Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination

Copper is one of the ubiquitous and inexpensive metals. In classical methodology, a stoichiometric amount of copper species has been utilised for organic synthesis. However, the development of copper-catalysed reactions is most important from the viewpoint of sustainability and green chemistry. This chapter summarises valuable homogeneous copper-catalysed reactions such as crosscouplings, oxidation, fixation of carbon dioxide, and others.

Copper complexes realise a wide variety of coupling reactions. Some of them have been known for a long time. However, copper salts are easily aggregated and deactivated, so the efficiency of the reactions was often low. In order to generate an active species realising catalytic reactions, ligands on copper centres play an important role. This chapter starts with two classic coupling reaction, i.e., Ullman-type and Glaser-type coupling reactions, then followed by more recent reactions.

Efficient and selective coupling of aryl and vinyl halides with N, O, and C nucleophiles are indispensable and important transformations to construct useful compounds. Over 110 years ago, Ullmann and Goldberg found the synthesis of aryl ethers and aryl amines by C–N and C–O bond-forming reactions in the presence of copper powder or copper salt.1  However, even until the late twenty century, these transformations often required stoichiometric amounts of copper reagent in polar solvents (such as N-methylpyrrolidone, nitrobenzene, and dimethylformamide) at high reaction temperatures (>200 °C). These harsh reaction conditions frequently led to severe limitations in the general use of the reaction due to limited applicable substrates and low product yields.

The situation was dramatically improved by using an appropriate auxiliary ligand for the copper centre.2  These ligands prevent copper aggregation, realising good catalyst solubility and stabilising active catalyst species. It was reported that 1,10-phenanthroline (phen) was a particularly effective ligand in the copper-catalysed reactions of aromatic amines with aryl iodides to afford arylamines in good yields in three hours (Scheme 15.1).3  The reactions can be carried out even in refluxing toluene. Subsequently, a wide variety of chelating ligands (N–N, O–O, and N–O) such as diamines, diols, diketones, and amino alcohols were found to be highly efficient with copper catalysts.2cf  In the presence of a catalytic amount of copper iodide and chelating ligands, aliphatic amines (Scheme 15.2)4a  and amides (Scheme 15.3)4b  are catalytically arylated with aryl iodides under relatively milder reaction conditions. N-Heterocycles are also alkenylated with alkenyl iodides (Scheme 15.4)4c,d  Primary and secondary alkylamines are arylated with aryl halides even at room temperature employing β-diketones5a  or 1,1′-bi-2-naphthol5b  as a ligand.

Scheme 15.1

Copper-catalysed reactions of aromatic amines with aryl iodides.

Scheme 15.1

Copper-catalysed reactions of aromatic amines with aryl iodides.

Close modal
Scheme 15.2

Copper-catalysed reaction of an aliphatic amine with an aryl iodide.

Scheme 15.2

Copper-catalysed reaction of an aliphatic amine with an aryl iodide.

Close modal
Scheme 15.3

Copper-catalysed arylation of an amide with an aryl iodide.

Scheme 15.3

Copper-catalysed arylation of an amide with an aryl iodide.

Close modal
Scheme 15.4

Copper-catalysed alkenylation of N-heterocycles.

Scheme 15.4

Copper-catalysed alkenylation of N-heterocycles.

Close modal

Proper choice of chelating ligand is also a key to realise efficient catalytic C–O bond formations. Diaryl ethers are afforded from phenols and aryl iodides in the presence of copper catalysts with N–O and N–N chelating ligands (Scheme 15.5).6a,b  When phenols are arylated with aryl bromides bearing directing groups at the ortho position in the presence of copper iodide and N,N-dimethylglycine as a ligand, highly efficient C–O bond formation proceeds even at room temperature (Scheme 15.6).6c 

Scheme 15.5

C–O bond-forming reaction of an aryl iodide with a phenol in the presence of copper catalysts.

Scheme 15.5

C–O bond-forming reaction of an aryl iodide with a phenol in the presence of copper catalysts.

Close modal
Scheme 15.6

Copper-catalysed coupling reaction of a phenol with an aryl bromide.

Scheme 15.6

Copper-catalysed coupling reaction of a phenol with an aryl bromide.

Close modal

Ullmann found that aryl halides underwent self-dimerisation (carbon–carbon bond-forming reaction) to afford the corresponding dimer (biaryls) in the presence of a stoichiometric amount of copper powder at high temperature (>200 °C).7a  Usually, even with highly activated copper powder or copper(i) salts, the carbon–carbon bond-forming reaction must be carried out at over 100 °C. Thus, this transformation was not so valuable as a synthetic method. However, copper(i) thiophene 2-carboxylate (CuTC) was found to be a highly efficient copper reagent to provide biaryls from aryl iodides and bromides at room temperature (Scheme 15.7).7b 

Scheme 15.7

CuTC-mediated homocoupling reaction of aryl halides.

Scheme 15.7

CuTC-mediated homocoupling reaction of aryl halides.

Close modal

The mechanism of Ullmann-type coupling reactions seems to be complicated. Density-functional calculations on the arylation reactions of methanol and methylamine with iodobenzene have been carried out,8  in which copper(i) complexes bearing β-diketone or 1,10-phenanthroline as a ligand are employed as catalysts. The results suggest that the arylation occurs via single-electron transfer (SET) or iodine atom transfer, depending on the electron-donating abilities of the ligand and nucleophile.

In 1869, Glaser found that copper(i) phenylacetylide prepared from phenylacetylene and a copper salt gave the acetylene dimer by air oxidation (Scheme 15.8).9a  This reaction system was heterogeneous and the reaction was rather slow. In addition, the potentially explosive copper acetylides had to be isolated before the oxidation. However, copper iodide bearing pyridine as a ligand9b  as well as copper(i) chloride having pyridine or TMEDA (N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethylenediamine) as a ligand9c,d  form a homogeneous catalyst system, and copper acetylides generated in situ can be utilised in the oxidation.10a  Thus, terminal alkynes are oxidatively dimerised to buta-1,3-diynes with copper(i) under oxygen at room temperature (Scheme 15.9).10b  An excess amount of copper(ii) with terminal alkynes also successfully afforded 1,3-diynes (Scheme 15.10).10c  The present oxidative coupling reactions are usually the method of choice for the construction of macrocycles containing buta-1,3-diynediyl moieties.10d,e 

Scheme 15.8

Copper-mediated Glaser coupling of phenylacetylene.

Scheme 15.8

Copper-mediated Glaser coupling of phenylacetylene.

Close modal
Scheme 15.9

Copper-catalysed Glaser coupling of 1-alkynyl ethers.

Scheme 15.9

Copper-catalysed Glaser coupling of 1-alkynyl ethers.

Close modal
Scheme 15.10

Copper-mediated Glaser coupling of 1-alkynes bearing carboxyl groups.

Scheme 15.10

Copper-mediated Glaser coupling of 1-alkynes bearing carboxyl groups.

Close modal

Selective crosscoupling of two different terminal alkynes is difficult in the usual Glaser coupling reaction. For these unsymmetrical conjugated diynes, copper(i)-catalysed coupling reaction of 1-halo alkynes with 1-alkynes in pyrrolidine provides the desired products at 20 °C (Scheme 15.11).11a  Similarly a variety of unsymmetrical 1,4-biaryl-1,3-butadiyne derivatives are prepared by the crosscoupling reaction of alkynylsilanes with 1-chloroalkynes in the presence of copper(i) chloride as a catalyst in DMF at 80 °C (Scheme 15.12).11b 

Scheme 15.11

Copper-catalysed coupling reaction of 1-haloalkynes with 1-alkynes.

Scheme 15.11

Copper-catalysed coupling reaction of 1-haloalkynes with 1-alkynes.

Close modal
Scheme 15.12

Copper-catalysed crosscoupling reaction of alkynylsilanes with 1-chloroalkynes.

Scheme 15.12

Copper-catalysed crosscoupling reaction of alkynylsilanes with 1-chloroalkynes.

Close modal

Sonogashira found the crosscoupling reaction of aryl halides with terminal alkynes in the presence of a palladium complex and copper(i) compound (Scheme 15.13).12  However, palladium complexes are rather expensive, so intensive efforts have been made to realise the Sonogashira reaction only with copper catalysts.13 

Scheme 15.13

Palladium-catalysed Sonogashira coupling in the presence of a catalytic amount of copper salts.

Scheme 15.13

Palladium-catalysed Sonogashira coupling in the presence of a catalytic amount of copper salts.

Close modal

Miura et al. reported the first palladium-free Sonogashira coupling reaction of aryl iodides or vinyl iodides with terminal alkynes in the presence of a copper iodide/triphenylphosphine/potassium carbonate catalyst system (Scheme 15.14).13b o-Iodo-acetanilide derivatives react with 1-alkynes smoothly even at room temperature in the presence of a copper iodide/N-methylpyrrolidine-2-carboxamide catalyst system (Scheme 15.15).13c  Various functionalities are tolerated in the catalytic reactions. Alkynylsilanes also react with a various aryl iodides in the presence of copper(i) chloride/triphenylphosphine/potassium benzoate catalyst system, affording unsymmetrical diarylethynes in good to excellent yields (Scheme 15.16).13d 

Scheme 15.14

Copper-catalysed Sonogashira coupling of aryl iodides with 1-alkynes.

Scheme 15.14

Copper-catalysed Sonogashira coupling of aryl iodides with 1-alkynes.

Close modal
Scheme 15.15

Copper-catalysed Sonogashira coupling of aryl iodides with 1-alkynes employing N-methylpyrrolidine-2-carboxamide as the additive.

Scheme 15.15

Copper-catalysed Sonogashira coupling of aryl iodides with 1-alkynes employing N-methylpyrrolidine-2-carboxamide as the additive.

Close modal
Scheme 15.16

Copper-catalysed Sonogashira coupling of aryl iodides with alkynylsilanes.

Scheme 15.16

Copper-catalysed Sonogashira coupling of aryl iodides with alkynylsilanes.

Close modal

Boronic acid derivatives are easily available and useful substrates especially in the palladium-catalysed Suzuki–Miyaura coupling reaction.14  In copper-catalysed reactions, they are also versatile starting materials. Dimerisation of arylboronic acids was first reported with copper acetate as a catalyst under oxygen at 100 °C.15a  Later, it was found that CuCl(OH)(phen) complex was much more efficient as a catalyst to afford dimer in high yields at 28 °C (Scheme 15.17).15b 

Scheme 15.17

Copper-catalysed dimerisation of arylboronic acids under air.

Scheme 15.17

Copper-catalysed dimerisation of arylboronic acids under air.

Close modal

Selective C–H bond arylation of electron-rich arenes with aryl boronic acids proceeds to give biaryls (Scheme 15.18).16a  It is noteworthy that the homocoupling of arylboronic acids does not occur. Although the oxygen atmosphere is not required for the coupling, the rate increases significantly under oxygen. Oxidative arylation of terminal alkynes with aryl boronic acids are carried out in the presence of a catalytic amount of copper(i) oxide (10 mol%) at room temperature under air (Scheme 15.19).16b 

Scheme 15.18

Oxidative C–H arylation of electron-rich arenes with aryl boronic acids in the presence of a stoichiometric amount of copper salt.

Scheme 15.18

Oxidative C–H arylation of electron-rich arenes with aryl boronic acids in the presence of a stoichiometric amount of copper salt.

Close modal
Scheme 15.19

Copper-catalysed oxidative arylation of terminal alkynes with aryl boronic acids.

Scheme 15.19

Copper-catalysed oxidative arylation of terminal alkynes with aryl boronic acids.

Close modal

In Ullman-type coupling, aryl boronic acids are much more efficient coupling partners with amines and phenols as compared with aryl halides. They successfully couple at room temperature in the presence of a copper acetate/triethylamine (or pyridine) catalyst system and the corresponding arylated products were provided in high yields (Scheme 15.20).17a,b  Similarly, aryl boronic acids are successfully coupled with structurally and electronically diverse substrates such as amides and sulfonamides to afford the corresponding N-arylated products.17a,c 

Scheme 15.20

C–N/C–O bond-forming reactions of aryl boronic acids with amines, amides or phenols.

Scheme 15.20

C–N/C–O bond-forming reactions of aryl boronic acids with amines, amides or phenols.

Close modal

Allylic substitutions, especially allylic alkylations, are important carbon–carbon bond-forming reactions. Palladium complexes are known as efficient catalysts in the reactions with soft carbon nucleophiles such as malonate carboanions.18  In contrast, copper catalysts allow the use of hard nucleophiles such as Grignard and organozinc reagents.19  In addition, these reactions usually proceed with high SN2′ fashion. Since the discovery of copper-catalysed asymmetric allylic alkylation of allylic acetate with butylmagnesium reagent (Scheme 15.21),20  the asymmetric alkylations have been developed considerably realising high enantioselectivity.21 

Scheme 15.21

Copper-catalysed asymmetric allylic alkylation of allylic acetate with Grignard reagent.

Scheme 15.21

Copper-catalysed asymmetric allylic alkylation of allylic acetate with Grignard reagent.

Close modal

A bidentate N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) ligand was found to be efficient for the asymmetric allylic alkylation employing diethylzinc (Scheme 15.22).22  In the reaction, a binuclear silver complex undergoes facile ligand exchange with a copper salt to afford an effective copper catalyst. γ-Selective allylic alkylation is realised with alkylboranes as nucleophiles that are easily prepared by the hydroboration of the corresponding alkenes.23a  The enantioselective version of the coupling reaction is established by the reaction of (Z)-allyl chloride with an alkylborane employing a copper catalyst with (R)-DTBM-SEGPHOS as a ligand (Scheme 15.23).23b  Aryl, alkenyl, and allylboronates are also utilised as nucleophiles in the copper-catalysed enantioselective allylic funtionalisation.24 

Scheme 15.22

Asymmetric allylic alkylation with diethylzinc employing a chiral Cu-NHC catalyst.

Scheme 15.22

Asymmetric allylic alkylation with diethylzinc employing a chiral Cu-NHC catalyst.

Close modal
Scheme 15.23

Copper-catalysed asymmetric allylic alkylation with alkyl boranes employing a chiral bidentate phosphine.

Scheme 15.23

Copper-catalysed asymmetric allylic alkylation with alkyl boranes employing a chiral bidentate phosphine.

Close modal

Addition reactions are highly atom efficient transformations, since all the atoms of substrates are incorporated in products. Copper catalysts play an important role as sustainable catalysts for addition reactions.

Enantioselective conjugated addition to Michael acceptors is one of the most powerful carbon–carbon bond-forming reactions to synthesise synthons for biological active and natural compounds. As the catalyst, copper21c,25  and rhodium26  are especially efficient: many copper catalysts are employed for the introduction of alkyl moieties, while rhodium catalysts are often used for the addition of aryl and alkenyl groups.

Copper-catalysed enantioselective conjugate addition of Grignard reagents to α,β-unsaturated methyl esters is successfully carried out to provide β-substituted chiral esters in good yields and with excellent enantioselectivities (Scheme 15.24).27a  A combination of copper iodide and commercially available chiral (R)-2,2′-bis(di-p-tolyl-phosphino)-1,1′-binaphthyl (Tol-BINAP) is also effective.27b 

Scheme 15.24

Copper-catalysed asymmetric conjugated addition of Grignard reagents to α,β-unsaturated methyl esters.

Scheme 15.24

Copper-catalysed asymmetric conjugated addition of Grignard reagents to α,β-unsaturated methyl esters.

Close modal

Alkylzincs undergo conjugate addition to nitroalkenes in the presence of a catalytic amount of (CuOTf)2·C6H628a  or [(MeCN)4Cu]PF628b  with a chiral peptide ligand. Optically enriched nitroalkanes bearing all-carbon quaternary carbon stereogenic centres are obtained efficiently (Scheme 15.25).28a  Similar catalytic asymmetric conjugated addition of alkylzincs to tetrasubstituted cyclic enones proceeds in the presence of air-stable copper cyanide and a chiral ligand.28c 

Scheme 15.25

Asymmetric conjugated addition of alkyl zinc reagents to nitroalkanes employing a chiral copper catalyst.

Scheme 15.25

Asymmetric conjugated addition of alkyl zinc reagents to nitroalkanes employing a chiral copper catalyst.

Close modal

Organoboranes are much milder nucleophiles, and may be attractive in the conjugate addition reaction due to their good stability and ease of handling. Arylboranes add to alkylidene cyanoacetates enantioselectively in the presence of a catalytic amount of copper(i) bromide and a chiral imidazolium salt as a precursor for the corresponding NHC ligand (Scheme 15.26).28d  Furthermore, alkylboranes undergo enantioselective conjugate addition to imidazol-2-yl α,β-unsaturated ketones with copper(i) chloride and NHC ligand.28e 

Scheme 15.26

Copper-catalysed asymmetric conjugated addition of aryl boronic esters to alkylidene cyanoacetates.

Scheme 15.26

Copper-catalysed asymmetric conjugated addition of aryl boronic esters to alkylidene cyanoacetates.

Close modal

The copper-catalysed azide–alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC)29  is known as the “click reaction” that was introduced by Sharpless to describe reactions realising simple procedure, high yield, high selectivity, and wide range of scope.30  The azide-alkyne cycloaddition was thoroughly investigated by Huisgen and coworkers in the 1950s as a 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction.31  Although the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions between alkynes and organoazides proceeds thermally, it was reported that the rate of the reaction with copper catalysts was increased by a factor of 107 as compared to the thermal process. In addition, the copper-catalysed reactions afford the 1,4-regioisomer selectively. A simplified reaction mechanism is shown in Scheme 15.27. A copper catalyst reacts with terminal alkynes to generate copper acetylide species. Coordination of organoazide to copper followed by cyclisation reaction gives a 1,2,3-triazolato-copper intermediate. Finally, protonation leads 1,2,3-triazole and the copper catalyst regenerates. Detailed mechanistic studies clarified that the reaction mechanism is not so simple; some experiments suggest that dinuclear copper complexes may be involved as reaction intermediates (Scheme 15.28).32 

Scheme 15.27

A simplified reaction scheme for copper-catalysed azide–alkyne cycloaddition.

Scheme 15.27

A simplified reaction scheme for copper-catalysed azide–alkyne cycloaddition.

Close modal
Scheme 15.28

A modified reaction scheme for copper-catalysed azide–alkyne cycloaddition.

Scheme 15.28

A modified reaction scheme for copper-catalysed azide–alkyne cycloaddition.

Close modal

A wide range of reaction conditions for copper-catalysed click reactions have been developed.29a  Regarding copper catalysts, both copper(i) and copper(ii) salts are acceptable. Since active catalyst species is believed to be a copper(i) state, copper(i) species are generated from copper(ii) salts using suitable reducing agents such as sodium ascorbate. The reaction is catalysed by in situ generated copper(i) species from elemental copper; a small amount of copper wire or turning is added to the reaction mixture, followed by vigorous stirring or shaking. As solvents, aqueous alcohols (methanol, ethanol, and t-butanol), tetrahydrofuran (THF), dimethylformamide (DMF), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) can be used in the procedures. In general, the copper-catalysed click reactions could proceed without ligand when suitable reaction conditions are adopted. However, copper complexes with various ligands such as triphenylphosphine (Scheme 15.29),33  and NHCs (Scheme 15.30)34  are known as good catalysts in organic solvents. With a heteroleptic bis(NHC) copper complex as a catalyst, the reaction proceeds with 5 ppm catalyst loading (Scheme 15.31).35  A water-soluble bathophenanthroline works as a good ligand for the synthesis of polymers36a  and modification of surfaces.36b  Tris(benzyltriazolylmethyl)amine (TBTA), which is prepared by the reaction of tripropargylamine with benzyl azide via CuAAC reaction works a good ligand (Scheme 15.32).37 

Scheme 15.29

Copper-catalysed azide–alkyne cycloaddition employing a phosphine as the ligand.

Scheme 15.29

Copper-catalysed azide–alkyne cycloaddition employing a phosphine as the ligand.

Close modal
Scheme 15.30

Copper-catalysed azide–alkyne cycloaddition employing a NHC as the ligand.

Scheme 15.30

Copper-catalysed azide–alkyne cycloaddition employing a NHC as the ligand.

Close modal
Scheme 15.31

Low catalyst loading reaction of copper-catalysed azide–alkyne cycloaddition.

Scheme 15.31

Low catalyst loading reaction of copper-catalysed azide–alkyne cycloaddition.

Close modal
Scheme 15.32

Copper-catalysed azide–alkyne cycloaddition employing tris(benzyltriazolylmethyl)amine as the ligand.

Scheme 15.32

Copper-catalysed azide–alkyne cycloaddition employing tris(benzyltriazolylmethyl)amine as the ligand.

Close modal

Organoboron compounds are useful reagents in carbon–carbon and carbon–heteroatom bond formations.14,26,38  Conventionally, these compounds are prepared by the hydroboration of unsaturated compounds39  or by the reaction of highly reactive organolithium or Grignard reagents with boron electrophiles.14  In place of these classical methodologies, much attention has been paid to develop transition metal-catalysed borylation reactions, in which various organoboron compounds with unique reactivity are prepared with good functional group compatibility. In the reactions, copper compounds show good catalytic activity and bis(pinacolato)diboron (B2(pin)2) is a typical boron source.40  In a catalytic cycle, a borylcopper (Cu–B) species is generated as a key intermediate by the reaction of copper alkoxide with B2(pin)2.41 

Stoichiometric amounts of copper(i) chloride, B2(pin)2, and potassium acetate are employed in hydroboration of terminal alkynes (Scheme 15.33).42  Catalytic hydroboration of terminal alkynes with B2(pin)2 is achieved by employing a copper catalyst.43  Products are obtained regioselectively by employing a suitable NHC ligand (Scheme 15.34). A bulky bidentate phosphine ligand is effective for regioselective hydroboration of aryl-substituted internal alkynes44  as well as internal alkynes bearing a propargyl ether, homopropargyl ether, and propargyl amine functionalities (Scheme 15.35).44c 

Scheme 15.33

Hydroboration of 1-octyne with B2(pin)2 in the presence of a stoichiometric amount of copper chlorides.

Scheme 15.33

Hydroboration of 1-octyne with B2(pin)2 in the presence of a stoichiometric amount of copper chlorides.

Close modal
Scheme 15.34

Ligand-controlled regioselective hydroboration of terminal alkynes.

Scheme 15.34

Ligand-controlled regioselective hydroboration of terminal alkynes.

Close modal
Scheme 15.35

Copper-catalysed regioselective hydroboration of unsymmetrical internal alkynes.

Scheme 15.35

Copper-catalysed regioselective hydroboration of unsymmetrical internal alkynes.

Close modal

The β-selective hydroboration of styrene derivatives proceeds in the presence of a catalytic amount of (SIMes)CuCl (Scheme 15.36).45  An asymmetric variant is also achieved by using a chiral NHC ligand.45b  The hydroboration of unactivated alkenes such as 1-hexene is facilitated by a copper(i) chloride/Xantphos catalytic system, giving a linear product with high regioselectivity (Scheme 15.37).45c  Copper-catalysed hydroboration of allenes employing B2(pin)2 is carried out regioselectively.46 

Scheme 15.36

Copper-catalysed hydroboration of internal alkenes.

Scheme 15.36

Copper-catalysed hydroboration of internal alkenes.

Close modal
Scheme 15.37

Copper-catalysed regioselective hydroboration of 1-hexene.

Scheme 15.37

Copper-catalysed regioselective hydroboration of 1-hexene.

Close modal

Carboboration of carbon–carbon multiple bonds that realises simultaneous carbon–boron and carbon–carbon bond formations is achieved with B2(pin)2 and carbon electrophiles in the presence of a copper catalyst. The reaction of phenylacetylene with methyl iodide and B2(pin)2 in the presence of copper(i) chloride/Xantphos catalyst system gives the corresponding carboboration products (Scheme 15.38).47a  The carboboration of internal alkynes with benzyl chloride as an electrophile occurs in the presence of the copper acetate/tricyclohexylphosphine catalyst (Scheme 15.39).47b  Copper-catalysed arylboration of internal alkynes occurs employing B2(pin)2 and an aryl iodide.48 

Scheme 15.38

Carboboration of alkynes with alkyl halide and B2(pin)2 employing Cu-Xantohos catalyst.

Scheme 15.38

Carboboration of alkynes with alkyl halide and B2(pin)2 employing Cu-Xantohos catalyst.

Close modal
Scheme 15.39

Carboboration of alkynes with benzyl chloride and B2(pin)2 employing Cu-PCy3 catalyst.

Scheme 15.39

Carboboration of alkynes with benzyl chloride and B2(pin)2 employing Cu-PCy3 catalyst.

Close modal

Intramolecular alkylboration of silyl-substituted homoallylic mesylates with B2(pin)2 achieves stereospecific synthesis of silyl-substituted cyclobutylboronates (Scheme 15.40).49a  Furthermore, the intramolecular alkylboration of silyl-substituted allylic carbonates can proceed enantioselectively.49b  Carbonyl compounds can be used as a carbon electrophile enantioselectively in the reaction of allenes with B2(pin)2 in the presence of a suitable chiral copper catalyst (Scheme 15.41).50 

Scheme 15.40

Copper-catalysed intramolecular alkylboration of silyl-substituted homoallylic mesylates with B2(pin)2.

Scheme 15.40

Copper-catalysed intramolecular alkylboration of silyl-substituted homoallylic mesylates with B2(pin)2.

Close modal
Scheme 15.41

Copper-catalysed enantioselective alkylborations of silyl-substituted allylic carbonates with B2(pin)2.

Scheme 15.41

Copper-catalysed enantioselective alkylborations of silyl-substituted allylic carbonates with B2(pin)2.

Close modal

Copper-catalysed borylative allyl–allyl coupling reaction using allylic phosphates as electrophiles has been reported (Scheme 15.42).51aA  copper catalyst bearing ICy as a ligand is most effective for this reaction, and borylative 1,5-diene derivatives are obtained in high yields and with high selectivities. The asymmetric variant of the borylative allyl–allyl coupling reaction is also established employing a chiral NHC ligand (Scheme 15.43).51b  This method has been applied to synthesis of various natural products.

Scheme 15.42

Copper-catalysed borylative allyl–allyl coupling reactions.

Scheme 15.42

Copper-catalysed borylative allyl–allyl coupling reactions.

Close modal
Scheme 15.43

Asymmetric borylative allyl–allyl coupling reactions with chiral copper catalysts.

Scheme 15.43

Asymmetric borylative allyl–allyl coupling reactions with chiral copper catalysts.

Close modal

Molecular oxygen is a highly environmentally benign and abundant oxidant. A range of useful oxidative transformations have been developed under an oxygen atmosphere in the presence of a copper catalyst.52  Representative examples are given below.

Benzylic and allylic alcohols are oxidised to the corresponding aldehydes or ketones in the presence of copper(ii) chloride/cesium carbonate as a catalyst under oxygen (Scheme 15.44).53a  A catalytically active μ-hydroxyl-bridged trinuclear copper species was isolated and its X-ray crystal structure was determined. A highly efficient oxidation of propargylic alcohols to ynones under air has been carried out in the presence of copper nanoparticles (Cu Nps) with bipyridine as a ligand (Scheme 15.45).53b 

Scheme 15.44

Copper-catalysed oxidation of alcohol with molecular oxygen.

Scheme 15.44

Copper-catalysed oxidation of alcohol with molecular oxygen.

Close modal
Scheme 15.45

Copper-catalysed oxidation of propargyl alcohol under air.

Scheme 15.45

Copper-catalysed oxidation of propargyl alcohol under air.

Close modal

Oxidative dimerisation of 2-naphthols to 1,1′-bis-2,2′-naphthol (BINOL) derivatives has been studied extensively. Copper(ii) catalyst under molecular oxygen has shown broad versatility in this transformation. Copper(ii)–Schiff base complexes reveal good catalytic activity in the dimerisation of 2-naphthols with low catalyst loading. This catalyst system is not so effective for substrates bearing electron-withdrawing substituents.53c  Cu(OH)Cl(TMEDA) is stable and shows good catalytic activity even for electron-poor naphthols under oxygen or air (Scheme 15.46).53d  The copper-catalysed aerobic coupling of 2-naphthols were carried out enantioselectively to provide homochiral biaryl natural compounds.53e,f 

Scheme 15.46

Copper-catalysed oxidative coupling of naphthols.

Scheme 15.46

Copper-catalysed oxidative coupling of naphthols.

Close modal

Aromatic aldehydes are oxidised to the corresponding carboxylic acids in the presence of 150 nm-size copper(ii) oxide under molecular oxygen in good yield (Scheme 15.47).54a  Aromatic, heterocyclic, and tertiary aliphatic nitriles are prepared from aldehydes under oxygen with copper powder (2 equivalents, 50 μm) and ammonium chloride (2 equivalents) in pyridine at 60 °C (Scheme 15.48).54b  Cycloalkanones are shown to undergo regioselective oxidative cleavage under oxygen in the presence of a catalytic amount (6–7.5 mol%) of hydrated copper nitrate in a mixture of acetic acid and water (Scheme 15.49).54c  When the optically active substrate is employed, the corresponding ketoacid is afforded in good yield without loss of enantiopurity.

Scheme 15.47

Oxidation of aldehydes to carboxylic acids in the presence of copper oxide.

Scheme 15.47

Oxidation of aldehydes to carboxylic acids in the presence of copper oxide.

Close modal
Scheme 15.48

Transformation of aldehydes to nitriles employing copper powder and ammonium salts.

Scheme 15.48

Transformation of aldehydes to nitriles employing copper powder and ammonium salts.

Close modal
Scheme 15.49

Copper-catalysed oxidative cleavage of cycloalkanone with dioxygen.

Scheme 15.49

Copper-catalysed oxidative cleavage of cycloalkanone with dioxygen.

Close modal

In the Baeyer–Villiger reaction, ketones are treated with peracids to give carboxylic esters by the insertion of oxygen. A similar reaction of ketones is catalysed by copper(ii) acetate under oxygen in the presence of an added aldehyde that generates a peracid in situ with oxygen (Scheme 15.50).54d  The oxidation occurs at the more substituted side of ketone as in the typical Baeyer–Villiger reaction. Chiral copper complexes catalyse the Baeyer–Villiger reaction giving optically active lactones with up to 95% enantiomeric excess.54e 

Scheme 15.50

Synthesis of carboxylic ester from ketone employing aldehyde and dioxygen in the presence of copper catalyst.

Scheme 15.50

Synthesis of carboxylic ester from ketone employing aldehyde and dioxygen in the presence of copper catalyst.

Close modal

The selective oxidative aromatic C–H bond functionalisation for new carbon–carbon bond formation is versatile, and various copper-catalysed or mediated reactions have been developed under molecular oxygen or air.55 

For intramolecular reactions, 3,3-disubstituted oxindoles are provided by the oxidative coupling of Ar–H and C–H moieties in the presence of stoichiometric amounts of copper(ii) complex and a base56a,b  (Scheme 15.51).56a  Similar reactions are carried out catalytically with copper(ii) acetate (5 mol%) under air (Scheme 15.52).56b  Indoline-2,3-diones (isatins) are afforded by copper-catalysed intramolecular C–H oxidation/acylation with formyl-N-arylformamides under oxygen (Scheme 15.53).56c 

Scheme 15.51

Copper-mediated intramolecular coupling reactions between C(sp2)–H and C(sp3)–H bonds.

Scheme 15.51

Copper-mediated intramolecular coupling reactions between C(sp2)–H and C(sp3)–H bonds.

Close modal
Scheme 15.52

Copper-catalysed intramolecular oxidative coupling reactions between C(sp2)–H and C(sp3)–H bonds in the presence of dioxygen.

Scheme 15.52

Copper-catalysed intramolecular oxidative coupling reactions between C(sp2)–H and C(sp3)–H bonds in the presence of dioxygen.

Close modal
Scheme 15.53

Copper-catalysed intramolecular C–H oxidation/acylation with formyl-N-arylformamides.

Scheme 15.53

Copper-catalysed intramolecular C–H oxidation/acylation with formyl-N-arylformamides.

Close modal

Intermolecular oxidative dimerisation of electron-poor arenes as well as electron-rich and electron-poor heterocycles proceeds in high yields in the presence of a catalytic amount of copper(ii) chloride under oxygen (Scheme 15.54).57a  Biazoles are efficiently prepared by oxidative dimerisation of azoles (imidazoles, oxazoles, and thiazoles) with copper(i) chloride (1 mol%) as a catalyst under air (Scheme 15.55).57b 

Scheme 15.54

Copper-catalysed intermolecular oxidative dimerisation of arenes.

Scheme 15.54

Copper-catalysed intermolecular oxidative dimerisation of arenes.

Close modal
Scheme 15.55

Copper-catalysed oxidative dimerisation of azoles.

Scheme 15.55

Copper-catalysed oxidative dimerisation of azoles.

Close modal

The direct crosscoupling of unfunctionalised aromatic compounds with terminal alkynes affords the same products as in the Sonogashira coupling reaction and is very attractive. 1,3,4-Oxadiazoles and oxazoles are coupled with terminal alkynes in the presence of a stoichiometric amount of copper(i) chloride at 120 °C under oxygen (Scheme 15.56).58a  Here, alkynes must be added over one hour to avoid the homocoupling of alkynes. On the other hand, polyfluoroarenes are also reactive and couple with terminal alkynes with a copper catalyst under oxygen58b,c  (Scheme 15.57).58b 

Scheme 15.56

Direct C–H alkynylation of oxazoles with terminal alkynes in the presence of a stoichiometric amount of copper salts.

Scheme 15.56

Direct C–H alkynylation of oxazoles with terminal alkynes in the presence of a stoichiometric amount of copper salts.

Close modal
Scheme 15.57

Copper-catalysed alkynylation of electron-deficient arenes with terminal alkynes.

Scheme 15.57

Copper-catalysed alkynylation of electron-deficient arenes with terminal alkynes.

Close modal

Transformation of carbon dioxide to valuable chemicals is one of the central challenges for chemists.59  Various transition-metal catalysts have been reported to be highly reliable in the utilisation of carbon dioxide.60,61  Some representative copper-catalysed reaction of carbon dioxide are discussed below.

The catalytic transformation of organic substrates with carbon dioxide via carbon–carbon bond formation is an important synthetic method for various carboxylic acids. It was reported that carboxylation of terminal alkynes with carbon dioxide and alkyl halides proceeded in the presence of a copper catalyst and a bases (Scheme 15.58).62a  The reaction proceeds via carboxylation of a copper-alkynyl intermediate generated from a terminal alkyne and copper species Similar copper-catalysed carboxylations of alkynes have been reported and the corresponding esters are obtained in good to high yields.62bg  The copper-catalysed direct C–H carboxylation of heteroaromatic compounds has been reported (Scheme 15.59).63a  Benzoxazoles and benzthiozoles that have a relatively acidic C–H bond react with carbon dioxide in the presence of copper catalyst and a suitable base.

Scheme 15.58

Copper-catalysed carboxylation of terminal alkynes with carbon dioxide.

Scheme 15.58

Copper-catalysed carboxylation of terminal alkynes with carbon dioxide.

Close modal
Scheme 15.59

Direct C–H carboxylation of heteroarenes with carbon dioxide employing copper catalysts.

Scheme 15.59

Direct C–H carboxylation of heteroarenes with carbon dioxide employing copper catalysts.

Close modal

Copper complexes catalyse the carboxylation of organoboron compounds. Aryl and vinylboronates react with carbon dioxide in the presence of copper catalysts and base to give the corresponding carboxylic acids in good to high yield (Scheme 15.60).64a  In the reaction, NHC64a  and bisoxazoline64b  are efficient ligands. Employing a NHC–copper complex, several catalytic intermediates were isolated and characterised by X-ray crystallography.64a  Copper complexes also show good catalytic activity in the carboxylation of alkylboranes (Scheme 15.61).65  Since the substrates are easily prepared by the hydroboration of terminal alkenes with 9-borabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane (9-BBN-H), the overall process is represented as a formal hydrocarboxylation of terminal alkenes with carbon dioxide. Allylboronates are also carboxylated in the presence of IPrCuCl as a catalyst.66  Copper-catalysed carboxylation of aryl iodides is reported to provide benzoic acid derivatives (Scheme 15.62).67a  In the reaction, diethylzinc is used as a reducing agent. Similar carboxylations of aryl halides are reported with nickel67b  or palladium67c  catalysts.

Scheme 15.60

Copper-catalysed carboxylation of arylboronates with carbon dioxide.

Scheme 15.60

Copper-catalysed carboxylation of arylboronates with carbon dioxide.

Close modal
Scheme 15.61

Copper-catalysed carboxylation of an alkylborane with carbon dioxide.

Scheme 15.61

Copper-catalysed carboxylation of an alkylborane with carbon dioxide.

Close modal
Scheme 15.62

Copper-catalysed carboxylation of an aryl iodide with carbon dioxide employing diethylzinc.

Scheme 15.62

Copper-catalysed carboxylation of an aryl iodide with carbon dioxide employing diethylzinc.

Close modal

The first catalytic hydrocarboxylation of alkynes employing carbon dioxide was reported with hydrosilanes as stable and easy-to-handle reducing agents. The reaction gives the corresponding α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids in good to high yields (Scheme 15.63).68  The fixation of carbon dioxide along with simultaneous introduction of another heteroatom moiety must be useful. The silacarboxylation of alkynes employing silylborane as a silicon source was reported (Scheme 15.64).69a  Various internal alkynes are converted to the corresponding silalactones selectively in good to high yields employing tricyclohexylphosphine as a ligand. Silacarboxylation of allenes occurs similarly (Scheme 15.65).69b  It is noteworthy that the reaction proceeds in regiodivergent manner. When rac-Me-DuPhos is employed as a ligand in hexane, vinylsilanes are obtained selectively. In contrast, tricyclohexylphosphine selectively provides allylsilanes.69b  Furthermore, the copper-catalysed boracarboxylation of alkynes employing bis(pinacolato)diboron as a boron source proceeds effectively, giving the corresponding lithium salt of boralactones (Scheme 15.66).70 

Scheme 15.63

Hydrocarboxylation of alkynes employing carbon dioxide and hydrosilanes in the presence of copper–NHC catalysts.

Scheme 15.63

Hydrocarboxylation of alkynes employing carbon dioxide and hydrosilanes in the presence of copper–NHC catalysts.

Close modal
Scheme 15.64

Copper-catalysed silacarboxylation of alkynes employing carbon dioxide and silylborane.

Scheme 15.64

Copper-catalysed silacarboxylation of alkynes employing carbon dioxide and silylborane.

Close modal
Scheme 15.65

Ligand-controlled regiodivergent silacarboxylation of allenes employing copper catalysts.

Scheme 15.65

Ligand-controlled regiodivergent silacarboxylation of allenes employing copper catalysts.

Close modal
Scheme 15.66

Copper-catalysed boracarboxylation of alkynes employing carbon dioxide with B2(pin)2.

Scheme 15.66

Copper-catalysed boracarboxylation of alkynes employing carbon dioxide with B2(pin)2.

Close modal

The synthesis of cyclic carbonates is one of the important reactions with regard to fixation of CO2. Copper complexes catalyse the reaction of epoxides with carbon dioxide, giving the corresponding carbonates (Scheme 15.67).71a  In the reaction, a binaphthylamine-based salen acts as good ligand. Similar reactions have been carried out employing phthalocyanine and porphyrin as ligands.71b  The reaction of a propargyl alcohol with carbon dioxide proceeded effectively in the presence of a copper catalyst in an ionic liquid (Scheme 15.68).72a  α, α-Disubstituted propargyl alcohols are converted to the corresponding α-methylene cyclic carbonates in high yields. When a propargyl alcohol is treated with a primary amine under a carbon-dioxide atmosphere, the corresponding cyclic carbamates are obtained (Scheme 15.69).72b 

Scheme 15.67

Copper-catalysed reaction of propylene oxide with carbon dioxide.

Scheme 15.67

Copper-catalysed reaction of propylene oxide with carbon dioxide.

Close modal
Scheme 15.68

Copper-catalysed reaction of propargyl alcohols with carbon dioxide in ionic liquids.

Scheme 15.68

Copper-catalysed reaction of propargyl alcohols with carbon dioxide in ionic liquids.

Close modal
Scheme 15.69

Synthesis of cyclic carbamates from propargyl alcohols and carbon dioxide in the presence of amines.

Scheme 15.69

Synthesis of cyclic carbamates from propargyl alcohols and carbon dioxide in the presence of amines.

Close modal

Copper complexes catalyse the reduction of carbon dioxide to formate employing hydrosilane as a reducing agent (Scheme 15.70).73  In the reaction, bidentate phosphines such as dppbz73a,b  and NHC73c  are efficient ligands. Carbon dioxide is also converted to formate in the presence of IPrCuOtBu as a catalyst and a hydroborane as a reducing agent.74  A borylcopper complex, IPrCuB(pin), reacts with carbon dioxide to give carbon monoxide and IPrCuOB(pin) (Scheme 15.71).41  The borylcopper complex works as a catalyst for the reduction of carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide employing B2(pin)2 as a reagent. A silylcopper complex, IPrCuSiMe2Ph, also reacts with carbon dioxide, giving carbon monoxide.75  A copper complex bearing a bis(pyridylmethyl)amine based ligand catalysed the reduction of carbon dioxide to oxalate under electrochemical conditions. Surprisingly, the fixation of carbon dioxide proceeded under an air atmosphere (Scheme 15.72).76 

Scheme 15.70

Hydrosilylation of carbon dioxide with copper catalysts.

Scheme 15.70

Hydrosilylation of carbon dioxide with copper catalysts.

Close modal
Scheme 15.71

Copper-catalysed reduction of carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide.

Scheme 15.71

Copper-catalysed reduction of carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide.

Close modal
Scheme 15.72

Electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to oxalates with a copper catalyst.

Scheme 15.72

Electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to oxalates with a copper catalyst.

Close modal

As described in this chapter, homogeneous copper catalysts work well in various organic transformations including carbon–carbon bond-forming reactions, oxidations, reductions, and fixation of carbon dioxide. In some cases, ligands on the copper play important roles in realising high efficiency and excellent regio- and stereoselectivities. Continued efforts on developing copper catalysts will contribute to efficient syntheses of many valuable molecules.

1a.
Ullmann
 
F.
Chem. Ber.
1903
, vol. 
36
 pg. 
2382
 
1b.
Ullmann
 
F.
Sponagel
 
P.
Chem. Ber.
1905
, vol. 
38
 pg. 
2211
 
1c.
Goldberg
 
I.
Chem. Ber.
1906
, vol. 
39
 pg. 
1691
 
2a.
For recent advances in Ullmann coupling, see:
Ribas
 
X.
Güell
 
I.
Pure Appl. Chem.
2014
, vol. 
86
 pg. 
345
 
2b.
Casitas
 
A.
Ribas
 
X.
Chem. Sci.
2013
, vol. 
4
 pg. 
2301
 
2c.
Surry
 
D. S.
Buchwald
 
S. L.
Chem. Sci.
2010
, vol. 
1
 pg. 
13
 
2d.
Monnier
 
F.
Taillefer
 
M.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2009
, vol. 
48
 pg. 
6954
 
2e.
Evano
 
G.
Blanchard
 
N.
Toumi
 
M.
Chem. Rev.
2008
, vol. 
108
 pg. 
3054
 
2f.
Beletskaya
 
I. P.
Cheprakov
 
A. V.
Coord. Chem. Rev.
2004
, vol. 
248
 pg. 
2337
 
2g.
Ley
 
S. V.
Thomas
 
A. W.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2003
, vol. 
42
 pg. 
5400
 
2h.
Kunz
 
K.
Scholz
 
U.
Ganzer
 
D.
Synlett
2003
pg. 
2428
 
3.
Goodbrand
 
H. B.
Hu
 
N.-X.
J. Org. Chem.
1999
, vol. 
64
 pg. 
670
 
4a.
Kwong
 
F. Y.
Klapars
 
A.
Buchwald
 
S. L.
Org. Lett.
2002
, vol. 
4
 pg. 
581
 
4b.
Klapars
 
A.
Huang
 
X.
Buchwald
 
S. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002
, vol. 
124
 pg. 
7421
 
4c.
Cristau
 
H.-J.
Cellier
 
P. P.
Spindler
 
J.-F.
Taillefer
 
M.
Chem. – Eur. J.
2004
, vol. 
10
 pg. 
5607
 
4d.
Kotovshchikov
 
Y. N.
Latyshev
 
G. V.
Lukashev
 
N. V.
Beletskaya
 
I. P.
Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2013
pg. 
7823
 
5a.
Shafir
 
A.
Buchwald
 
S. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006
, vol. 
128
 pg. 
8742
 
5b.
Jiang
 
D.
Fu
 
H.
Jiang
 
Y.
Zhao
 
Y.
J. Org. Chem.
2007
, vol. 
72
 pg. 
672
 
6a.
Cristau
 
H.-J.
Cellier
 
P. P.
Hamada
 
S.
Spindler
 
J.-F.
Taillefer
 
M.
Org. Lett.
2004
, vol. 
6
 pg. 
913
 
6b.
Ouali
 
A.
Spindler
 
J.-F.
Cristau
 
H.-J.
Tailefer
 
M.
Adv. Synth. Catal.
2006
, vol. 
348
 pg. 
499
 
6c.
Cai
 
Q.
Zou
 
B.
Ma
 
D.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2006
, vol. 
45
 pg. 
1276
 
7a.
Ullmann
 
F.
Bielecki
 
J.
Chem. Ber.
1901
, vol. 
34
 pg. 
2174
 
7b.
Zhang
 
S.
Zhang
 
D.
Liebeskind
 
L. S.
J. Org. Chem.
1997
, vol. 
62
 pg. 
2312
 
8.
Jones
 
G. O.
Liu
 
P.
Houk
 
K. N.
Buchwald
 
S. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010
, vol. 
132
 pg. 
6205
 
9a.
Glaser
 
C.
Chem. Ber.
1869
, vol. 
2
 pg. 
422
 
9b.
Eglinton
 
G.
Galbraith
 
A. R.
Chem. Ind.
1956
pg. 
737
 
9c.
Hay
 
A. S.
J. Org. Chem.
1960
, vol. 
25
 pg. 
1275
 
9d.
Hay
 
A. S.
J. Org. Chem.
1962
, vol. 
27
 pg. 
3320
 
10a.
Siemsen
 
P.
Livingston
 
R. C.
Diederich
 
F.
Chem. Rev.
2000
, vol. 
39
 pg. 
2632
 
10b.
Valenti
 
E.
Pericàs
 
M. A.
Serratosa
 
F.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1990
, vol. 
112
 pg. 
7405
 
10c.
Hébert
 
N.
Beck
 
A.
Lennox
 
R. B.
Just
 
G.
J. Org. Chem.
1992
, vol. 
57
 pg. 
1777
 
10d.
Pak
 
J. J.
Weakley
 
T. J. R.
Haley
 
M. M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999
, vol. 
121
 pg. 
8182
 
10e.
Bédard
 
A.-C.
Collins
 
S. K.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2011
, vol. 
133
 pg. 
19976
 
11a.
Alami
 
M.
Ferri
 
F.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1996
, vol. 
37
 pg. 
2763
 
11b.
Nishihara
 
Y.
Ikegashira
 
K.
Mori
 
A.
Hiyama
 
T.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1998
, vol. 
39
 pg. 
4075
 
12a.
Sonogashira
 
K.
J. Organomet. Chem.
2002
, vol. 
653
 pg. 
46
 
12b.
K.
Sonogashira
, in
Comprehensive Organic Synthesis
, ed. B. M. Trost, I. Fleming,
Pergamon Press
,
Oxford
,
1999
, vol. 3, pp. 521–549
12c.
Chinchilla
 
R.
Nájera
 
C.
Chem. Rev.
2007
, vol. 
107
 pg. 
874
 
12d.
Doucet
 
H.
Hierso
 
J.-C.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2007
, vol. 
46
 pg. 
834
 
12e.
Chinchilla
 
R.
Nájera
 
C.
Chem. Soc. Rev.
2011
, vol. 
40
 pg. 
5084
 
13a.
For a review:
Thomas
 
A. M.
Sujatha
 
A.
Anilkumar
 
G.
RSC Adv.
2014
, vol. 
4
 pg. 
21688
 
13b.
Okuro
 
K.
Furuune
 
M.
Enna
 
M.
Miura
 
M.
Nomura
 
M.
J. Org. Chem.
1993
, vol. 
58
 pg. 
4716
 
13c.
Jiang
 
H.
Fu
 
H.
Qiao
 
R.
Jiang
 
Y.
Zhao
 
Y.
Synthesis
2008
pg. 
2417
 
13d.
Yang
 
D.
Li
 
B.
Yang
 
H.
Fu
 
H.
Hu
 
L.
Synlett
2011
pg. 
702
 
14.
Miyaura
 
N.
Suzuki
 
A.
Chem. Rev.
1995
, vol. 
95
 pg. 
2457
 
15a.
Demir
 
A. S.
Reis
 
Ö.
Emrullahoglu
 
M.
J. Org. Chem.
2003
, vol. 
68
 pg. 
10130
 
15b.
Kirai
 
N.
Yamamoto
 
Y.
Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2009
pg. 
1864
 
16a.
Ban
 
I.
Sudo
 
T.
Taniguchi
 
T.
Itami
 
K.
Org. Lett.
2008
, vol. 
10
 pg. 
3607
 
16b.
Rao
 
H.
Fu
 
H.
Jiang
 
Y.
Zhao
 
Y.
Adv. Synth. Catal.
2010
, vol. 
352
 pg. 
458
 
17a.
Chan
 
D. M. T.
Monaco
 
K. L.
Wang
 
R.-P.
Winters
 
M. P.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1998
, vol. 
39
 pg. 
2933
 
17b.
Evans
 
D. A.
Katz
 
J. L.
West
 
T. R.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1998
, vol. 
39
 pg. 
2937
 
17c.
Lan
 
J.-B.
Zhang
 
G.-L.
Yu
 
X.-Q.
You
 
J.-S.
Chen
 
L.
Yan
 
M.
Xie
 
R.-G.
Synlett
2004
pg. 
1095
 
18.
Handbook of Organopalladium Chemistry for Organic Synthesis
, ed. E.-i. Negishi,
John Wiley & Sons
,
New York
,
2002
19.
The Chemistry of Organocopper Compounds
, ed. Z. Rappoport,
John Wiley & Sons
,
West Sussex
,
2009
20.
van Klaveren
 
M.
Persson
 
E. S. M.
del Villar
 
A.
Grove
 
D. M.
Bäckvall
 
J.-E.
van Koten
 
G.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1995
, vol. 
36
 pg. 
3059
 
21a.
Yorimitsu
 
H.
Oshima
 
K.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2005
, vol. 
44
 pg. 
4435
 
21b.
Hoveyda
 
A. H.
Hird
 
A. W.
Kacprzynski
 
M. A.
Chem. Commun.
2004
pg. 
1779
 
21c.
Alexakis
 
A.
Bäckvall
 
J. E.
Krause
 
N.
Pàmies
 
O.
Diéguez
 
M.
Chem. Rev.
2008
, vol. 
108
 pg. 
2796
 
21d.
Harutyunyan
 
S. R.
den Hartog
 
T.
Geurts
 
K.
Minnaard
 
A. J.
Feringa
 
B. L.
Chem. Rev.
2008
, vol. 
108
 pg. 
2824
 
22.
Larsen
 
A. O.
Leu
 
W.
Oberhuber
 
C. N.
Campbell
 
J. E.
Hoveyda
 
A. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004
, vol. 
126
 pg. 
11130
 
23a.
Ohmiya
 
H.
Yokobori
 
U.
Makida
 
Y.
Sawamura
 
M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010
, vol. 
132
 pg. 
2895
 
23b.
Shido
 
Y.
Yoshida
 
M.
Tanabe
 
M.
Ohmiya
 
H.
Sawamura
 
M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2012
, vol. 
134
 pg. 
18573
 
24a.
Shintani
 
R.
Takatsu
 
K.
Takeda
 
M.
Hayashi
 
T.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2011
, vol. 
50
 pg. 
8656
 
24b.
Jung
 
B.
Hoveyda
 
A. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2012
, vol. 
134
 pg. 
1490
 
24c.
Gao
 
F.
Carr
 
J. L.
Hoveyda
 
A. H.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2012
, vol. 
51
 pg. 
6613
 
25a.
For reviews, see:
Hawner
 
C.
Alexakis
 
A.
Chem. Commun.
2010
, vol. 
46
 pg. 
7295
 
25b.
Jerphagnon
 
T.
Pizzuti
 
M. G.
Chem. Soc. Rev.
2009
, vol. 
38
 pg. 
1039
 
26.
For a review, see:
Hayashi
 
T.
Yamasaki
 
K.
Chem. Rev.
2003
, vol. 
103
 pg. 
2829
 
27a.
López
 
F.
Harutyunyan
 
S. R.
Meetsma
 
A.
Minnaard
 
A. J.
Feringa
 
B. L.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2005
, vol. 
44
 pg. 
2752
 
27b.
Wang
 
S.-Y.
Ji
 
S.-J.
Loh
 
T.-P.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007
, vol. 
129
 pg. 
276
 
28a.
Wu
 
J.
Mampreian
 
D. M.
Hoveyda
 
A. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005
, vol. 
127
 pg. 
4584
 
28b.
Zeng
 
X.
Gao
 
J. J.
Song
 
J. J.
Ma
 
S.
Desrosiers
 
J.-N.
Mulder
 
J. A.
Rodriguez
 
S.
Herbage
 
M. A.
Haddad
 
N.
Qu
 
B.
Fandrick
 
K. R.
Grinberg
 
N.
Lee
 
H.
Wei
 
X.
Yee
 
N. K.
Senanayake
 
C. H.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2014
, vol. 
53
 pg. 
12153
 
28c.
Hird
 
A. W.
Hoveyda
 
A. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005
, vol. 
127
 pg. 
14988
 
28d.
Takatsu
 
K.
Shintani
 
R.
Hayashi
 
T.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2011
, vol. 
50
 pg. 
5548
 
28e.
Yoshida
 
M.
Ohmiya
 
H.
Sawamura
 
M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2012
, vol. 
134
 pg. 
11896
 
29a.
Selected Reviews, see:
Meldal
 
M.
Tormoe
 
C. W.
Chem. Rev.
2008
, vol. 
108
 pg. 
2952
 
29b.
Hein
 
J. E.
Fokin
 
V. V.
Chem. Soc. Rev.
2010
, vol. 
39
 pg. 
1302
 
29c.
Hanni
 
K. D.
Leigh
 
D. A.
Chem. Soc. Rev.
2010
, vol. 
39
 pg. 
1240
 
29d.
Moses
 
J. E.
Moorhouse
 
A. D.
Chem. Soc. Rev.
2007
, vol. 
36
 pg. 
1249
 
29e.
Nandivada
 
H.
Jiang
 
X.
Lahanmn
 
J.
Adv. Mater.
2007
, vol. 
19
 pg. 
2197
 
29f.
Qu
 
T.-M.
Lu
 
Y.-J.
Tan
 
J.-H.
Huang
 
Z.-S.
Wong
 
K.-Y.
Gu
 
L.-Q.
Chem. Med. Chem.
2008
, vol. 
3
 pg. 
690
 
30.
Kolb
 
H. C.
Finn
 
M. G.
Sharpless
 
K. B.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2001
, vol. 
40
 pg. 
2004
 
31a.
Huisgen
 
R.
Szeimies
 
G.
Moebius
 
L.
Chem. Ber.
1967
, vol. 
100
 pg. 
2494
 
31b.
Huisgen
 
R.
Pure Appl. Chem.
1989
, vol. 
61
 pg. 
613
 
32.
Worrell
 
B. T.
Malik
 
J. A.
Fokin
 
V. V.
Science
2013
, vol. 
340
 pg. 
457
 
33a.
Wu
 
P.
Feldman
 
A. K.
Nugent
 
A. K.
Hawker
 
C. J.
Scheel
 
A.
Voit
 
B.
Pyun
 
J.
Fréchet
 
J. M. J.
Sharpless
 
K. B.
Fokin
 
V. V.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2004
, vol. 
43
 pg. 
3928
 
33b.
Pérez-Balderas
 
F.
Ortega-Muñoz
 
M.
Morales-Sanfrutos
 
J.
Hernández-Mateo
 
F.
Calvo-Flores
 
F. G.
Calvo-Asín
 
J. A.
Isac-García
 
J.
Santoyo-González
 
F.
Org. Lett.
2003
, vol. 
5
 pg. 
1951
 
34a.
Díez-González
 
S.
Nolan
 
S. P.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2008
, vol. 
47
 pg. 
8881
 
34b.
Díez-González
 
S.
Stevens
 
E. D.
Nolan
 
S. P.
Chem. Commun.
2008
pg. 
4747
 
35.
Lazreg
 
F.
Slawin
 
A. M. Z.
Cazin
 
C. S. J.
Organometallics
2012
, vol. 
31
 pg. 
7969
 
36a.
Gupta
 
S. S.
Raja
 
K. S.
Kaltgrad
 
E.
Strable
 
E.
Finn
 
M. G.
Chem. Commun.
2005
pg. 
4315
 
36b.
Devaraj
 
N. K.
Dinolfo
 
P. H.
Chidsey
 
C. E. D.
Collman
 
J. P.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006
, vol. 
128
 pg. 
1794
 
37.
Chan
 
T. R.
Hilgraf
 
R.
Sharpless
 
K. B.
Fokin
 
V. V.
Org. Lett.
2004
, vol. 
6
 pg. 
2853
 
38.
Miyaura
 
N.
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
2008
, vol. 
81
 pg. 
1535
 
39a.
For reviews, see:
Brown
 
H. C.
Pure Appl. Chem.
1976
, vol. 
47
 pg. 
49
 
39b.
Beletskaya
 
L.
Pelter
 
A.
Tetrahedron
1997
, vol. 
53
 pg. 
4957
 
39c.
Crudden
 
C. M.
Edwards
 
D.
Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2003
pg. 
4695
 
39d.
Carroll
 
A.-M.
O'sullivan
 
T. P.
Guiry
 
P. J.
Adv. Synth. Catal.
2005
, vol. 
347
 pg. 
609
 
40a.
Semba
 
K.
Fujihara
 
T.
Terao
 
J.
Tsuji
 
Y.
Tetrahedron
2015
, vol. 
71
 pg. 
2183
 
40b.
Fujihara
 
T.
Semba
 
K.
Terao
 
J.
Tsuji
 
Y.
Catal. Sci. Technol.
2014
, vol. 
4
 pg. 
1699
 
40c.
Yun
 
J.
Asian J. Org. Chem.
2013
, vol. 
2
 pg. 
1016
 
41.
Laitar
 
D. S.
Muller
 
P.
Sadighi
 
J. P.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005
, vol. 
127
 pg. 
17196
 
42a.
Takahashi
 
K.
Ishiyama
 
T.
Miyaura
 
N.
Chem. Lett.
2000
pg. 
982
 
42b.
Takahashi
 
K.
Ishiyama
 
T.
Miyaura
 
N.
J. Organomet. Chem.
2001
, vol. 
625
 pg. 
47
 
43.
Jang
 
H.
Zhugralin
 
A. R.
Lee
 
Y.
Hoveyda
 
A. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2011
, vol. 
133
 pg. 
7859
 
44a.
Kim
 
H. R.
Jung
 
I. G.
Yoo
 
K.
Jang
 
K.
Lee
 
E. S.
Yun
 
J.
Son
 
S. U.
Chem. Commun.
2010
, vol. 
46
 pg. 
758
 
44b.
Kim
 
H. R.
Yun
 
J.
Chem. Commun.
2011
, vol. 
47
 pg. 
2943
 
44c.
Semba
 
K.
Fujihara
 
T.
Terao
 
J.
Tsuji
 
Y.
Chem. – Eur. J.
2012
, vol. 
18
 pg. 
4179
 
45a.
Lee
 
Y.
Hoveyda
 
A. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2009
, vol. 
131
 pg. 
3160
 
45b.
Corberán
 
R.
Mszar
 
N. W.
Hoveyda
 
A. H.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2011
, vol. 
50
 pg. 
7079
 
45c.
Kubota
 
K.
Yamamoto
 
E.
Ito
 
H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2013
, vol. 
135
 pg. 
2635
 
46a.
Semba
 
K.
Shinomiya
 
M.
Fujihara
 
T.
Terao
 
J.
Tsuji
 
Y.
Chem. – Eur. J.
2013
, vol. 
19
 pg. 
7125
 
46b.
Jung
 
B.
Hoveyda
 
A. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2012
, vol. 
134
 pg. 
1490
 
46c.
Yuan
 
W.
Ma
 
S.
Adv. Synth. Catal.
2012
, vol. 
354
 pg. 
1867
 
46d.
Meng
 
F.
Jung
 
B.
Haeffner
 
F.
Hoveyda
 
A. H.
Org. Lett.
2013
, vol. 
15
 pg. 
1414
 
47a.
Alfaro
 
A.
Parra
 
A.
Alemán
 
J.
Ruano
 
J. L. G.
Tortosa
 
M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2012
, vol. 
134
 pg. 
15165
 
47b.
Yoshida
 
H.
Kageyuki
 
I.
Takaki
 
K.
Org. Lett.
2013
, vol. 
15
 pg. 
952
 
48.
Zhou
 
Y.
You
 
W.
Smith
 
K. B.
Brown
 
M. K.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2014
, vol. 
53
 pg. 
3475
 
49a.
Ito
 
H.
Toyoda
 
T.
Sawamura
 
M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010
, vol. 
132
 pg. 
5990
 
49b.
Ito
 
H.
Kosaka
 
Y.
Nonoyama
 
K.
Sasaki
 
Y.
Sawamura
 
M.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2008
, vol. 
47
 pg. 
7424
 
50.
Meng
 
F.
Jang
 
H.
Jung
 
B.
Hoveyda
 
A. H.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2013
, vol. 
52
 pg. 
5046
 
51a.
Semba
 
K.
Bessho
 
N.
Fujihara
 
T.
Terao
 
J.
Tsuji
 
Y.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2014
, vol. 
53
 pg. 
9007
 
51b.
Meng
 
F.
McGrath
 
K. P.
Hoveyda
 
A. H.
Nature
2014
, vol. 
513
 pg. 
367
 
52.
Allen
 
S. E.
Walvoord
 
R. R.
Padilla-Salinas
 
R.
Kozlowski
 
M. C.
Chem. Rev.
2013
, vol. 
113
 pg. 
6234
 
53a.
Liang
 
L.
Rao
 
G.
Sun
 
H.-L.
Zhang
 
J.-L.
Adv. Synth. Catal.
2010
, vol. 
352
 pg. 
2371
 
53b.
Han
 
C.
Yu
 
M.
Sun
 
W.
Yao
 
X.
Synlett
2011
pg. 
2363
 
53c.
Sharma
 
V. B.
Jain
 
S. L.
Sain
 
B.
J. Mol. Chem. A: Chem.
2004
, vol. 
219
 pg. 
61
 
53d.
Noji
 
M.
Nakajima
 
M.
Koga
 
K.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1994
, vol. 
35
 pg. 
7983
 
53e.
Morgan
 
B. J.
Mulrooney
 
C. A.
O'Brein
 
E. M.
Kozlowski
 
M. C.
J. Org. Chem.
2010
, vol. 
75
 pg. 
30
 
53f.
O'Brien
 
E. M.
Morgan
 
B. J.
Mulrooney
 
A.
Carroll
 
P. J.
Kozlowski
 
M. C.
J. Org. Chem.
2010
, vol. 
75
 pg. 
57
 
54a.
Tian
 
Q.
Shi
 
D.
Sha
 
Y.
Molecules
2008
, vol. 
13
 pg. 
948
 
54b.
Capdevielle
 
P.
Lavigne
 
A.
Maumy
 
M.
Synthesis
1989
pg. 
451
 
54c.
Atlamsani
 
A.
Brégeault
 
J.-M.
Synthesis
1993
pg. 
79
 
54d.
Bolm
 
C.
Schlingloff
 
G.
Weickhardt
 
K.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1993
, vol. 
34
 pg. 
3405
 
54e.
Bolm
 
C.
Schlingloff
 
G.
Bienewald
 
F.
J. Mol. Cat. A: Chem.
1997
, vol. 
117
 pg. 
347
 
55a.
For Reviews, see:
Hirao
 
K.
Miura
 
M.
Chem. Commun.
2012
, vol. 
48
 pg. 
10704
 
55b.
Wendlandt
 
A. E.
Suess
 
A. N.
Stahl
 
S. S.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2011
, vol. 
50
 pg. 
11062
 
55c.
Zhang
 
M.
Appl. Organomet. Chem.
2010
, vol. 
24
 pg. 
269
 
56a.
Jia
 
Y.-X.
Kündig
 
E. P.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2009
, vol. 
48
 pg. 
1636
 
56b.
Klein
 
J. E. M. N.
Perry
 
A.
Pugh
 
D. S.
Taylor
 
R. J. K.
Org. Lett.
2010
, vol. 
12
 pg. 
3446
 
56c.
Tang
 
B.-X.
Song
 
R.-J.
Wu
 
C.-Y.
Zhou
 
M.-B.
Wei
 
W.-T.
Deng
 
G.-B.
Yin
 
D.-L.
Li
 
J.-H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010
, vol. 
132
 pg. 
8900
 
57a.
Do
 
H.-Q.
Daugulis
 
O.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2009
, vol. 
131
 pg. 
17052
 
57b.
Zhu
 
M.
Fujita
 
K.
Yamaguchi
 
R.
Chem. Commun.
2011
, vol. 
47
 pg. 
12876
 
58a.
Kitahara
 
M.
Hirano
 
K.
Tsurugi
 
H.
Satoh
 
T.
Miura
 
M.
Chem. – Eur. J.
2010
, vol. 
16
 pg. 
1772
 
58b.
Matsuyama
 
N.
Kitahara
 
M.
Hirano
 
K.
Satoh
 
T.
Miura
 
M.
Org. Lett.
2010
, vol. 
12
 pg. 
2358
 
58c.
Wei
 
Y.
Zhao
 
H.
Kan
 
J.
Su
 
W.
Hong
 
M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010
, vol. 
132
 pg. 
2522
 
59a.
Carbon Dioxides as Chemical Feedstock
, ed. M. Aresta,
Wiley-VHC
,
Weinheim
,
2010
59b.
New and Future Developments in Catalysis, Activation of Carbon Dioxide
, ed. S. L. Suib,
Elsevier
,
Amsterdam
,
2013
60a.
For reviews, see:
Tsuji
 
Y.
Fujihara
 
T.
Chem. Commun.
2012
, vol. 
48
 pg. 
9956
 
60b.
Zhang
 
L.
Hou
 
Z.
Chem. Sci.
2013
, vol. 
4
 pg. 
3395
 
60c.
Huang
 
K.
Sun
 
C.-L.
Shi
 
Z.-J.
Chem. Soc. Rev.
2011
, vol. 
40
 pg. 
2435
 
60d.
Cokoja
 
M.
Bruckmeier
 
C.
Rieger
 
B.
Herrmann
 
W. A.
Kuhn
 
F. E.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2011
, vol. 
50
 pg. 
8510
 
60e.
Riduan
 
S. N.
Zhang
 
Y.
Dalton Trans.
2010
, vol. 
39
 pg. 
3347
 
61.
Pinaka
 
A.
Vougioukalakis
 
G. C.
Coord. Chem. Rev.
2015
, vol. 
288
 pg. 
69
 
62a.
Fukue
 
Y.
Oi
 
S.
Inoue
 
Y.
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1994
pg. 
2091
 
62b.
Yu
 
D.
Zhang
 
Y.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
2010
, vol. 
107
 pg. 
20184
 
62c.
Yu
 
D.
Tian
 
M. X.
Zang
 
Y.
Adv. Synth. Catal.
2012
, vol. 
354
 pg. 
969
 
62d.
Goosen
 
L. J.
Rodriguez
 
N.
Manjolinho
 
F.
Lange
 
P. P.
Adv. Synth. Catal.
2010
, vol. 
352
 pg. 
2913
 
62e.
Arndt
 
M.
Risto
 
E.
Krause
 
T.
Goosen
 
L. J.
ChemCatChem
2012
, vol. 
4
 pg. 
484
 
62f.
Zhang
 
W.-Z.
Li
 
W.-J.
Zhang
 
X.
Hou
 
H.
Lu
 
X.-B.
Org. Lett.
2011
, vol. 
13
 pg. 
2402
 
62g.
Inamoto
 
K.
Asano
 
N.
Kobayashi
 
K.
Yonemoto
 
M.
Kondo
 
Y.
Org. Biomol. Chem.
2012
, vol. 
10
 pg. 
1514
 
63a.
Zang
 
L.
Cheng
 
J.
Ohishi
 
T.
Hou
 
Z.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2010
, vol. 
49
 pg. 
8670
 
63b.
Inomata
 
H.
Ogata
 
K.
Fukuzawa
 
S.
Hou
 
Z.
Org. Lett.
2012
, vol. 
14
 pg. 
3986
 
63c.
Boogaerts
 
I. I. F.
Forman
 
G. C.
Furst
 
M. R. L.
Cazin
 
C. S. J.
Nolan
 
S. P.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2010
, vol. 
49
 pg. 
8674
 
64a.
Ohishi
 
T.
Nishiura
 
T.
Hou
 
Z.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2008
, vol. 
47
 pg. 
5792
 
64b.
Takaya
 
J.
Tadami
 
S.
Ukai
 
K.
Iwasawa
 
N.
Org. Lett.
2008
, vol. 
10
 pg. 
2697
 
65a.
Ohmiya
 
H.
Tanabe
 
M.
Sawamura
 
M.
Org. Lett.
2011
, vol. 
13
 pg. 
1086
 
65b.
Ohishi
 
T.
Zhang
 
L.
Nishiura
 
M.
Hou
 
Z.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2011
, vol. 
50
 pg. 
8114
 
66.
Duong
 
H. A.
Huleatt
 
P. B.
Tan
 
Q. W.-W.
Shuying
 
E. L.
Org. Lett.
2013
, vol. 
15
 pg. 
4034
 
67a.
Tran-Vu
 
H.
Daugulis
 
O.
ACS Catal.
2013
, vol. 
3
 pg. 
2417
 
67b.
Fujihara
 
T.
Nogi
 
K.
Xu
 
T.
Terao
 
J.
Tsuji
 
Y.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2012
, vol. 
134
 pg. 
9106
 
67c.
Correa
 
A.
Martin
 
R.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2009
, vol. 
131
 pg. 
15974
 
68.
Fujihara
 
T.
Xu
 
T.
Semba
 
K.
Terao
 
J.
Tsuji
 
Y.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2011
, vol. 
50
 pg. 
523
 
69a.
Fujihara
 
T.
Tani
 
Y.
Semba
 
K.
Terao
 
J.
Tsuji
 
Y.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2012
, vol. 
51
 pg. 
11487
 
69b.
Tani
 
Y.
Fujihara
 
T.
Terao
 
J.
Tsuji
 
Y.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2014
, vol. 
136
 pg. 
17706
 
70.
Zhang
 
L.
Cheng
 
J.
Carry
 
B.
Hou
 
Z.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2012
, vol. 
134
 pg. 
14314
 
71a.
Shen
 
Y.-M.
Duan
 
W.-L.
Shi
 
M.
J. Org. Chem.
2003
, vol. 
68
 pg. 
1559
 
71b.
Srivastava
 
R.
Bennur
 
T. H.
Srinivas
 
D.
J. Mol. Cat. A: Chem.
2005
, vol. 
226
 pg. 
199
 
72a.
Gu
 
Y.
Shi
 
F.
Deng
 
Y.
J. Org. Chem.
2004
, vol. 
69
 pg. 
391
 
72b.
Gu
 
Y.
Zhang
 
Q.
Duan
 
Z.
Zhang
 
J.
Zhang
 
S.
Deng
 
Y.
J. Org. Chem.
2004
, vol. 
69
 pg. 
391
 
73a.
Motokura
 
K.
Kashiwame
 
D.
Miyaji
 
A.
Baba
 
T.
Org. Lett.
2012
, vol. 
14
 pg. 
2642
 
73b.
Motokura
 
K.
Kashiwame
 
D.
Takahashi
 
N.
Miyaji
 
A.
Baba
 
T.
Chem. – Eur. J.
2013
, vol. 
19
 pg. 
10030
 
73c.
Zhang
 
L.
Cheng
 
J.
Hou
 
Z.
Chem. Commun.
2013
, vol. 
49
 pg. 
4782
 
74.
Shintani
 
R.
Nozaki
 
K.
Organometallics
2013
, vol. 
32
 pg. 
2459
 
75.
Kleeberg
 
C.
Cheung
 
M. S.
Lin
 
Z.
Marder
 
T. B.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2011
, vol. 
133
 pg. 
19060
 
76.
Angamuthu
 
R.
Byers
 
P.
Luts
 
A.
Spek
 
A. L.
Bouwman
 
E.
Science
2010
, vol. 
327
 pg. 
313
 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal