li
P.
,
Liu
L.
,
Ye
J.
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
,
2015
, vol.
5
pg.
1402279
144.
Peelaers
H.
,
Van de Walle
C. G.
,
J. Phys. Chem. C
,
2014
, vol.
118
pg.
12073
145.
Zhou
W.
,
Zou
X. L.
,
Najmaei
S.
,
Liu
Z.
,
Shi
Y. M.
,
Kong
J.
,
Lou
J.
,
Ajayan
P. M.
,
Yakobson
B. I.
,
Idrobo
J. C.
,
Nano Lett.
,
2013
, vol.
13
pg.
2615
146.
Nie
C.
,
Yin
M.
,
Zhao
Y.
,
Zhao
C.
,
Zhang
B.
,
Song
X.
,
Yi
X.
,
Zhang
Y.
,
Luo
L.
,
Wang
S.
,
J. Phys. Chem. C
,
2021
, vol.
125
pg.
25739
147.
Wang
Z.
,
Mi
B.
,
Environ. Sci. Technol.
,
2017
, vol.
51
pg.
8229
148.
Zhang
X.
,
Lai
Z.
,
Tan
C.
,
Zhang
H.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2016
, vol.
55
pg.
8816
149.
Castellanos-Gomez
A.
,
Poot
M.
,
Steele
G. A.
,
van der Zant
H. S. J.
,
Agrait
N.
,
Rubio-Bollinger
G.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2012
, vol.
24
pg.
772
150.
Bertolazzi
S.
,
Brivio
J.
,
Kis
A.
,
ACS Nano
,
2011
, vol.
5
pg.
9703
151.
Pu
J.
,
Yomogida
Y.
,
Liu
K. K.
,
Li
L. J.
,
Iwasa
Y.
,
Takenobu
T.
,
Nano Lett.
,
2012
, vol.
12
pg.
4013
152.
Rapoport
L.
,
Fleischer
N.
,
Tenne
R.
,
J. Mater. Chem.
,
2005
, vol.
15
pg.
1782
153.
Lemogne
T.
,
Donnet
C.
,
Martin
J. M.
,
Tonck
A.
,
Millardpinard
N.
,
Fayeulle
S.
,
Moncoffre
N.
,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A
,
1994
, vol.
12
pg.
1998
154.
Feng
J.
,
Qian
X. F.
,
Huang
C. W.
,
Li
J.
,
Nat. Photonics
,
2012
, vol.
6
pg.
865
155.
Duerloo
K.-A. N.
,
Ong
M. T.
,
Reed
E. J.
,
J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
,
2012
, vol.
3
pg.
2871
156.
Ma
J.
,
Xiong
X.
,
Wu
D.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Ban
C.
,
Feng
Y.
,
Meng
J.
,
Gao
X.
,
Dai
J.-Y.
,
Han
G.
,
Gan
L.-Y.
,
Zhou
X.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2023
, vol.
35
pg.
2300027
157.
Kibsgaard
J.
,
Chen
Z. B.
,
Reinecke
B. N.
,
Jaramillo
T. F.
,
Nat. Mater.
,
2012
, vol.
11
pg.
963
158.
Chu
X.
,
Yao
G.
,
Wee
A. T. S.
,
Wang
X.-S.
,
Nanotechnology
,
2012
, vol.
23
pg.
375603
159.
Zhong
X.
,
Yang
H. D.
,
Guo
S. J.
,
Li
S. W.
,
Gou
G. L.
,
Niu
Z. Y.
,
Dong
Z. P.
,
Lei
Y. J.
,
Jin
J.
,
Li
R.
,
Ma
J. T.
,
J. Mater. Chem.
,
2012
, vol.
22
pg.
13925
160.
Xu
H.
,
Yi
J. J.
,
She
X. J.
,
Liu
Q.
,
Song
L.
,
Chen
S. M.
,
Yang
Y. C.
,
Song
Y. H.
,
Vajtai
R.
,
Lou
J.
,
Li
H. M.
,
Yuan
S. Q.
,
Wu
J. J.
,
Ajayan
P. M.
,
Appl. Catal., B
,
2018
, vol.
220
pg.
379
161.
Ai
K.
,
Ruan
C.
,
Shen
M.
,
Lu
L.
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
,
2016
, vol.
26
pg.
5542
162.
Francombe
M. H.
,
Br. J. Appl. Phys.
,
1958
, vol.
9
pg.
415
163.
Yim
W. M.
,
Rosi
F. D.
,
Solid-State Electron.
,
1972
, vol.
15
pg.
1121
164.
Liu
W. S.
,
Lukas
K. C.
,
McEnaney
K.
,
Lee
S.
,
Zhang
Q.
,
Opeil
C. P.
,
Chen
G.
,
Ren
Z. F.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2013
, vol.
6
pg.
552
165.
Wang
S.
,
Sun
Y.
,
Yang
J.
,
Duan
B.
,
Wu
L.
,
Zhang
W.
,
Yang
J.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2016
, vol.
9
pg.
3436
166.
Kagarakis
C. A.
,
J. Mater. Sci.
,
1978
, vol.
13
pg.
1594
167.
Jiang
Y.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Sagendorf
J.
,
West
D.
,
Kou
X.
,
Wei
X.
,
He
L.
,
Wang
K. L.
,
Zhang
S.
,
Zhang
Z.
,
Nano Lett.
,
2013
, vol.
13
pg.
2851
168.
Drabble
J. R.
,
Goodman
C. H. L.
,
J. Phys. Chem. Solids
,
1958
, vol.
5
pg.
142
169.
Huang
B. L.
,
Kaviany
M.
,
Phys. Rev. B:Condens. Matter Mater. Phys.
,
2008
, vol.
77
pg.
125209
170.
Pei
Y.
,
Shi
X.
,
LaLonde
A.
,
Wang
H.
,
Chen
L.
,
Snyder
G. J.
,
Nature
,
2011
, vol.
473
pg.
66
171.
Pei
Y.
,
Wang
H.
,
Snyder
G. J.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2012
, vol.
24
pg.
6125
172.
Wang
G. F.
,
Cagin
T.
,
Phys. Rev. B:Condens. Matter Mater. Phys.
,
2007
, vol.
76
pg.
075201
173.
Mishra
S. K.
,
Satpathy
S.
,
Jepsen
O.
,
J. Phys.:Condens. Matter
,
1997
, vol.
9
pg.
461
174.
Horak
J.
,
Cermak
K.
,
Koudelka
L.
,
J. Phys. Chem. Solids
,
1986
, vol.
47
pg.
805
175.
Jiang
J.
,
Chen
L. D.
,
Yao
Q.
,
Bai
S. Q.
,
Wang
Q.
,
Mater. Chem. Phys.
,
2005
, vol.
92
pg.
39
176.
Perrin
D.
,
Chitroub
M.
,
Scherrer
S.
,
Scherrer
H.
,
J. Phys. Chem. Solids
,
2000
, vol.
61
pg.
1687
177.
Wu
Y. H.
,
Zhai
R. S.
,
Zhu
T. J.
,
Zhao
X. B.
,
Mater. Today Phys.
,
2017
, vol.
2
pg.
62
178.
Zhuang
H. L.
,
Pan
Y.
,
Sun
F. H.
,
Dong
J. F.
,
Pei
J.
,
Asfandiyar
,
Cai
B. W.
,
Hu
H. H.
,
Tang
H.
,
Li
J. F.
,
Nano Energy
,
2019
, vol.
60
pg.
857
179.
Kim
K.
,
Kim
G.
,
Lee
H.
,
Lee
K. H.
,
Lee
W.
,
Scr. Mater.
,
2018
, vol.
145
pg.
41
180.
Qin
H. X.
,
Liu
Y.
,
Zhang
Z. W.
,
Wang
Y. M.
,
Cao
J.
,
Cai
W.
,
Zhang
Q.
,
Sui
J. H.
,
Mater. Today Phys.
,
2018
, vol.
6
pg.
31
181.
Rowe
D. M.
,
Thermoelectrics Handbook: Macro to Nano
,
CRC Press
,
Boca Raton
, 1st edn,
2006
.
182.
Delves
R. T.
,
Bowley
A. E.
,
Hazelden
D. W.
,
Goldsmid
H. J.
,
Proc. Phys. Soc.
,
1961
, vol.
78
pg.
838
183.
Goldsmid
H. J.
,
Proc. Phys. Soc. B
,
1956
, vol.
69
pg.
203
184.
Shen
J. J.
,
Hu
L. P.
,
Zhu
T. J.
,
Zhao
X. B.
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
,
2011
, vol.
99
pg.
124102
185.
Xiao
Y.
,
Liu
W.
,
Zhang
Y.
,
Wang
D.
,
Shi
H.
,
Wang
S.
,
Jin
Y.
,
Qu
W.
,
Wu
H.
,
Ding
X.
,
Sun
J.
,
Zhao
L.-D.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2021
, vol.
9
pg.
23011
186.
Satterthwaite
C. B.
,
Ure
R. W.
,
Phys. Rev.
,
1957
, vol.
108
pg.
1164
187.
Hao
F.
,
Qiu
P.
,
Tang
Y.
,
Bai
S.
,
Xing
T.
,
Chu
H.-S.
,
Zhang
Q.
,
Lu
P.
,
Zhang
T.
,
Ren
D.
,
Chen
J.
,
Shi
X.
,
Chen
L.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2016
, vol.
9
pg.
3120
188.
Zhu
B.
,
Liu
X.
,
Wang
Q.
,
Qiu
Y.
,
Shu
Z.
,
Guo
Z.
,
Tong
Y.
,
Cui
J.
,
Gu
M.
,
He
J.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2020
, vol.
13
pg.
2106
189.
Witting
I. T.
,
Ricci
F.
,
Chasapis
T. C.
,
Hautier
G.
,
Snyder
G. J.
,
Research
,
2020
, vol.
2020
pg.
4361703
190.
Svechnikova
T. E.
,
Maksimova
N. M.
,
Konstantinov
P. P.
,
Inorg. Mater.
,
1998
, vol.
34
pg.
233
191.
Chen
Y. L.
,
Analytis
J. G.
,
Chu
J. H.
,
Liu
Z. K.
,
Mo
S. K.
,
Qi
X. L.
,
Zhang
H. J.
,
Lu
D. H.
,
Dai
X.
,
Fang
Z.
,
Zhang
S. C.
,
Fisher
I. R.
,
Hussain
Z.
,
Shen
Z. X.
,
Science
,
2009
, vol.
325
pg.
178
192.
Wang
L. M.
,
Zhang
Z. M.
,
Liu
Y. C.
,
Wang
B. R.
,
Fang
L.
,
Qiu
J. J.
,
Zhang
K.
,
Wang
S. R.
,
Nat. Commun.
,
2018
, vol.
9
pg.
3817
193.
Witting
I. T.
,
Chasapis
T. C.
,
Ricci
F.
,
Peters
M.
,
Heinz
N. A.
,
Hautier
G.
,
Snyder
G. J.
,
Adv. Electron. Mater.
,
2019
, vol.
5
pg.
1800904
194.
Rudolph
P.
,
Kiessling
F. M.
,
Cryst. Res. Technol.
,
1988
, vol.
23
pg.
1207
195.
Rudolph
P.
,
Prog. Cryst. Growth Charact. Mater.
,
1994
, vol.
29
pg.
275
196.
Hoshikawa
K.
,
Taishi
T.
,
Ohba
E.
,
Miyagawa
C.
,
Kobayashi
T.
,
Yanagisawa
J.
,
Shinozuka
M.
,
J. Cryst. Growth
,
2014
, vol.
401
pg.
146
197.
Pech-Canul
M. I.
and
Ravindra
N. M.
,
Semiconductors: Synthesis, Properties and Applications
,
Springer Nature
,
Switzerland
, 1st edn,
2019
.
198.
Rai
R. S.
,
Mahajan
S.
,
McDevitt
S.
,
Johnson
C. J.
,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B
,
1991
, vol.
9
pg.
1892
199.
Mandal
K. C.
,
Mertiri
A.
,
Pabst
G. W.
,
Roy
R. G.
,
Cui
Y.
,
Battacharya
P.
,
Groza
M.
,
Burger
A.
,
Conway
A. M.
,
Nikolic
R. J.
,
Nelson
A. J.
and
Paynec
S. A.
,
Proceedings of SPIE
,
San Diego
,
2008
.
200.
Jin
M.
,
Jiang
J.
,
Li
R. B.
,
Wang
X. H.
,
Chen
Y. X.
,
Zhang
R. L.
,
Chen
Y. Q.
,
Mater. Res. Bull.
,
2019
, vol.
114
pg.
156
201.
Kim
Y.
,
Choi
I. H.
,
J. Korean Phys. Soc.
,
2018
, vol.
72
pg.
238
202.
Krolicka
A. K.
,
Mirowska
A.
,
Materna
A.
,
Piersa
M.
,
Cryst. Res. Technol.
,
2017
, vol.
52
pg.
1600376
203.
Jeon
Y.
,
Kang
H. S.
,
Opt. Rev.
,
2007
, vol.
14
pg.
373
204.
Trifonova
E.
,
Yanchev
I. Y.
,
Manou
P.
,
Kambas
K.
,
Anagnostopoulos
A. N.
,
J. Mater. Sci.
,
1996
, vol.
31
pg.
3647
205.
Hruban
A.
,
Materna
A.
,
Dalecki
W.
,
Strzelecka
G.
,
Piersa
M.
,
Jurkiewicz-Wegner
E.
,
Diduszko
R.
,
Romaniec
M.
,
Orlowski
W.
,
Acta Phys. Pol. A
,
2011
, vol.
120
pg.
950
206.
Wu
H. J.
,
Chen
S. W.
,
Ikeda
T.
,
Snyder
G. J.
,
Acta Mater.
,
2012
, vol.
60
pg.
6144
207.
Marcano
G.
,
de Chalbaud
L. M.
,
Rincon
C.
,
Perez
G. S.
,
Mater. Lett.
,
2002
, vol.
53
pg.
151
208.
Shukri
Z. A.
,
Champness
C. H.
,
J. Cryst. Growth
,
1998
, vol.
191
pg.
97
209.
Liu
Z.
,
Peters
J. A.
,
Li
H.
,
Kanatzidis
M. G.
,
Wessels
B. W.
,
Semicond. Sci. Technol.
,
2013
, vol.
28
pg.
015022
210.
Bas
H.
,
Kalkan
N.
,
Deger
D.
,
J. Mater. Sci.:Mater. Electron.
,
2016
, vol.
27
pg.
7518
211.
Al Orainy
R. H.
,
Acta Phys. Pol. A
,
2013
, vol.
124
pg.
728
212.
Davidyuk
G. E.
,
Yurchenko
O. N.
,
Parasyuk
O. V.
,
Sachanyuk
V. P.
,
Pankevich
V. Z.
,
Shavarova
A. P.
,
Inorg. Mater.
,
2008
, vol.
44
pg.
361
213.
Mikhailov
V. F.
,
Sokolov
A. M.
,
Sokolov
E. B.
,
Pelevin
O. V.
,
Inorg. Mater.
,
1982
, vol.
18
pg.
1078
214.
Baughman
R. J.
,
Lefever
R. A.
,
Mater. Res. Bull.
,
1969
, vol.
4
pg.
721
215.
Svechnikova
T. E.
,
Shelimova
L. E.
,
Konstantinov
P. P.
,
Kretova
M. A.
,
Avilov
E. S.
,
Zemskov
V. S.
,
Stiewe
C.
,
Zuber
A.
,
Muller
E.
,
Inorg. Mater.
,
2005
, vol.
41
pg.
1043
216.
Ivanova
L. D.
,
Petrova
L. I.
,
Granatkina
Y. V.
,
Zemskov
V. S.
,
Inorg. Mater.
,
2007
, vol.
43
pg.
933
217.
Ivanova
L. D.
,
Sidorov
Y. A.
,
Inorg. Mater.
,
1998
, vol.
34
pg.
222
218.
Hebert
S.
,
Barbier
T.
,
Berthebaud
D.
,
Lebedev
O. I.
,
Pralong
V.
,
Maignan
A.
,
J. Phys. Chem. C
,
2021
, vol.
125
pg.
5386
219.
Roychowdhury
S.
,
Jana
M. K.
,
Pan
J.
,
Guin
S. N.
,
Sanyal
D.
,
Waghmare
U. V.
,
Biswas
K.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2018
, vol.
57
pg.
4043
220.
Wang
S. S.
,
Bu
K. J.
,
Wang
D.
,
Zheng
C.
,
Che
X. L.
,
Han
Z.
,
Huang
F. Q.
,
J. Alloys Compd.
,
2021
, vol.
853
pg.
157092
221.
Li
Z.
,
Jiang
X. X.
,
Yi
C. J.
,
Zhou
M. L.
,
Guo
Y. W.
,
Luo
X. Y.
,
Lin
Z. S.
,
Wu
Y. C.
,
Shi
Y. G.
,
Yao
J. Y.
,
J. Mater. Chem. C
,
2018
, vol.
6
pg.
10042
222.
Xing
W. H.
,
Tang
C. L.
,
Wang
N. Z.
,
Li
C. X.
,
Li
Z.
,
Wu
J. Y.
,
Lin
Z. S.
,
Yao
J. Y.
,
Yin
W. L.
,
Kang
B.
,
Inorg. Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
18452
223.
Li
S. F.
,
Yan
D.
,
J. Solid State Chem.
,
2021
, vol.
296
pg.
121945
224.
Ohring
M.
,
Materials Science of Thin Films: Deposition and Structure
,
Academic Press
,
San Diego
, 2nd edn,
2002
.
225.
Samad
L.
,
Caban-Acevedo
M.
,
Shearer
M. J.
,
Park
K.
,
Hamers
R. J.
,
Jin
S.
,
Chem. Mater.
,
2015
, vol.
27
pg.
3108
226.
Etzkorn
J.
,
Therese
H. A.
,
Rocker
F.
,
Zink
N.
,
Kolb
U.
,
Tremel
W.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2005
, vol.
17
pg.
2372
227.
Zhang
J.
,
Zhai
T.
,
Arifurrahman
F.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Hitt
A.
,
He
Z.
,
Ai
Q.
,
Liu
Y.
,
Lin
C.-Y.
,
Zhu
Y.
,
Tang
M.
,
Lou
J.
,
Nano Lett.
,
2024
, vol.
24
pg.
2465
228.
Munoz
R.
,
Gomez-Aleixandre
C.
,
Chem. Vap. Deposition
,
2013
, vol.
19
pg.
297
229.
Afzaal
M.
,
Ellwood
K.
,
Pickett
N. L.
,
O'Brien
P.
,
Raftery
J.
,
Waters
J.
,
J. Mater. Chem.
,
2004
, vol.
14
pg.
1310
230.
Kemmler
M.
,
Lazell
M.
,
O'Brien
P.
,
Otway
D. J.
,
Park
J. H.
,
Walsh
J. R.
,
J. Mater. Sci.:Mater. Electron.
,
2002
, vol.
13
pg.
531
231.
Chuprakov
I. S.
,
Dahmen
K. H.
,
J. Phys. IV
,
1999
, vol.
9
pg.
313
232.
Salicio
O.
,
Wiemer
C.
,
Fanciulli
M.
,
Gawelda
W.
,
Siegel
J.
,
Afonso
C. N.
,
Plausinaitiene
V.
,
Abrutis
A.
,
J. Appl. Phys.
,
2009
, vol.
105
pg.
033520
233.
Ritch
J. S.
,
Chivers
T.
,
Afzaal
M.
,
O'Brien
P.
,
Chem. Soc. Rev.
,
2007
, vol.
36
pg.
1622
234.
You
Y. C.
,
Zeng
T.
,
Liu
J. S.
,
Hu
T. S.
,
Tai
G. A.
,
Prog. Chem.
,
2015
, vol.
27
pg.
1578
235.
Chen
X.
,
Wong
L.-W.
,
Huang
L.
,
Zheng
F.
,
Huang
R.
,
Lau
S. P.
,
Lee
C.-S.
,
Zhao
J.
,
Deng
Q.
,
Thuc Hue
L.
,
Chem. Mater.
,
2021
, vol.
33
pg.
7039
236.
Zhou
S. S.
,
Wang
R. Y.
,
Han
J. B.
,
Wang
D. L.
,
Li
H. Q.
,
Gan
L.
,
Zhai
T. Y.
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
,
2019
, vol.
29
pg.
1805880
237.
Waters
J.
,
Crouch
D.
,
Raftery
J.
,
O'Brien
P.
,
Chem. Mater.
,
2004
, vol.
16
pg.
3289
238.
Cecchini
R.
,
Gajjela
R. S. R.
,
Martella
C.
,
Wiemer
C.
,
Lamperti
A.
,
Nasi
L.
,
Lazzarini
L.
,
Nobili
L. G.
,
Longo
M.
,
Small
,
2019
, vol.
15
pg.
1901743
239.
Pang
C.
,
Srivastava
A.
,
Lockart
M. M.
,
Mewes
T.
,
Bowman
M. K.
,
Bao
N. Z.
,
Shen
L. M.
,
Gupta
A.
,
ACS Appl. Electron. Mater.
,
2019
, vol.
1
pg.
1424
240.
Selmo
S.
,
Cecchini
R.
,
Cecchi
S.
,
Wiemer
C.
,
Fanciulli
M.
,
Rotunno
E.
,
Lazzarini
L.
,
Rigato
M.
,
Pogany
A.
,
Lugstein
A.
,
Longo
M.
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
,
2016
, vol.
109
pg.
213103
241.
Sanchez-Perez
C.
,
Knapp
C. E.
,
Colman
R. H.
,
Sotelo-Vazquez
C.
,
Sathasivam
S.
,
Oilunkaniemi
R.
,
Laitinen
R. S.
,
Carmalt
C. J.
,
ACS Omega
,
2020
, vol.
5
pg.
15799
242.
Fu
Q. D.
,
Wang
X. W.
,
Zhou
J. D.
,
Xia
J.
,
Zeng
Q. S.
,
Lv
D. H.
,
Zhu
C.
,
Wang
X. L.
,
Shen
Y.
,
Li
X. M.
,
Hua
Y. N.
,
Liu
F. C.
,
Shen
Z. X.
,
Jin
C. H.
,
Liu
Z.
,
Chem. Mater.
,
2018
, vol.
30
pg.
4001
243.
Zhang
T.
,
Jiang
B.
,
Xu
Z.
,
Mendes
R. G.
,
Xiao
Y.
,
Chen
L. F.
,
Fang
L. W.
,
Gemming
T.
,
Chen
S. L.
,
Ruemmeli
M. H.
,
Fu
L.
,
Nat. Commun.
,
2016
, vol.
7
pg.
13911
244.
Li
J.
,
Wei
Z.
and
Kang
J.
,
Two-Dimensional Semiconductors: Synthesis, Physical Properties and Applications
,
Wiley-VCH
,
Germany
, 1st edn,
2020
.
245.
Wen
H.
,
Xiong
L.
,
Tan
C. B.
,
Zhu
K. M.
,
Tang
Y.
,
Wang
J. B.
,
Zhong
X. L.
,
Chin. Phys. B
,
2021
, vol.
30
pg.
057803
246.
Ahmad
K. S.
,
Zafar
A.
,
Jaffri
S. B.
,
Alamgir
M. K.
,
Sohail
M.
,
Mehmood
R. F.
,
Rehman
M. u.
,
Ali
D.
,
Results Phys.
,
2020
, vol.
19
pg.
103647
247.
Andzane
J.
,
Felsharuk
A.
,
Sarakovskis
A.
,
Malinovskis
U.
,
Kauranens
E.
,
Bechelany
M.
,
Niherysh
K. A.
,
Komissarov
I. V.
,
Erts
D.
,
Mater. Today Energy
,
2021
, vol.
19
pg.
100587
248.
Cruz-Gomez
J.
,
Hernandez-Cantero
E.
,
Santos-Cruz
D.
,
Mayen-Hernandez
S. A.
,
DeMoure-Flores
F.
and
Santos-Cruz
J.
,
Proceedings of IEEE
,
Mexico
,
2021
.
249.
Thornbur
D. D.
,
Thin Solid Films
,
1972
, vol.
11
pg.
219
250.
Anwar
J.
,
Ahmad
K. S.
,
Jaffri
S. B.
,
Sohail
M.
,
Can. Metall. Q.
,
2022
, vol.
61
pg.
145
251.
Zafar
A.
,
Ahmad
K. S.
,
Jaffri
S. B.
,
Sohail
M.
,
Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem.
,
2020
, vol.
196
pg.
36
252.
Psaras
P. A.
and
Langford
H. D.
,
Advancing Materials Research: National Academy of Engineering and National Academy of Sciences
,
National Academy Press
,
Washington, D. C.
,
1987
.
253.
Zhuang
Z. B.
,
Peng
Q.
,
Li
Y. D.
,
Chem. Soc. Rev.
,
2011
, vol.
40
pg.
5492
254.
Devaraju
M. K.
,
Honma
I.
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
,
2012
, vol.
2
pg.
284
255.
Nath
M.
,
Choudhury
A.
,
Kundu
A.
,
Rao
C. N. R.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2003
, vol.
15
pg.
2098
256.
Lin
C. C.
,
Lee
W. F.
,
Lu
M. Y.
,
Chen
S. Y.
,
Hung
M. H.
,
Chan
T. C.
,
Tsai
H. W.
,
Chueh
Y. L.
,
Chen
L. J.
,
J. Mater. Chem.
,
2012
, vol.
22
pg.
7098
257.
Jin
R. C.
,
Chen
G.
,
Pei
J.
,
Xu
H. M.
,
Lv
Z. S.
,
RSC Adv.
,
2012
, vol.
2
pg.
1450
258.
Yao
W. T.
,
Yu
S. H.
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
,
2008
, vol.
18
pg.
3357
259.
Jin
R. C.
,
Chen
G.
,
Pei
J.
,
Sun
J. X.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Nanoscale
,
2011
, vol.
3
pg.
3893
260.
Tyagi
A. K.
and
Ningthoujam
R. S.
,
Handbook on Synthesis Strategies for Advanced Materials Volume-I: Techniques and Fundamentals
,
Springer
,
Singapore
, 1st edn,
2021
.
261.
Hernández-Ramírez
A.
and
Medina-Ramírez
I.
,
Photocatalytic Semiconductors: Synthesis, Characterization, and Environmental Applications
,
Springer International
,
Switzerland
,
2015
.
262.
Rabenau
A.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
,
1985
, vol.
24
pg.
1026
263.
Rowe
D. M.
,
Materials, Preparation, and Characterization in Thermoelectrics
,
CRC Press
,
Boca Raton
,
2012
.
264.
Han
G.
,
Zhang
R. Z.
,
Popuri
S. R.
,
Greer
H. F.
,
Reece
M. J.
,
Bos
J. W. G.
,
Zhou
W. Z.
,
Knox
A. R.
,
Gregory
D. H.
,
Materials
,
2017
, vol.
10
pg.
233
265.
Li
Z. L.
,
Chen
Y. D.
,
Li
J. F.
,
Chen
H.
,
Wang
L. J.
,
Zheng
S. Q.
,
Lu
G. W.
,
Nano Energy
,
2016
, vol.
28
pg.
78
266.
Han
G.
,
Popuri
S. R.
,
Greer
H. F.
,
Llin
L. F.
,
Bos
J. W. G.
,
Zhou
W. Z.
,
Paul
D. J.
,
Ménard
H.
,
Knox
A. R.
,
Montecucco
A.
,
Siviter
J.
,
Man
E. A.
,
Li
W.-g.
,
Paul
M. C.
,
Gao
M.
,
Sweet
T.
,
Freer
R.
,
Azough
F.
,
Baig
H.
,
Mallick
T. K.
,
Gregory
D. H.
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
,
2017
, vol.
7
pg.
1602328
267.
Ibáñez
M.
,
Korkosz
R. J.
,
Luo
Z. S.
,
Riba
P.
,
Cadavid
D.
,
Ortega
S.
,
Cabot
A.
,
Kanatzidis
M. G.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2015
, vol.
137
pg.
4046
268.
Kar
S.
,
Chaudhuri
S.
,
Chem. Phys. Lett.
,
2004
, vol.
398
pg.
22
269.
Yuan
B.
,
Luan
W.
,
Tu
S.-t.
,
Dalton Trans.
,
2012
, vol.
41
pg.
772
270.
Lei
S. J.
,
Tang
K. B.
,
Zheng
H. G.
,
Mater. Lett.
,
2006
, vol.
60
pg.
1625
271.
Lu
J.
,
Qi
P. F.
,
Peng
Y. Y.
,
Meng
Z. Y.
,
Yang
Z. P.
,
Yu
W. C.
,
Qian
Y. T.
,
Chem. Mater.
,
2001
, vol.
13
pg.
2169
272.
Zhang
L.
,
Yang
H.
,
Li
L.
,
Zhang
R.
,
Liu
R.
,
Ma
J.
,
Xie
X.
,
Gao
F.
,
Inorg. Chem.
,
2008
, vol.
47
pg.
11950
273.
Jiang
L.
,
Zhu
Y.-J.
,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
,
2010
pg.
1238
274.
Zhao
X. B.
,
Ji
X. H.
,
Zhang
Y. H.
,
Zhu
T. J.
,
Tu
J. P.
,
Zhang
X. B.
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
,
2005
, vol.
86
pg.
062111
275.
Tai
G. a.
,
Zhou
B.
,
Guo
W. L.
,
J. Phys. Chem. C
,
2008
, vol.
112
pg.
11314
276.
Cheng
L.
,
Chen
Z.-G.
,
Yang
L.
,
Han
G.
,
Xu
H.-Y.
,
Snyder
G. J.
,
Lu
G.-Q.
,
Zou
J.
,
J. Phys. Chem. C
,
2013
, vol.
117
pg.
12458
277.
Liu
X. F.
,
Wang
H. Y.
,
Zhang
B.
,
Zheng
S. K.
,
Chen
Y.
,
Zhang
H.
,
Chen
X. H.
,
Wang
G. Y.
,
Zhou
X. Y.
,
Han
G.
,
J. Mater. Sci. Technol.
,
2022
, vol.
120
pg.
205
278.
Mi
J. L.
,
Lock
N.
,
Sun
T.
,
Christensen
M.
,
Sondergaard
M.
,
Hald
P.
,
Hng
H. H.
,
Ma
J.
,
Iversen
B. B.
,
ACS Nano
,
2010
, vol.
4
pg.
2523
279.
Han
G.
,
Chen
Z. G.
,
Yang
L.
,
Cheng
L.
,
Drennan
J.
,
Zou
J.
,
Cryst. Growth Des.
,
2013
, vol.
13
pg.
5092
280.
Soriano
R. B.
,
Malliakas
C. D.
,
Wu
J. S.
,
Kanatzidis
M. G.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2012
, vol.
134
pg.
3228
281.
Soriano
R. B.
,
Wu
J. S.
,
Kanatzidis
M. G.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2015
, vol.
137
pg.
9937
282.
Donega
C. D.
,
Liljeroth
P.
,
Vanmaekelbergh
D.
,
Small
,
2005
, vol.
1
pg.
1152
283.
Park
J.
,
Joo
J.
,
Kwon
S. G.
,
Jang
Y.
,
Hyeon
T.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2007
, vol.
46
pg.
4630
284.
Han
J. H.
,
Lee
S.
,
Cheon
J.
,
Chem. Soc. Rev.
,
2013
, vol.
42
pg.
2581
285.
Ibáñez
M.
,
Korkosz
R. J.
,
Luo
Z.
,
Riba
P.
,
Cadavid
D.
,
Ortega
S.
,
Cabot
A.
,
Kanatzidis
M. G.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2015
, vol.
137
pg.
4046
286.
Cadavid
D.
,
Ibáñez
M.
,
Shavel
A.
,
Juan Dura
O.
,
Lopez de la Torre
M. A.
,
Cabot
A.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2013
, vol.
1
pg.
4864
287.
Liu
Y.
,
Garcia
G.
,
Ortega
S.
,
Cadavid
D.
,
Palacios
P.
,
Lu
J. Y.
,
Ibáñez
M.
,
Xi
L. L.
,
De Roo
J.
,
Lopez
A. M.
,
Marti-Sanchez
S.
,
Cabezas
I.
,
de la Mata
M.
,
Luo
Z. S.
,
Dun
C.
,
Dobrozhan
O.
,
Carroll
D. L.
,
Zhang
W. Q.
,
Martins
J.
,
Kovalenko
M. V.
,
Arbiol
J.
,
Noriega
G.
,
Song
J. M.
,
Wahnon
P.
,
Cabot
A.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2017
, vol.
5
pg.
2592
288.
Yu
J. H.
,
Joo
J.
,
Park
H. M.
,
Baik
S. I.
,
Kim
Y. W.
,
Kim
S. C.
,
Hyeon
T.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2005
, vol.
127
pg.
5662
289.
Han
G.
,
Popuri
S. R.
,
Greer
H. F.
,
Bos
J. W. G.
,
Zhou
W. Z.
,
Knox
A. R.
,
Montecucco
A.
,
Siviter
J.
,
Man
E. A.
,
Macauley
M.
,
Paul
D. J.
,
Li
W. G.
,
Paul
M. C.
,
Gao
M.
,
Sweet
T.
,
Freer
R.
,
Azough
F.
,
Baig
H.
,
Sellami
N.
,
Mallick
T. K.
,
Gregory
D. H.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2016
, vol.
55
pg.
6433
290.
Han
G.
,
Popuri
S. R.
,
Greer
H. F.
,
Llin
L. F.
,
Bos
J. W. G.
,
Zhou
W. Z.
,
Paul
D. J.
,
Menard
H.
,
Knox
A. R.
,
Montecucco
A.
,
Siviter
J.
,
Man
E. A.
,
Li
W. G.
,
Paul
M. C.
,
Gao
M.
,
Sweet
T.
,
Freer
R.
,
Azough
F.
,
Baig
H.
,
Mallick
T. K.
,
Gregory
D. H.
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
,
2017
, vol.
7
pg.
1602328
291.
Lesyuk
R.
,
Klein
E.
,
Yaremchuk
I.
,
Klinke
C.
,
Nanoscale
,
2018
, vol.
10
pg.
20640
292.
Wu
Y.
,
Wadia
C.
,
Ma
W. L.
,
Sadtler
B.
,
Alivisatos
A. P.
,
Nano Lett.
,
2008
, vol.
8
pg.
2551
293.
Park
K. H.
,
Jang
K.
,
Son
S. U.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2006
, vol.
45
pg.
4608
294.
Li
F.
,
Fu
J.
,
Torche
A.
,
Kull
S.
,
Kornowski
A.
,
Lesyuk
R.
,
Bester
G.
,
Klinke
C.
,
Adv. Mater. Interfaces
,
2020
, vol.
7
pg.
2000410
295.
Arachchige
I. U.
,
Soriano
R.
,
Malliakas
C. D.
,
Ivanov
S. A.
,
Kanatzidis
M. C.
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
,
2011
, vol.
21
pg.
2737
296.
Wang
H. Y.
,
Liu
X. F.
,
Zhang
B.
,
Huang
L. S.
,
Yang
M. L.
,
Zhang
X.
,
Zhang
H.
,
Wang
G. Y.
,
Zhou
X. Y.
,
Han
G.
,
Chem. Eng. J.
,
2020
, vol.
393
pg.
124763
297.
Khan
A. H.
,
Brescia
R.
,
Polovitsyn
A.
,
Angeloni
I.
,
Martin-Garcia
B.
,
Moreels
I.
,
Chem. Mater.
,
2017
, vol.
29
pg.
2883
298.
Choi
J. J.
,
Lim
Y.-F.
,
Santiago-Berrios
M. E. B.
,
Oh
M.
,
Hyun
B.-R.
,
Sung
L.
,
Bartnik
A. C.
,
Goedhart
A.
,
Malliaras
G. G.
,
Abruna
H. D.
,
Wise
F. W.
,
Hanrath
T.
,
Nano Lett.
,
2009
, vol.
9
pg.
3749
299.
Malakooti
R.
,
Cademartiri
L.
,
Akcakir
Y.
,
Petrov
S.
,
Migliori
A.
,
Ozin
G. A.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2006
, vol.
18
pg.
2189
300.
Son
J. S.
,
Choi
M. K.
,
Han
M. K.
,
Park
K.
,
Kim
J. Y.
,
Lim
S. J.
,
Oh
M.
,
Kuk
Y.
,
Park
C.
,
Kim
S. J.
,
Hyeon
T.
,
Nano Lett.
,
2012
, vol.
12
pg.
640
301.
Malik
M. A.
,
O'Brien
P.
,
Revaprasadu
N.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
1999
, vol.
11
pg.
1441
302.
Castro
S. L.
,
Bailey
S. G.
,
Raffaelle
R. P.
,
Banger
K. K.
,
Hepp
A. F.
,
J. Phys. Chem. B
,
2004
, vol.
108
pg.
12429
303.
Allen
P. M.
,
Bawendi
M. G.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2008
, vol.
130
pg.
9240
304.
Tang
J.
,
Hinds
S.
,
Kelley
S. O.
,
Sargent
E. H.
,
Chem. Mater.
,
2008
, vol.
20
pg.
6906
305.
Huang
L. S.
,
Lu
J. Z.
,
Ma
D. W.
,
Ma
C. M.
,
Zhang
B.
,
Wang
H. Y.
,
Wang
G. Y.
,
Gregory
D. H.
,
Zhou
X. Y.
,
Han
G.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2020
, vol.
8
pg.
1394
306.
Wei
Y. Q.
,
Zhou
Z. Z.
,
Jiang
P. F.
,
Zheng
S. K.
,
Xiong
Q. H.
,
Zhang
B.
,
Wang
G. Y.
,
Lu
X.
,
Han
G.
,
Zhou
X. Y.
,
ACS Appl. Energy Mater.
,
2021
, vol.
4
pg.
9240
307.
Fan
F. J.
,
Wang
Y. X.
,
Liu
X. J.
,
Wu
L.
,
Yu
S. H.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2012
, vol.
24
pg.
6158
308.
Ibáñez
M.
,
Zamani
R.
,
Li
W. H.
,
Shavel
A.
,
Arbiol
J.
,
Ramon Morante
J.
,
Cabot
A.
,
Cryst. Growth Des.
,
2012
, vol.
12
pg.
1085
309.
Ibáñez
M.
,
Zamani
R.
,
LaLonde
A.
,
Cadavid
D.
,
Li
W. H.
,
Shavel
A.
,
Arbiol
J.
,
Morante
J. R.
,
Gorsse
S.
,
Snyder
G. J.
,
Cabot
A.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2012
, vol.
134
pg.
4060
310.
Ren
X.
,
Yuan
L.
,
Liang
Q.
,
Xie
R.
,
Geng
Z.
,
Sun
Y.
,
Wang
L.
,
Huang
K.
,
Wu
T.
,
Feng
S.
,
ChemPlusChem
,
2018
, vol.
83
pg.
812
311.
Giancaspro
M.
,
Sibillano
T.
,
Panzarea
F.
,
Giannini
C.
,
Schmitzer
S.
,
Vischio
F.
,
Depalo
N.
,
Agostiano
A.
,
Curri
M. L.
,
Striccoli
M.
,
Fanizza
E.
,
Mater. Chem. Front.
,
2021
, vol.
5
pg.
1341
312.
Yin
D.
,
Dun
C.
,
Zhang
H.
,
Fu
Z.
,
Gao
X.
,
Wang
X.
,
Singh
D. J.
,
Carroll
D. L.
,
Liu
Y.
,
Swihart
M. T.
,
Small
,
2021
, vol.
17
pg.
2006729
313.
Lofton
C.
,
Sigmund
W.
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
,
2005
, vol.
15
pg.
1197
314.
Ithurria
S.
,
Dubertret
B.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2008
, vol.
130
pg.
16504
315.
Komarneni
S.
,
Roy
R.
,
Mater. Lett.
,
1985
, vol.
3
pg.
165
316.
Zhu
Y. J.
,
Chen
F.
,
Chem. Rev.
,
2014
, vol.
114
pg.
6462
317.
Laird
T.
,
Org. Process Res. Dev.
,
2011
, vol.
15
pg.
478
318.
Rajamathi
M.
,
Seshadri
R.
,
Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci.
,
2002
, vol.
6
pg.
337
319.
Mehta
R. J.
,
Karthik
C.
,
Jiang
W.
,
Singh
B.
,
Shi
Y.
,
Siegel
R. W.
,
Borca-Tasciuc
T.
,
Ramanath
G.
,
Nano Lett.
,
2010
, vol.
10
pg.
4417
320.
Panda
A. B.
,
Glaspell
G.
,
El-Shall
M. S.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2006
, vol.
128
pg.
2790
321.
Shao
M. W.
,
Kong
L. F.
,
Li
Q.
,
Yu
W. C.
,
Qian
Y. T.
,
Inorg. Chem. Commun.
,
2003
, vol.
6
pg.
737
322.
Harpeness
R.
,
Gedanken
A.
,
Weiss
A. M.
,
Slifkin
M. A.
,
J. Mater. Chem.
,
2003
, vol.
13
pg.
2603
323.
Park
S.
,
Park
J.
,
Selvaraj
R.
,
Kim
Y.
,
J. Ind. Eng. Chem.
,
2015
, vol.
31
pg.
269
324.
Caponetti
E.
,
Martino
D. C.
,
Leone
M.
,
Pedone
L.
,
Saladino
M. L.
,
Vetri
V.
,
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
,
2006
, vol.
304
pg.
413
325.
Firth
A. V.
,
Tao
Y.
,
Wang
D. S.
,
Ding
J. F.
,
Bensebaa
F.
,
J. Mater. Chem.
,
2005
, vol.
15
pg.
4367
326.
Song
Q.
,
Ai
X.
,
Topuria
T.
,
Rice
P. M.
,
Alharbi
F. H.
,
Bagabas
A.
,
Bahattab
M.
,
Bass
J. D.
,
Kim
H.-C.
,
Scott
J. C.
,
Miller
R. D.
,
Chem. Commun.
,
2010
, vol.
46
pg.
4971
327.
Wang
Y.
,
Yang
W.
,
Zhang
L.
,
Hu
Y.
,
Lou
X. W.
,
Nanoscale
,
2013
, vol.
5
pg.
10864
328.
Synnott
D. W.
,
Seery
M. K.
,
Hinder
S. J.
,
Colreavy
J.
,
Pillai
S. C.
,
Nanotechnology
,
2013
, vol.
24
pg.
045704
329.
Qian
H. F.
,
Qiu
X.
,
Li
L.
,
Ren
J. C.
,
J. Phys. Chem. B
,
2006
, vol.
110
pg.
9034
330.
Alvand
Z. M.
,
Rajabi
H. R.
,
Mirzaei
A.
,
Masoumiasl
A.
,
New J. Chem.
,
2019
, vol.
43
pg.
15126
331.
Sheng
J. Q.
,
Liu
X. F.
,
Niu
C. Z.
,
Sun
Y. F.
,
Chen
Y.
,
Wang
H. Y.
,
Zhang
B.
,
Wang
G. Y.
,
Zhou
X. Y.
,
Han
G.
,
J. Mater. Chem. C
,
2020
, vol.
8
pg.
10333
332.
Maria Gonzalez-Barrios
M.
,
Tabuyo-Martinez
M.
,
Cascos
V.
,
Dura
O. J.
,
Alonso
J. A.
,
Avila-Brande
D.
,
Prado-Gonjal
J.
,
Ceram. Int.
,
2022
, vol.
48
pg.
12331
333.
Wang
L.
,
Zheng
S.
,
Chen
H.
,
J. Electron. Mater.
,
2017
, vol.
46
pg.
2847
334.
Hostetler
E. B.
,
Kim
K.-J.
,
Oleksak
R. P.
,
Fitzmorris
R. C.
,
Peterson
D. A.
,
Chandran
P.
,
Chang
C.-H.
,
Paul
B. K.
,
Schut
D. M.
,
Herman
G. S.
,
Mater. Lett.
,
2014
, vol.
128
pg.
54
335.
Dong
G.-H.
,
Zhu
Y.-J.
,
Chem. Eng. J.
,
2012
, vol.
193
pg.
227
336.
Mu
C. F.
,
Yao
Q. Z.
,
Qu
X. F.
,
Zhou
G. T.
,
Li
M. L.
,
Fu
S. Q.
,
Colloids Surf., A
,
2010
, vol.
371
pg.
14
337.
Cao
H.
,
Hu
X.
,
Zhu
Y.
,
Mater. Lett.
,
2024
, vol.
359
pg.
135881
338.
Liao
X. H.
,
Chen
N. Y.
,
Xu
S.
,
Yang
S. B.
,
Zhu
J. J.
,
J. Cryst. Growth
,
2003
, vol.
252
pg.
593
339.
Yang
S.
,
Ji
F.
,
Wang
Z.
,
Zhu
Y.
,
Hu
K.
,
Ouyang
Y.
,
Wang
R.
,
Ma
X.
,
Cao
C.
,
Electrochim. Acta
,
2019
, vol.
324
pg.
134864
340.
Chen
Y.
,
Chen
J.
,
Zhang
B.
,
Yang
M.
,
Liu
X.
,
Wang
H.
,
Yang
L.
,
Wang
G.
,
Han
G.
,
Zhou
X.
,
J. Mater. Sci. Technol.
,
2021
, vol.
78
pg.
121
341.
Zhu
J. J.
,
Palchik
O.
,
Chen
S. G.
,
Gedanken
A.
,
J. Phys. Chem. B
,
2000
, vol.
104
pg.
7344
342.
Chen
Y.
,
Wu
H.
,
Zhang
B.
,
Chen
J.
,
Zhou
Z.
,
Lu
X.
,
Zhou
Y.
,
Wang
G.
,
Han
G.
,
Zhou
X.
,
J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.
,
2024
, vol.
44
pg.
6374
343.
Yang
W.
,
Zhang
L.
,
Hu
Y.
,
Zhong
Y.
,
Wu
H. B.
,
Lou
X. W.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2012
, vol.
51
pg.
11501
344.
Li
X.
,
Lu
Y.
,
Cai
K.
,
Gao
M.
,
Li
Y.
,
Wang
Z.
,
Wu
M.
,
Wei
P.
,
Zhao
W.
,
Du
Y.
,
Shen
S.
,
Chem. Eng. J.
,
2022
, vol.
434
pg.
134739
345.
Pei
J.
,
Chen
G.
,
Jia
D.
,
Yu
Y.
,
Sun
J.
,
Xu
H.
,
Qiu
Z.
,
New J. Chem.
,
2014
, vol.
38
pg.
59
346.
Kavinchan
J.
,
Thongtem
T.
,
Thongtem
S.
,
Mater. Lett.
,
2010
, vol.
64
pg.
2388
347.
Liu
Y.-Q.
,
Zhang
M.
,
Wang
F.-X.
,
Pan
G.-B.
,
J. Mater. Chem. C
,
2014
, vol.
2
pg.
240
348.
Singh
S.
,
Hong
S.
,
Jeon
W.
,
Lee
D.
,
Hwang
J.-Y.
,
Lim
S.
,
Kwon
G. D.
,
Pribat
D.
,
Shin
H.
,
Kim
S. W.
,
Baik
S.
,
Chem. Mater.
,
2015
, vol.
27
pg.
2315
349.
Zhou
X.
,
Yao
S.
,
Long
Y.
,
Wang
Z.
,
Li
W.
,
Mater. Lett.
,
2015
, vol.
145
pg.
23
350.
Zheng
J.
,
Chen
S.
,
Cai
K.
,
Yin
J.
,
Shen
S.
,
Ceram. Int.
,
2017
, vol.
43
pg.
5920
351.
Yao
Q.
,
Zhu
Y.
,
Chen
L.
,
Sun
Z.
,
Chen
X.
,
J. Alloys Compd.
,
2009
, vol.
481
pg.
91
352.
Zhang
W. J.
,
Li
D. Z.
,
Chen
Z. X.
,
Sun
M.
,
Li
W. J.
,
Lin
Q.
,
Fu
X. Z.
,
Mater. Res. Bull.
,
2011
, vol.
46
pg.
975
353.
Zhang
W. J.
,
Li
D. Z.
,
Sun
M.
,
Shao
Y.
,
Chen
Z. X.
,
Xiao
G. C.
,
Fu
X. Z.
,
J. Solid State Chem.
,
2010
, vol.
183
pg.
2466
354.
Bensebaa
F.
,
Durand
C.
,
Aouadou
A.
,
Scoles
L.
,
Du
X.
,
Wang
D.
,
Le Page
Y.
,
J. Nanopart. Res.
,
2010
, vol.
12
pg.
1897
355.
Apte
S. K.
,
Garaje
S. N.
,
Bolade
R. D.
,
Ambekar
J. D.
,
Kulkarni
M. V.
,
Naik
S. D.
,
Gosavi
S. W.
,
Baeg
J. O.
,
Kale
B. B.
,
J. Mater. Chem.
,
2010
, vol.
20
pg.
6095
356.
Xie
D. D.
,
Zhang
B.
,
Zhang
A. J.
,
Chen
Y. J.
,
Yan
Y. C.
,
Yang
H. Q.
,
Wang
G. W.
,
Wang
G. Y.
,
Han
X. D.
,
Han
G.
,
Lu
X.
,
Zhou
X. Y.
,
Nanoscale
,
2018
, vol.
10
pg.
14546
357.
Shin
S. W.
,
Han
J. H.
,
Park
C. Y.
,
Moholkar
A. V.
,
Lee
J. Y.
,
Kim
J. H.
,
J. Alloys Compd.
,
2012
, vol.
516
pg.
96
358.
Backes
C.
,
Higgins
T. M.
,
Kelly
A.
,
Boland
C.
,
Harvey
A.
,
Hanlon
D.
,
Coleman
J. N.
,
Chem. Mater.
,
2017
, vol.
29
pg.
243
359.
Xu
Y. Y.
,
Cao
H. Z.
,
Xue
Y. Q.
,
Li
B.
,
Cai
W. H.
,
Nanomaterials
,
2018
, vol.
8
pg.
942
360.
Coleman
J. N.
,
Lotya
M.
,
O'Neill
A.
,
Bergin
S. D.
,
King
P. J.
,
Khan
U.
,
Young
K.
,
Gaucher
A.
,
De
S.
,
Smith
R. J.
,
Shvets
I. V.
,
Arora
S. K.
,
Stanton
G.
,
Kim
H.-Y.
,
Lee
K.
,
Kim
G. T.
,
Duesberg
G. S.
,
Hallam
T.
,
Boland
J. J.
,
Wang
J. J.
,
Donegan
J. F.
,
Grunlan
J. C.
,
Moriarty
G.
,
Shmeliov
A.
,
Nicholls
R. J.
,
Perkins
J. M.
,
Grieveson
E. M.
,
Theuwissen
K.
,
McComb
D. W.
,
Nellist
P. D.
,
Nicolosi
V.
,
Science
,
2011
, vol.
331
pg.
568
361.
Dines
M. B.
,
J. Chem. Educ.
,
1974
, vol.
51
pg.
221
362.
Matte
H. S. S. R.
,
Gomathi
A.
,
Manna
A. K.
,
Late
D. J.
,
Datta
R.
,
Pati
S. K.
,
Rao
C. N. R.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2010
, vol.
49
pg.
4059
363.
Joensen
P.
,
Frindt
R. F.
,
Morrison
S. R.
,
Mater. Res. Bull.
,
1986
, vol.
21
pg.
457
364.
Miremadi
B. K.
,
Morrison
S. R.
,
J. Appl. Phys.
,
1988
, vol.
63
pg.
4970
365.
Yang
D.
,
Frindt
R. F.
,
J. Phys. Chem. Solids
,
1996
, vol.
57
pg.
1113
366.
Lin
Z. Y.
,
Liu
Y.
,
Halim
U.
,
Ding
M. N.
,
Liu
Y. Y.
,
Wang
Y. L.
,
Jia
C. C.
,
Chen
P.
,
Duan
X. D.
,
Wang
C.
,
Song
F.
,
Li
M. F.
,
Wan
C. Z.
,
Huang
Y.
,
Duan
X. F.
,
Nature
,
2018
, vol.
562
pg.
254
367.
Ciesielski
A.
,
Samori
P.
,
Chem. Soc. Rev.
,
2014
, vol.
43
pg.
381
368.
Tian
R. M.
,
Wan
C. L.
,
Wang
Y. F.
,
Wei
Q. S.
,
Ishida
T.
,
Yamamoto
A.
,
Tsuruta
A.
,
Shin
W. S.
,
Li
S.
,
Koumoto
K.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2017
, vol.
5
pg.
564
369.
Cunningham
G.
,
Lotya
M.
,
Cucinotta
C. S.
,
Sanvito
S.
,
Bergin
S. D.
,
Menzel
R.
,
Shaffer
M. S. P.
,
Coleman
J. N.
,
ACS Nano
,
2012
, vol.
6
pg.
3468
370.
Tyagi
A. K.
and
Ningthoujam
R. S.
,
Handbook on Synthesis Strategies for Advanced Materials Volume-III: Materials Specific Synthesis Strategies
,
Springer Nature
,
Singapore
, 1st edn,
2021
.
371.
Enayati
M. H.
,
Mohamed
F. A.
,
Int. Mater. Rev.
,
2014
, vol.
59
pg.
394
372.
Suryanarayana
C.
,
Research
,
2019
, vol.
2019
pg.
4219812
373.
Schilz
J.
,
Riffel
M.
,
Pixius
K.
,
Meyer
H. J.
,
Powder Technol.
,
1999
, vol.
105
pg.
149
374.
Suryanarayana
C.
,
Prog. Mater. Sci.
,
2001
, vol.
46
pg.
1
375.
Volkov
V. A.
,
El'kin
I. A.
,
Zagainov
A. V.
,
Protasov
A. V.
,
Elsukov
E. P.
,
Phys. Met. Metallogr.
,
2014
, vol.
115
pg.
557
376.
Sie
F. R.
,
Liu
H. J.
,
Kuo
C. H.
,
Hwang
C. S.
,
Chou
Y. W.
,
Yeh
C. H.
,
Intermetallics
,
2018
, vol.
92
pg.
113
377.
Melquiades
M. O.
,
de Oliveira
L. S.
,
Rebelo
Q. H. F.
,
Chaudhuri
P.
,
Leite
E. R.
,
Triches
D. M.
,
Michielon de Souza
S.
,
J. Appl. Phys.
,
2019
, vol.
126
pg.
135707
378.
Chen
Y.-X.
,
Ge
Z.-H.
,
Yin
M.
,
Feng
D.
,
Huang
X.-Q.
,
Zhao
W.
,
He
J.
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
,
2016
, vol.
26
pg.
6836
379.
Tan
Q.
,
Zhao
L. D.
,
Li
J. F.
,
Wu
C. F.
,
Wei
T. R.
,
Xing
Z. B.
,
Kanatzidis
M. G.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2014
, vol.
2
pg.
17302
380.
Zhang
Q.
,
Liao
B. L.
,
Lan
Y. C.
,
Lukas
K.
,
Liu
W. S.
,
Esfarjani
K.
,
Opeil
C.
,
Broido
D.
,
Chen
G.
,
Ren
Z. F.
,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
,
2013
, vol.
110
pg.
13261
381.
Ohtani
T.
,
Maruyama
K.
,
Ohshima
K.
,
Mater. Res. Bull.
,
1997
, vol.
32
pg.
343
382.
Jiang
J.
,
Zhu
H. T.
,
Niu
Y.
,
Zhu
Q.
,
Song
S. W.
,
Zhou
T.
,
Wang
C.
,
Ren
Z. F.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2020
, vol.
8
pg.
4790
383.
Chen
Y.-X.
,
Zhang
B.-P.
,
Ge
Z.-H.
,
Shang
P.-P.
,
J. Solid State Chem.
,
2012
, vol.
186
pg.
109
384.
Maciazek
E.
,
Malicka
E.
,
Karolus
M.
,
Panek
J.
,
Stoklosa
Z.
,
Gron
T.
,
Gudwanski
A.
,
Sawicki
B.
,
IEEE Trans. Magn.
,
2017
, vol.
53
pg.
2400205
385.
Nunna
R.
,
Qiu
P. F.
,
Yin
M. J.
,
Chen
H. Y.
,
Hanus
R.
,
Song
Q. F.
,
Zhang
T. S.
,
Chou
M. Y.
,
Agne
M. T.
,
He
J. Q.
,
Snyder
G. J.
,
Shi
X.
,
Chen
L. D.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2017
, vol.
10
pg.
1928
386.
Tkatch
V. I.
,
Denisenko
S. N.
,
Beloshov
O. N.
,
Acta Mater.
,
1997
, vol.
45
pg.
2821
387.
Zhou
Z. M.
,
Huang
W. J.
,
Luo
J.
,
Li
X. P.
,
Zhou
T.
,
Lei
B. B.
,
Wang
C. H.
,
Xia
H.
and
Peng
C. Y.
,
Materials Science Forum
,
Kunming
,
2011
.
388.
Young
J. S.
,
Reddy
R. G.
,
J. Mater. Eng. Perform.
,
2019
, vol.
28
pg.
5917
389.
Greer
A. L.
,
Science
,
1995
, vol.
267
pg.
1947
390.
Chen
H.
,
He
Y.
,
Shiflet
G. J.
,
Poon
S. J.
,
Nature
,
1994
, vol.
367
pg.
541
391.
Su
X. L.
,
Wei
P.
,
Li
H.
,
Liu
W.
,
Yan
Y. G.
,
Li
P.
,
Su
C. Q.
,
Xie
C. J.
,
Zhao
W. Y.
,
Zhai
P. C.
,
Zhang
Q. J.
,
Tang
X. F.
,
Uher
C.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2017
, vol.
29
pg.
1602013
392.
Tkatch
V. I.
,
Limanovskii
A. I.
,
Denisenko
S. N.
,
Rassolov
S. G.
,
Mater. Sci. Eng., A
,
2002
, vol.
323
pg.
91
393.
Wang
S. Y.
,
Xie
W. J.
,
Li
H.
,
Tang
X. F.
,
Intermetallics
,
2011
, vol.
19
pg.
1024
394.
Cai
X.
,
Fan
X. a.
,
Rong
Z.
,
Yang
F.
,
Gan
Z.
,
Li
G.
,
J. Phys. D:Appl. Phys.
,
2014
, vol.
47
pg.
115101
395.
Xie
W. J.
,
Wang
S. Y.
,
Zhu
S.
,
He
J.
,
Tang
X. F.
,
Zhang
Q. J.
,
Tritt
T. M.
,
J. Mater. Sci.
,
2013
, vol.
48
pg.
2745
396.
Chen
Y.
,
Zhu
T. J.
,
Yang
S. H.
,
Zhang
S. N.
,
Miao
W.
,
Zhao
X. B.
,
J. Electron. Mater.
,
2010
, vol.
39
pg.
1719
397.
Du
B.
,
Li
H.
,
Xu
J.
,
Tang
X.
,
Uher
C.
,
J. Solid State Chem.
,
2011
, vol.
184
pg.
109
398.
Yan
X. M.
,
Zheng
S. K.
,
Zhou
Z. Z.
,
Wu
H.
,
Zhang
B.
,
Huang
Y. L.
,
Lu
X.
,
Han
G.
,
Wang
G. Y.
,
Zhou
X. Y.
,
Nano Energy
,
2021
, vol.
84
pg.
105879
399.
Ding
G.
,
Si
J.
,
Wu
H.
,
Yang
S.
,
Zhao
J.
,
Wang
G.
,
J. Alloys Compd.
,
2016
, vol.
662
pg.
368
400.
Xie
W.
,
He
J.
,
Kang
H. J.
,
Tang
X.
,
Zhu
S.
,
Laver
M.
,
Wang
S.
,
Copley
J. R. D.
,
Brown
C. M.
,
Zhang
Q.
,
Tritt
T. M.
,
Nano Lett.
,
2010
, vol.
10
pg.
3283
401.
Xie
W.
,
Tang
X.
,
Yan
Y.
,
Zhang
Q.
,
Tritt
T. M.
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
,
2009
, vol.
94
pg.
102111
402.
Tang
H.
,
Guo
L.
,
Wang
G.
,
Wu
H.
,
Shen
X.
,
Zhang
B.
,
Lu
X.
,
Wang
G.
,
Zhang
X.
,
Zhou
X.
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
,
2019
, vol.
11
pg.
23337
403.
Baxter
J.
,
Bian
Z.
,
Chen
G.
,
Danielson
D.
,
Dresselhaus
M. S.
,
Fedorov
A. G.
,
Fisher
T. S.
,
Jones
C. W.
,
Maginn
E.
,
Kortshagen
U.
,
Manthiram
A.
,
Nozik
A.
,
Rolison
D. R.
,
Sands
T.
,
Shi
L.
,
Sholl
D.
,
Wu
Y.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2009
, vol.
2
pg.
559
404.
Ren
L.
,
Li
Y.
,
Zhang
N.
,
Li
Z.
,
Lin
X.
,
Zhu
W.
,
Lu
C.
,
Ding
W.
,
Zou
J.
,
Nano-Micro Lett.
,
2023
, vol.
15
pg.
93
405.
Han
G.
,
Lu
Y.
,
Jia
H.
,
Ding
Z.
,
Wu
L.
,
Shi
Y.
,
Wang
G.
,
Luo
Q.
,
Chen
Y. a.
,
Wang
J.
,
Huang
G.
,
Zhou
X.
,
Li
Q.
,
Pan
F.
,
J. Magnesium Alloys
,
2023
, vol.
11
pg.
3896
406.
Pumera
M.
,
Sofer
Z.
,
Ambrosi
A.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2014
, vol.
2
pg.
8981
407.
Muller
G. A.
,
Cook
J. B.
,
Kim
H. S.
,
Tolbert
S. H.
,
Dunn
B.
,
Nano Lett.
,
2015
, vol.
15
pg.
1911
408.
Wang
T. Y.
,
Chen
S. Q.
,
Pang
H.
,
Xue
H. G.
,
Yu
Y.
,
Adv. Sci.
,
2017
, vol.
4
pg.
1600289
409.
Ji
L. W.
,
Lin
Z.
,
Alcoutlabi
M.
,
Zhang
X. W.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2011
, vol.
4
pg.
2682
410.
Qin
S.
,
Lei
W. W.
,
Liu
D.
,
Chen
Y.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2016
, vol.
4
pg.
1440
411.
Tao
K.
,
Wang
X. F.
,
Xu
Y. F.
,
Liu
J.
,
Song
X. F.
,
Fu
C. P.
,
Chen
X. Q.
,
Qu
X. Z.
,
Zhao
X. F.
,
Gao
L.
,
J. Am. Ceram. Soc.
,
2020
, vol.
103
pg.
4453
412.
Zhu
W.
,
Zhao
J.
,
Tao
X.
,
J. Energy Storage
,
2024
, vol.
84
pg.
110934
413.
Thomas
S.
,
Gueye
A. B.
and
Gupta
R. K.
,
Nanostructured Materials for Supercapacitors
,
Springer Nature
,
Switzerland
, 1st edn,
2022
.
414.
Lamba
P.
,
Singh
P.
,
Singh
P.
,
Singh
P.
,
Bharti
,
Kumar
A.
,
Gupta
M.
,
Kumar
Y.
,
J. Energy Storage
,
2022
, vol.
48
pg.
103871
415.
Dahiya
Y.
,
Hariram
M.
,
Kumar
M.
,
Jain
A.
,
Sarkar
D.
,
Coord. Chem. Rev.
,
2022
, vol.
451
pg.
214265
416.
Yang
J.
,
Yu
C.
,
Fan
X. M.
,
Liang
S. X.
,
Li
S. F.
,
Huang
H. W.
,
Ling
Z.
,
Hao
C.
,
Qiu
J. S.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2016
, vol.
9
pg.
1299
417.
Li
X. L.
,
Li
X. D.
,
Cheng
J. L.
,
Yuan
D. M.
,
Ni
W.
,
Guan
Q.
,
Gao
L. Z.
,
Wang
B.
,
Nano Energy
,
2016
, vol.
21
pg.
228
418.
Acerce
M.
,
Voiry
D.
,
Chhowalla
M.
,
Nat. Nanotechnol.
,
2015
, vol.
10
pg.
313
419.
Hu
X.
,
Jood
P.
,
Ohta
M.
,
Kunii
M.
,
Nagase
K.
,
Nishiate
H.
,
Kanatzidis
M. G.
,
Yamamoto
A.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2016
, vol.
9
pg.
517
420.
Zhao
L. D.
,
Chang
C.
,
Tan
G. J.
,
Kanatzidis
M. G.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2016
, vol.
9
pg.
3044
421.
Liu
W.-D.
,
Yang
L.
,
Chen
Z.-G.
,
Nano Today
,
2020
, vol.
35
pg.
100938
422.
Fu
C. G.
,
Bai
S. Q.
,
Liu
Y. T.
,
Tang
Y. S.
,
Chen
L. D.
,
Zhao
X. B.
,
Zhu
T. J.
,
Nat. Commun.
,
2015
, vol.
6
pg.
8144
423.
Hu
H.
,
Ju
Y.
,
Yu
J.
,
Wang
Z.
,
Pei
J.
,
Thong
H.-C.
,
Li
J.-W.
,
Cai
B.
,
Liu
F.
,
Han
Z.
,
Su
B.
,
Zhuang
H.-L.
,
Jiang
Y.
,
Li
H.
,
Li
Q.
,
Zhao
H.
,
Zhang
B.-P.
,
Zhu
J.
,
Li
J.-F.
,
Nat. Mater.
,
2024
, vol.
23
pg.
527
424.
Liu
H. L.
,
Shi
X.
,
Xu
F. F.
,
Zhang
L. L.
,
Zhang
W. Q.
,
Chen
L. D.
,
Li
Q.
,
Uher
C.
,
Day
T.
,
Snyder
G. J.
,
Nat. Mater.
,
2012
, vol.
11
pg.
422
425.
Zhao
L. D.
,
Lo
S. H.
,
Zhang
Y. S.
,
Sun
H.
,
Tan
G. J.
,
Uher
C.
,
Wolverton
C.
,
Dravid
V. P.
,
Kanatzidis
M. G.
,
Nature
,
2014
, vol.
508
pg.
373
426.
Li
C.
,
Chen
J.
,
Chen
J.
,
Zhang
Y.
,
Li
M.
,
Li
H.
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
,
2024
, vol.
14
pg.
2303162
427.
Li
K.
,
Yang
X.
,
Lu
Y.
,
Xue
J.
,
Lu
S.
,
Zheng
J.
,
Chen
C.
,
Tang
J.
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
,
2022
, vol.
12
pg.
2200725
428.
Fu
Q.
,
Han
J.
,
Wang
X.
,
Xu
P.
,
Yao
T.
,
Zhong
J.
,
Zhong
W.
,
Liu
S.
,
Gao
T.
,
Zhang
Z.
,
Xu
L.
,
Song
B.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2021
, vol.
33
pg.
1907818
429.
Zheng
Y. R.
,
Wu
P.
,
Gao
M. R.
,
Zhang
X. L.
,
Gao
F. Y.
,
Ju
H. X.
,
Wu
R.
,
Gao
Q.
,
You
R.
,
Huang
W. X.
,
Liu
S. J.
,
Hu
S. W.
,
Zhu
J. F.
,
Li
Z. Y.
,
Yu
S. H.
,
Nat. Commun.
,
2018
, vol.
9
pg.
2533
430.
Wu
Y. S.
,
Liu
X. J.
,
Han
D. D.
,
Song
X. Y.
,
Shi
L.
,
Song
Y.
,
Niu
S. W.
,
Xie
Y. F.
,
Cai
J. Y.
,
Wu
S. Y.
,
Kang
J.
,
Zhou
J. B.
,
Chen
Z. Y.
,
Zheng
X. S.
,
Xiao
X. H.
,
Wang
G. M.
,
Nat. Commun.
,
2018
, vol.
9
pg.
1425
431.
Gu
C.
,
Hu
S. J.
,
Zheng
X. S.
,
Gao
M. R.
,
Zheng
Y. R.
,
Shi
L.
,
Gao
Q.
,
Zheng
X.
,
Chu
W. S.
,
Yao
H. B.
,
Zhu
J. F.
,
Yu
S. H.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2018
, vol.
57
pg.
4020
432.
Yu
Y.
,
Huang
S.-Y.
,
Li
Y.
,
Steinmann
S. N.
,
Yang
W.
,
Cao
L.
,
Nano Lett.
,
2014
, vol.
14
pg.
553
433.
Liu
C.
,
Li
F.
,
Ma
L. P.
,
Cheng
H. M.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2010
, vol.
22
pg.
E28
434.
Goodenough
J. B.
,
Kim
Y.
,
Chem. Mater.
,
2010
, vol.
22
pg.
587
435.
Armand
M.
,
Tarascon
J. M.
,
Nature
,
2008
, vol.
451
pg.
652
436.
Chen
B.
,
Chao
D.
,
Liu
E.
,
Jaroniec
M.
,
Zhao
N.
,
Qiao
S.-Z.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2020
, vol.
13
pg.
1096
437.
Wu
J.
,
Ihsan-Ul-Haq
M.
,
Ciucci
F.
,
Huang
B.
,
Kim
J.-K.
,
Energy Storage Mater.
,
2021
, vol.
34
pg.
582
438.
Ye
Z.
,
Sun
H.
,
Gao
H.
,
Sun
L.
,
Guo
J.
,
Jiang
Y.
,
Wu
C.
,
Zheng
S.
,
Energy Storage Mater.
,
2023
, vol.
60
pg.
102855
439.
Neumann
J.
,
Petranikova
M.
,
Meeus
M.
,
Gamarra
J. D.
,
Younesi
R.
,
Winter
M.
,
Nowak
S.
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
,
2022
, vol.
12
pg.
2102917
440.
Zhao
X.
,
Zhang
Y.
,
Hou
Y.
,
Zhao
Z.
,
Gong
Y.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Wei
H.
,
Pol
V. G.
,
Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater.
,
2022
, vol.
5
pg.
2988
441.
Wakihara
M.
,
Mater. Sci. Eng., R
,
2001
, vol.
33
pg.
109
442.
Lin
D.
,
Liu
Y.
,
Cui
Y.
,
Nat. Nanotechnol.
,
2017
, vol.
12
pg.
194
443.
Goodenough
J. B.
,
Park
K.-S.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2013
, vol.
135
pg.
1167
444.
Zhang
H.
,
Qiao
L.
,
Kuehnle
H.
,
Figgemeier
E.
,
Armand
M.
,
Eshetu
G. G.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2023
, vol.
16
pg.
11
445.
Armand
M. B.
, Intercalation Electrodes, in
Materials for Advanced Batteries
, ed.
Murphy
D. W.
,
Broadhead
J.
and
Steele
B. C. H.
, NATO Conference Series,
Springer
, Boston, MA,
1980
,
vol. 2
.
446.
Nishi
Y.
,
Chem. Rec.
,
2001
, vol.
1
pg.
406
447.
Dunn
B.
,
Kamath
H.
,
Tarascon
J.-M.
,
Science
,
2011
, vol.
334
pg.
928
448.
Etacheri
V.
,
Marom
R.
,
Elazari
R.
,
Salitra
G.
,
Aurbach
D.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2011
, vol.
4
pg.
3243
449.
Tamirat
A. G.
,
Lui
Y.
,
Dong
X. L.
,
Wang
C. X.
,
Wang
Y. G.
,
Xia
Y. Y.
,
Small Struct.
,
2021
, vol.
2
pg.
2000126
450.
Huang
M.
,
Xi
B. J.
,
Shi
N. X.
,
Feng
J. K.
,
Qian
Y. T.
,
Xue
D. F.
,
Xiong
S. L.
,
Small Struct.
,
2021
, vol.
2
pg.
2000085
451.
Yu
S. H.
,
Lee
S. H.
,
Lee
D. J.
,
Sung
Y. E.
,
Hyeon
T.
,
Small
,
2016
, vol.
12
pg.
2146
452.
Chan
C. K.
,
Peng
H.
,
Liu
G.
,
McIlwrath
K.
,
Zhang
X. F.
,
Huggins
R. A.
,
Cui
Y.
,
Nat. Nanotechnol.
,
2008
, vol.
3
pg.
31
453.
Li
H.
,
Wang
Z. X.
,
Chen
L. Q.
,
Huang
X. J.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2009
, vol.
21
pg.
4593
454.
Park
M. H.
,
Cho
Y.
,
Kim
K.
,
Kim
J.
,
Liu
M. L.
,
Cho
J.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2011
, vol.
50
pg.
9647
455.
Wang
Z. Y.
,
Zhou
L.
,
Lou
X. W.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2012
, vol.
24
pg.
1903
456.
Cabana
J.
,
Monconduit
L.
,
Larcher
D.
,
Rosa Palacin
M.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2010
, vol.
22
pg.
E170
457.
Jia
G. C.
,
Chao
D. L.
,
Tiep
N. H.
,
Zhang
Z.
,
Fan
H. J.
,
Energy Storage Mater.
,
2018
, vol.
14
pg.
136
458.
Li
Y. H.
,
Chang
K.
,
Shangguan
E.
,
Guo
D. L.
,
Zhou
W.
,
Hou
Y.
,
Tang
H. W.
,
Li
B.
,
Chang
Z. R.
,
Nanoscale
,
2019
, vol.
11
pg.
1887
459.
Biby
A. H.
,
Ali
B. A.
,
Allam
N. K.
,
Mater. Today Energy
,
2021
, vol.
20
pg.
100677
460.
Du
G.
,
Guo
Z.
,
Wang
S.
,
Zeng
R.
,
Chen
Z.
,
Liu
H.
,
Chem. Commun.
,
2010
, vol.
46
pg.
1106
461.
Yu
S.-H.
,
Zachman
M. J.
,
Kang
K.
,
Gao
H.
,
Huang
X.
,
DiSalvo
F. J.
,
Park
J.
,
Kourkoutis
L. F.
,
Abruna
H. D.
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
,
2019
, vol.
9
pg.
1902773
462.
Yao
K.
,
Xu
Z. W.
,
Huang
J. F.
,
Ma
M.
,
Fu
L. C.
,
Shen
X. T.
,
Li
J.
,
Fu
M. S.
,
Small
,
2019
, vol.
15
pg.
1805405
463.
Liu
H.
,
Su
D.
,
Zhou
R. F.
,
Sun
B.
,
Wang
G. X.
,
Qiao
S. Z.
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
,
2012
, vol.
2
pg.
970
464.
Zhang
C.-L.
,
Jiang
Z.-H.
,
Lu
B.-R.
,
Liu
J.-T.
,
Cao
F.-H.
,
Li
H.
,
Yu
Z.-L.
,
Yu
S.-H.
,
Nano Energy
,
2019
, vol.
61
pg.
104
465.
Chang
K.
,
Chen
W.
,
ACS Nano
,
2011
, vol.
5
pg.
4720
466.
Chen
Y. M.
,
Yu
X. Y.
,
Li
Z.
,
Paik
U.
,
Lou
X. W.
,
Sci. Adv.
,
2016
, vol.
2
pg.
e1600021
467.
Zeng
Q.
,
Tian
S.
,
Liu
G.
,
Yang
H.
,
Sun
X.
,
Wang
D.
,
Huang
J.
,
Yan
D.
,
Peng
S.
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
,
2022
, vol.
14
pg.
6958
468.
Lee
J.
,
Choi
C.
,
Lee
H.
,
Ma
S.
,
Tan
J.
,
Jang
G.
,
Shim
S. G.
,
Park
Y. S.
,
Yun
J.
,
Kim
D.-W.
,
Moon
J.
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
,
2022
, vol.
12
pg.
2103138
469.
An
C.
,
Ni
Y.
,
Wang
Z.
,
Li
X.
,
Liu
X.
,
Inorg. Chem. Front.
,
2018
, vol.
5
pg.
1045
470.
He
C.
,
Wei
Y.
,
Wang
Z.
,
Wang
J.
,
Kwok Kit Richard
Y.
,
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
,
2024
, vol.
664
pg.
156
471.
Wu
J.
,
Lau
W.-M.
,
Geng
D.-S.
,
Rare Met.
,
2017
, vol.
36
pg.
307
472.
Wang
A.
,
Chen
X.
,
Yu
G.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Ionics
,
2021
, vol.
27
pg.
541
473.
Fei
L.
,
Lin
Q.
,
Yuan
B.
,
Chen
G.
,
Xie
P.
,
Li
Y.
,
Xu
Y.
,
Deng
S.
,
Smirnov
S.
,
Luo
H.
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
,
2013
, vol.
5
pg.
5330
474.
Yu
L.
,
Qin
L.
,
Xu
X.
,
Kim
K.
,
Liu
J.
,
Kang
J.
,
Kim
K. H.
,
Chem. Eng. J.
,
2022
, vol.
431
pg.
133463
475.
Hu
X.
,
Liu
X.
,
Chen
K.
,
Wang
G.
,
Wang
H.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2019
, vol.
7
pg.
11016
476.
Lv
X.
,
Li
F.
,
Gong
J.
,
Gu
J.
,
Lin
S.
,
Chen
Z.
,
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
,
2020
, vol.
22
pg.
8902
477.
Park
A.-R.
,
Park
C.-M.
,
ACS Nano
,
2017
, vol.
11
pg.
6074
478.
Ersan
F.
,
Ozaydin
H. D.
,
Gokoglu
G.
,
Akturk
E.
,
Appl. Surf. Sci.
,
2017
, vol.
425
pg.
301
479.
Yin
S.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Zhang
X.
,
Wei
C.
,
Huang
X.
,
Wen
G.
,
Appl. Surf. Sci.
,
2023
, vol.
609
pg.
155435
480.
Rehman
S. U.
,
Samad
A.
,
Saeed
M.
,
Amin
B.
,
Hafeez
M.
,
Mir
I. A.
,
Zhu
L.
,
Appl. Surf. Sci.
,
2021
, vol.
551
pg.
149304
481.
Vega-Mayoral
V.
,
Tian
R.
,
Kelly
A. G.
,
Griffin
A.
,
Harvey
A.
,
Borrelli
M.
,
Nisi
K.
,
Backes
C.
,
Coleman
J. N.
,
Nanoscale
,
2019
, vol.
11
pg.
6206
482.
Dong
X.
,
Chen
F.
,
Chen
G.
,
Wang
B.
,
Tian
X.
,
Yan
X.
,
Yin
Y.-X.
,
Deng
C.
,
Wang
D.
,
Mao
J.
,
Xu
S.
,
Zhang
S.
,
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
,
2022
, vol.
619
pg.
359
483.
Wu
D.
,
Wang
C.
,
Wu
M.
,
Chao
Y.
,
He
P.
,
Ma
J.
,
J. Energy Chem.
,
2020
, vol.
43
pg.
24
484.
Kong
L.
,
Liu
Y.
,
Huang
H.
,
Liu
M.
,
Xu
W.
,
Li
B.
,
Bu
X.-H.
,
Sci. China Mater.
,
2021
, vol.
64
pg.
820
485.
Wang
Y.
,
Qian
X.
,
Zhou
W.
,
Liao
H.
,
Cheng
S.
,
RSC Adv.
,
2014
, vol.
4
pg.
36597
486.
Fan
H.
,
Yu
H.
,
Wu
X.
,
Zhang
Y.
,
Luo
Z.
,
Wang
H.
,
Guo
Y.
,
Madhavi
S.
,
Yan
Q.
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
,
2016
, vol.
8
pg.
25261
487.
Liang
T.
,
Wang
H.
,
Wang
R.
,
He
B.
,
Gong
Y.
,
Yan
C.
,
Electrochim. Acta
,
2021
, vol.
389
pg.
138686
488.
Chen
Y.
,
Wang
J.
,
Hong
Y.
,
Yang
Y.
,
Tan
L.
,
Li
N.
,
Ma
C.
,
Wang
J.
,
Fan
X.
,
Zhu
Y.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2023
, vol.
11
pg.
6168
489.
Yuan
Y.
,
Yang
M.
,
Liu
L.
,
Xia
J.
,
Yan
H.
,
Liu
J.
,
Wen
J.
,
Zhang
Y.
,
Wang
X.
,
Nanoscale
,
2020
, vol.
12
pg.
20337
490.
Yao
S.
,
Cui
J.
,
Deng
Y.
,
Chong
W. G.
,
Wu
J.
,
Ihsan-Ul-Haq
M.
,
Mai
Y.-W.
,
Kim
J.-K.
,
Energy Storage Mater.
,
2019
, vol.
20
pg.
36
491.
Luo
W.
,
Calas
A.
,
Tang
C.
,
Li
F.
,
Zhou
L.
,
Mai
L.
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
,
2016
, vol.
8
pg.
35219
492.
Sun
X.
,
Zhang
B.
,
Chen
M.
,
Wang
L.
,
Wang
D.
,
Man
R.
,
Iqbal
S.
,
Tian
F.
,
Qian
Y.
,
Xu
L.
,
Nano Today
,
2022
, vol.
43
pg.
101408
493.
Kumari
P.
,
Pal
P.
,
Shinzato
K.
,
Awasthi
K.
,
Ichikawa
T.
,
Jain
A.
,
Kumar
M.
,
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
2020
, vol.
45
pg.
16992
494.
Wei
Y.
,
Chen
J.
,
Wang
S.
,
Zhong
X.
,
Xiong
R.
,
Gan
L.
,
Ma
Y.
,
Zhai
T.
,
Li
H.
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
,
2020
, vol.
12
pg.
16264
495.
Han
G.
,
Chen
Z. G.
,
Ye
D. L.
,
Yang
L.
,
Wang
L. Z.
,
Drennan
J.
,
Zou
J.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2014
, vol.
2
pg.
7109
496.
Zhang
L.
,
Wei
Q.
,
Sun
D.
,
Li
N.
,
Ju
H.
,
Feng
J.
,
Zhu
J.
,
Mai
L.
,
Cairns
E. J.
,
Guo
J.
,
Nano Energy
,
2018
, vol.
51
pg.
391
497.
Han
G.
,
Chen
Z.-G.
,
Ye
D.
,
Wang
B.
,
Yang
L.
,
Zou
Y.
,
Wang
L.
,
Drennan
J.
,
Zou
J.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2015
, vol.
3
pg.
7560
498.
Imran
M.
,
Bokhari
T. H.
,
Wu
Y.
,
Rana
Z.
,
Gul
E.
,
Rahman
G.
,
Zafar
A.
,
Ali
T.
,
Javaid
S.
,
Hussain
S.
,
Maaz
K.
,
Karim
S.
,
Ahmad
M.
,
Xiang
G.
,
Nisar
A.
,
New J. Chem.
,
2024
, vol.
48
pg.
2755
499.
Chen
L.
,
Yang
W.
,
Li
X.
,
Han
L.
,
Wei
M.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2019
, vol.
7
pg.
10331
500.
Thiagarajan
K.
,
Theerthagiri
J.
,
Senthil
R. A.
,
Madhavan
J.
,
J. Mater. Sci.:Mater. Electron.
,
2017
, vol.
28
pg.
17354
501.
Zhong
C.
,
Deng
Y. D.
,
Hu
W. B.
,
Qiao
J. L.
,
Zhang
L.
,
Zhang
J. J.
,
Chem. Soc. Rev.
,
2015
, vol.
44
pg.
7484
502.
Karuppasamy
K.
,
Prasanna
K.
,
Kim
D.
,
Kang
Y. H.
,
Rhee
H. W.
,
RSC Adv.
,
2017
, vol.
7
pg.
19211
503.
Karuppasamy
K.
,
Rhee
H. W.
,
Reddy
P. A.
,
Gupta
D.
,
Mitu
L.
,
Polu
A. R.
,
Shajan
X. S.
,
J. Ind. Eng. Chem.
,
2016
, vol.
40
pg.
168
504.
Karuppasamy
K.
,
Kim
H. S.
,
Kim
D.
,
Vikraman
D.
,
Prasanna
K.
,
Kathalingam
A.
,
Sharma
R.
,
Rhee
H. W.
,
Sci. Rep.
,
2017
, vol.
7
pg.
11103
505.
Karthikprabhu
S.
,
Karuppasamy
K.
,
Vikraman
D.
,
Prasanna
K.
,
Maiyalagan
T.
,
Nichelson
A.
,
Kathalingam
A.
,
Kim
H. S.
,
Appl. Surf. Sci.
,
2018
, vol.
449
pg.
435
506.
Simon
P.
,
Gogotsi
Y.
,
Dunn
B.
,
Science
,
2014
, vol.
343
pg.
1210
507.
Wang
M.-x.
,
He
D.
,
Zhu
M.
,
Wu
L.
,
Wang
Z.
,
Huang
Z.-H.
,
Yang
H.
,
J. Power Sources
,
2023
, vol.
560
pg.
232703
508.
Pershaanaa
M.
,
Bashir
S.
,
Ramesh
S.
,
Ramesh
K.
,
J. Energy Storage
,
2022
, vol.
50
pg.
104599
509.
da Silveira Firmiano
E. G.
,
Rabelo
A. C.
,
Dalmaschio
C. J.
,
Pinheiro
A. N.
,
Pereira
E. C.
,
Schreiner
W. H.
,
Leite
E. R.
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
,
2014
, vol.
4
pg.
1301380
510.
Gao
Y.-j.
,
Song
W.
,
Louise Liu
J.
and
Bashir
S.
,
Advances in Sustainable Energy: Policy, Materials and Devices
,
Springer Nature
,
Switzerland
, 1st edn,
2021
.
511.
Iqbal
M. Z.
,
Aziz
U.
,
J. Energy Storage
,
2022
, vol.
46
pg.
103823
512.
Zhang
J. T.
,
Zhao
X. S.
,
ChemSusChem
,
2012
, vol.
5
pg.
818
513.
Laheaar
A.
,
Arenillas
A.
,
Beguin
F.
,
J. Power Sources
,
2018
, vol.
396
pg.
220
514.
Borenstein
A.
,
Hanna
O.
,
Attias
R.
,
Luski
S.
,
Brousse
T.
,
Aurbach
D.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2017
, vol.
5
pg.
12653
515.
Augustyn
V.
,
Simon
P.
,
Dunn
B.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2014
, vol.
7
pg.
1597
516.
Zhang
Y. X.
,
Yu
S.
,
Lou
G. B.
,
Shen
Y. L.
,
Chen
H.
,
Shen
Z. H.
,
Zhao
S. Y.
,
Zhang
J. Z.
,
Chai
S. G.
,
Zou
Q. C.
,
J. Mater. Sci.
,
2017
, vol.
52
pg.
11201
517.
Chatterjee
D. P.
,
Nandi
A. K.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2021
, vol.
9
pg.
15880
518.
Nardekar
S. S.
,
Krishnamoorthy
K.
,
Pazhamalai
P.
,
Sahoo
S.
,
Mariappan
V. K.
,
Kim
S.-J.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2020
, vol.
8
pg.
13121
519.
Mohan
M.
,
Shetti
N. P.
,
Aminabhavi
T. M.
,
J. Energy Storage
,
2023
, vol.
58
pg.
106321
520.
Fan
L. Q.
,
Liu
G. J.
,
Zhang
C. Y.
,
Wu
J. H.
,
Wei
Y. L.
,
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
2015
, vol.
40
pg.
10150
521.
Liu
C.
,
Bai
Y.
,
Zhao
Y.
,
Yao
H.
,
Pang
H.
,
Energy Storage Mater.
,
2020
, vol.
33
pg.
470
522.
Wang
H.
,
Tran
D.
,
Qian
J.
,
Ding
F.
,
Losic
D.
,
Adv. Mater. Interfaces
,
2019
, vol.
6
pg.
1900915
523.
Ouyang
Y.
,
Ye
H. T.
,
Xia
X. F.
,
Jiao
X. Y.
,
Li
G. M.
,
Mutahir
S.
,
Wang
L.
,
Mandler
D.
,
Lei
W.
,
Hao
Q. L.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2019
, vol.
7
pg.
3228
524.
Chen
H.
,
Jiang
J.
,
Zhang
L.
,
Wan
H.
,
Qi
T.
,
Xia
D.
,
Nanoscale
,
2013
, vol.
5
pg.
8879
525.
Pu
J.
,
Cui
F. L.
,
Chu
S. B.
,
Wang
T. L.
,
Sheng
E. H.
,
Wang
Z. H.
,
ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng.
,
2014
, vol.
2
pg.
809
526.
Chen
H.
,
Jiang
J.
,
Zhao
Y.
,
Zhang
L.
,
Guo
D.
,
Xia
D.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2015
, vol.
3
pg.
428
527.
Bell
L. E.
,
Science
,
2008
, vol.
321
pg.
1457
528.
Zhou
Z.
,
Han
G.
,
Lu
X.
,
Wang
G.
,
Zhou
X.
,
J. Magnesium Alloys
,
2022
, vol.
10
pg.
1719
529.
DiSalvo
F. J.
,
Science
,
1999
, vol.
285
pg.
703
530.
Sootsman
J. R.
,
Chung
D. Y.
,
Kanatzidis
M. G.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2009
, vol.
48
pg.
8616
531.
Seebeck
T. J.
,
Abh. Dtsch. Akad. Wiss. Berlin
,
1822
, vol.
265
pg.
1822
532.
Peltier
J. C. A.
,
Ann. Chim. Phys.
,
1834
, vol.
56
pg.
371
533.
Thomson
W.
,
Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh
,
1857
, vol.
3
pg.
91
534.
Sales
B. C.
,
Science
,
2002
, vol.
295
pg.
1248
535.
Dresselhaus
M. S.
,
Chen
G.
,
Tang
M. Y.
,
Yang
R.
,
Lee
H.
,
Wang
D.
,
Ren
Z.
,
Fleurial
J.-P.
,
Gogna
P.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2007
, vol.
19
pg.
1043
536.
Snyder
G. J.
,
Toberer
E. S.
,
Nat. Mater.
,
2008
, vol.
7
pg.
105
537.
Yang
J. H.
,
Caillat
T.
,
MRS Bull.
,
2006
, vol.
31
pg.
224
538.
Khajepour
A.
,
Rahmani
F.
,
Appl. Radiat. Isot.
,
2017
, vol.
119
pg.
51
539.
Holgate
T. C.
,
Bennett
R.
,
Hammel
T.
,
Caillat
T.
,
Keyser
S.
,
Sievers
B.
,
J. Electron. Mater.
,
2015
, vol.
44
pg.
1814
540.
Orr
B.
,
Akbarzadeh
A.
,
Mochizuki
M.
,
Singh
R.
,
Appl. Therm. Eng.
,
2016
, vol.
101
pg.
490
541.
Yang
J. H.
,
Stabler
F. R.
,
J. Electron. Mater.
,
2009
, vol.
38
pg.
1245
542.
Rebenklau
L.
,
Gierth
P.
,
Paproth
A.
,
Irrgang
K.
,
Lippmann
L.
,
Wodtke
A.
,
Niedermeyer
L.
,
Augsburg
K.
and
Bechtold
F.
,
European Microelectronics Packaging Conference
,
Friedrichshafen
,
2015
.
543.
Tritt
T. M.
,
Subramanian
M. A.
,
MRS Bull.
,
2006
, vol.
31
pg.
188
544.
Leonov
V.
,
J. Manuf. Syst.
,
2011
, vol.
21
pg.
125013
545.
Leonov
V.
,
Vullers
R. J. M.
,
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy
,
2009
, vol.
1
pg.
062701
546.
Yang
Y.
,
Wei
X. J.
,
Liu
J.
,
J. Phys. D:Appl. Phys.
,
2007
, vol.
40
pg.
5790
547.
Goldsmid
H. J.
,
Introduction to Thermoelectricity
,
Springer Verlag
,
Berlin
, 2nd edn,
2016
.
548.
Cutler
M.
,
Leavy
J. F.
,
Fitzpatrick
R. L.
,
Phys. Rev.
,
1964
, vol.
133
pg.
1143
549.
Mahan
G. D.
,
Bartkowiak
M.
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
,
1999
, vol.
74
pg.
953
550.
Shi
X.-L.
,
Zou
J.
,
Chen
Z.-G.
,
Chem. Rev.
,
2020
, vol.
120
pg.
7399
551.
Peng
K.
,
Lu
X.
,
Zhan
H.
,
Hui
S.
,
Tang
X.
,
Wang
G.
,
Dai
J.
,
Uher
C.
,
Wang
G.
,
Zhou
X.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2016
, vol.
9
pg.
454
552.
Heremans
J. P.
,
Jovovic
V.
,
Toberer
E. S.
,
Saramat
A.
,
Kurosaki
K.
,
Charoenphakdee
A.
,
Yamanaka
S.
,
Snyder
G. J.
,
Science
,
2008
, vol.
321
pg.
554
553.
Heremans
J. P.
,
Wiendlocha
B.
,
Chamoire
A. M.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2012
, vol.
5
pg.
5510
554.
Lin
Y.
,
Wood
M.
,
Imasato
K.
,
Kuo
J. J.
,
Lam
D.
,
Mortazavi
A. N.
,
Slade
T. J.
,
Hodge
S. A.
,
Xi
K.
,
Kanatzidis
M. G.
,
Clarke
D. R.
,
Hersam
M. C.
,
Snyder
G. J.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2020
, vol.
13
pg.
4114
555.
Yang
L.
,
Chen
Z.-G.
,
Hong
M.
,
Wang
L.
,
Kong
D.
,
Huang
L.
,
Han
G.
,
Zou
Y.
,
Dargusch
M.
,
Zou
J.
,
Nano Energy
,
2017
, vol.
31
pg.
105
556.
Pei
Y.
,
Zheng
L.
,
Li
W.
,
Lin
S.
,
Chen
Z.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Xu
X.
,
Yu
H.
,
Chen
Y.
,
Ge
B.
,
Adv. Electron. Mater.
,
2016
, vol.
2
pg.
1600019
557.
Zhu
Y.-K.
,
Sun
Y.
,
Zhu
J.
,
Song
K.
,
Liu
Z.
,
Liu
M.
,
Guo
M.
,
Dong
X.
,
Guo
F.
,
Tan
X.
,
Yu
B.
,
Cai
W.
,
Jiang
J.
,
Sui
J.
,
Small
,
2022
, vol.
18
pg.
2201352
558.
Biswas
K.
,
He
J. Q.
,
Blum
I. D.
,
Wu
C.-I.
,
Hogan
T. P.
,
Seidman
D. N.
,
Dravid
V. P.
,
Kanatzidis
M. G.
,
Nature
,
2012
, vol.
489
pg.
414
559.
Yu
B.
,
Liu
W. S.
,
Chen
S.
,
Wang
H.
,
Wang
H. Z.
,
Chen
G.
,
Ren
Z. F.
,
Nano Energy
,
2012
, vol.
1
pg.
472
560.
Slack
G. A.
and
Rowe
D. M.
,
CRC Handbook of Thermoelectrics
,
CRC press
,
Boca Raton
,
1995
.
561.
Hu
L. P.
,
Wu
H. J.
,
Zhu
T. J.
,
Fu
C. G.
,
He
J. Q.
,
Ying
P. J.
,
Zhao
X. B.
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
,
2015
, vol.
5
pg.
1500411
562.
Rhyee
J. S.
,
Lee
K. H.
,
Lee
S. M.
,
Cho
E.
,
Kim
S. I.
,
Lee
E.
,
Kwon
Y. S.
,
Shim
J. H.
,
Kotliar
G.
,
Nature
,
2009
, vol.
459
pg.
965
563.
Pei
Y. Z.
,
LaLonde
A.
,
Iwanaga
S.
,
Snyder
G. J.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2011
, vol.
4
pg.
2085
564.
Yang
L.
,
Chen
Z. G.
,
Han
G.
,
Hong
M.
,
Zou
Y. C.
,
Zou
J.
,
Nano Energy
,
2015
, vol.
16
pg.
367
565.
Hong
M.
,
Chen
Z. G.
,
Pei
Y. Z.
,
Yang
L.
,
Zou
J.
,
Phys. Rev. B:Condens. Matter Mater. Phys.
,
2016
, vol.
94
pg.
161201
566.
Li
W.
,
Zheng
L. L.
,
Ge
B. H.
,
Lin
S. Q.
,
Zhang
X. Y.
,
Chen
Z. W.
,
Chang
Y. J.
,
Pei
Y. Z.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2017
, vol.
29
pg.
1605887
567.
Shi
X.
,
Yang
J.
,
Salvador
J. R.
,
Chi
M. F.
,
Cho
J. Y.
,
Wang
H.
,
Bai
S. Q.
,
Yang
J. H.
,
Zhang
W. Q.
,
Chen
L. D.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2011
, vol.
133
pg.
7837
568.
Meng
X. F.
,
Liu
Z. H.
,
Cui
B.
,
Qin
D. D.
,
Geng
H. Y.
,
Cai
W.
,
Fu
L. W.
,
He
J. Q.
,
Ren
Z. F.
,
Sui
J. H.
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
,
2017
, vol.
7
pg.
1602582
569.
Sales
B. C.
,
Mandrus
D.
,
Williams
R. K.
,
Science
,
1996
, vol.
272
pg.
1325
570.
Kleinke
H.
,
Chem. Mater.
,
2010
, vol.
22
pg.
604
571.
Christensen
M.
,
Johnsen
S.
,
Iversen
B. B.
,
Dalton Trans.
,
2010
, vol.
39
pg.
978
572.
Liu
Y.
,
Wu
L. M.
,
Li
L. H.
,
Du
S. W.
,
Corbett
J. D.
,
Chen
L.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2009
, vol.
48
pg.
5305
573.
Toberer
E. S.
,
May
A. F.
,
Snyder
G. J.
,
Chem. Mater.
,
2010
, vol.
22
pg.
624
574.
Wu
L.
,
Zhou
Z.
,
Han
G.
,
Zhang
B.
,
Yu
J.
,
Wang
H.
,
Chen
Y.
,
Lu
X.
,
Wang
G.
,
Zhou
X.
,
Chem. Eng. J.
,
2023
, vol.
475
pg.
145988
575.
Xiao
S.
,
Peng
K.
,
Zhou
Z.
,
Wang
H.
,
Zheng
S.
,
Lu
X.
,
Han
G.
,
Wang
G.
,
Zhou
X.
,
J. Magnesium Alloys
,
2023
, vol.
11
pg.
2486
576.
Tang
X.
,
Zhang
B.
,
Zhang
X.
,
Wang
S.
,
Lu
X.
,
Han
G.
,
Wang
G.
,
Zhou
X.
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
,
2020
, vol.
12
pg.
8359
577.
Brown
S. R.
,
Kauzlarich
S. M.
,
Gascoin
F.
,
Snyder
G. J.
,
Chem. Mater.
,
2006
, vol.
18
pg.
1873
578.
Snyder
G. J.
,
Christensen
M.
,
Nishibori
E.
,
Caillat
T.
,
Iversen
B. B.
,
Nat. Mater.
,
2004
, vol.
3
pg.
458
579.
Mai
C. K.
,
Schlitz
R. A.
,
Su
G. M.
,
Spitzer
D.
,
Wang
X. J.
,
Fronk
S. L.
,
Cahill
D. G.
,
Chabinyc
M. L.
,
Bazan
G. C.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2014
, vol.
136
pg.
13478
580.
Bubnova
O.
,
Khan
Z. U.
,
Malti
A.
,
Braun
S.
,
Fahlman
M.
,
Berggren
M.
,
Crispin
X.
,
Nat. Mater.
,
2011
, vol.
10
pg.
429
581.
He
M.
,
Qiu
F.
,
Lin
Z. Q.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2013
, vol.
6
pg.
1352
582.
Maensiri
S.
,
Nuansing
W.
,
Mater. Chem. Phys.
,
2006
, vol.
99
pg.
104
583.
Robert
R.
,
Romer
S.
,
Reller
A.
,
Weidenkaff
A.
,
Adv. Eng. Mater.
,
2005
, vol.
7
pg.
303
584.
Wang
Y. Y.
,
Rogado
N. S.
,
Cava
R. J.
,
Ong
N. P.
,
Nature
,
2003
, vol.
423
pg.
425
585.
Xiao
Y.
,
Zhao
L.-D.
,
npj Quantum Mater.
,
2018
, vol.
3
pg.
55
586.
Jia
B.
,
Huang
Y.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Zhou
Y.
,
Zhao
X.
,
Ning
S.
,
Xu
X.
,
Lin
P.
,
Chen
Z.
,
Jiang
B.
,
He
J.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2022
, vol.
15
pg.
1920
587.
Zhao
L. D.
,
Wu
H. J.
,
Hao
S. Q.
,
Wu
C. I.
,
Zhou
X. Y.
,
Biswas
K.
,
He
J. Q.
,
Hogan
T. P.
,
Uher
C.
,
Wolverton
C.
,
Dravid
V. P.
,
Kanatzidis
M. G.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2013
, vol.
6
pg.
3346
588.
Chen
Z.-G.
,
Shi
X.
,
Zhao
L.-D.
,
Zou
J.
,
Prog. Mater. Sci.
,
2018
, vol.
97
pg.
283
589.
Zhao
L.-D.
,
Tan
G.
,
Hao
S.
,
He
J.
,
Pei
Y.
,
Chi
H.
,
Wang
H.
,
Gong
S.
,
Xu
H.
,
Dravid
V. P.
,
Uher
C.
,
Snyder
G. J.
,
Wolverton
C.
,
Kanatzidis
M. G.
,
Science
,
2016
, vol.
351
pg.
141
590.
Liu
H.
,
Yuan
X.
,
Lu
P.
,
Shi
X.
,
Xu
F.
,
He
Y.
,
Tang
Y.
,
Bai
S.
,
Zhang
W.
,
Chen
L.
,
Lin
Y.
,
Shi
L.
,
Lin
H.
,
Gao
X.
,
Zhang
X.
,
Chi
H.
,
Uher
C.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2013
, vol.
25
pg.
6607
591.
Hu
L. P.
,
Zhu
T. J.
,
Liu
X. H.
,
Zhao
X. B.
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
,
2014
, vol.
24
pg.
5211
592.
Luo
Y. B.
,
Yang
J. Y.
,
Jiang
Q. H.
,
Li
W. X.
,
Xiao
Y.
,
Fu
L. W.
,
Zhang
D.
,
Zhou
Z. W.
,
Cheng
Y. D.
,
Nano Energy
,
2015
, vol.
18
pg.
37
593.
Kitagawa
H.
,
Kurata
A.
,
Araki
H.
,
Morito
S.
,
Tanabe
E.
,
J. Electron. Mater.
,
2010
, vol.
39
pg.
1692
594.
Yan
X. A.
,
Poudel
B.
,
Ma
Y.
,
Liu
W. S.
,
Joshi
G.
,
Wang
H.
,
Lan
Y. C.
,
Wang
D. Z.
,
Chen
G.
,
Ren
Z. F.
,
Nano Lett.
,
2010
, vol.
10
pg.
3373
595.
Hu
L. P.
,
Zhu
T. J.
,
Wang
Y. G.
,
Xie
H. H.
,
Xu
Z. J.
,
Zhao
X. B.
,
NPG Asia Mater.
,
2014
, vol.
6
pg.
e88
596.
Bao
D.
,
Chen
J.
,
Yu
Y.
,
Liu
W.
,
Huang
L.
,
Han
G.
,
Tang
J.
,
Zhou
D.
,
Yang
L.
,
Chen
Z.-G.
,
Chem. Eng. J.
,
2020
, vol.
388
pg.
124295
597.
Wang
Y.
,
Liu
W.-D.
,
Shi
X.-L.
,
Hong
M.
,
Wang
L.-J.
,
Li
M.
,
Wang
H.
,
Zou
J.
,
Chen
Z.-G.
,
Chem. Eng. J.
,
2020
, vol.
391
pg.
123513
598.
Xie
W. J.
,
Tang
X. F.
,
Yan
Y. G.
,
Zhang
Q. J.
,
Tritt
T. M.
,
J. Appl. Phys.
,
2009
, vol.
105
pg.
113713
599.
Li
J. H.
,
Tan
Q.
,
Li
J. F.
,
Liu
D. W.
,
Li
F.
,
Li
Z. Y.
,
Zou
M. M.
,
Wang
K.
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
,
2013
, vol.
23
pg.
4317
600.
Kim
S. I.
,
Lee
K. H.
,
Mun
H. A.
,
Kim
H. S.
,
Hwang
S. W.
,
Roh
J. W.
,
Yang
D. J.
,
Shin
W. H.
,
Li
X. S.
,
Lee
Y. H.
,
Snyder
G. J.
,
Kim
S. W.
,
Science
,
2015
, vol.
348
pg.
109
601.
Deng
R.
,
Su
X.
,
Hao
S.
,
Zheng
Z.
,
Zhang
M.
,
Xie
H.
,
Liu
W.
,
Yan
Y.
,
Wolverton
C.
,
Uher
C.
,
Kanatzidis
M. G.
,
Tang
X.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2018
, vol.
11
pg.
1520
602.
Chen
Z.
,
Jian
Z.
,
Li
W.
,
Chang
Y.
,
Ge
B.
,
Hanus
R.
,
Yang
J.
,
Chen
Y.
,
Huang
M.
,
Snyder
G. J.
,
Pei
Y.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2017
, vol.
29
pg.
1606768
603.
Luo
Z.-Z.
,
Cai
S.
,
Hao
S.
,
Bailey
T. P.
,
Luo
Y.
,
Luo
W.
,
Yu
Y.
,
Uher
C.
,
Wolverton
C.
,
Dravid
V. P.
,
Zou
Z.
,
Yan
Q.
,
Kanatzidis
M. G.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2022
, vol.
15
pg.
368
604.
He
J. Q.
,
Zhao
L. D.
,
Zheng
J. C.
,
Doak
J. W.
,
Wu
H. J.
,
Wang
H. Q.
,
Lee
Y.
,
Wolverton
C.
,
Kanatzidis
M. G.
,
Dravid
V. P.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2013
, vol.
135
pg.
4624
605.
Zhang
Q. Y.
,
Wang
H.
,
Liu
W. S.
,
Wang
H. Z.
,
Yu
B.
,
Zhang
Q.
,
Tian
Z. T.
,
Ni
G.
,
Lee
S.
,
Esfarjani
K.
,
Chen
G.
,
Ren
Z. F.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2012
, vol.
5
pg.
5246
606.
LaLonde
A. D.
,
Pei
Y. Z.
,
Snyder
G. J.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2011
, vol.
4
pg.
2090
607.
Zhang
J.
,
Wu
D.
,
He
D.
,
Feng
D.
,
Yin
M.
,
Qin
X.
,
He
J.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2017
, vol.
29
pg.
1703148
608.
Hanus
R.
,
Agne
M. T.
,
Rettie
A. J. E.
,
Chen
Z.
,
Tan
G.
,
Chung
D. Y.
,
Kanatzidis
M. G.
,
Pei
Y.
,
Voorhees
P. W.
,
Snyder
G. J.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2019
, vol.
31
pg.
1900108
609.
Girard
S. N.
,
He
J.
,
Li
C.
,
Moses
S.
,
Wang
G.
,
Uher
C.
,
Dravid
V. P.
,
Kanatzidis
M. G.
,
Nano Lett.
,
2010
, vol.
10
pg.
2825
610.
Wu
D.
,
Zhao
L. D.
,
Tong
X.
,
Li
W.
,
Wu
L. J.
,
Tan
Q.
,
Pei
Y. L.
,
Huang
L.
,
Li
J. F.
,
Zhu
Y. M.
,
Kanatzidis
M. G.
,
He
J. Q.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2015
, vol.
8
pg.
2056
611.
Jiang
B. B.
,
Yu
Y.
,
Cui
J.
,
Liu
X. X.
,
Xie
L.
,
Liao
J. C.
,
Zhang
Q. H.
,
Huang
Y.
,
Ning
S. C.
,
Jia
B. H.
,
Zhu
B.
,
Bai
S. Q.
,
Chen
L. D.
,
Pennycook
S. J.
,
He
J. Q.
,
Science
,
2021
, vol.
371
pg.
830
612.
Chang
C.
,
Wu
M.
,
He
D.
,
Pei
Y.
,
Wu
C.-F.
,
Wu
X.
,
Yu
H.
,
Zhu
F.
,
Wang
K.
,
Chen
Y.
,
Huang
L.
,
Li
J.-F.
,
He
J.
,
Zhao
L.-D.
,
Science
,
2018
, vol.
360
pg.
778
613.
Zhou
Y. M.
,
Zhao
L. D.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2017
, vol.
29
pg.
1702676
614.
Liu
J.
,
Wang
P.
,
Wang
M. Y.
,
Xu
R.
,
Zhang
J.
,
Liu
J. Z.
,
Li
D.
,
Liang
N. N.
,
Du
Y. W.
,
Chen
G.
,
Tang
G. D.
,
Nano Energy
,
2018
, vol.
53
pg.
683
615.
Shi
X. L.
,
Wu
A.
,
Feng
T. L.
,
Zheng
K.
,
Liu
W. D.
,
Sun
Q.
,
Hong
M.
,
Pantelides
S. T.
,
Chen
Z. G.
,
Zou
J.
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
,
2019
, vol.
9
pg.
1803242
616.
Shi
X.
,
Zheng
K.
,
Hong
M.
,
Liu
W.
,
Moshwan
R.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Qu
X.
,
Chen
Z.-G.
,
Zou
J.
,
Chem. Sci.
,
2018
, vol.
9
pg.
7376
617.
Zhang
Q.
,
Chere
E. K.
,
Sun
J. Y.
,
Cao
F.
,
Dahal
K.
,
Chen
S.
,
Chen
G.
,
Ren
Z. F.
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
,
2015
, vol.
5
pg.
1500360
618.
Han
Y. M.
,
Zhao
J.
,
Zhou
M.
,
Jiang
X. X.
,
Leng
H. Q.
,
Li
L. F.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2015
, vol.
3
pg.
4555
619.
Lin
C. C.
,
Lydia
R.
,
Yun
J. H.
,
Lee
H. S.
,
Rhyee
J. S.
,
Chem. Mater.
,
2017
, vol.
29
pg.
5344
620.
Guo
J.
,
Jian
J. K.
,
Liu
J.
,
Cao
B. L.
,
Lei
R. B.
,
Zhang
Z. H.
,
Song
B.
,
Zhao
H. Z.
,
Nano Energy
,
2017
, vol.
38
pg.
569
621.
Zhou
M.
,
Snyder
G. J.
,
Li
L. F.
,
Zhao
L. D.
,
Inorg. Chem. Front.
,
2016
, vol.
3
pg.
1449
622.
Lee
Y. K.
,
Luo
Z.
,
Cho
S. P.
,
Kanatzidis
M. G.
,
Chung
I.
,
Joule
,
2019
, vol.
3
pg.
719
623.
Luo
Y. B.
,
Cai
S. T.
,
Hua
X.
,
Chen
H. J.
,
Liang
Q. H.
,
Du
C. F.
,
Zheng
Y.
,
Shen
J. H.
,
Xu
J. W.
,
Wolverton
C.
,
Dravid
V. P.
,
Yan
Q. Y.
,
Kanatzidis
M. G.
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
,
2019
, vol.
9
pg.
1803072
624.
Zhang
H.
,
Chen
Y.
,
Liu
X.
,
Wang
H.
,
Niu
C.
,
Zheng
S.
,
Zhang
B.
,
Lu
X.
,
Wang
G.
,
Han
G.
,
Zhou
X.
,
Mater. Today Energy
,
2022
, vol.
30
pg.
101137
625.
Liu
X.
,
Wang
H.
,
Chen
Y.
,
Zhang
B.
,
Zhang
H.
,
Zheng
S.
,
Chen
X.
,
Lu
X.
,
Wang
G.
,
Zhou
X.
,
Han
G.
,
Scr. Mater.
,
2022
, vol.
218
pg.
114846
626.
Liu
X.
,
Chen
Y.
,
Wang
H.
,
Liu
S.
,
Zhang
B.
,
Lu
X.
,
Wang
G.
,
Han
G.
,
Chen
X.
,
Zhou
X.
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
,
2024
, vol.
16
pg.
2240
627.
Olvera
A. A.
,
Moroz
N. A.
,
Sahoo
P.
,
Ren
P.
,
Bailey
T. P.
,
Page
A. A.
,
Uher
C.
,
Poudeu
P. F. P.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2017
, vol.
10
pg.
1668
628.
Zhao
K. P.
,
Qiu
P. F.
,
Song
Q. F.
,
Blichfeld
A. B.
,
Eikeland
E.
,
Ren
D. D.
,
Ge
B. H.
,
Iversen
B. B.
,
Shi
X.
,
Chen
L. D.
,
Mater. Today Phys.
,
2017
, vol.
1
pg.
14
629.
He
Y.
,
Day
T.
,
Zhang
T. S.
,
Liu
H. L.
,
Shi
X.
,
Chen
L. D.
,
Snyder
G. J.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2014
, vol.
26
pg.
3974
630.
Wang
H.
,
Zheng
S. K.
,
Wu
H.
,
Xiong
X.
,
Xiong
Q. H.
,
Wang
H. Y.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Zhang
B.
,
Lu
X.
,
Han
G.
,
Wang
G. Y.
,
Zhou
X. Y.
,
Small
,
2022
, vol.
18
pg.
2104592
631.
Zheng
S.
,
Yang
X.
,
Wang
H.
,
Zhang
B.
,
Xiong
X.
,
Lu
X.
,
Han
G.
,
Wang
G.
,
Zhou
X.
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
,
2022
, vol.
12
pg.
2202575
632.
Hong
A. J.
,
Li
T.
,
Zhu
H. X.
,
Zhou
X. H.
,
He
Q. Y.
,
Liu
W. S.
,
Yan
Z. B.
,
Liu
J. M.
,
Ren
Z. F.
,
Solid State Ionics
,
2014
, vol.
261
pg.
21
633.
Shi
X.
,
Chen
H. Y.
,
Hao
F.
,
Liu
R. H.
,
Wang
T.
,
Qiu
P. F.
,
Burkhardt
U.
,
Grin
Y.
,
Chen
L. D.
,
Nat. Mater.
,
2018
, vol.
17
pg.
421
634.
Yang
S.
,
Gao
Z.
,
Qiu
P.
,
Liang
J.
,
Wei
T.-R.
,
Deng
T.
,
Xiao
J.
,
Shi
X.
,
Chen
L.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2021
, vol.
33
pg.
2007681
635.
He
S.
,
Li
Y.
,
Liu
L.
,
Jiang
Y.
,
Feng
J.
,
Zhu
W.
,
Zhang
J.
,
Dong
Z.
,
Deng
Y.
,
Luo
J.
,
Zhang
W.
,
Chen
G.
,
Sci. Adv.
,
2020
, vol.
6
pg.
eaaz8423
636.
Wang
H.
,
Liu
X.
,
Zhou
Z.
,
Wu
H.
,
Chen
Y.
,
Zhang
B.
,
Wang
G.
,
Zhou
X.
,
Han
G.
,
Acta Mater.
,
2022
, vol.
223
pg.
117502
637.
Wang
H.
,
Han
G.
,
Zhang
B.
,
Chen
Y.
,
Liu
X.
,
Zhang
K.
,
Lu
X.
,
Wang
G.
,
Zhou
X.
,
Acta Mater.
,
2023
, vol.
248
pg.
118753
638.
Li
J.
,
Zhang
X.
,
Chen
Z.
,
Lin
S.
,
Li
W.
,
Shen
J.
,
Witting
I. T.
,
Faghaninia
A.
,
Chen
Y.
,
Jain
A.
,
Chen
L.
,
Snyder
G. J.
,
Pei
Y.
,
Joule
,
2018
, vol.
2
pg.
976
639.
Jiang
B.
,
Wang
W.
,
Liu
S.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Wang
C.
,
Chen
Y.
,
Xie
L.
,
Huang
M.
,
He
J.
,
Science
,
2022
, vol.
377
pg.
208
640.
Lewis
N. S.
,
Science
,
2007
, vol.
315
pg.
798
641.
Zhang
Z. H.
,
Wang
P.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2012
, vol.
5
pg.
6506
642.
Garín
M.
,
Pasanen
T. P.
,
López
G.
,
Vähänissi
V.
,
Chen
K.
,
Martín
I.
,
Savin
H.
,
Small
,
2023
, vol.
19
pg.
2302250
643.
Rehman
F.
,
Syed
I. H.
,
Khanam
S.
,
Ijaz
S.
,
Mehmood
H.
,
Zubair
M.
,
Massoud
Y.
,
Mehmood
M. Q.
,
Energy Adv.
,
2023
, vol.
2
pg.
1239
644.
Ren
M.
,
Fang
L.
,
Zhang
Y.
,
Eickemeyer
F. T.
,
Yuan
Y.
,
Zakeeruddin
S. M.
,
Grätzel
M.
,
Wang
P.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2024
pg.
2403403
645.
Zhou
R.
,
Xu
J.
,
Luo
P.
,
Hu
L.
,
Pan
X.
,
Xu
J.
,
Jiang
Y.
,
Wang
L.
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
,
2021
, vol.
11
pg.
2101923
646.
Kim
B.
,
Baek
S.-W.
,
Kim
C.
,
Kim
J.
,
Lee
J.-Y.
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
,
2022
, vol.
12
pg.
2102689
647.
Huang
X.
,
Zhang
L.
,
Cheng
Y.
,
Oh
J.
,
Li
C.
,
Huang
B.
,
Zhao
L.
,
Deng
J.
,
Zhang
Y.
,
Liu
Z.
,
Wu
F.
,
Hu
X.
,
Yang
C.
,
Chen
L.
,
Chen
Y.
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
,
2022
, vol.
32
pg.
2108634
648.
Kujovic
L.
,
Liu
X.
,
Abbas
A.
,
Jones
L. O.
,
Law
A. M.
,
Togay
M.
,
Curson
K. M.
,
Barth
K. L.
,
Bowers
J. W.
,
Walls
J. M.
,
Oklobia
O.
,
Lamb
D. A.
,
Irvine
S. J. C.
,
Zhang
W.
,
Lee
C.
,
Nagle
T.
,
Lu
D.
,
Xiong
G.
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
,
2024
, vol.
34
pg.
2312528
649.
Zhang
G. Q.
,
Finefrock
S.
,
Liang
D. X.
,
Yadav
G. G.
,
Yang
H. R.
,
Fang
H. Y.
,
Wu
Y.
,
Nanoscale
,
2011
, vol.
3
pg.
2430
650.
Makrides
G.
,
Zinsser
B.
,
Norton
M.
,
Georghiou
G. E.
,
Schubert
M.
,
Werner
J. H.
,
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
,
2010
, vol.
14
pg.
754
651.
Ning
C.-Z.
,
Dou
L.
,
Yang
P.
,
Nat. Rev. Mater.
,
2017
, vol.
2
pg.
17070
652.
Al-Ezzi
A. S.
,
Ansari
M. N. M.
,
Appl. Syst. Innov.
,
2022
, vol.
5
pg.
67
653.
Lin
C.
,
Liu
G.
,
Xi
X.
,
Wang
L.
,
Wang
Q.
,
Sun
Q.
,
Li
M.
,
Zhu
B.
,
de Lara
D. P.
,
Zai
H.
,
Materials
,
2022
, vol.
15
pg.
8142
654.
Baugher
B. W. H.
,
Churchill
H. O. H.
,
Yang
Y.
,
Jarillo-Herrero
P.
,
Nat. Nanotechnol.
,
2014
, vol.
9
pg.
262
655.
Pospischil
A.
,
Furchi
M. M.
,
Mueller
T.
,
Nat. Nanotechnol.
,
2014
, vol.
9
pg.
257
656.
Birkmire
R. W.
,
McCandless
B. E.
,
Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci.
,
2010
, vol.
14
pg.
139
657.
Ferekides
C. S.
,
Balasubramanian
U.
,
Mamazza
R.
,
Viswanathan
V.
,
Zhao
H.
,
Morel
D. L.
,
Sol. Energy
,
2004
, vol.
77
pg.
823
658.
Lincot
D.
,
Guillemoles
J. F.
,
Taunier
S.
,
Guimard
D.
,
Sicx-Kurdi
J.
,
Chaumont
A.
,
Roussel
O.
,
Ramdani
O.
,
Hubert
C.
,
Fauvarque
J. P.
,
Bodereau
N.
,
Parissi
L.
,
Panheleux
P.
,
Fanouillere
P.
,
Naghavi
N.
,
Grand
P. P.
,
Benfarah
M.
,
Mogensen
P.
,
Kerrec
O.
,
Sol. Energy
,
2004
, vol.
77
pg.
725
659.
Jones
E. W.
,
Barrioz
V.
,
Irvine
S. J. C.
,
Lamb
D.
,
Thin Solid Films
,
2009
, vol.
517
pg.
2226
660.
Major
J. D.
,
Proskuryakov
Y. Y.
,
Durose
K.
,
Prog. Photovoltaics
,
2013
, vol.
21
pg.
436
661.
Rios-Flores
A.
,
Pena
J. L.
,
Castro-Pena
V.
,
Ares
O.
,
Castro-Rodriguez
R.
,
Bosio
A.
,
Sol. Energy
,
2010
, vol.
84
pg.
1020
662.
Afzaal
M.
,
O'Brien
P.
,
J. Mater. Chem.
,
2006
, vol.
16
pg.
1597
663.
Ferekides
C. S.
,
Marinskiy
D.
,
Viswanathan
V.
,
Tetali
B.
,
Palekis
V.
,
Selvaraj
P.
,
Morel
D. L.
,
Thin Solid Films
,
2000
, vol.
361
pg.
520
664.
Green
M. A.
,
Emery
K.
,
Hishikawa
Y.
,
Warta
W.
,
Dunlop
E. D.
,
Prog. Photovoltaics
,
2013
, vol.
21
pg.
827
665.
Pawar
S. M.
,
Pawar
B. S.
,
Kim
J. H.
,
Joo
O. S.
,
Lokhande
C. D.
,
Curr. Appl. Phys.
,
2011
, vol.
11
pg.
117
666.
Repins
I.
,
Contreras
M. A.
,
Egaas
B.
,
DeHart
C.
,
Scharf
J.
,
Perkins
C. L.
,
To
B.
,
Noufi
R.
,
Prog. Photovoltaics
,
2008
, vol.
16
pg.
235
667.
Aboulfadl
H.
,
Sopiha
K. V.
,
Keller
J.
,
Larsen
J. K.
,
Scragg
J. J. S.
,
Persson
C.
,
Thuvander
M.
,
Edoff
M.
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
,
2021
, vol.
13
pg.
7188
668.
Allouhi
A.
,
Rehman
S.
,
Buker
M. S.
,
Said
Z.
,
J. Cleaner Prod.
,
2022
, vol.
362
pg.
132339
669.
Massiot
I.
,
Cattoni
A.
,
Collin
S.
,
Nat. Energy
,
2020
, vol.
5
pg.
959
670.
Tuttle
J. R.
,
Ward
J. S.
,
Duda
A.
,
Berens
T. A.
,
Contreras
M. A.
,
Ramanathan
K. R.
,
Tennant
A. L.
,
Keane
J.
,
Cole
E. D.
,
Emery
K.
and
Noufi
R.
,
Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings
,
San Francisco
,
1996
.
671.
Stolt
L.
,
Hedstrom
J.
,
Kessler
J.
,
Ruckh
M.
,
Velthaus
K. O.
,
Schock
H. W.
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
,
1993
, vol.
62
pg.
597
672.
Negami
T.
,
Nishitani
M.
,
Kohara
N.
,
Hashimoto
Y.
and
Wada
T.
,
Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings
,
San Francisco
,
1996
.
673.
Yin
J.
,
Jin
J.
,
Lin
H.
,
Yin
Z.
,
Li
J.
,
Lu
M.
,
Guo
L.
,
Xi
P.
,
Tang
Y.
,
Yan
C.-H.
,
Adv. Sci.
,
2020
, vol.
7
pg.
1903070
674.
Wang
M.
,
Zhang
L.
,
He
Y.
,
Zhu
H.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2021
, vol.
9
pg.
5320
675.
Guo
Y.
,
Park
T.
,
Yi
J. W.
,
Henzie
J.
,
Kim
J.
,
Wang
Z.
,
Jiang
B.
,
Bando
Y.
,
Sugahara
Y.
,
Tang
J.
,
Yamauchi
Y.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2019
, vol.
31
pg.
1807134
676.
Chen
D.-R.
,
Muthu
J.
,
Guo
X.-Y.
,
Chin
H.-T.
,
Lin
Y.-C.
,
Haider
G.
,
Ting
C.-C.
,
Kalbac
M.
,
Hofmann
M.
,
Hsieh
Y.-P.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2023
, vol.
11
pg.
15802
677.
Jiao
Y.
,
Zheng
Y.
,
Jaroniec
M.
,
Qiao
S. Z.
,
Chem. Soc. Rev.
,
2015
, vol.
44
pg.
2060
678.
Feng
J.-X.
,
Wu
J.-Q.
,
Tong
Y.-X.
,
Li
G.-R.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2018
, vol.
140
pg.
610
679.
Zhang
N.
,
Chai
Y.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2021
, vol.
14
pg.
4647
680.
Zheng
Y.
,
Jiao
Y.
,
Jaroniec
M.
,
Qiao
S. Z.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2015
, vol.
54
pg.
52
681.
Sheng
W. C.
,
Gasteiger
H. A.
,
Shao-Horn
Y.
,
J. Electrochem. Soc.
,
2010
, vol.
157
pg.
B1529
682.
Tao
H. C.
,
Gao
Y. N.
,
Talreja
N.
,
Guo
F.
,
Texter
J.
,
Yan
C.
,
Sun
Z. Y.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2017
, vol.
5
pg.
7257
683.
Jayabal
S.
,
Saranya
G.
,
Wu
J.
,
Liu
Y. Q.
,
Geng
D. S.
,
Meng
X. B.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2017
, vol.
5
pg.
24540
684.
Marini
S.
,
Salvi
P.
,
Nelli
P.
,
Pesenti
R.
,
Villa
M.
,
Berrettoni
M.
,
Zangari
G.
,
Kiros
Y.
,
Electrochim. Acta
,
2012
, vol.
82
pg.
384
685.
Morales-Guio
C. G.
,
Hu
X. L.
,
Acc. Chem. Res.
,
2014
, vol.
47
pg.
2671
686.
Joo
J.
,
Kim
T.
,
Lee
J.
,
Choi
S.-I.
,
Lee
K.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2019
, vol.
31
pg.
1806682
687.
Wang
J.
,
Yue
X.
,
Yang
Y.
,
Sirisomboonchai
S.
,
Wang
P.
,
Ma
X.
,
Abudula
A.
,
Guan
G.
,
J. Alloys Compd.
,
2020
, vol.
819
pg.
153346
688.
Sun
T.
,
Tang
Z.
,
Zang
W.
,
Li
Z.
,
Li
J.
,
Li
Z.
,
Cao
L.
,
Rodriguez
J. S. D.
,
Mariano
C. O. M.
,
Xu
H.
,
Lyu
P.
,
Hai
X.
,
Lin
H.
,
Sheng
X.
,
Shi
J.
,
Zheng
Y.
,
Lu
Y.-R.
,
He
Q.
,
Chen
J.
,
Novoselov
K. S.
,
Chuang
C.-H.
,
Xi
S.
,
Luo
X.
,
Lu
J.
,
Nat. Nanotechnol.
,
2023
, vol.
18
pg.
763
689.
Tiwari
A. P.
,
Kim
K.
,
Jeon
S.
,
Curr. Opin. Electrochem.
,
2022
, vol.
34
pg.
100982
690.
Seh
Z. W.
,
Kibsgaard
J.
,
Dickens
C. F.
,
Chorkendorff
I. B.
,
Norskov
J. K.
,
Jaramillo
T. F.
,
Science
,
2017
, vol.
355
pg.
eaad4998
691.
Meng
Y. T.
,
Song
W. Q.
,
Huang
H.
,
Ren
Z.
,
Chen
S. Y.
,
Suib
S. L.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2014
, vol.
136
pg.
11452
692.
Tran
P. D.
,
Tran
T. V.
,
Orio
M.
,
Torelli
S.
,
Truong
Q. D.
,
Nayuki
K.
,
Sasaki
Y.
,
Chiam
S. Y.
,
Yi
R.
,
Honma
I.
,
Barber
J.
,
Artero
V.
,
Nat. Mater.
,
2016
, vol.
15
pg.
640
693.
Yin
Y.
,
Han
J. C.
,
Zhang
Y. M.
,
Zhang
X. H.
,
Xu
P.
,
Yuan
Q.
,
Samad
L.
,
Wang
X. J.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Zhang
Z. H.
,
Zhang
P.
,
Cao
X. Z.
,
Song
B.
,
Jin
S.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2016
, vol.
138
pg.
7965
694.
Yan
D. F.
,
Li
Y. X.
,
Huo
J.
,
Chen
R.
,
Dai
L. M.
,
Wang
S. Y.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2017
, vol.
29
pg.
1606459
695.
Di
J.
,
Chen
C.
,
Yang
S.-Z.
,
Chen
S.
,
Duan
M.
,
Xiong
J.
,
Zhu
C.
,
Long
R.
,
Hao
W.
,
Chi
Z.
,
Chen
H.
,
Weng
Y.-X.
,
Xia
J.
,
Song
L.
,
Li
S.
,
Li
H.
,
Liu
Z.
,
Nat. Commun.
,
2019
, vol.
10
pg.
2840
696.
Wu
H.
,
Yang
T.
,
Du
Y. H.
,
Shen
L.
,
Ho
G. W.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2018
, vol.
30
pg.
1804341
697.
Kim
J. S.
,
Kim
B.
,
Kim
H.
,
Kang
K.
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
,
2018
, vol.
8
pg.
1702774
698.
Zhang
B.
,
Zheng
X. L.
,
Voznyy
O.
,
Comin
R.
,
Bajdich
M.
,
Garcia-Melchor
M.
,
Han
L. L.
,
Xu
J. X.
,
Liu
M.
,
Zheng
L. R.
,
de Arquer
F. P. G.
,
Dinh
C. T.
,
Fan
F. J.
,
Yuan
M. J.
,
Yassitepe
E.
,
Chen
N.
,
Regier
T.
,
Liu
P. F.
,
Li
Y. H.
,
De Luna
P.
,
Janmohamed
A.
,
Xin
H. L. L.
,
Yang
H. G.
,
Vojvodic
A.
,
Sargent
E. H.
,
Science
,
2016
, vol.
352
pg.
333
699.
Faber
M. S.
,
Dziedzic
R.
,
Lukowski
M. A.
,
Kaiser
N. S.
,
Ding
Q.
,
Jin
S.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2014
, vol.
136
pg.
10053
700.
Wang
J.
,
Xu
F.
,
Jin
H. Y.
,
Chen
Y. Q.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2017
, vol.
29
pg.
1605838
701.
Lei
Y.
,
Pakhira
S.
,
Fujisawa
K.
,
Wang
X.
,
Iyiola
O. O.
,
Lopez
N. P.
,
Elias
A. L.
,
Rajukumar
L. P.
,
Zhou
C.
,
Kabius
B.
,
Alem
N.
,
Endo
M.
,
Lv
R.
,
Mendoza-Cortes
J. L.
,
Terrones
M.
,
ACS Nano
,
2017
, vol.
11
pg.
5103
702.
Zhao
Y.
,
Dongfang
N.
,
Triana
C. A.
,
Huang
C.
,
Erni
R.
,
Wan
W.
,
Li
J.
,
Stoian
D.
,
Pan
L.
,
Zhang
P.
,
Lan
J.
,
Iannuzzi
M.
,
Patzke
G. R.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2022
, vol.
15
pg.
727
703.
Zhao
Y.
,
Wei
S.
,
Pan
K.
,
Dong
Z.
,
Zhang
B.
,
Wu
H.-H.
,
Zhang
Q.
,
Lin
J.
,
Pang
H.
,
Chem. Eng. J.
,
2021
, vol.
421
pg.
129645
704.
Shan
X.
,
Liu
J.
,
Mu
H.
,
Xiao
Y.
,
Mei
B.
,
Liu
W.
,
Lin
G.
,
Jiang
Z.
,
Wen
L.
,
Jiang
L.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2020
, vol.
59
pg.
1659
705.
Zhang
N.
,
Hu
Y.
,
An
L.
,
Li
Q.
,
Yin
J.
,
Li
J.
,
Yang
R.
,
Lu
M.
,
Zhang
S.
,
Xi
P.
,
Yan
C.-H.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2022
, vol.
61
pg.
e202207217
706.
Xue
Z.
,
Li
X.
,
Liu
Q.
,
Cai
M.
,
Liu
K.
,
Liu
M.
,
Ke
Z.
,
Liu
X.
,
Li
G.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2019
, vol.
31
pg.
1900430
707.
Zhou
W. J.
,
Wu
X. J.
,
Cao
X. H.
,
Huang
X.
,
Tan
C. L.
,
Tian
J.
,
Liu
H.
,
Wang
J. Y.
,
Zhang
H.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2013
, vol.
6
pg.
2921
708.
Gao
Q.
,
Huang
C. Q.
,
Ju
Y. M.
,
Gao
M. R.
,
Liu
J. W.
,
An
D.
,
Cui
C. H.
,
Zheng
Y. R.
,
Li
W. X.
,
Yu
S. H.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2017
, vol.
56
pg.
7769
709.
Gao
M. R.
,
Yao
W. T.
,
Yao
H. B.
,
Yu
S. H.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2009
, vol.
131
pg.
7486
710.
Gao
M. R.
,
Xu
Y. F.
,
Jiang
J.
,
Zheng
Y. R.
,
Yu
S. H.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2012
, vol.
134
pg.
2930
711.
Gao
M. R.
,
Cao
X.
,
Gao
Q.
,
Xu
Y. F.
,
Zheng
Y. R.
,
Jiang
J.
,
Yu
S. H.
,
ACS Nano
,
2014
, vol.
8
pg.
3970
712.
Zheng
Y. R.
,
Gao
M. R.
,
Gao
Q.
,
Li
H. H.
,
Xu
J.
,
Wu
Z. Y.
,
Yu
S. H.
,
Small
,
2015
, vol.
11
pg.
182
713.
Hinnemann
B.
,
Moses
P. G.
,
Bonde
J.
,
Jorgensen
K. P.
,
Nielsen
J. H.
,
Horch
S.
,
Chorkendorff
I.
,
Norskov
J. K.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2005
, vol.
127
pg.
5308
714.
Jaramillo
T. F.
,
Jorgensen
K. P.
,
Bonde
J.
,
Nielsen
J. H.
,
Horch
S.
,
Chorkendorff
I.
,
Science
,
2007
, vol.
317
pg.
100
715.
Karunadasa
H. I.
,
Montalvo
E.
,
Sun
Y. J.
,
Majda
M.
,
Long
J. R.
,
Chang
C. J.
,
Science
,
2012
, vol.
335
pg.
698
716.
Xie
J. F.
,
Zhang
J. J.
,
Li
S.
,
Grote
F.
,
Zhang
X. D.
,
Zhang
H.
,
Wang
R. X.
,
Lei
Y.
,
Pan
B. C.
,
Xie
Y.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2013
, vol.
135
pg.
17881
717.
Gao
M. R.
,
Chan
M. K. Y.
,
Sun
Y. G.
,
Nat. Commun.
,
2015
, vol.
6
pg.
7493
718.
Zhang
J.
,
Wang
T.
,
Liu
P.
,
Liu
S. H.
,
Dong
R. H.
,
Zhuang
X. D.
,
Chen
M. W.
,
Feng
X. L.
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
2016
, vol.
9
pg.
2789
719.
Staszak-Jirkovsky
J.
,
Malliakas
C. D.
,
Lopes
P. P.
,
Danilovic
N.
,
Kota
S. S.
,
Chang
K. C.
,
Genorio
B.
,
Strmcnik
D.
,
Stamenkovic
V. R.
,
Kanatzidis
M. G.
,
Markovic
N. M.
,
Nat. Mater.
,
2016
, vol.
15
pg.
197
720.
Xiong
Q. Z.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Liu
P. F.
,
Zheng
L. R.
,
Wang
G. Z.
,
Yang
H. G.
,
Wong
P. K.
,
Zhang
H. M.
,
Zhao
H. J.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2018
, vol.
30
pg.
1801450
721.
Miao
R.
,
Dutta
B.
,
Sahoo
S.
,
He
J. K.
,
Zhong
W.
,
Cetegen
S. A.
,
Jiang
T.
,
Alpay
S. P.
,
Suib
S. L.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2017
, vol.
139
pg.
13604
722.
Yin
J.
,
Jin
J.
,
Zhang
H.
,
Lu
M.
,
Peng
Y.
,
Huang
B. L.
,
Xi
P. X.
,
Yan
C. H.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2019
, vol.
58
pg.
18676
723.
Paracchino
A.
,
Laporte
V.
,
Sivula
K.
,
Graetzel
M.
,
Thimsen
E.
,
Nat. Mater.
,
2011
, vol.
10
pg.
456
724.
Fujishima
A.
,
Honda
K.
,
Nature
,
1972
, vol.
238
pg.
37
725.
Ni
M.
,
Leung
M. K. H.
,
Leung
D. Y. C.
,
Sumathy
K.
,
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
,
2007
, vol.
11
pg.
401
726.
Khan
S. U. M.
,
Al-Shahry
M.
,
Ingler
W. B.
,
Science
,
2002
, vol.
297
pg.
2243
727.
Park
J. H.
,
Kim
S.
,
Bard
A. J.
,
Nano Lett.
,
2006
, vol.
6
pg.
24
728.
Chiarello
G. L.
,
Selli
E.
,
Forni
L.
,
Appl. Catal., B
,
2008
, vol.
84
pg.
332
729.
Wu
H. J.
,
Zhang
Z. H.
,
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
2011
, vol.
36
pg.
13481
730.
Wu
H. J.
,
Zhang
Z. H.
,
J. Solid State Chem.
,
2011
, vol.
184
pg.
3202
731.
Maeda
K.
,
Takata
T.
,
Hara
M.
,
Saito
N.
,
Inoue
Y.
,
Kobayashi
H.
,
Domen
K.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2005
, vol.
127
pg.
8286
732.
Maeda
K.
,
Domen
K.
,
Chem. Mater.
,
2010
, vol.
22
pg.
612
733.
Yang
X. Y.
,
Wolcott
A.
,
Wang
G. M.
,
Sobo
A.
,
Fitzmorris
R. C.
,
Qian
F.
,
Zhang
J. Z.
,
Li
Y.
,
Nano Lett.
,
2009
, vol.
9
pg.
2331
734.
Wolcott
A.
,
Smith
W. A.
,
Kuykendall
T. R.
,
Zhao
Y. P.
,
Zhang
J. Z.
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
,
2009
, vol.
19
pg.
1849
735.
Kanade
K. G.
,
Kale
B. B.
,
Baeg
J. O.
,
Lee
S. M.
,
Lee
C. W.
,
Moon
S. J.
,
Chang
H. J.
,
Mater. Chem. Phys.
,
2007
, vol.
102
pg.
98
736.
Chen
H. M.
,
Chen
C. K.
,
Chang
Y.-C.
,
Tsai
C.-W.
,
Liu
R.-S.
,
Hu
S.-F.
,
Chang
W.-S.
,
Chen
K.-H.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2010
, vol.
49
pg.
5966
737.
Zhang
Z. H.
,
Wang
P.
,
J. Mater. Chem.
,
2012
, vol.
22
pg.
2456
738.
Paracchino
A.
,
Brauer
J. C.
,
Moser
J. E.
,
Thimsen
E.
,
Graetzel
M.
,
J. Phys. Chem. C
,
2012
, vol.
116
pg.
7341
739.
Sivula
K.
,
Le Formal
F.
,
Graetzel
M.
,
Chem. Mater.
,
2009
, vol.
21
pg.
2862
740.
Hwang
D. W.
,
Kim
J.
,
Park
T. J.
,
Lee
J. S.
,
Catal. Lett.
,
2002
, vol.
80
pg.
53
741.
Wang
H. L.
,
Lindgren
T.
,
He
J. J.
,
Hagfeldt
A.
,
Lindquist
S. E.
,
J. Phys. Chem. B
,
2000
, vol.
104
pg.
5686
742.
Hameed
A.
,
Gondal
M. A.
,
Yamani
Z. H.
,
Catal. Commun.
,
2004
, vol.
5
pg.
715
743.
Hong
S. J.
,
Jun
H.
,
Borse
P. H.
,
Lee
J. S.
,
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
2009
, vol.
34
pg.
3234
744.
Wang
Q.
,
Domen
K.
,
Chem. Rev.
,
2020
, vol.
120
pg.
919
745.
Wu
J. H.
,
Huang
Y.
,
Ye
W.
,
Li
Y. G.
,
Adv. Sci.
,
2017
, vol.
4
pg.
1700194
746.
Lu
Q. P.
,
Yu
Y. F.
,
Ma
Q. L.
,
Chen
B.
,
Zhang
H.
,
Adv. Mater.
,
2016
, vol.
28
pg.
1917
747.
Mei
B.
,
Han
K.
,
Mul
G.
,
ACS Catal.
,
2018
, vol.
8
pg.
9154
748.
Gratzel
M.
,
Nature
,
2001
, vol.
414
pg.
338
749.
Asahi
R.
,
Morikawa
T.
,
Ohwaki
T.
,
Aoki
K.
,
Taga
Y.
,
Science
,
2001
, vol.
293
pg.
269
750.
Chen
S.
,
Vequizo
J. J. M.
,
Pan
Z.
,
Hisatomi
T.
,
Nakabayashi
M.
,
Lin
L.
,
Wang
Z.
,
Kato
K.
,
Yamakata
A.
,
Shibata
N.
,
Takata
T.
,
Yamada
T.
,
Domen
K.
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
2021
, vol.
143
pg.
10633
751.
Wolff
C. M.
,
Frischmann
P. D.
,
Schulze
M.
,
Bohn
B. J.
,
Wein
R.
,
Livadas
P.
,
Carlson
M. T.
,
Jaeckel
F.
,
Feldmann
J.
,
Wuerthner
F.
,
Stolarczyk
J. K.
,
Nat. Energy
,
2018
, vol.
3
pg.
862
752.
Sathish
M.
,
Viswanathan
B.
,
Viswanath
R. P.
,
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
2006
, vol.
31
pg.
891
753.
Bao
N.
,
Shen
L.
,
Takata
T.
,
Domen
K.
,
Chem. Mater.
,
2008
, vol.
20
pg.
110
754.
Zhao
N.
,
Peng
J.
,
Liu
G.
,
Zhang
Y.
,
Lei
W.
,
Yin
Z.
,
Li
J.
,
Zhai
M.
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
2018
, vol.
6
pg.
18458
755.
Chen
J.
,
Wu
X.-J.
,
Yin
L.
,
Li
B.
,
Hong
X.
,
Fan
Z.
,
Chen
B.
,
Xue
C.
,
Zhang
H.
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
,
2015
, vol.
54
pg.
1210
756.
Li
Z.
,
Meng
X.
,
Zhang
Z.
,
J. Photochem. Photobiol., C
,
2018
, vol.
35
pg.
39
757.
Xiao
W.-Z.
,
Xu
L.
,
Rong
Q.-Y.
,
Dai
X.-Y.
,
Cheng
C.-P.
,
Wang
L.-L.
,
Appl. Surf. Sci.
,
2020
, vol.
504
pg.
144425

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal